Lesaka Technologies acquires Bank Zero for R1. 09 billion, boosting its fintech capabilities
Image: AI Ron
Lesaka Technologies' share price shot up 17.1% Friday morning after announcing it has entered into a R1.091 billion agreement to acquire 100% of South Africa's digital lender, Bank Zero Mutual Bank.
The companies said Friday the acquisition will be settled through a combination of new shares—such that the shareholders of Bank Zero will own about 12% of Lesaka's shares at the time of completion of the proposed transaction—and up to R91 million in cash.
"The acquisition of Bank Zero is a transformative event in Lesaka's journey, enabling us to better serve our consumers, merchants, and enterprise clients by embedding a trusted, well-engineered neobank capability into our fintech platform,' said Lesaka chairman Ali Mazanderani in a statement.
"Our focus has always been on using technology to remove friction, lower costs, and challenge legacy banking norms. Joining forces with Lesaka allows us to accelerate that mission at scale—reaching more customers, faster. It represents a critical step for Lesaka and Bank Zero in realising new revenue streams, improving capital efficiency, and unlocking synergies across our ecosystem," said Bank Zero CEO Yatin Narsai.
The 12% stake is valued at about R1bn based on the R88.26 share price. The share price was trading at R81.99 on Friday monring. The selling shareholders of Bank Zero—which include its chairman Michael Jordaan, CEO Yatin Narsai, and other key members of the bank—will collectively hold a 12% stake in Lesaka.
The transaction is still subject to the regulatory approvals such as by the Prudential Authority and Competition Commission.
Bank Zero, founded in 2018, is built on modern technology on an app-driven platform and a zero-fee banking model, offering retail and commercial banking services.
As of the end of April 2025, Bank Zero had a deposit base in excess of R400m and more than 40 000 funded accounts across South Africa.
Bank Zero's digital banking infrastructure and its operational banking licence, together with Lesaka's fintech and distribution platform, would transform the way Lesaka is able to conduct business in the future, said Mazanderani.
These include better servicing of Lesaka's customers through full banking services, unlocking synergies and opportunities, accelerating innovation, and streamlining Lesaka's Consumer, Merchant, and Enterprise divisions—all enabling a shift in the financial profile of Lesaka and empowering the combined group to deliver greater value to consumers and businesses.
'Lesaka expects the transaction to support a more optimised balance sheet in the future, allowing the group to finance the existing and continued growth in lending books through customer deposits, driving stronger lending unit economics,' Lesaka said.
In addition, the reduction in the use of bank debt in the group's Consumer and Merchant divisions would help to deleverage Lesaka's debt. After the deal, Lesaka could achieve a more than R1bn reduction in debt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
GPAA refutes allegations of mismanagement amid scrutiny over office lease agreements
The GPAA is a government component which reports to the Minister of Finance and administers funds and schemes on behalf of the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF), the largest pension fund in Africa. Image: Sipplied The Government Pensions Administration Agency (GPAA) has refuted all allegations of mismanagement of funds, irregular procurement, and subvertion of governance processes. This comes after weekend reports that the GPAA paid R270 million to contractors for refurbishing a building it allegedly has no legal access to, linked to a 10-year office lease agreement estimated at R1 billion. The GPAA is a government agency that administers funds for the Government Employees Pension Fund, serving 1.7 million employees and pensioners. GPAA spokesperson, Mack Lewele, on Tuesday said the allegations were the subject of an ongoing audit process. Lekwele told Business Report that due to this process, the GPAA was not in a position to make pre-emptive statements as they may jeopardise the audit outcome. 'As stated previously, we reiterate that our process to procure the services mentioned was fair, transparent and competitive. Reports claiming that the GPAA committed R1bn to a fictitious building lease are wrong,' he said. 'While the GPAA is still committed to the investigation process and will rather not pre-empt its outcomes, we wish to strongly refute the falsehood about R1bn. This is not true even by any calculations of what would have been an annual cost of the rental over the intended number of years.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration said on Tuesday that it will summon the GPAA to appear before it and provide details about the circumstances surrounding the alleged 'ghost contract'. However, Lekwele said it was not true that there was no signed offer to purchase agreement between the bidder and the owner of the building. Lekwele said the GPAA awarded the bidder based on their satisfying the requirement to either own a building or be in possession of a signed offer to purchase agreement. 'This practice is standard in the property industry. The allegation of R270m paid for refurbishment is also factually incorrect and misleading,' he said. 'Thus, words like 'ghost', 'fictitious', etc. are simply intended to damage the individuals' and entity's reputation, and we request refraining from publishing such wrong information. We still appeal to all stakeholders to allow the process to complete, and as stated before, we will follow appropriate actions if the results point to any maladministration.' Meanwhile, the Public Servants Association (PSA) said it was alarmed by the alleged level of recklessness, criminality, disregard of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), and lack of proper governance at the GPAA in respect of payments for services not yet rendered. The PSA said it was aware of instructions being issued for prepayment of R11.9m out of R21m for the procurement of services whilst the GPAA has no current legal obligation to make such payment. The workers' union said the payment will further raise the risk of duplicate payments, especially given the absence of contract vetting, with the need to implement the GPAA's internal audit recommendation for proper contract review and project oversight. 'Proceeding with payment may thus result in the payment of potentially irregular or unlawful transactions. Section 57 of the PFMA obligates officials to prevent unauthorised, irregular, fruitless or wasteful expenditure. The Public Service Regulations further prohibit the execution of unlawful, unethical, or improper instruction,' said the PSA. 'The PSA is appalled by the highly irregular conduct of the relevant GPAA official demanding that these payments be made whilst being aware that these contrary to prevailing statutes and financial regulations. This conduct raises questions about who stands to benefit from such transactions. An internal audit recommendation is being ignored in a demonstration of an abuse of power and a lack of integrity.'
eNCA
6 days ago
- eNCA
Edward Kieswetter to exit revenue service
JOHANNESBURG - Commissioner Edward Kieswetter is negotiating his SARS exit once his contract ends. The Sunday Times has seen an internal letter to staff, mapping out the transition period when he leaves. READ: Discussion | SARS Commissioner Kieswetter talks on collections of over R1bn President Cyril Ramaphosa extended Kieswetter's contract by two years, before his initial five-year term that started in 2019, could expire. He was mandated with turning around the Revenue Service, after it was hollowed out under the leadership of Tom Moyane, during the State Capture years.
TimesLIVE
06-08-2025
- TimesLIVE
R400m and counting: public sector bosses cash in as SOEs flounder
MP and DA deputy spokesperson on public service and administration Leah Potgieter has criticised "rampant executive spending" across public entities. Portgieter said more than R400m is spent annually on executive salaries across 117 entities and likely more across the full landscape of nearly 700 state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The DA highlighted entities including: Transnet, where the CEO earns R8.5m despite operational failures and a R47bn bailout; The Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa paying its CEO R7.8m amid audit disclaimers and service collapse; The Road Accident Fund, where the CEO earns R7.1m even though the fund is technically insolvent; Rand Water, where ongoing service delivery failures contrast with the CEO's R5.4m remuneration. 'This reflects a broken system with weak oversight and eroded public accountability,' said Potgieter. The party called on the public service and administration minister to establish a standardised executive remuneration framework for public entities, enforce mandatory disclosure and justification when salary norms are exceeded and work with parliament on systemic governance reforms in line with public service principles. 'The excessive salaries remain not only unjustifiable but an affront to the millions of South Africans who rely on basic services that are consistently failing,' she said. This comes after a parliamentary reply shed light on the multi-million rand remuneration packages received by CEOs and top executives at SOEs and financial institutions. DA MP Jan Naudé de Villiers asked the finance minister to provide full details for the total remuneration, benefits and bonuses of CEOs and the most senior officials at state-owned and state-linked entities reporting to him. In his response the minister revealed total pay, benefits and performance bonuses of senior officials in public finance institutions such as the Development Bank of Southern Africa, the South African Revenue Service, the Financial Sector Conduct Authority and the Financial Services Providers (FAIS) ombud. He also revealed many operate outside the salary guidelines set by the department of public service and administration. The annual remuneration report from the 2023/24 office of the FAIS ombud showed five top executives earned a combined total of more than R9.5m. The highest-paid executive was CFO Shaun Maharaj, who earned a total package of R2.4m in 2023/24, including a base salary of R1.89m, a performance bonus of nearly R100,000 and other benefits. Ombud John Simpson earned R2.3m despite receiving no pension contribution or performance bonus. In the 2024/25 financial year, Maharaj's package increased to R2.7m including a performance bonus of more than R319,000 while Simpson's total package rose modestly to R2.5m. In his response the finance minister highlighted that the FAIS ombud does not follow department of public service and administration salary scales. 'The office operates in a highly specialised industry with a unique structure. Market remuneration benchmark survey data is used to determine internal pay scales using the Hay grading system.' The Development Bank of Southern Africa stood out as the highest payer with its CEO earning R10.5m in 2023/24, an amount that jumped to R15.5m in 2024/25. This includes guaranteed pay, allowances, benefits and variable pay. The minister confirmed bank is not governed by department of public service and administration remuneration limits. At the Financial Sector Conduct Authority, the commissioner earns a cost-to-company salary of R5.8mn which includes a monthly employer retirement fund contribution of R47,774 and he does not receive a bonus. The authority also falls outside of department of public service and administration control. 'Authority remuneration is cost-to-employer. There are no allowances and the bonus plan does not apply to the commissioner,' said the minister. The Government Employees Pension Fund pays its principal executive officer a base salary of R4m with additional allowances and retirement contributions bringing the total to R6.7m. For the 2023/24 financial year the executive also received short- and long-term incentive bonuses totalling R3.2m, pushing the overall remuneration above R9m. The minister said the fund also does not follow department of public service and administration remuneration rules, instead benchmarking against private sector norms. The Revenue Service commissioner received a guaranteed package of R8.2m with a R2m performance bonus paid in 2024/25 for the previous year's performance. A bonus of R2.4m was paid the year before. The minister said the service is governed by its own legislation and is not subject to the department of public service and administration guidelines. Several other state-linked entities also reported significant pay packages: C+South African Special Risks Insurance Association CEO: R4.6m basic salary and R1.8m bonus in 2023/24. Financial Intelligence Centre director: R3.6m package, no bonuses. Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors CEO: R4.78m. Land Bank CEO: R4.94m, with additional cellphone and petrol allowances. No bonuses paid yet for 2024/25. Ombud Council chief ombud: R2.93m salary plus R28,000 bonus in 2023/24. Entities which did report compliance with department of public service and administration guidelines are the Government Technical Advisory Centre, where the acting head earns R1.9m, and the government Pension Administration Agency, where the CEO earned R2.2m with no bonuses.
