logo
We're not in ‘business' of regime change or redrawing maps, says Israeli ambassador to India

We're not in ‘business' of regime change or redrawing maps, says Israeli ambassador to India

The Print5 hours ago
Gurugram: Israel is not in the 'business' of changing regimes or redrawing maps in West Asia like Turkey or Iran, said Reuven Azar, the Israeli ambassador to India at ThePrint's Off The Cuff Monday.
'We are not in the business of redrawing the map of the Middle East. Israel is pretty different from other powers in the region. And you could see that very clearly following the turmoil that started in 2011, what was called the Arab Spring. You had Arab countries that collapsed or that entered into a huge turmoil. Israel didn't interfere there to try to determine their political future,' Azar said, in conversation with Shekhar Gupta, ThePrint's Editor-in-Chief at The Quorum, Gurugram.
Azar added: 'There were other countries that did interfere, like for example, Iran and Turkey. So we are in the business of trying to serve our interests. And as much as we are concerned with dealing with our threats, we are trying to also grasp opportunity.'
The 'opportunity' indicated by the Israeli envoy is the Abraham Accords—a series of treaties which normalised ties between Tel Aviv and a number of countries in the region, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan.
The Accords, which were signed between September 2020 and January 2021, were one of the most hard-won geopolitical battles in West Asia and North Africa this decade. They build on the Camp David Accords, which saw Israel and Egypt agree to peace at the end of the 1970s and the peace treaty between Jordan and Tel Aviv, signed in 1994.
The agreements aimed to normalise diplomatic ties between Israel and the aforementioned states, eventually creating common interests between countries that for over seven decades had had none.
'This has nothing to do with redrawing maps. It's just a matter of fulfilling the common interest we have with those countries that are more pragmatic in our region and are interested like us to promote stability and connectivity,' Azar said, explaining the Accords.
The Israeli envoy, when asked about why Tel Aviv did not push for regime change in Iran, made it clear that Israel has no capabilities to drag its 'conscript' army to impose such changes. Tel Aviv launched Operation Rising Lion on 13 June, striking at key Iranian nuclear facilities and military personnel.
Within days at least 10 senior Iranian generals and a number of nuclear scientists were killed by Israel's military operation. The US joined in the strikes on 21 June, through Operation Midnight Hammer, which struck Tehran's nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
'I don't remember any case in which there was regime change from the air, okay? So nobody was planning to invade Iran or to take care of a nation of 100 million people. And therefore (Israel), as a democracy, which, you know, is accountable to its people, that actually has a conscription army, we are not in the business of, you know, dragging our people to endless wars to change the political landscape in other countries,' said Azar.
The ambassador added: 'We are not capable of doing it. We don't have the will, okay? …and of course, you know, I would be very happy if there would be a regime change in Iran, but it depends on the Iranian people.'
In the 12-day war, Israel gained air superiority over Iran. Tehran, in its retaliatory operation—True Promise 3—sought to strike at Israel using ballistic missiles. The Israeli air defence systems were able to intercept roughly 90 percent of Iran's missiles. However, the use of ballistic missiles by Iran saw a number of buildings hit and 29 Israelis killed, while over 3,000 were injured.
According to Iranian officials, 935 people were killed by Israeli air strikes in the West Asian nation. The air superiority gained by Israel allowed the US' B2 stealth bombers to enter Iranian airspace unhindered and drop 'bunker buster' bombs at Fordow and Natanz. Fordow, Iran's most fortified uranium enrichment site was buried deep underground.
The US has claimed to have 'completely obliterated' the site. At least two such bombs were also used at Natanz. However, any assessments of the true damage to the nuclear programme of Iran will take time to be reported.
'What is important in our perspective is that… the fact that Iran will continue to possess fissile material that is enriched to a high level doesn't mean that they will be able to reconstitute their nuclear plan that easily, because we have destroyed their centrifuges factory,' Azar said.
The Israeli ambassador added: 'We have hit dozens of sites that were related to the nuclear programme and we continue to have penetration into the Iranian system and the resolve to deal with the situation in which Iran re-embarks on a military nuclear plan.'
(Edited by Viny Mishra)
Also read: Pakistan & North Korea are the 2 countries involved in Nuclear proliferation, says Israeli envoy to India
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Other Nations Also Enrich Uranium – So Why Is Only Iran A Global Villain?
Other Nations Also Enrich Uranium – So Why Is Only Iran A Global Villain?

India.com

timean hour ago

  • India.com

Other Nations Also Enrich Uranium – So Why Is Only Iran A Global Villain?

New Delhi: Uranium enrichment is not rare. Argentina does it. Brazil too. So does Japan. Even the Netherlands. All of them refine uranium for peaceful reasons, mainly for energy. No drama. No threats. No sanctions. Then there is Iran. Same process. Same science. But a global firestorm. Warnings from Washington. Airstrikes from Israel. Sanctions. Suspicion. Why? Let's break it down. Same Process, Different Perception Enrichment means increasing the concentration of Uranium-235. Natural uranium holds just 0.7% of it. Power reactors need around 3-5%. Nuclear bombs need more than 90%. Countries like Argentina and Japan keep enrichment under 5%. No surprises. No secrets. Always under the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) watch. Iran did not stop at 5%. It went to 60%. That is far above energy needs. Just a step away from weapons-grade material. The United Nations' nuclear energy watchdog, IAEA, has flagged it repeatedly. It says Iran holds more than 400 kg of 60% enriched uranium that is enough for making 10 nuclear bombs. 'Secrecy' Fuels Suspicion Iran's nuclear journey has allegedly not been transparent. In 2009, a hidden facility at Fordow was revealed, not by Tehran but by Western intelligence. Before that, the AMAD project (an Iranian scientific project with the aim of developing nuclear weapons) quietly explored weaponisation until 2003. And now, IAEA inspectors are routinely denied access. In 2025, for the first time in two decades, the IAEA formally declared Iran in breach of its obligations. Compare that with Brazil, the Netherlands or Japan. Their programmes stay open and cooperative. No secret bunkers. No hidden centrifuges. The Regional Firetrap Iran sits in a volatile neighbourhood – Israel, Saudi Arabia and U.S. bases in the Gulf nations. Tensions always near the surface. Iranian leaders have issued fiery statements against Israel. Some called for its destruction. That changes how the world views Tehran's nuclear work. Israel does not take chances. It launched airstrikes in 2025 on Iranian nuclear sites – Natanz, Fordow and more. The United States supported it. The message was loud and clear – Iran's nuclear rise will not be tolerated. None of the other uranium-enriching countries face such hostility from their neighbours. No threats. No attacks. No regional war risk. Technology Through 'Backdoor' Iran allegedly did not always develop its nuclear tech legally. It reportedly tapped into the A.Q. Khan network from Pakistan and bought parts from shady vendors in Europe. That purported history still haunts it. Other nations built their systems through public and internationally accepted channels. No smuggling, no cover-ups. JCPOA Gamble, Its Collapse In 2015, Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with six global powers. It agreed to limit enrichment, reduce stockpiles and allow inspections. In return, it got sanctions relief. Then in 2018, President Donald Trump pulled the United States out. Sanctions returned. Iran responded by allegedly ramping up enrichment again. By 2025, its uranium stockpile was reportedly 22 times higher than JCPOA limits. The agreement collapsed. The trust shattered. Symbol of Sovereignty or Defiance? For Iran, its nuclear programme is a matter of national pride. A stand against what it sees as Western domination. Its leaders say enrichment is a right and a matter of dignity. But to Washington and Tel Aviv, it looks like defiance, a threat and a potential path to the bomb. Japan does not speak this language, nor does Brazil. Their enrichment is a utility. Iran's is a political statement. Double Standard? There is one. Israel reportedly holds nuclear weapons. It never signed the NPT. It faces no sanctions. Iran signed the treaty. It faces the scrutiny, the airstrikes and the economic chokehold. Still, Iran's own behavior – secrecy, enrichment levels and regional aggression (as alleged) – keeps fueling the fire. The World Watches IAEA continues to raise red flags. Sanctions tighten. Talks stall. And yet, other nations with enrichment programmes continue uninterrupted. Argentina refines. The Netherlands develops. Japan innovates. But the spotlight never turns their way. Only Iran stands at the centre of this nuclear storm. Enriching uranium, but also enriching suspicion.

‘MUSIC TO MY EARS!': Trump Shocked By US Senate's Nod To His $5 Trillion ‘One Big Beautiful' Bill
‘MUSIC TO MY EARS!': Trump Shocked By US Senate's Nod To His $5 Trillion ‘One Big Beautiful' Bill

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

‘MUSIC TO MY EARS!': Trump Shocked By US Senate's Nod To His $5 Trillion ‘One Big Beautiful' Bill

Israeli Settlers Riot, Torch Vehicles, Clash With Troops After Teen Shooting In West Bank | Dramatic Footage Dozens of Israeli settlers rioted outside a military base in the West Bank after a 14-year-old was shot, allegedly by an IDF officer. The violent protest involved pepper spray, stone-throwing, and vehicle vandalism. As the military investigates whether its own soldier was responsible, tensions flare between settlers and security forces. Other related riots across the region have intensified, with attacks on soldiers, arson, and anti-government graffiti. The IDF reports a rise in violent nationalist incidents despite an overall decline in settler unrest this year.#IDF #westbank #Israel #netanyahu #militarybase #riots 5.7K views | 1 day ago

Trump to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on Gaza ceasefire in upcoming White House talks
Trump to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on Gaza ceasefire in upcoming White House talks

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

Trump to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on Gaza ceasefire in upcoming White House talks

The Republican leader is set to host Netanyahu at the White House on July 7 and the swift resolution of Israel's 12-day war with Iran has revived hopes for a halt to the Gaza fighting read more US President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, US, April 7, 2025. File Image/Reuters US President Donald Trump vowed Tuesday to be 'very firm' in his stance on ending the war in Gaza when he meets next week with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The remarks by the president, made during a tour of a migrant detention center in Florida, came after he said earlier that he was hoping for a truce in the nearly 21-month conflict by 'sometime next week.' The Republican leader is set to host Netanyahu at the White House on July 7 and the swift resolution of Israel's 12-day war with Iran has revived hopes for a halt to the Gaza fighting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Almost relentless combat in the Palestinian territory since Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel has created dire humanitarian conditions for the population of more than two million. Trump was asked Tuesday by reporters if a ceasefire could be in place before Netanyahu's visit. 'We hope it's going to happen, and we're looking for it to happen sometime next week,' he said before departing for Florida. Trump has previously urged Israel to 'make the deal in Gaza,' but on the ground, Israel has continued to pursue its offensive across the Palestinian territory. The end of Israel's 12-day war with Iran – which followed a US bombing mission on Tehran's nuclear sites – has provided a window of opportunity for a deal, with Trump keen to add another peace agreement to a series of recent deals he has brokered. Asked at the detention center how firm he will be with Netanyahu on ending the war, Trump replied: 'Very firm.' 'But he wants it too…. He wants to end it too,' Trump added. The visit next Monday will be Netanyahu's third since Trump returned to power in January, and comes on the heels of the US president making a rare intervention into domestic Israeli politics. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump appeared over the weekend to threaten US aid to Israel as he called in a social media post for prosecutors to drop long-running corruption charges against Netanyahu. Netanyahu became the first foreign leader to visit Trump in his second term in February, when the US president surprised him by suddenly announcing a plan for the United States to 'take over' Gaza. The Israeli premier visited again in April.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store