
Job Market Reveals Growing Risks For Marginalized Workers, And The Entire Economy
Based on the July 2025 jobs report and revisions to prior months, the softening of the U.S. job market poses growing challenges, especially for marginalized groups, exposing and exacerbating entrenched inequities.
The July report showed a troubling increase in unemployment for Black workers, with the overall Black unemployment rate rising to 7.2%, and Black women experiencing unemployment at 6.3%, their highest rates since 2021. Notably, unemployment among Black men spiked significantly from 5.2% in May to 6.9% in July, illustrating a spreading distress that often starts with the most vulnerable groups and then extends wider in the labor market. Single mothers saw unemployment rise to 6.5%, a near four-year high, highlighting a clear gendered and caregiving dimension to job loss during a weakening economy. The labor market is not only softening, but doing so unevenly — with marginalized groups less shielded from the downturn and with fewer opportunities for recovery or advancement than their counterparts.
Marginalized workers, particularly Black women and single mothers, are disproportionately affected by this downturn, compounding the 'last hired, first fired' dynamic and long-standing structural barriers. We see this acutely in this year's mass terminations among the federal workforce, which disproportionately affected probationary workers (typically newer hires), among whom women and people of color are overrepresented. For instance, women made up 72% of probationary workers in the Department of Education and 69% in Veterans Affairs, while people of color made up 65% of probationary workers in the Department of Treasury and 55% in Department of Housing and Urban Development.The loss of these jobs, and uncertainty on whether they will ever come back, given the gutting of many of these federal agencies, is a huge setback to economic equity, as public sector jobs have traditionally offered more accessible economic security and career mobility for Black communities. Compounding the issue, slow recovery in state and local government employment signals that these historically important avenues are no longer the steady pathway to middle-class life they once were.Beyond just the hit to government jobs, rising unemployment rates among marginalized groups often serve as an early warning signal for the broader economy because these workers typically occupy frontline, entry-level and lower-wage positions that are most sensitive to economic shifts. As layoffs and job losses mount in these groups, reduced consumer spending and weakened demand ripple outward, eventually impacting more privileged workers and sectors that depend on overall economic stability.In other words, when the most vulnerable among us lose ground, it is often a precursor to wider economic challenges that can disrupt prosperity across all demographics. Addressing inequities proactively not only supports communities hardest hit now, but also strengthens the resilience of the entire economy.Fortunately, there are several steps both the private and public sector can take to remedy what's already been lost, and mitigate future fallout.Business leaders should:Policymakers should:The July 2025 jobs report reveals heightened vulnerability for marginalized groups who face intersecting economic pressures, from racial disparities in unemployment to caregiving burdens exacerbating job loss. Both immediate business actions and sustained policy interventions are essential to offset the disproportionate toll, ensure equitable access to opportunity, and prevent further widening of long-term economic disparities.Whether it's frontline layoffs, public sector workforce cuts, or the steady drumbeat of rising joblessness among Black workers and single mothers, labor market trouble for marginalized groups is never just their story — it's the economy's story. These workers are often society's economic bellwethers. When their employment prospects worsen, it signals deeper fractures that, left unchecked, will eventually affect us all. Ignoring these early warning signs means not just failing the most vulnerable, but risking a broader economic downturn that harms even those who assume their jobs and finances are safe. If business leaders and policymakers read the writing on the wall now and act to shore up opportunity where it's eroding fastest, they won't just prevent further damage to marginalized communities — they'll strengthen the foundation for resilience and shared prosperity across the entire economy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown
Deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller on Wednesday railed against what he called 'stupid white hippies' who were protesting the federal crackdown on crime in the nation's capital and argued they did not represent the citizens of Washington, D.C. Miller, Vice President Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited Union Station on Wednesday, where National Guard troops have been stationed outside for days in a show of force near the transportation hub. 'We are not going to let the communists destroy a great American city, let alone the nation's capital,' Miller told the crowd near Shake Shack inside Union Station. 'And let's just also address another thing. All these demonstrators you've seen out here in recent days, all these elderly white hippies, they're not part of the city and never have been. And by the way, most of the citizens who live in Washington, D.C., are Black.' 'So we're going to ignore these stupid white hippies that all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old,' he added. 'And we're going to get back to the business of protecting the American people and the citizens of Washington, D.C.' The Trump administration earlier this month began surging federal law enforcement across parts of the district to crack down on what the White House said was an unacceptable level of crime, despite statistics showing violent crime has declined in the city. Last week, Trump took federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department and deployed hundreds of National Guard troops across the city to further the crack down on crime. The White House has said officers across the district have made more than 550 arrests since the surge in federal resources began on Aug. 7. But local residents have largely expressed disapproval with the aggressive moves from the federal government. A Washington Post-Schar School poll of 604 D.C. residents published Wednesday found 65 percent do not think Trump's actions will make the city safer. Roughly 80 percent of residents said they opposed Trump's executive order to federalize the city's police department.


Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump calls on Federal Reserve official to resign after ally accuses her of mortgage fraud
Pulte also charged in his letter that Cook has listed her condo in Atlanta, Georgia, for rent. Mortgages for homes used as principal residences typically carry lower interest rates than properties that are purchased to rent, Pulte's letter said. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The allegation represents another front in the Trump administration's attack on the Fed, which has yet to cut its key interest rate as Trump has demanded. If Cook were to step down, then the White House could nominate a replacement. And Trump has said he would only appoint people who would support lower rates. Advertisement The more members of the Fed's governing board that Trump can appoint, the more control he will be able to assert over the Fed, which has long been considered independent from day-to-day politics. Trump will be able to replace Chair Jerome Powell in May 2026, when Powell's term expires. Yet 12 members of the Fed's interest-rate setting committee have a vote on whether to raise or lower interest rates, so even replacing the Chair doesn't guarantee that Fed policy will shift the way Trump wants. Advertisement All seven members of the Fed's governing board, however, are able to vote on rate decisions. The other five voters include the president of the Fed's New York branch and a rotating group of four of the presidents of the Fed's other 11 regional branches. Trump appointed two members of the Fed's board in his first term, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman. Both dissented July 30 from the central bank's decision to keep its rate unchanged in favor of a rate cut. Another Fed governor, Adriana Kugler, stepped down unexpectedly Aug. 1, and Trump has appointed one of his economic advisers, Stephen Miran, to fill out the remainder of her term until January. If Trump is able to replace Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's board, as well as Kugler and Powell, that would give him a clear majority on the board of governors. Powell, however, could stay on the board after finishing his term as chair next May. The Federal Reserve declined to comment on the accusation. Trump has for months demanded that the Federal Reserve reduce the short-term interest rate it controls, which currently stands at about 4.3%. He has also repeatedly insulted Powell, who has said that the Fed would like to see more evidence of how the economy evolves in response to Trump's sweeping tariffs before making any moves. Powell has also said the duties threaten to raise inflation and slow growth. Advertisement Trump says that a lower rate would reduce the government's borrowing costs on $37 trillion in debt and boost the housing market by reducing mortgage rates. Yet mortgage borrowing costs do not always follow the Fed's rate decisions. The Trump administration has made similar claims of mortgage fraud against Democrats that Trump has attacked, including California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mississippi Supreme Court map violates Voting Rights Act, judge rules
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — A federal judge has ordered Mississippi to redraw its Supreme Court electoral map, after finding the map dilutes the power of Black voters. U.S. District Judge Sharion Aycock ruled the map, which was enacted in 1987, violates the Voting Rights Act and cannot be used in future elections. The Mississippi branch of the American Civil Liberties Union helped litigate the lawsuit, arguing the map cut Mississippi's Delta region — a historically Black area — in half. 'This win corrects a historic injustice," said Ari Savitzky, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU Voting Rights Project. "All Mississippians will benefit from fair district lines that give Black voters an equal voice — and new generations of Black leaders an equal chance to help shape the state's future by serving on the state's highest court.' The lawsuit, which was filed on April 25, 2022, argued the map diminished the Black vote in the Central District. Aycock's ruling notes that only four Black people have served on the Mississippi Supreme Court. All of them held the same seat in the Central District and were first appointed to the position by a sitting governor. Aycock wrote that she will impose a deadline for the Mississippi Legislature to create a new map. The Mississippi Secretary of State's office said it is reviewing the 105-page order and will consider appealing the decision. Solve the daily Crossword