GPAA refutes allegations of mismanagement amid scrutiny over office lease agreements
Image: Sipplied
The Government Pensions Administration Agency (GPAA) has refuted all allegations of mismanagement of funds, irregular procurement, and subvertion of governance processes.
This comes after weekend reports that the GPAA paid R270 million to contractors for refurbishing a building it allegedly has no legal access to, linked to a 10-year office lease agreement estimated at R1 billion.
The GPAA is a government agency that administers funds for the Government Employees Pension Fund, serving 1.7 million employees and pensioners.
GPAA spokesperson, Mack Lewele, on Tuesday said the allegations were the subject of an ongoing audit process.
Lekwele told Business Report that due to this process, the GPAA was not in a position to make pre-emptive statements as they may jeopardise the audit outcome.
'As stated previously, we reiterate that our process to procure the services mentioned was fair, transparent and competitive. Reports claiming that the GPAA committed R1bn to a fictitious building lease are wrong,' he said.
'While the GPAA is still committed to the investigation process and will rather not pre-empt its outcomes, we wish to strongly refute the falsehood about R1bn. This is not true even by any calculations of what would have been an annual cost of the rental over the intended number of years.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration said on Tuesday that it will summon the GPAA to appear before it and provide details about the circumstances surrounding the alleged 'ghost contract'.
However, Lekwele said it was not true that there was no signed offer to purchase agreement between the bidder and the owner of the building.
Lekwele said the GPAA awarded the bidder based on their satisfying the requirement to either own a building or be in possession of a signed offer to purchase agreement.
'This practice is standard in the property industry. The allegation of R270m paid for refurbishment is also factually incorrect and misleading,' he said.
'Thus, words like 'ghost', 'fictitious', etc. are simply intended to damage the individuals' and entity's reputation, and we request refraining from publishing such wrong information. We still appeal to all stakeholders to allow the process to complete, and as stated before, we will follow appropriate actions if the results point to any maladministration.'
Meanwhile, the Public Servants Association (PSA) said it was alarmed by the alleged level of recklessness, criminality, disregard of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), and lack of proper governance at the GPAA in respect of payments for services not yet rendered.
The PSA said it was aware of instructions being issued for prepayment of R11.9m out of R21m for the procurement of services whilst the GPAA has no current legal obligation to make such payment.
The workers' union said the payment will further raise the risk of duplicate payments, especially given the absence of contract vetting, with the need to implement the GPAA's internal audit recommendation for proper contract review and project oversight.
'Proceeding with payment may thus result in the payment of potentially irregular or unlawful transactions. Section 57 of the PFMA obligates officials to prevent unauthorised, irregular, fruitless or wasteful expenditure. The Public Service Regulations further prohibit the execution of unlawful, unethical, or improper instruction,' said the PSA.
'The PSA is appalled by the highly irregular conduct of the relevant GPAA official demanding that these payments be made whilst being aware that these contrary to prevailing statutes and financial regulations. This conduct raises questions about who stands to benefit from such transactions. An internal audit recommendation is being ignored in a demonstration of an abuse of power and a lack of integrity.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
KZN finance MEC says education department could be losing R1 billion annually to ghost workers
KwaZulu-Natal Finance MEC Francois Rodgers has launched a province-wide headcount to root out ghost workers Image: KZN Legislature KwaZulu-Natal Finance MEC Francois Rodgers has launched a province-wide headcount to root out ghost workers, nonexistent employees who continue to draw salaries, costing the Department of Education an estimated R1 billion each year. In an interview with broadcaster Newzroom Afrika, Rodgers said some teachers who had resigned, been dismissed or passed away were still receiving monthly payments. "Under the Department of Education, for some years now, a repeat finding is what we refer to as staff loans. Now, this is not teachers who go and take loans from the department, but it's teachers who, for whatever reason, exit the system," Rodgers said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading "They might pass away, they might resign, they might be dismissed, but they continue to receive remuneration, and it runs into hundreds of millions of rands, and this is ongoing. Now, the other challenge that we've picked up is ghost teachers, and this is where we're starting, with the Department of Education" Rodgers added that the problem could be costing the department around R1 billion per year. "Having a discussion with the MEC of Education, we would estimate that we're looking at about a billion rand per annum that could possibly be being swindled out of the Department of Education. "And that's why it's critically important for us now to undertake this assessment, and to make it an independent assessment, allow Treasury to take control with the Department of Education and do this particular assessment" Rodgers said the headcount would not be a simple manual exercise, but would make use of technology, including artificial intelligence, to verify the identity of government employees. "The manner in which we're going to do it is going to be not just a simple headcount, but it's going to be using new technology, IT linked with AI, and then comparing that to our PERSAL records, which is our personnel records,' he explained. IOL Business Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel
The South African
2 days ago
- The South African
Gayton McKenzie gives away FREE Springbok tickets
SA Rugby CEO Rian Oberholzer says the organisation has met its crowd and financial targets for Saturday's Rugby Championship opener between the Springboks and Wallabies at Ellis Park, despite the 62 000-seat stadium not being sold out. As of Friday, tickets remained available across several sections of the stadium, with prices ranging from R1 050 to R4 000, according to the official Ticketmaster website. The steep pricing has raised eyebrows, especially when compared with a full DStv subscription, which offers access to the entire Test series – including the second clash in Cape Town next weekend – for roughly the same cost as the cheapest match ticket. In an effort to boost attendance, the Department of Sports, Arts and Culture, led by Minister Gayton McKenzie, was distributing 2 000 free tickets as recently as Thursday morning. Speaking at Loftus Versfeld during the launch of Vodacom's new telecoms sponsorship deal with SA Rugby, Oberholzer claimed that the match had already met financial projections. 'We've hit our targets in terms of budgeting for the event,' said Oberholzer. 'When we did our forecasts, we worked on an 85% capacity. We're well over that. After the United Rugby Championship, we'll review our programme and how we drove it.' He added that any shortcomings in the campaign would be evaluated and addressed ahead of the 2026 season. 'If we've made any mistakes, we'll rectify them before the season starts next year.' Saturday's fixture continues a recent trend of under-capacity Springbok Test matches, following lukewarm ticket sales for July Tests against Italy in Pretoria and Port Elizabeth, and Georgia in Nelspruit. Despite this, SA Rugby maintains confidence in the Springboks' commercial pull. The team continues to generate strong TV viewership and remains a major drawcard following their 2023 Rugby World Cup victory. The final chance for local fans to watch the Springboks live in South Africa this year will come on 27 September, when they take on Argentina at Hollywoodbets Kings Park in Durban. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Homeowner vindicated after CoJ's ‘illegal use' property rates declared unlawful
High Court orders the City of Joburg to reverse all charges levied against a Randburg property since July 2019. The City of Johannesburg's (CoJ's) conduct in levying property rates on a Randburg woman's home, based on the tariff applicable to properties put to an illegal use, has been declared unlawful by the High Court in Johannesburg. Sylvia Maria Lampe has operated a home exercise studio for 42 years and was granted permission by the Randburg Town Council on 19 January 1984 to run her studio from the property. Some 25 years later in 2017, the CoJ, which had succeeded the Randburg Town Council's rights and obligations, determined that Lampe did not have its consent to operate her business on the premises. ALSO READ: Charged R1 083.63 on your City of Johannesburg bill this month? Here's why Court orders reversal of charges Judge Stuart Wilson on Thursday ordered the CoJ to reverse all charges levied on Lampe's municipal account since 1 July 2019, which were based on the claim that the property was being put to illegal use. Judge Wilson also interdicted and restrained the CoJ from continuing to levy property rates against Lampe's municipal account on this illegal property use basis. The CoJ must, within 30 days of the date of Judge Wilson's order, also furnish Lampe with a municipal account recalculated on the basis of his orders. The CoJ was further interdicted and restrained from terminating any services to Lampe's property on the basis of non-payment of municipal charges levied in contravention of Judge Wilson's order. The order granted against the CoJ reflects what Lampe applied for in her application. Judge Wilson criticised the CoJ, stating it had conducted itself throughout the litigation 'in an unresponsive and high-handed manner'. 'It failed seriously to oppose the bulk of Ms Lampe's claim. In the end, it pursued a far-fetched justification of one portion of the penalties it has imposed. 'Had the city engaged reasonably and sensibly with Ms Lampe from the outset, this application would never have been necessary,' he said. ALSO READ: Johannesburg homeowners uproar over soaring property rates Attempts to resolve consent issue Lampe sent two letters to the CoJ after it determined that she did not have its consent to operate her business from the property. She explained that her business was being operated in accordance with the licence she obtained from the Randburg Town Council in 1984 and that, accordingly, she did have the necessary consent to operate her business. Therefore, the property was not being put to an illegal use, and the notice should be withdrawn. Judge Wilson said those letters were ignored, and the CoJ in July 2019 increased the property rates levied against the property. Lampe told the court that from that month her municipal account included an additional R9 400 per month in rates and taxes. This was levied on the basis that the property was being put to an illegal use because the CoJ had not consented to its use as a home exercise studio. Lampe could not afford these charges and did not pay them, but she lodged a new application with the CoJ for consent to run her business from the property. ALSO READ: Bad news for business and property owners as municipal rates spike Electricity disconnected, later reversed by court The CoJ responded to Lampe's refusal to pay the additional rates by terminating her electricity supply and suing for the outstanding amounts. However, the electricity disconnection was reversed by order of Judge Bashier Vally on 5 March 2020. Judge Vally also ordered the parties to 'hold a debatement regarding the penalties charged' to Lampe within 30 days of his order. Judge Wilson said that this debatement never took place, with the CoJ taking the view it would simply proceed with its action to collect the rates it claimed were owed. Lampe's new consent use application from the CoJ was granted in October 2020. Judge Wilson said this seems to have triggered the withdrawal of the CoJ's action to collect the outstanding rates. But, Judge Wilson said the CoJ continued to levy enhanced rates and taxes against Lampe's property on the basis that it was being put to an illegal use, despite the CoJ itself having consented to the use of the property in October 2020. ALSO READ: City of Joburg, please get your house in order! Ongoing attempts to disconnect Lampe, in the meantime, had to fend off further attempts to disconnect her water and electricity supplies. Judge Wilson said the CoJ did not seriously oppose the relief sought by Lampe in respect of the illegal use charges levied on or after 20 October 2020, the date on which it gave its consent for the use of the property to run her business. He said the CoJ in its answering affidavit says that it is 'attending to reverse the penalty costs charged on and after 20 October 2020,' but highlighted that the answering affidavit was deposed on 6 September 2021. 'I have nothing before me that indicates that Ms Lampe's account has since actually been corrected to the extent the city concedes it should be. 'However, the city can suffer no prejudice from an order that it implements such a correction. If it has already done so, then so much the better,' he said. Judge Wilson said the only real dispute before him was whether Lampe is entitled to the reversal of the penalty charges levied between 1 July 2019 and 20 October 2020. ALSO READ: Huge rates shock could force Joburg schools to close down A 'far-fetched' proposition He said the CoJ maintained the property was being put to an illegal use during that time because its consent was not obtained until 20 October 2020, and that the penalty charges it levied against the property during that time were perfectly lawful. Judge Wilson disagreed, stressing the CoJ accepts that the consent the Randburg Town Council gave for the use of the property in 1984 binds it as the Randburg Town Council's successor in law. He said the CoJ also accepts that the Randburg Town Council granted Lampe a licence to use the property for the purposes to which she put it, and also that the licence was renewed annually for 10 years before being renewed indefinitely. Judge Wilson said the CoJ stakes its opposition to Lampe's application solely on the contention that she never applied for consent in terms of the Randburg Town Planning Scheme of 1976. The CoJ's point, as far as he understands it, seems to be that Lampe might have had a business licence from the Randburg Town Council but that did not mean the Randburg Town Council had consented to the use of the property in terms of its Town Planning Scheme of 1976. 'I find that proposition far-fetched. 'It beggars belief that the Randburg Town Council would have issued a business licence that authorised the illegal operation of Ms Lampe's business from the property nominated in the licence,' he said. Costs were awarded against the CoJ. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
