logo
538's former top numbers guy to launch data journalism site

538's former top numbers guy to launch data journalism site

Yahoo12-05-2025

The former head of 538, shuttered last year by ABC News, is building a new media outlet aimed at recapturing the defunct polling news site's audience and building the kind of serious data journalism that has been abandoned by most legacy news organizations.
On Monday, G. Elliott Morris, the data journalist who took over 538 in 2023, is launching Strength In Numbers, a paid Substack that he plans on growing into a publication to rival his old website. The site, which has been operating for free for the past several months while Morris' agreement with ABC runs out, will have daily items about national politics grounded in data without punditry.
In an interview with Semafor, Morris said that he was excited about the opportunity to build a new digital media organization from the ground up. But he said that part of the offering is aimed at correcting what he sees as the failures of legacy broadcast journalism in the 2020s, both in its business model and in what he said was its inability to speak honestly about threats to democracy.
'The moment we're in in journalism and democracy right now is a lot harder to talk about if your news outlet is sort of expressly devoted to not pissing people off,' he said.
He added: 'We're going to be really nerdy about the news and talk to you like people, not treat you like idiots, and not try to obscure the story.'After ABC decided in 2023 to cut costs at 538, resulting in layoffs and the departure of founder Nate Silver, it shocked the political journalism community with a surprising and somewhat bold move: hiring Morris, his upstart rival, to be 538's editorial director of data analytics. The then-26-year-old pollster and analyst cast the moment as an opportunity to rebuild the site.
But by mid-way through 2024, Morris and 538's relationship with ABC had deteriorated significantly. His election forecast model was more heavily weighted in favor of historical fundamentals like incumbency, and was suspicious of early state public opinion surveys — impulses that had served Morris and his team when accurately predicting the outcome of congressional elections at The Economist in 2018 and the presidential race in 2020 (he was slightly less successful in 2022).
But after Joe Biden's disastrous position in a June debate, his emphasis on the non-polling elements distinguished him from his competitors in a way that was unpleasant for skittish ABC higher-ups. The network became uncomfortable that its analytic model was an outlier among the polls and poll aggregators in showing Biden still with a 50% chance of winning the election the debate.
Biden's departure from the race allowed 538 to reset its election forecast model. But the network was done with the unwanted attention. Semafor reported in August that 538 had adjusted its model following Biden's decision to leave the 2024 race, but that rollout was delayed amid internal disagreement within ABC over whether and how much to explain the methodological revisions. ABC's communications team also prohibited the staff from discussing or disclosing many details about the changes publicly, and the company's lawyer strongly suggested changes to its methodology posts. Ultimately, 538 said the race was a coin toss, but correctly predicted that Republicans were likely to hold onto the Senate.
The ordeal frustrated staff at 538 and Morris, who had been open on X about his methodologies, and who felt that ABC had handicapped the team's ability to do its job well and communicate with an audience desperate to understand the flood of political information.
'To the extent ABC has a PR strategy, it's to deny and obfuscate, and hope that reputational hits heal magically by virtue of passing time. That strategy was constantly in conflict with ours, which focused on earning trust through transparency and personal author-audience relationships,' he said. 'There is no reckoning internally with the brand's loss of credibility over the last 20 years.'
Morris feels that the new independence will allow him to run a more nimble but expansive organization. He told Semafor that Strength In Numbers will also start doing some of its own surveys, and is launching a monthly online poll with a partner on Tuesday. Morris told Semafor that he has 16,000 free subscribers after just a few weeks on Substack, and hopes to generate enough revenue from paid subscriptions to scale up and hire more staff within the next several months (he expects that 6% of them will convert to paid subscribers, in line but slightly above what Substack told him it sees for publications on average).
'There's enough interest that with just a little bit of monetization, know-how and content, you can make enough for it to be sustainable, at least at the beginning, from a small group of people,' he said. 'And maybe, if you scale it up, even a lot of people.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fired ABC News reporter Terry Moran finds new job — day after boot from company over Stephen Miller tirade
Fired ABC News reporter Terry Moran finds new job — day after boot from company over Stephen Miller tirade

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Fired ABC News reporter Terry Moran finds new job — day after boot from company over Stephen Miller tirade

Former ABC News veteran correspondent Terry Moran has launched his independent journalism career. The 65-year-old journalist resurfaced his Substack account and vowed he would get back to the 'important work,' he said Wednesday, a day after he was booted from the Disney-owned network. Moran was dismissed Tuesday for violating the company's policies with a viral social media attack against top White House official Stephen Miller. Advertisement 5 Terry Moran shared his new career to his Substack account on June 11, 2025. Terry Moran/X 'For almost 28 years, I was a reporter and anchor for ABC News, as you may have heard, I am not there anymore. I'm here with you, on Substack,' Moran said in a video posted to the site. 'This amazing space and I can't wait to get at it. Get into the important work that we all have to do in this time of such trouble for our country.' Advertisement Moran revealed he would be publishing his own reporting and interviews on his site. He teased it would take some time to get the account up and running because 'he had to get some stuff sorted out.' Moran shared the announcement on his X account, the same platform he used to fire off his post against White House Deputy Chief of Staff Miller days earlier. His now-deleted post targeted Miller, calling the Trump administrator 'one of the people who conceptualizes the impulses of the Trumpist movement and translates them into policy,' and operates not on 'brains' but on 'bile.' Advertisement 'It's not brains. It's bile. Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He's a world-class hater,' Moran added. 'You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate.' 5 Moran revealed he would be publishing his own reporting and interviews to his site. Terry Moran/X 5 President Donald Trump is interviewed by ABC's Terry Moran inside the Oval Office of the White House on April 29, 2025. AP The Disney-owned ABC initially suspended Moran for the post because it violated the network's 'objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage.' Advertisement 'The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards — as a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation,' a spokesperson told The Post Sunday. Moran's attack on Miller 'pissed' off employees at the company, The Post exclusively reported. 'He should be fired,' one ABC News insider told The Post on Monday. 'People inside are pissed at Terry for screwing things up for the network.' ABC fired Moran on Tuesday, three days before the reporter's contract was set to expire and because of the social media post. 5 Terry Moran sits behind the ABC News anchor desk at the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida on Aug. 28, 2012. Disney General Entertainment Content via Getty Images 5 Terry Moran during Election Night coverage for ABC News on Nov. 5, 2024. ABC 'We are at the end of our agreement with Terry Moran and based on his recent post – which was a clear violation of ABC News policies – we have made the decision to not renew,' an ABC News spokesperson told The Post. Since his firing, Moran has changed his X biography, describing himself as an 'Independent Journalist.'

Australia 'confident' in US nuclear sub deal despite review
Australia 'confident' in US nuclear sub deal despite review

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Australia 'confident' in US nuclear sub deal despite review

Australia said Thursday it is "very confident" in the future of a US agreement to equip its navy with a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, after the Trump administration put the pact under review. The 2021 AUKUS deal joins Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States in a multi-decade effort to balance China's growing military might. It aims to arm Australia with a fleet of cutting-edge, nuclear-powered submarines from the United States, and cooperate in developing an array of warfare technologies. US President Donald Trump's administration has advised Australia and the United Kingdom that it is reviewing AUKUS, a spokesperson for the Australian Defence Department confirmed Thursday. Defence Minister Richard Marles said he was "very confident" Australia would still get the American submarines. "I think the review that's been announced is not a surprise," he told public broadcaster ABC. "We've been aware of this for some time. We welcome it. It's something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do." Australia plans to acquire at least three Virginia Class submarines from the United States within 15 years, eventually manufacturing its own subs. - 'Time to wake up?' - The US navy has 24 Virginia-class vessels, which can carry cruise missiles, but American shipyards are struggling to meet production targets set at two new boats each year. Critics question why the United States would sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia without stocking its own military first. Marles said boosting the US production of US Virginia Class submarines was a challenge. "That's why we are working very closely with the United States on seeing that happen. But that is improving," he said. Government forecasts estimate the submarine programme alone could cost Australia up to US$235 billion over the next 30 years, a price tag that has contributed to criticism of the strategy. Australia should conduct its own review of AUKUS, said former conservative prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, noting that Britain and now the United States had each decided to re-examine the pact. "Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our Parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?," he posted on X. Former Labor Party prime minister Paul Keating, a vehement critic of AUKUS, said the US review might "save Australia from itself". Australia should carve its own security strategy "rather than being dragged along on the coat tails of a fading Atlantic empire", Keating said. - 'Good deal for the US' - Any US review of AUKUS carries a risk, particularly since it is a Biden-era initiative, said Euan Graham, senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. But it is "fundamentally a good deal for the US", he said, with Australia already investing cash to boost American submarine production as part of the agreement. "I just do not think it is realistic for Australia, this far backed in, to have any prospect of withdrawing itself from AUKUS," Graham told AFP. "I don't think there is a plan B that would meet requirements, and I think it would shred Australia's reputation fundamentally in a way that would not be recoverable." djw/lec/hmn

Trump speech at Fort Bragg prompts questions, concerns about politicization of military
Trump speech at Fort Bragg prompts questions, concerns about politicization of military

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump speech at Fort Bragg prompts questions, concerns about politicization of military

WASHINGTON — Defense Department officials say troops who cheered and jeered Tuesday at President Donald Trump's political statements at a rally at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, did not violate military regulations, but a former military legal officer said they did just that. During the speech, uniformed soldiers yelled in support of Trump's political statements and booed former President Joe Biden and California Gov. Gavin Newsom. 'Do you think this crowd would have showed up for Biden? I don't think so,' Trump said to boos about Biden. Trump made other comments about Newsom and about Karen Bass, the mayor of Los Angeles, where protests against the administration's crackdown on immigrants have been taking place and where Trump has ordered thousands of National Guard members and active-duty Marines deployed in response. Other Trump comments about the 'fake news media,' transgender people, protesters in California and flag-burning also drew boos from the uniformed military members in attendance. Trump is known for his rallies at which he goes after and pokes fun at political enemies and other issues, but typically he makes those remarks at political events, not on U.S. military bases. Such overt political activity on a base is the prerogative of the commander in chief. But military leaders would typically frown upon troops' reacting the way they did as inconsistent with military good order and discipline, and, according to one expert, it is a violation of military regulations found in the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or UCMJ. Presidents of both parties often use troops as political props and put them and their commanders in difficult positions by doing so, but Trump's speech took that to a new level, said Geoffrey DeWeese, a retired judge advocate general who is now an attorney with Mark S. Zaid PC. (Zaid has represented whistleblowers on both sides of the aisle, including one who filed a complaint about Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in 2019 that led to Trump's impeachment, and he was one of the people whose security clearances Trump revoked this year.) 'It's a sad tradition to use the military as a backdrop for political purposes,' DeWeese said. 'To actively attack another president or a sitting governor and incite the crowd to boo, that's a step in a dangerous direction, that really says we want to politicize the military, that sends a bad message.' DeWeese said there were likely to have been violations of the UCMJ. 'I would be cringing if I was a senior officer and it happened under my watch,' he said. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said repeatedly that he wants to take politics out of the military by removing diversity, equity and inclusion programs and banning service by transgender service members. Kori Schake, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who worked at the State Department and the National Security Council under former President George W. Bush and at the Pentagon under former President George H.W. Bush, said in an email that commanders at Fort Bragg should have done a better job preparing troops there. 'It's terrible,' she wrote. 'It's predictably bad behavior by the President to try and score political points in a military setting, and it's a command failure by leaders at Ft Bragg not to prepare soldiers for that bad behavior and counsel them not to participate.' The Pentagon said in a statement that there had been no violation of the UCMJ and suggested the media was against policies that Trump has championed. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell also alleged in a statement that the media 'cheered on the Biden administration' and its policies regarding the Defense Department 'when they forced drag queen performances on military bases, promoted service members on the basis of race and sex in violation of federal law, and fired troops who refused an experimental vaccine.' 'Believe me, no one needs to be encouraged to boo the media,' Parnell said. 'Look no further than this query, which is nothing more than a disgraceful attempt to ruin the lives of young soldiers.' On Wednesday, Army officials at Fort Bragg addressed the sale of some MAGA merchandise at the event, which was planned in cooperation with a nonpartisan organization, American 250. 'The Army remains committed to its core values and apolitical service to the nation,' Col. Mary Ricks, a spokeswoman for the Army's 18th Airborne Corps at Bragg, said in a statement. 'The Army does not endorse political merchandise or the views it represents. The vendor's presence is under review to determine how it was permitted and to prevent similar circumstances in the future.' The Army's own new field manual, published recently, says the apolitical nature of being a U.S. soldier is what contributes to the public trust. The Army 'as an institution must be nonpartisan and appear so, too,' says the new field manual, 'The Army: A Primer to Our Profession of Arms.' 'Being nonpartisan means not favoring any specific political party or group. Nonpartisanship assures the public that our Army will always serve the Constitution and our people loyally and responsively.' U.S. troops can participate in political functions, just not while on duty or in uniform, the book says. 'As a private citizen you are encouraged to participate in our democratic process, but as a soldier you must be mindful of how your actions may affect the reputation and perceived trustworthiness of our Army as an institution,' it says. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store