Germany, UK to jointly develop long-range missiles – DW – 05/16/2025
The German armed forces are to become "the strongest conventional army in Europe." Chancellor Friedrich Merz set this ambitious goal in his first government declaration to the Bundestag this week. "We must be in a position to defend ourselves so that we do not ever actually need to defend ourselves," said the new head of government, referring to the threat posed by Russia. This is to be achieved in close coordination with European partners, and with the UK, in particular.
This was made official last fall in an agreement that both countries celebrated as "historic." It has become known as the Trinity House Agreement, named after the place in London where it was signed by Defense Minister Boris Pistorius and his British counterpart John Healey last October. Never before has there been such an agreement between the two countries.
Healey traveled to Berlin this Thursday (15.05.2025) to concretize the joint plans.
Chancellor Merz vows to build strongest army in Europe
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Common strategic goals
Although the UK is no longer a member of the EU, the nuclear power remains a strong military partner in NATO and shares common interests with Germany. "The UK is deeply involved in the geographical areas that are important to Germany, such as the Baltic states and the far north, but also to some extent on NATO's eastern flank," stressed Ben Schreer, head of the Berlin office of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).
Both countries now intend to join forces to protect the North Atlantic and the North Sea, for example. Not only do important sea trade routes run through the North Sea, but also gas pipelines and cables that carry electricity from large offshore facilities to the coast.
Following suspected Russian attacks on underwater cables in the Baltic Sea, security experts fear similar attacks in the North Sea. Both countries want to work to counter such attacks by providing a "clear and comprehensive picture of the underwater situation," the agreement states.
Defense Ministers Boris Pistorius and John Healey met to discuss cooperation Image: Twardy/BMVg
Joint operations with submarines and maritime reconnaissance aircraft are also part of this plan. In the future, the German P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft will be deployed from Scotland to help monitor the airspace over the North Atlantic. The Bundeswehr has placed a new order for these aircraft and the British Army is already using them, meaning that German crews can already train there.
"These long-range maritime reconnaissance aircraft can target submarines over long distances," emphasized Defense Minister Pistorius after the discussions with his British counterpart. As a result, both partners will jointly strengthen NATO's submarine-hunting capabilities in the North Atlantic and North Sea.
Development of long-range missiles
Both countries have a strong defense industry, and there are also plans for cooperation in this area. For example, the German armaments group Rheinmetall manufactures the Boxer armored transport vehicle at its plants in the UK, of which the British army has ordered 500 units. One of the key elements of the agreement is the joint development of precision weapons with a range of more than 2000 kilometers (1242,7 miles), which other European countries can also take part in.
Another area of cooperation is the development of armed drones. This is an area in which the Bundeswehr is lagging behind and only started acquiring smaller combat drones this year. The British Army, on the other hand, has years of operational experience in this field, from which the Bundeswehr could benefit.
The Boeing P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft will be used by the British and German armed forces to monitor the airspace over the North Sea and the North Atlantic Image: Alexander Bogatyrev/SOPA Images/Sipa USA/picture alliance
Developing compatible weapons systems
The two countries also want to cooperate on developing fighter aircraft for the future — up to a point at least. That's because Germany is already developing a new system in collaboration with France and Spain, while the UK is developing a different system together with Italy and Japan. "From a European perspective, it makes perfect sense to at least ensure that the two systems are compatible so that they can work together in future joint missions," emphasized security expert Schreer.
This addresses a point where Europe has repeatedly created obstacles for itself: there are too many different weapons systems, some of which are not compatible with each other. "We need common standards and we need a simplification of systems in Europe," said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz shortly after taking office.
At a time when European NATO states are having to shoulder a greater burden in terms of defense, German-British cooperation could set an example. It is "a constructive building block" that complements other forms of cooperation, says Schreer, like that between Germany and France.
As Schreer sees it, "the big question is what the UK will be willing and able to contribute to the defense of Europe. And this, of course, raises some crucial questions, especially with regard to the UK's defense budget, where larger investments are likely to become increasingly difficult."
German FM backs 5% NATO spending target
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
How much money will the Bundeswehr get?
In Germany, the question of the size of the future defense budget is also being raised. Due to the change of government, there is still no budget for 2025, but there are already heated discussions about the required sums.
This Thursday, Foreign Minister (CDU) backed the target set by US President Donald Trump of spending up to 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defense in the future — and immediately faced backlash from his coalition partners, the center-left Social Democrats (SPD).
After his meeting with Healey, Defense Minister Pistorius explained that he was responsible for drawing up the defense budget. He said that NATO's decisions at its upcoming summit in June will serve for him as a benchmark. "We all know that this will be much more expensive than the two percent that is being discussed today." Three percent of economic output or more is "not unrealistic." British Defense Minister Healey added: "It's not just about how much we spend, but how we do it."
This article was originally written in German.
While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Ukraine Says Fighting 'Difficult' After Reports Of Russia's Rapid Gains
Ukraine said Tuesday it was engaged in "difficult" battles with Russian forces after Moscow had made rapid advances in a narrow but important section of the front line in the country's east. The gains came just days before US President Donald Trump was to meet Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska for talks on the war, the first meeting between a sitting US and Russian leader since 2021. The Ukrainian army said it was engaged in "heavy" battles with Russian forces attempting to penetrate its defences. "The situation is difficult and dynamic," it said in a statement. A map published by Ukrainian battlefield monitor DeepState, which has close ties with Ukraine's military, showed Russia had advanced around 10 kilometres (six miles) over around two days, deep into a narrow section of the eastern front line. The corridor -- now apparently under Russian control -- threatens the town of Dobropillia, a mining hub that civilians are fleeing and that has come under Russian drone attacks. It also further isolates the destroyed town of Kostiantynivka, one of the last large urban areas in the Donetsk region still held by Ukraine. The Institute for the Study of War, a US-based observatory, said Russia was sending small sabotage groups forwards. It said it was "premature" to call the Russian advances in around Dobropillia "an operational-level breakthrough". The military's Operational-Tactical Group Donetsk, which oversees parts of the front in the industrial region, also said Russia was probing Ukrainian lines with small sabotage groups, describing battles as "complex, unpleasant and dynamic". Trump has described his summit with Putin on Friday as a chance to check the Russian leader's ideas for ending the war. Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky warned ahead of the talks that Moscow was laying the groundwork for further attacks, after Trump said on Monday that both sides would have to swap territory for peace. European leaders have meanwhile sought to ensure respect for Kyiv's interests. "We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations," Zelensky said in a statement on social media. Russia, which invaded Ukraine in 2022, has made costly but incremental gains across the sprawling front in recent months and claims to have annexed four Ukrainian regions while still fighting to control them. Ukrainian police meanwhile said that Russian attacks in the past hours had killed three people and wounded 12 others, including a child.
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
EU Ready To Do Plastic Pollution Deal 'But Not At Any Cost'
The European Union is ready to do a deal to land a groundbreaking treaty on plastic pollution, but not at any cost, the EU's environment commissioner insisted Tuesday. With little over two days left to strike a global accord in talks at the UN in Geneva, Jessika Roswall said it was "time" to clinch a deal between oil-producing countries and more ambitious nations, including EU states. Five previous rounds of talks over the past two and a half years have failed to seal an agreement, including a supposedly final round in South Korea late last year. The current talks in Geneva opened a week ago but are due to close on Thursday. "The EU is ready to do a deal but not at any cost," Roswall told reporters. "We do like plastic... and we will continue to need it. However, we don't like plastic pollution and it's time to end plastic pollution as quickly as possible," the commissioner said. She said any treaty should give businesses the certainty of a clear global framework in which to operate. A cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group -- including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia and Iran -- want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management. The EU and others want to go much further by reining in plastic production -- which on current trends is set to triple by 2060 -- and by phasing out certain especially toxic chemicals. Danish Environment Minister Magnus Heunicke admitted that the "wide gap" between the rival camps was making the negotiations a challenge but said the work of tackling plastic pollution "will only get harder the longer we wait. So now's the time". "There's going to be a whole lot more drama in the days to come," he said, "but our goal is this drama should end up in a deal", he said, speaking alongside Roswall at the United Nations. He said all parties, including the EU, had to re-examine their red lines and see where they could tweak them in the interests of landing a deal by Thursday. "If we all stick to our red lines then a deal is impossible," he said. "So we have to look at those red lines and we have to negotiate and compromise -- because we will be worse off if we don't succeed in making a deal. "That's not me saying 'a deal at any price': Not at all. But a deal that is legally binding and has strong text and lays the ground for our work in the years ahead in order to tackle plastic pollution."
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Why is Trump being so generous to China? – DW – 08/12/2025
Donald Trump slashed tariffs and softened his stance on China, while imposing steep duties on India and Brazil. What leverage does Beijing hold that others don't? After months as a trade pariah, China is now at the heart of US President Donald Trump's efforts to reset relations and avoid another tariff spiral. Back in April, Trump labeled China "the greatest threat to America," saying it had "cheated" the world's largest economy for decades. He then slapped massive tariffs of 145% on Chinese goods. Just months later, the tone has shifted. Trump has extended the tariff pause on China, praised President Xi Jinping as "a strong leader," and floated the idea of a US-China summit this fall. Meanwhile, countries like India and Brazil now face the steepest penalties — up to 50% tariffs — while China's rate is capped at a more manageable 30%. Trump has several reasons for giving China an easier ride. He wants to avoid a tariff spike just as US retailers stock up on Chinese imports for the crucial holiday season. Trump is also buying time to allow negotiations on a broader trade deal that could include technology, energy and rare earth minerals. As China is the only country to firmly confront Washington's aggressive policy stance, Antonio Fatas, economics professor at INSEAD Business School, thinks Beijing's strategy may have left Trump scrambling for leverage. "From the beginning, it was clear that China was more willing than the US to have a full-blown trade war," Fatas told DW, which would bring "economic consequences that the Trump administration cannot afford." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video China's dominance in rare earths — needed to produce everything from electric vehicles to missile guidance systems — is arguably Beijing's strongest card. With US industries heavily reliant on Chinese supply, these minerals have become a decisive factor in the trade standoff. After Trump announced sky-high tariffs in April, China, which controls about 60% of global rare earth production and nearly 90% of refining, imposed export controls on seven rare earth elements and permanent magnets, hitting US industries hard, including carmakers. Washington is also pushing for tighter restrictions on China's access to advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips, while pressuring Beijing to cut imports of Russian oil, warning of secondary sanctions — including steep tariffs — if volumes continue to rise. Further down the list of priorities, Trump is urging China to quadruple its purchases of US soybeans — a boost to American farmers and last year's $295.5 billion (€254.5 billion) trade deficit between the world powers. China is by far the world's largest soybean importer, accounting for over 60% of global demand, mostly for livestock feed and cooking oil. China, on the other hand, is seeking a lasting rollback in US tariffs, especially around technology and manufacturing. Beijing also wants safeguards for Chinese firms from US sanctions and assurances over access to cutting-edge US chips. At the same time, the Chinese government is now actively discouraging the use of Nvidia's H20 processor, the most advanced US chip currently allowed for export to China. Analysts say this move is a public show that the country is becoming less reliant on the US for high-end technology. Economist Alicia Garcia-Herrero, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel, noted Trump's many trade, domestic and geopolitical challenges — like Friday's peace talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska — as other reasons he's giving China more leeway. "Trump has enough on his plate ... and has no choice but to offer China more [time] than other countries," she told DW. Now that the tariff truce has been extended until early November, negotiators can zero in on the most contentious issues. Chief among them is avoiding a return to triple-digit tariffs — 145% on Chinese goods and 125% on US exports. Both sides agree such a move would be economically damaging. China's current 30% average tariff rate remains significantly above most other countries. Chinese copper and steel exports to the US are subject to a 50% levy. While China enjoys extra time, India's fall from favored partner at the start of Trump's second term to trade villain has been swift. The country now faces a punishing tariff of up to 50% — 25% on general goods and an additional 25% on Russian oil purchases that's expected to kick in on August 27. INSEAD's Fatas noted that "India has neither the economic size of China, exports crucial for US industry, nor the power to inflict damage on the US economy," calling on New Delhi to work with allies to show collective strength and secure a better tariff. While China may appear to have the upper hand in negotiations, Han Shen Lin, China Managing Director of strategic advisory firm The Asia Group, warned against complacency from the Chinese side. After all, Trump's flair for chaos leaves room for unexpected moves. "We can't underestimate the US's ability to add more shock value [to negotiations]," Han told Reuters news agency. "I suspect the type of leverage the US has, as the largest consumer market in the world, will be a factor that will cause other countries to think cautiously." Despite softening his tone, Trump is keeping up the pressure on China in other ways. Chinese exporters have been rerouting goods meant for the US through Southeast Asian countries, especially Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand. The objective is to obscure their origin and avoid direct US tariffs. In response, Trump has imposed a sweeping 40% transshipment tariff on all nations suspected of facilitating Chinese rerouting, which took effect last week. With US-China negotiations expected to stretch until the deadline, Garcia-Herrero, who is also chief economist for Asia-Pacific at French investment bank Natixis, foresees a partial trade thaw that benefits US firms while sidelining key allies. "We'll likely get movement on both export controls on high-end chips from the US side and rare-earth from Beijing," Garcia-Herrero told DW. " China will likely see a slightly lower [base] tariff and US companies will get better access to the Chinese market, to the detriment of the European Union, South Korea and Japan."
