Seven-year-old Chennai girl mauled by house owner's Pitbull dog, severely injured
The dog was subsequently caught and sent to a Corporation animal shelter, while Jothi was booked under sections 125 and 291 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act. Further investigation is underway.In another incident, a young girl was attacked by stray dogs while she was playing in her locality in Karnataka's Chitradurga district on July 19. The incident was caught on CCTV camera.The video of the incident showed two stray dogs chasing a girl, believed to be from six to nine-years-old, during daytime in a street of a residential colony. The footage captures the moment the child trips and falls while trying to flee, after which the dogs continue to attack her. The assault ends only when local residents rush to her aid. The visibly shaken girl could be seen crying and pleading for help.- Ends
IN THIS STORY#Tamil Nadu#Chennai
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Man sentenced to 20-years of rigorous imprisonment for kidnapping, raping minor girl
A city court sentenced a 22-year-old man to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment for kidnapping and raping a minor girl in May 2021, said police officers on Friday. The incident occurred on May 6, 2021. (Getty Images) The verdict was pronounced by additional sessions Judge Jasmine Sharma, who presides over a designated special fast-track court. The convict was found guilty under Sections 363 (kidnapping) and 366 (kidnapping with intent to compel marriage) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 6 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act. Along with the sentence, the court imposed a fine of ₹50,000 on the convict. Special public prosecutor Sunil Kumar Parmar said the time already spent by the accused in judicial custody will be deducted from the overall sentence, as per court orders. 'The incident occurred on May 6, 2021, when the victim, a Class IX student from a private school in Bilaspur, was found missing by her parents as she failed to leave for school,' Parmar said. After failing to locate her, her father lodged a missing person's complaint with the police. During the investigation, police learned that a man from the same neighbourhood had abducted the girl. However, tracking the duo proved difficult, as the girl did not have a mobile phone, and the accused refrained from using one to avoid detection, officers added. The victim was eventually rescued on July 4, 2021, from Hoshiarpur in Punjab, where she had been held captive. 'Based on her statement, the accused was arrested within hours from Panchgaon Chowk in Manesar,' Parmar said. Parmar added that the minor's medical examination confirmed she was raped multiple times. 'She testified against the accused in court and revealed he had lured her on the pretext of marriage. Other witnesses also supported the prosecution's case,' he said.
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Chhattisgarh High Court acquits man convicted for murdering kin on grounds of ‘legal insanity'
The Chhattisgarh High Court recently acquitted a 25-year-old man who was awarded a life sentence for murdering his father and grandmother, after his counsel was able to prove that the appellant was of unsound mind. Holding that Dhamtari resident Mahesh Verma, who had been convicted for the 2021 double murder, fitted the term legally insane, the court said that the Investigating Officer admitted that during the investigation, he did not procure any documents relating to psychiatric treatment of the accused from his family members. It further said that despite a preliminary report clearly referring to the appellant as a mental patient, no certificate from the treating psychiatrist was obtained, and the trial court merely relied on a report from the inquiry under Section 328 CrPC (which assesses competency to stand trial), not the mental status at the time of the act which is the legally relevant consideration under Section 22 BNS (or section 84 of the IPC referring to an Act by a person of unsound mind – Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, by reason of unsoundness of mind, is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary to law). The HC held that an accused who seeks exoneration from liability for an act under Section 84 has to prove legal insanity and not medical insanity. Legal insanity 'Since the term insanity or unsoundness of mind has not been defined in the Penal Code, it carries different meaning in different contexts and describes varying degrees of mental disorder. A distinction is to be made between legal insanity and medical insanity. The court is concerned with legal insanity and not with medical insanity,' the verdict delivered by Judge Bibhu Datta Guru and Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha said. Mahesh's counsel, Abhishek Sinha, had argued before the High Court that his client was suffering from insanity at the time, and a non-examination of his mental state created a serious infirmity in the case. Mr. Sinha said the accused had suffered a head injury during Covid 19 lockdown, and his mental state was not good, and he had been under treatment for the last year at Raipur Mmental Hospital. The incident On April 13, 2021, at around 11 pm, Mahesh, who was kept locked in his room because he was mentally unstable, demanded that his mother, Rekha, open the door so he could get water. His mother was fearful and did not open the door; she called her husband, Pannalal Verma, who subsequently opened the door. When his family asked him why he was creating a commotion, Mahesh said, 'I am Hanuman ji, Bajrang Bali, and Durga.' He then pushed away his mother and started attacking his father and grandmother, Triveni. His mother went to seek help from the neighbours but by the time she returned, Pannalal and Triveni were dead. The matter went to a Sessions court which convicted Mahesh for double murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment in February 2024.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Thane MACT Awards ₹87 Lakh Compensation in 2015 Road Accident Death
Thane: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Thane, awarded a compensation of Rs 87.13 lakh to the family of a 55-year-old school teacher who succumbed to injuries sustained in a road accident in 2015. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The tribunal, presided over by Member R.V. Mohite, held the driver of a tempo solely responsible for the mishap. The accident occurred on July 31, 2015, near Sunita Apartment in Ulhasnagar-3, when the teacher was riding his motorcycle. According to case records, a tempo driver suddenly opened the vehicle door, causing the motorcyclist to crash into it. The victim suffered a severe head injury and remained in a coma for nearly a year before passing away on July 31, 2016. The tribunal relied on various pieces of evidence, including the FIR, spot panchanama, medical records, and crucial CCTV footage, which was presented in court by the investigating officer. Although the registration numbers and identity were not clearly visible in the footage, the tribunal accepted corroborative statements, including that of the tempo owner, who confirmed the vehicle and driver involved. The tribunal rejected objections raised by the insurer, which challenged the admissibility of the CCTV footage and raised concerns about an alleged policy breach. Member of MACT, Mohite, ruled that strict evidentiary rules under BNS do not apply to claims under the Motor Vehicles Act, and there was no evidence of footage tampering. The court also dismissed the claim of a licensing issue, confirming there was no breach of the insurance policy. The deceased was a permanent teacher at a Ulhasnagar municipal school, earning Rs 63,594 per month. The court considered his income, age, and number of dependents to compute compensation. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The awarded amount includes loss of future income, future prospects, medical expenses, along with amounts for consortium, estate, funeral expenses, and love and affection. The tribunal directed the tempo owner and insurer to jointly and severally pay the total amount with 9% annual interest from the date of petition filing until full payment. The compensation will be distributed among the widow and two adult children of the deceased, with part of the amount to be invested in fixed deposits in nationalised banks.
