&w=3840&q=100)
God prices fall to 3-week low amid strong dollar & focus on Federal Reserve
A saleswoman displays a gold necklace inside a jewellery showroom on the occasion of Akshaya Tritiya, a major gold buying festival, in Kolkata, India, May 7, 2019. (Photo: Reuters)
Gold edged higher on Wednesday but remained near a three-week low as the dollar strengthened, while investors awaited the Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole symposium later this week for potential signals on monetary policy.
Spot gold was up 0.2 per cent at $3,321.83 per ounce, as of 0601 GMT, after reaching its lowest level since August 1.
US gold futures for December delivery rose 0.2 per cent to $3,364.30.
A stronger dollar and improving risk appetite from recent geopolitical developments are weighing on gold prices, with markets looking out for Fed Chair Jerome Powell's speech in Jackson Hole, OANDA senior market analyst Kelvin Wong said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The US dollar index climbed to a more than one-week high, making gold less affordable for buyers using other currencies.
Powell is due to speak at the Kansas City Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole symposium on Friday and investors are watching for any clues on monetary policy trajectory.
Minutes of the Fed's July meeting, due later in the day, are anticipated to offer further insights into the central bank's policy stance.
'The macroeconomic backdrop is likely to turn supportive, with Fed resuming its interest rate cuts from September. Higher tariffs will impact economic growth, keeping investment strong for gold,' ANZ said in a note.
Gold typically performs well in a low-interest-rate environment and amid heightened uncertainties.
Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump ruled out deploying ground troops to Ukraine on Tuesday but suggested air support could be part of a deal to end Russia's war in the region.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy hailed the White House talks as a 'major step forward' towards ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and setting up a trilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump.
Elsewhere, spot silver fell 0.5 per cent to $37.20 per ounce, platinum gained 0.6 per cent to $1,314.25 and palladium was down 0.6 per cent to $1,108.25.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
(Reporting by Anmol Choubey in Bengaluru; Editing by Subhranshu Sahu and Rashmi Aich)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
6 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Doing more and differently must be mantra of India-Russia ties: Jaishankar
India and Russia should come out with a creative and innovative approach to confront complex geopolitical challenges, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said on Wednesday amid increasing strains in New Delhi's ties with Washington over its purchase of Russian crude oil. Jaishankar made the remarks at a meeting with Russia's First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov in Moscow. In his televised opening remarks, the external affairs minister said India and Russia should continuously diversify and expand their "agenda" of cooperation including by diversifying the bilateral trade basket and through more joint ventures. "Doing more and doing differently should be our mantras," he said. The comments came against the backdrop of a downturn in relations between India and the US after President Donald Trump doubled tariffs on Indian goods to a whopping 50 per cent including a 25 per cent additional duties for India's purchase of Russian crude oil. The external affairs minister arrived in Moscow on Tuesday on a three-day visit. The Jaishankar-Manturov talks were held under the framework of India-Russia Inter-Governmental Commission for Trade, Economic, Scientific, Technological, and Cultural Cooperation (IRIGC-TEC). The meeting was aimed at preparing grounds for Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to India later this year. Elaborating on the importance of India-Russia ties in the context of current geopolitical upheaval, Jaishankar made specific suggestions to further consolidate the engagement, especially in the economic sphere. "The various working groups and sub groups could perhaps take a more creative and innovative approach towards their respective agendas. The challenges posed by the larger landscape that I mentioned require us to do so," he said. The external affairs minister said both sides should continuously diversify and expand their agenda through mutual consultation. "This will help us tap into full potential of our trade and investment ties. We should not get stuck on a beaten track," he said Jaishankar also called for setting "quantifiable targets and specific timelines" to achieve more in expanding the ties between the two countries. "I would urge that we set ourselves some quantifiable targets and specific timelines so that we challenge ourselves to achieve more, perhaps even surpass what we set out to do," he said. "Each working Group and each sub Group could apply itself to setting of targets and see what we could achieve by the next session of the IRIGC-TEC," he said. "For example, if you are looking at trade barriers, could we pick a certain number and make a commitment? If we have agreed to a certain proposal, can we set a firm timeline for that?" he said. Jaishankar also pitched for a "coordination mechanism" between the business forum and the different working groups of the IRIGC to ensure a two-way flow of ideas. "We will like the IRIGC to become even more result-oriented, relevant and readily available to the business communities of the two sides," he said.

Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump turns up the heat. Fed Chair Jerome Powell tries to keep his cool.
Minutes before his congressional testimony this summer, Jerome Powell sat alone, staring straight ahead in the wood-paneled chamber, appearing deep in thought. The Federal Reserve chair later told an associate he felt locked in, prepared for questions about the central bank's chief roles—keeping inflation low and Americans employed. Powell looked steeled for criticism, and he didn't have to wait long. A Republican ally of President Trump, Ohio Sen. Bernie Moreno, launched into a theatrical beatdown an hour into the hearing. He accused Powell of partisanship for comments linking Trump's tariffs with the potential for higher prices and a slowing economy. 'I don't comment on tariffs at all, actually," Powell said. 'I comment only on inflation." Ignoring him, Moreno said inflation was going down, echoing a Trump talking point. The president has demanded an immediate rate cut and disparaged Powell's integrity and intelligence for failing to comply, calling him a knucklehead and a moron. Trump himself nominated Powell for the job in 2017. 'We got elected by millions of voters," Moreno said as his time expired. 'You got elected by one person, and he doesn't want you to be in that job." Powell raised an eyebrow, clicked off his microphone and turned to face the next senator's questions. It was just another day for the Fed chair, who wakes up every morning under siege by critics, led by Trump, who say inflation has been tamed and the economy is ready for a rate cut. Powell and many others have a wait-and-see view. Fed Chair Jerome Powell waiting to testify at a Senate committee hearing on June. 25. Powell's remarks Friday at the annual economic symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyo., will be closely watched by investors and Washington policymakers. Everyone with skin in the game, which is just about everyone who carries a wallet, has reason to listen for clues about when rates might fall. To Powell, the Fed's survival as a central bank that operates outside of partisan control, which he considers a pillar of national prosperity, will depend on how it navigates the current economic moment. Those who have worked closely with him say he is focused almost exclusively on making the right decisions, relying on lessons gained from steering the Fed in the pandemic and then being slow to tackle the worst inflation spike in decades. 'I think it is no more subtle than he wakes up every day and probably goes to bed every night thinking, 'What can I do to preserve the institution?'" said Richard Clarida, who served as the Fed's No. 2 during the first half of Powell's tenure. The political pressure reached a surreal peak during Trump's surprise visit last month to the renovation project at Fed headquarters. White House advisers had spent weeks heaping blame on Powell for cost overruns. Trump and Powell, each wearing white hard hats and suits, toured the dusty construction site. In front of TV news cameras, Trump motioned Powell to stand closer to him and then declared that costs to renovate two historical buildings had climbed to $3.1 billion from $2.5 billion. Powell shook his head, and Trump handed him a printout prepared by White House staff. Powell easily found what he needed to dispute the president's claim. 'You just added in a third building," he said, one that had been completed years earlier. Trump later smoothed things over and declared that the meeting with Powell went well. 'There was no tension," the president said. On Wednesday, Trump called for the immediate resignation of Fed governor Lisa Cook, who has consistently voted with Powell, over allegations of mortgage fraud before her Fed appointment. The president told aides he is considering firing Cook, according to people familiar with the matter, which would leave a vacancy for him to fill. 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position," Cook said. 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts." President Trump handing Fed Chair Jerome Powell a tally sheet last month showing costs for renovations at the Federal Reserve in outside the Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve building in Washington last month. The Jesuit-educated Powell leads an institution that is an easy target for politicians because, like the Vatican, the Fed has authority but no army. Powell has told associates that despite looking older, he doesn't feel worn down by the pressure. He has maintained what he calls, at age 72, the best physical shape of his life, swimming three times a week and working out with a personal trainer. The regimen helps Powell manage stress, though the weight of decisions affecting millions of Americans sometimes wakes him in the middle of the night. Powell draws strength from an outpouring of support, voiced privately by lawmakers of both parties, bank executives and the occasional stranger who approaches him at the airport or gym. He keeps letters from people who thank him for his steadiness. 'He has a really strong sense of what he's doing there and why," said Jon Faust, who was a senior adviser to Powell for his first six years as Fed chair. At the congressional hearings this summer, Powell sidestepped a question about political pressure and said he was focused on keeping the economy in good shape with inflation under control. 'I want to turn it over to my successor in that condition," he said. 'That's the only thing I think about." Beyond partisan political pressures, the economic challenge alone would test any Fed chair. The Fed's tool—raising or lowering interest rates—is a blunt instrument for a complex $30 trillion economy: push rates too high and risk recession, lower rates too much and risk higher inflation. Powell must steer through an economy facing the uncertainties of Trump's trade policy and the impact of artificial intelligence. The still unknown fallout from tariffs and AI will shape how businesses hire and set prices. And the Fed's decisions will affect whether Americans can afford a home or see their paychecks keep up with costs. Inflation has been above the Fed's 2% target for four years. Officials worry tariffs will encourage businesses to raise prices and keep inflation elevated. Economic policymakers also worry about the health of the U.S. labor market, which can take years to return to normal after recessions. Postpandemic employment trends have been hard to read. Recent swings in business formation and immigration can make estimates of labor demand difficult to pin down. Monitors at the New York Stock Exchange showing Fed Chair Jerome Powell speak on July 30. 'They're in a no-win situation because they're going to be late on employment no matter what, given the downward revisions we've already seen," said Diane Swonk, chief economist at KPMG. 'And inflation is likely to look worse before it looks better." Recent economic data shows the challenge. After declining gradually last year, a gauge of underlying inflation fell to a low of 2.6% this year and is now creeping toward 3%. Payroll growth slowed sharply over the three months that ended in July with significant downward revisions to May and June figures. Even so, the unemployment rate has held close to 4.2%. The hiring slowdown coincides with Trump administration policy shifts that include immigration crackdowns, tariffs, federal job cuts and reduced spending on government contractors and nonprofits. The Trump administration says its tax cuts and deregulation might offset some of those headwinds. A majority of Fed officials supported holding rates steady last month, though two Fed governors, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, dissented in favor of a rate cut. Waller and Bowman are Trump appointees who are under consideration to become Fed chair when Powell's term ends in May. Waller warned that job growth is weaker than it looks, with some indicators 'flashing red." He has argued that officials shouldn't decide rates based on tariff-related price increases, saying those aren't likely to be repeated. In a swipe at Powell, Bowman said Fed decisions haven't been consistent. She pointed out that housing, consumer spending and the share of working-age people with jobs were weaker now than last year, when the Fed began to cut rates. On the other side of the rate-cut debate are the inflation hawks. Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid, a voting member of the rate-setting committee this year, argued in a speech last week that the effect of tariffs on inflation had been limited, in part, because the Fed hadn't eased rates prematurely. He said he expected the uncertainty of its impact on prices would last months. Powell's job is to forge consensus from these competing views and, when needed, guide it in his preferred direction. The path there may be emerging from the economic data itself. The July jobs report provided clearer evidence of labor market softness—potentially giving Powell rationale for a rate cut next month. The labor market 'is not bad right now," San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said. 'But you know that the direction of change is going the wrong way." She also said tariffs aren't passing through to higher prices as much as some forecasters feared, reducing the risk of a big shock. Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said the Fed might have to cut rates now to support the labor market and leave open the prospect of reversing those moves if inflation resurges. 'I don't love that path," he said, 'but that might be the best of a limited set of options." Others are undecided. St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem and Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee flagged an unexpected rise last month in prices for services, which would suggest holding rates steady. Yet Musalem also pointed to slower economic growth, which could favor a future rate cut. Trump's challenge is that Fed independence runs deeper than any single leader. Even if Powell is replaced by someone more sympathetic to the White House next spring, there may still be officials worried about inflation and impervious to political pressure. Powell has served as a shield for some colleagues. His relationships with Fed peers are likely 'stronger than ever because the committee knows the tough spot that both the chair and the institution are in," Faust said. Some see less danger in the blustery attacks by Trump on Powell than the possibility of a White House campaign to weaken the Fed structure, including the 12 reserve banks. Meetings to set interest rates are attended by the 12 bank presidents and a seven-member board of governors, though only five presidents at a time have a vote on policy decisions. Unlike Fed governors, who are nominated by the president, regional bank presidents are chosen by their local boards and have traditionally operated independent of Washington. The Fed presidents serve five-year terms at a time, and the terms run concurrently. The 12 presidents must be reappointed by the governors to new five-year terms before next March. A Fed board could remove a regional bank president by majority vote, but it never has done so. Fed Chair Jerome Powell arriving for a Federal Reserve Board meeting last month in Washington. Since the governors are appointed by the president, there are nervous conversations about the possibility of the White House seating a future board dominated by Trump appointees, who would threaten to block reappointments of Fed presidents before March or remove them after they are reappointed. A Trump administration official alleged Wednesday that Cook, a Fed governor appointed by Biden, might have committed mortgage fraud by applying for loans on two properties she each identified as her primary residence. Trump selected one of his economic advisers to fill the seat of a Fed governor who resigned unexpectedly this month. If another governor leaves early, the president could install an ally and give his appointees a majority on the board. A final source of pressure on the Fed came last week from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a former hedge-fund investor with keen knowledge of monetary policy who is overseeing the search for the next Fed chair. Bessent, who had pledged not to comment on rates, said in a TV interview that the Fed should consider a larger half-percentage-point rate cut in September and, after that, to continue to lower its benchmark rate, currently around 4.3%, to less than 3%. Some investors subsequently dialed up expectations for a half-point cut. Bessent did more than just voice an opinion. He appeared to put Powell in a corner. If investors buy or sell assets because the Treasury secretary's comments lead them to believe a sizable rate cut has become more likely, Powell risks disappointing markets and taking the blame for any selloff if the Fed doesn't follow through. When Bessent was asked about his comments during an interview the following day, he said, 'I didn't tell the Fed what to do." Write to Nick Timiraos at
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
6 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sanctions-hit Nayara Energy uses dark fleet to import oil, transport fuels
Indian refiner Nayara Energy, backed by Russia and under European Union sanctions, is relying on a dark fleet to import oil and transport refined fuels, according to shipping reports and LSEG flows. Nayara, which controls about 8 per cent of India's 5.2 million barrel-per-day refining capacity, has been struggling to transport fuel since being placed under EU sanctions in July, a move that prompted shippers to back out, forcing the refiner to cut its crude runs. India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, abides by UN sanctions and not unilateral actions, allowing refiners to import oil and ship products in vessels also under EU sanctions. This month, Nayara has imported at least seven cargoes of Russian oil, including on sanctions-hit vessels Centurion, Mars 6, Pushpa, Horae and Devika, formerly known as Apar, according to shipping reports and LSEG data. All were carrying about 700,000 barrels of Russian flagship Urals crude, the data shows. Nayara did not respond to an email seeking comment. Prior to the sanctions, Nayara was selling about 70 per cent of the refined fuels produced at its 400,000 bpd day Vadinar refinery in western Gujarat state through its local network of more than 6,600 fuel stations, and exporting the rest. Nayara, majority owned by Russian entities including Rosneft, is seeking government help to secure ships and maintain stable operations at the refinery, where it has cut runs to 70-80 per cent of capacity. A shipping source said Indian lines that undertake overseas voyages are not willing to carry oil and refined products for Nayara, while an official at a company that regularly shipped Nayara's refined products said they could not get insurance cover for their vessels in such cases. Another shipping source said Russian entities were helping Nayara arrange ships. According to LSEG trade flows, the company has used the Next, Tempest Dream, Leruo, Nova, Varg, Sard and Uriel - all under EU sanctions - to ship refined fuels, mainly gasoline and gasoil. Some of the vessels were renamed after being placed under sanctions. Evgeniy Griva, Russia's deputy trade representative to India, on Wednesday said Nayara is getting oil supplies from Russian oil major Rosneft and is not facing problems.