Kamala Harris Aide Claims Joe Biden Ruined Her Chances Against Trump: 'He Totally F**ked Us'
An aide for Kamala Harris during her presidential campaign last year blasted former President Joe Biden for the timing of his decision to drop out of the race, saying that he "totally f---ed us" by doing so too late.
The analysis by David Plouffe, who managed former president Barack Obama's successful 2008 run, is part of the book "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again."
Written by journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, it also includes claims that top aides for Biden hid his declining mental condition from the lower-level staff and discussed the potential need to use a wheelchair should he be elected for a second term.
Plouffe called the Harris campaign a "f---ing nightmare" and said "it's all Biden;" referring to the then-president's insistence to continue with his candidacy for over three weeks even after the disastrous debate against Donald Trump in which his mental acuity was put into question.
A passage of the upcoming book, obtained by The Guardian, details how Plouffe received calls from donors worried about Biden, leading him to ask White House officials whether they believed Biden could win the election. He was repeatedly told Biden could.
The book also quotes a senior aide who quit the White House because they did not think Biden should run saying that "we attempted to shield him from his own staff so many people didn't realize the extent of the decline beginning in 2023." Moreover, a Democratic strategist called the decision an "abomination" and said Biden "stole an election from the Democratic party" and "the American people."
Perhaps aware of the book's impact on his reputation, Biden gave two interviews last week to defend his course of action. He has also hired a communications strategist.
Original Sin also details a visit by Obama to the White House in 2023, warning Biden to "just make sure" he could beat Donald Trump. Other figures related to the party who expressed concern about Biden's ability to run included donor Ari Emanuel, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
Originally published on Latin Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Elon Musk Asks If It's Time for New Political Party Amid Feud With Donald Trump
Elon Musk has once again stirred political debate in the United States, this time by hinting at the creation of a new political party. The billionaire's move comes amid an escalating public feud with US President Donald Trump, raising questions about Musk's political ambitions and his influence over the American right. Elon Musk Posts Viral Poll on X On Friday, 6 June 2025, Musk posted a poll on his official X account asking: 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 The post quickly went viral, attracting over 89.4 million views and more than 5.6 million votes. At the time of writing, around 80.4% of respondents agreed that the United States needs a new party to represent the political centre, while 19.6% opposed the idea. Though the post did not mention Trump directly, the timing of the poll coincides with rising tensions between the Tesla boss and the US President. From Allies to Rivals: The Musk–Trump Breakdown Musk and Trump once maintained a close relationship, especially during Trump's campaign for a second term. Upon returning to the White House, Trump appointed Musk as a special government employee in a department ironically named the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. But the relationship has since soured. On Wednesday, 4 June, Musk was dismissed from his advisory role following repeated public criticisms of Trump's legislative agenda. In response, Musk took to X, claiming that Trump would not have won the election without his support. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51–49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote. Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Trump, speaking to media, appeared to accept that the relationship had collapsed. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' Trump said via NDTV. 'I don't know if we will anymore. I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' he added. Is Elon Musk Running for President? Despite the speculation, Musk has made no official statement about running for office. His recent poll and political commentary have reignited public interest, but the billionaire is legally ineligible to run for president. US law requires that presidential candidates be natural-born citizens. Musk, who was born in South Africa and became a US citizen in 2002, does not meet this requirement. However, this hasn't stopped his name from circulating in political circles. In 2024, several Democratic lawmakers labelled Musk the 'de facto' leader of the Republican Party, highlighting his growing influence over American politics and policy. What's Next for Musk in US Politics? Whether or not Musk intends to form a new party, his latest post signals a push to redefine political discourse. His call to represent the 'middle 80 percent' taps into widespread frustration with the polarised state of US politics. While a presidential bid remains off the table, Musk's political influence—fueled by his online reach, business empire, and media presence—continues to grow. With the 2028 election on the horizon, both Republicans and Democrats are likely to keep a close eye on his next move. Originally published on IBTimes UK
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
Musk's Rage 'Helps Bolster' GOP Senator's Efforts Against Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Lawmaker Says
Sen. Ron Johnson said Elon Musk's explosive criticism of Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending plan helps reinforce Republican opposition to the bill, which some in the GOP warn will worsen the federal deficit. The latest divide within the party comes as lawmakers debate Trump's so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill," a legislative package that his allies say fulfills campaign promises but that fiscal conservatives like Johnson argue is too costly. Musk's public meltdown over the bill, paired with his threats to oust supporters and revelations that he donated over $250 million to Trump's campaign, has further complicated the politics surrounding the measure, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported. In a series of social media posts this week, Musk claimed Trump wouldn't have been reelected without him, accused the former president of ties to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, and called for his impeachment. Trump fired back by threatening Musk's federal contracts and accusing him of trying to sabotage the legislation to protect electric vehicle tax breaks for Tesla. While Johnson welcomed Musk's support in questioning the bill's fiscal impact, other Republicans brushed off the feud. Rep. Derrick Van Orden called the dustup a "tempest in a teapot" and reiterated his loyalty to Trump. "I think it has an impact," Johnson said. "I think it helps bolster, certainly, my case that we have to address this." Rep. Tom Tiffany said Musk's input came too late to make a difference. Still, some lawmakers acknowledged that the billionaire's comments aren't helping the GOP unify behind the bill. Rep. Scott Fitzgerald said Musk's attacks weren't "helpful," and Rep. Troy Nehls accused Musk of having "lost [his] damn mind." Despite the fallout, Van Orden said the legislation will move forward and insisted Trump is still leading the GOP. Originally published on Latin Times
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
ICE Detained US Marshal Who Matched the 'General Description' of Person of Interest Inside Arizona Immigration Court
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained a deputy U.S. marshal inside the home of Arizona's immigration court after they matched the "general description" of a person of interest agents were looking for. "A Deputy US Marshal who fit the general description of a subject being sought by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) was briefly detained at a federal building in Tucson after entering the lobby of the building," the U.S. Marshals Service said in a statement obtained by the Arizona Daily Star. "The Deputy US Marshal's identity was quickly confirmed by other law enforcement officers, and he exited the building without incident," the statement continued. The incident reportedly took place in late May, sources told the Daily Star. The building the marshal was detained at both houses deputy U.S. marshals and the state's immigration court. ICE agents have begun turning to immigration courts across the country as spots to detain migrants they accuse of being in the country illegally. However, this incident has caused concern among legal experts as U.S. marshals work for the federal government. "It begs the question of what other situations are happening, what else aren't we hearing about regular people in the community getting mistakenly picked up?" Noah Schramm, a policy strategist with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Arizona, told the outlet. ICE has come under fire several times over the past few months after accidentally detaining American citizens and people in the country legally. One Maryland man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, made national headlines after he was mistakenly sent to a mega prison in El Salvador. The increase in detainments across the country came as part of President Donald Trump's campaign promise for "mass deportations." Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and Trump adviser Stephen Miller reportedly directed immigration officials to aim for 3,000 arrests per day. This past Tuesday alone, more than 2,200 individuals were detained. ICE has not publicly addressed the incident and the deputy marshal involved has not been identified. Originally published on Latin Times
