&w=3840&q=100)
As Turkey & Azerbaijan support Pakistan, bookings fall 60%, cancellations surge 250%, says Make My Trip
Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharid and Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan hold a bilateral meeting in Ankara, Turkey on April 22, 2025. Image/Embassy of Pakistan in Ankara
Indians have been punishing Turkey and Azerbaijan for their support of Pakistan in the ongoing tensions in their own way.
Bookings for Turkey and Turkey have fallen by 60 per cent and cancellations have surged by 250 per cent in recent days, according to a spokesperson of Make My Trip.
Since the Pahalgam attack and resultant Operation Sindoor by India, Turkey and Azerbaijan have emerged as the most vocal supporters of Pakistan. Turkey's support goes way beyond statements. The country has provided Pakistan with armed drones that it has used to attack India.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As a result, a movement has taken shape in India for the boycott of the countries. People and companies have joined hands. While companies have suspended bookings for these countries, people have made calls to not buy these countries' products.
Make My Trip joins travel companies in stand on Turkey, Azerbaijan
Make My Trip has become the latest company to take a stand on Turkey and Azerbaijan's support for Pakistan amid ongoing tensions.
In a statement, a company spokesperson said that Make My Trip has discontinued all promotions and offers for Turkey and Azerbaijan to discourage people from travelling to these countries.
'In solidarity with our nation and out of deep respect for our armed forces, we strongly support this sentiment and advise all against all non-essential travel to Azerbaijan and Turkey. We have already discontinued all promotions and offers on our platform to discourage tourism to these two destinations,' said the spokesperson.
Other companies that have taken a stand against Turkey and Azerbaijan are:
EaseMyTrip has suspended all bookings for Turkey.
Cox & Kings has suspended all bookings for Turkey and Azerbaijan
Travomint has suspended of all travel packages to Turkey and Azerbaijan.
ixigo has suspended bookings for Turkey and Azerbaijan.
Goa Villas has ended the partnership with Turkish Airlines.
Cleartrip has suspended all bookings to Turkey and Azerbaijan.
Tourism is a major source of revenue for these two countries and Indians have emerged as an important customer segment — particularly for Azerbaijan.
Estimates suggest that tourism contributes to around 28 per cent of Azerbaijan's GDP and Indians make up around 10 per cent of all those tourists. Indians are the fourth-largest source of tourists for the country.
ALSO READ: Why and how is Turkey doubling down on its support for Pakistan
In Turkey, tourism and hospitality sectors contribute around $140 billion to the economy and Indian tourists are among the fastest-growing segments. In recent years, the country had become particularly popular among Indians for destination weddings and corporate meetings, conferences, retreats, and exhibitions. Last year, Indian tourists to the country grew by around 20 per cent year-on-year.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Calls for boycott have also been expanded to products imported from these countries, such as Turkish apples. India is the largest importer of Turkish apples and imported apples worth around $92 billion last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Should rate-setting panel track headline or core inflation? RBI stirs debate
The central bank has initiated a process to gather opinions on whether monetary policy should track headline inflation or core inflation, which strips out the impact of fuel and energy price increases. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Thursday released a discussion paper on its inflation-targeting framework seven months before the existing one comes up for renewal. The framework is reviewed every five years, with the last one happening in 2021, when the government, in consultation with RBI, set it at 4% with a tolerance band of +/-2%. The discussion paper asks four questions. First, whether headline inflation or core inflation would best guide the conduct of monetary policy, given evolving relative dynamics of food and core inflation and the continuing high weight of food in the consumer price basket. Second, whether the 4% inflation target continues to remain optimal for balancing growth with stability in a fast-growing, large emerging economy like India. Third, should the tolerance band around the target be revised in any way, including whether it should be narrowed, widened, or eliminated? Lastly, should the target inflation level be removed, and only a range be maintained within the overall ambit of maintaining flexibility without undermining monetary policy's credibility? The debate over whether core inflation should be the benchmark instead of the headline numbers has been ongoing for some time. It centres around monetary policy's handicap on food prices as they are caused by supply-side problems like food supply issues and not by demand, which can be controlled by interest rate changes. Food currently occupies a 46% weight in the headline consumer price index or CPI basket. In July 2024, the Economic Survey for 2023-24 suggested excluding food prices from India's inflation-targeting framework 'The debate on what should be the monetary policy target benchmark–headline inflation or core inflation (which excludes the volatile components of inflation, such as food and fuel from headline)–is premised on the issue of inclusivity vs stability," the discussion paper said. It said that headline inflation is favoured worldwide as a more representative measure of the overall price conditions. In fact, except for Uganda, all nations that target inflation look at headline inflation. The paper said the argument for targeting headline inflation emphasises that downplaying the role of food inflation in price stability can erode monetary policy credibility and de-anchor inflation expectations. According to the paper, there is also the argument that the current CPI base (2011-12) is outdated, and the share of food would decline considerably once it is revised to a more recent year. 'However, the continued dominance of food in Indian households' consumption basket is corroborated by the latest Survey of Household Consumption Expenditure 2023-24. It indicates that 90% of the lowest fractile rural households and 50 per cent of the lowest fractile urban households spend more than 50% of their monthly consumption on food and energy," it said. RBI said the quarterly path since inception of flexible inflation targeting showed that average inflation was at 3.9% during the first four years of the framework and very close to the target. It exceeded the target during 2020-2024 (and even went above the upper threshold level of 6%), driven by supply disruptions on account of the pandemic, geopolitical conflicts and adverse weather events, it said. The paper said that while there are arguments on both sides as to whether to raise or lower the target of 4%, justifications for pursuing the target and the framework stem from India's relative success in lowering inflation and responding to exogenous shocks. The discussion paper said that, like other countries, India may consider narrowing its current tolerance band to about 1-1.5%. Moreover, the recent consumer expenditure survey suggests that the share of food and beverages in the upcoming new CPI series could be lower, further lowering the volatility of headline inflation.
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Silence will only embolden the bully: Chinese Ambassador on U.S. tariffs
China will 'firmly stand' with India to uphold World Trade Organisation principles, said Chinese Ambassador to India Xu Feihong, taking direct aim at the U.S. for imposing 50% tariffs on Indian goods. In a speech about the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, where Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Russian President Vladimir Putin and leaders of Central Asia, Pakistan, Iran and Belarus will be hosted by Chinese President Xi Jinping, Ambassador Xu was particularly sharp on the 'trade and tariff wars' that he said had disrupted the multilateral trading system, and referred to the U.S. as a 'bully'. The comments by a diplomat in India about a third country were unusual, possibly indicating that the SCO Summit in Tianjin on September 1 will be critical of the U.S.'s actions. Also Read | 'Important opportunity' faces India, China, says Foreign Minister Wang Yi 'The United States has long benefited greatly from free trade, but now it is using tariffs as a bargaining chip to demand exorbitant prices from various countries,' Mr. Xu said at an event, organised by two Delhi-based think-tanks Chintan Research Foundation and the Centre for Global India Insights, entitled 'SCO Summit & Resetting India-China relations'. Referring to U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of 50% tariffs on Indian goods, which include 25% penalty tariffs for the import of Russian oil, due to go into place next week, Mr. Xu said that China 'firmly opposes' the move. While the Chinese Foreign Ministry has opposed the U.S.'s reciprocal tariffs and China imposed counter-tariffs on the U.S., this is the first such unequivocal support from China over the tariffs imposed on India. Also Read | No change in Taiwan policy, say government sources after Beijing's claim 'In the face of such acts, silence or compromise only emboldens the bully. China will firmly stand with India to uphold the multilateral trading system with the World Trade Organization at its core,' Mr. Xu continued. Making a pitch for better India-China ties after the four-year military standoff at the Line of Actual Control, the Chinese Ambassador pointed to the improvement in ties over the past 10 months since the Modi-Xi meeting in Kazan in October 2024, pointing to many more visas and high-level engagements as well as the re-opening of the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra. He also said that bilateral trade in 2025 had already crossed $75 billion, indicating a 10% rise from the previous year. To a question about India's concerns over cross-border terrorism and China's support to Pakistan, Mr. Xu said that 'not only China and India, Pakistan is also a victim of terrorism, so what we should do is to make joint efforts to fight against terrorism,' in comments that would not be viewed as positively by New Delhi. Also Read | De-escalation process at LAC must move forward: Jaishankar tells Wang Mr. Xu's speech was followed by comments from India's former Ambassador to Russia Venkatesh Verma who said the SCO summit hosted by China was important for India to strengthen multipolarity in the region and to discuss counterterrorism, and would include India-China bilateral talks as well. Former Army Chief General Manoj Naravane pointed to boundary resolution talks between Special Representatives NSA Ajit Doval and visiting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Delhi earlier this week that agreed to build on the 2005 agreement for the boundary as a positive move so the 'irritant in the relationship can be set aside'. He said that he hoped once the task of delimitation of the boundary was completed, delineation and demarcation of the border would be completed quickly as well. General Naravane, who was Army Chief when the Galwan clashes occurred in which 20 Indian soldiers were killed by PLA soldiers in 2020, said that while India-China ties had been tense over the past 60-70 years, the period marked only a 'blip' in the longer timeline of more peaceful India-China civilisational ties. Also Read | Russia welcomes Wang Yi's visit and the positive turn in India-China ties Speaking to journalists after the event, Mr. Xu said the 10-point consensus reached by Mr. Doval and Mr. Wang was important, adding that experts would now work on an 'early harvest agreement for the proper management of border areas.'
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Birla, Harivansh flag poor productivity, slam Opposition for disruptions as Monsoon Session ends
The stormy Monsoon Session of Parliament ended on Thursday (August 21, 2025) with the Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh blaming the Opposition for repeated disruptions. Follow Parliament Monsoon session Day 21 highlights The session began with the abrupt resignation of Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar on July 21 and ended with Union Home Minister Amit Shah moving a resolution to appoint a joint select committee to study crucial amendments to the Constitution proposing automatic cessation of office if a Prime Minister or a Chief Minister spends 31 days in custody. Throughout the session, the Opposition protested, demanding a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls and the alleged 'vote theft' in the Lok Sabha and recent Assembly elections. The demand for adjournment motions on the issue was rejected, leading to disruptions in both the Houses. The Upper House functioned for only 41 hours and 15 minutes, while the Lok Sabha could work only for 37 hours this session. In their concluding remarks, Mr. Birla and Mr. Harivansh criticised the Opposition members for their behaviour. 'Despite the best efforts of the Chair to facilitate meaningful and disruption-free discussions on the listed business, this session was regrettably marred by repeated disruptions, leading to frequent adjournments. This not only resulted in the loss of precious parliamentary time but also deprived us of the opportunity to deliberate upon several matters of public importance,' Mr. Harivansh said. The Deputy Chairman said the productivity of the Monsoon Session stood at 38.88%, something that calls for serious introspection. 'Members had the opportunity to raise 285 Questions, 285 Zero Hour submissions, and 285 Special Mentions. However, only 14 Questions, seven Zero Hour submissions, and 61 Special Mentions could actually be taken up,' he said, adding that while these contributions are of value, they represent only a fraction of what this House is capable of achieving when it functions to its full potential. During the Session, the Rajya Sabha passed or returned as many as 15 Government Bills. Lok Sabha saw the introduction of 14 Bills of which 12 were passed. Both the Houses discussed Operation Sindoor and the Lok Sabha debated the achievements of India's space programme. Mr. Birla said the members had all decided at the beginning of the session that the House will have 120 hours of discussion and dialogue. 'The Business Advisory Committee also agreed to this. But due to continuous deadlock and planned disruptions, we could barely work for 37 hours in this session,' he said in his valedictory address. In this session, 419 starred questions were included in the agenda, but due to disruptions, only 55 questions could be taken up for oral answers. Mr. Birla said that 'as public representatives, the entire country watches our conduct and functioning'. 'The public has great expectations from us that we have serious and meaningful discussions on their problems and issues of wider public interest, on important Bills, in accordance with the decorum of Parliament,' he said. 'It is the responsibility of all of us to cooperate in building healthy traditions in the House. In this dignified House, we should avoid sloganeering and disruption and take forward serious and meaningful discussions. As Members of Parliament, we should set an example before the country and the world through our work and behaviour. Our language in the House and the Parliament premises should always be restrained and decent'. 'Agreement and disagreement are a natural process of democracy, but our collective effort should be that the House runs with dignity, decorum and decency. We have to think about what message we are sending to the citizens through the country's highest democratic institution. I am sure that all the political parties and honourable members will seriously think and introspect on this issue,' he said.
