logo
Sydney gym's dress code has divided, confused Australians

Sydney gym's dress code has divided, confused Australians

News.com.au16-06-2025
A Sydney gym's dress code has sparked a divided reaction, with some calling it 'sexist' while others insisted restaurants have similar rules upon entry and sportswear is no different.
Camperdown Fitness, in Sydney's Inner West, is one of the city's largest fitness spaces. However, the popular gym, which has members as young as 14, has recently updated its dress code, sparking a fiery debate online.
For women, the fashion guidelines dictate the length of shorts that can be worn — meaning they have to fall a couple of inches below the bum — and sports bras need to have two straps, discouraging boobtubes and one-shoulder tops.
For men, tops cannot show too much of their arms or back, discouraging showy muscle singlets.
The rules are displayed on televisions throughout the gym, with images showing 'correct' and 'incorrect' examples of attire.
Many people have had strong reactions to the new guidelines, calling them 'overbearing' and saying the TV monitors made them feel 'uncomfortable'.
'Sexist and outdated policies dictating what a woman can and cannot wear in the gym. I would suggest you give your staff some training and have a stricter hiring process if a woman's shoulder is offensive,' one said.
Others claimed to have cancelled their membership as a result.
But, many had absolutely no issue with the gym's dress code.
'Their business (the gym) so their choice. Same as a store or restaurant can choose their clientele,' one said.
Another added: 'Looks like a dress code for men and women to me. Not sexist and totally acceptable for an establishment to have a dress code.'
'Looking forward to my next gym session,' one simply wrote.
Another social media user said: 'No, it's not a fashion show, it should be about having a place for people to go to improve their health and lifestyle. Ridiculous.'
Michael Wood, who owns the gym alongside Paul Vella, told The Daily Telegraph: 'Our guidelines require appropriate athletic wear that ensures safety during equipment use and maintains our family-friendly environment serving ages 14+ with an onsite creche.'
news.com.au has contacted the gym for further comment.
2GB's Ben Fordham also weighed in on the debate, saying he found the gym's new dress code 'confusing'.
'Are these respectful boundaries or some kind of clothing censorship — you be the judge,' he said.
Mr Fordham claimed in his opinion the only difference between some of the images — particularly when it came to the shorts — was the size of the woman's bottom.
'If you've got a bum lift, then you can't wear those shorts,' he said.
'There's another one where you've got the bloke, he's covered in muscles and he's wearing a really tiny singlet, and they say that's no good. But next to it there is a photo of a bloke who's wearing a similar kind of singlet but he's got smaller muscles and that's OK.'
Camperdown Fitness isn't the only facility to enforce a dress code. Caitlin Emiko, an Australian living in New York, attends Greenwich Village Athletic — a squad training gym that requires members solely wear black workout gear.
The private fitness chain introduced it in a bid to create an inclusive and non-judgemental workout environment.
Ms Emiko told news.com.au in December last year that she didn't think it was a common rule at New York gyms but it was one she enjoyed.
'I personally love it, takes all of the thought out of getting dressed in the morning, and as a marketing girl think it looks great on their socials,' she said.
'The rule is in place to foster a sense of inclusivity and focus. When you're at the gym, it's all about working out, connecting, and building each other up — not getting distracted by brands or outfits.
'This gym thrives on its strong sense of community, encouraging everyone to focus on their fitness journey rather than appearances.'
Meanwhile, Stephen Metcalf was told wearing ugg boots to a Gym Group branch in Swindon, England, was 'inappropriate'.
After filming himself confronting staff about the rules – arguing as it didn't specify ugg boots he should be allowed – Mr Metcalf was notified by email that his behaviour was 'aggressive, abusive, intimidating, anti-social, (and) threatening'. He was also informed that his contract had been terminated.
Following the exchange and subsequent cancellation of his membership, Mr Metcalf said it was a 'stupid' decision and he can't see the difference between wearing Ugg boots and people who take their footwear off in the gym to perform certain exercises.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Desperate' Crows questioned for ‘arguing at every turn' as slur saga stalls
‘Desperate' Crows questioned for ‘arguing at every turn' as slur saga stalls

News.com.au

time19 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Desperate' Crows questioned for ‘arguing at every turn' as slur saga stalls

The Adelaide Crows have come under scrutiny for 'arguing the toss at every turn' with regards to the ongoing investigation into the alleged homophobic slur delivered by Izak Rankine to a Collingwood player. The Crows are bracing for Rankine to be dealt a season-ending suspension from the AFL, but despite expectations a decision would be made on Tuesday — as all parties involved have been spoken to — the league will continue to mull the situation until at least Thursday before determining a sanction. Watch every game until the 2025 AFL Grand Final LIVE with no ad-breaks during play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Join now and get your first month for just $1. Adelaide was granted 'additional time to respond to the AFL's proposed determinations', per an AFL statement on Wednesday afternoon. The alleged incident occurred on Saturday night, before relevant interviews took place and submissions made on Monday. The league is thought to be hunting a five-match ban for Rankine — which would end his season — with the Crows now in the process of readying their response. Respected commentator and AFL 360 host Gerard Whateley called the drawn-out process 'convoluted' on Wednesday night, with the saga about to enter its fourth day. 'That is an intolerably convoluted process, and it risks the AFL looking indecisive — perhaps behind the scenes they haven't been at all, but that's how it looks from the outside,' Whateley began on Fox Footy. 'It does make me wonder why Andrew Dillon and his legal team didn't go to Adelaide on Tuesday, sit in the board room and stay until matters were resolved. 'I think on a public front ... this is going to run all the way until game day of Round 24 — it's a nasty story. It's got an unsavoury edge, and some of the debate around it is it's damaging to the code.' Whateley expressed his belief that the Crows aren't acting 'in a contrite manner' as they continue to try for the most lenient possible suspension. 'My focus, really, is on Adelaide, who seem desperate to fight every angle of this,' he said. 'It's not a picture of accepting responsibility and acting in a contrite manner. And they are arguing the toss at every turn, formally and informally — (making the argument) finals games should be worth more than home-and-away games, even though there's no precedent in the system for that. 'They have gone with Rankine was provoked, which is a big stretch, I think — he was antagonised, but provoked is a big stretch. 'Informally, they've even raised Snoop Dogg. That's the domain of talkback radio, not a responsible footy club.' Whateley said there were 'three possibilities' that could have eventuated. 'Front up to what happened, pledge to address whatever it is in the environment that allowed this to happen, and accept what's coming,' he said. Former Demons captain Garry Lyon took a slightly different route to Whateley, suggesting the Crows were within their rights to 'fight and fight hard' to get Rankine off the hook — provided they also fall on their sword and accept the forthcoming penalty when the time comes. 'It's incumbent from a supporter's point of view to do the best job they possibly can to see if they can get Izak back playing,' Lyon said on AFL 360. 'Now, as unsavoury as that may sound, and as you've pointed it out, it smacks of them not wanting to take responsibility, I think they are entitled to argue their case as vociferously and as strongly as they possibly can, given the stakes that are at play — so long as they are accepting of the final verdict and it doesn't go too far. 'As a football club that's sitting on top of the ladder and are premiership favourites, there is a way to deal with it. And as I said, I don't begrudge them the right to fight and fight hard — even if that means getting in the trenches a bit — but there comes a time where you do need to show some humility and be accepting of the penalty, and that'll come.'

Nikita Tszyu and Michael Zerafa win with first-round TKOs in Sydney
Nikita Tszyu and Michael Zerafa win with first-round TKOs in Sydney

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Nikita Tszyu and Michael Zerafa win with first-round TKOs in Sydney

Nikita Tszyu is pondering his next move after restoring family pride with a devastating first-round TKO victory over the previously undefeated Lulzim Ismaili. Ismail's corner opted to stop the fight after the Macedonian copped a battering from "The Butcher" at the ICC Sydney Theatre on Wednesday night. Making his much-anticipated comeback following a year out of the ring, Tszyu needed barely a minute to show there were no lingering effects from hand surgery when he stunned Ismaili with two huge lefts. The 27-year-old slayer finished Ismaili with a liver punch that broke his hapless Germany-based opponent's rib. "I wanted to properly hurt him," Tszyu said. In improving his own record to 11-0 and capturing the vacant WBO intercontinental super-welterweight title, Tszyu also extended his famous family's incredible record in Australia to 52-0. As well as Tszyu himself, the 27-year-old's father, Kostya (18-0), and older, former world champion brother Tim (23-0) have never lost a professional fight on home turf. After defending his family's honour, Tszyu admitted he had been driven not only to deliver for his newborn daughter but also to quieten the doubters after his superstar sibling's three world-title losses in the US over the past 18 months. "I copped a lot of criticism with my brother's recent fights," he said. "I mean, this is boxing. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. "We celebrate our wins and we celebrate our losses. "There's no shame in it." Wednesday night's victory may have set up a domestic blockbuster with the Tszyus' arch-rival Michael Zerafa, who earlier destroyed American Mikey Dahlman also inside 2 minutes in the co-main event to claim the WBO intercontinental middleweight strap. The 33-year-old former world title challenger hurt Dahlman early with a big right before tripping and unfairly receiving a double count from the referee. An incredulous Zerafa mocked the decision before swiftly taking matters into his own hands, punishing Dahlman further with a flurry of punches to the head. Standing corrected, the referee had no choice but to stop the fight and award Zerafa a TKO. While he would prefer to fight Tim Tszyu next, Zerafa said he was also prepared to settle for Nikita if need be — and show who's boss. "I believe I beat Nikita," he said. "Nikita's doing good things and beating who's in front of him and he's proving that he belongs at that level with me. "But I think there's a little bit more to do." If he really had his way, though, the WBC's soon-to-be fifth-ranked middleweight would prefer to be fighting internationally for boxing's biggest spoils than settling any scores in a domestic grudge match. "Overseas for a title eliminator, yeah, 100 per cent. Give me that," Zerafa said. "My dream was to be a world champion, not to fight one of the Tszyu brothers." AAP

Boks out to hit back after watching lineout video nasty
Boks out to hit back after watching lineout video nasty

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Boks out to hit back after watching lineout video nasty

South Africa's video analysis of their stunning 38-22 Rugby Championship defeat to Australia must have been a hard watch, not least the loss of five messy lineouts, normally such a reliable area of their game from which to launch attacks. The Wallabies managed to disrupt the Springboks' set-piece as they won at Ellis Park on Saturday for the first time in 62 years having rallied from 22-0 down in a second-half display for the ages. Springbok coach Rassie Erasmus has now rotated both locks from that game for the second Test against Australia in Cape Town on Saturday, with Lood de Jager and Eben Etzebeth both dropping to the bench. In come RG Snyman and Ruan Nortje, with Franco Mostert selected at flanker, but also a formidable lineout jumper. "All credit to Australia for how they handled the lineouts last week," Nortje told reporters on Wednesday. "It's not just the players who were on the field, all the locks sat together and made plans from the Sunday before the match. "So we need to ensure that we are more effective in that department this weekend. "We know we are much better than what we showed in Johannesburg, so it will be vital for us to stick to our plans this week and to go out there and be as physical as possible." Nortje, 27, is very much the junior in the Springbok lock collection, but has been impressive in his seven caps to date. "It's special for me to be part of this group of locks," he said. "Many of them have been my heroes since I started playing junior rugby, so I try to learn with each opportunity I get to play and train with them." Defending champions South Africa need a victory on Saturday to rekindle their title hopes with a tough two-match tour in New Zealand coming up next month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store