Fast-food fixer: 83-year-old Hungry Jack wants a five-minute plan for Domino's Pizza
Since then, it hasn't capitalised on the flash-in-the-pan success. Pizza sales have stalled. Profit predictions were downgraded three times in a year.
'It has been this huge growth story for a long time. The last two or three years hasn't [delivered] any growth,' said Tom Kierath, investment banking firm Barrenjoey's head of consumer research.
Investors fled the stock after van Dyck's resignation was announced, sending the share price to little over a tenth of that peak to $16.96. Cowin was aware of the need to reassure rattled shareholders, with van Dyck's departure coming so soon after Meij's. The billionaire businessman has a personal stake – 25.7 per cent – in fixing this.
'The business has got to do better. We're custodians of other people's money,' Cowin said. 'But to make this business successful, we have to have growth, and we have to do it now rather than on a long-term basis.'
What's gone wrong at Domino's?
Domino's problems didn't appear overnight. Many competitive edges that once made it a market leader have eroded over years. Meij sought to make Domino's website and app best-in-class, spending nearly $23 million in half a year alone on digital platforms.
The investment doesn't appear to have generated high returns.
'You had the Peloton bubble, you had the Lululemon bubble with everyone buying casual wear, and we had this Domino's bubble because they were digitally well advanced beyond anyone else,' said food industry consultant and Titanium Food director Suzee Brain.
'That gave them inflated confidence that they were the new flavour of the month. So they started some really massive expansion off the back of a false economy.'
The rapid store roll-out across Europe and Asia, once a major sales driver, was reversing. In Australia, Domino's couldn't keep the sales spurt they enjoyed during the pandemic.
'They weren't able to keep a lot of those customers, because there's another problem: the product is not all that great,' said Brain. 'They've never marketed it because they make great pizza … But now, it actually needs to be about the pizza.'
Domino's is facing a more competitive and diverse fast-food landscape in which players such as Guzman y Gomez and El Jannah are attracting younger customers and US chains Five Guys and Wingstop are keen for their slice of the market.
As Australia's dominant pizza chain, industry watchers believe Domino's must advocate more effectively for the entire pizza category.
Loading
'As part of your 'what we do for the kids for a family eating Sunday evening dinner' [considerations], does Domino's become part of the conversation more than it currently is? That's the opportunity,' said one industry analyst who declined to be named.
The business must become more profitable, Cowin has told investors. Ideally, this would happen through a sales uplift, but as there's no guarantee of that, costs need to be pulled out of the business. As delivery aggregators Uber Eats and DoorDash eat Domino's lunch, IT spending has been an early target.
'Our technology is not any better than Uber's and the other people that we have to deal with,' said Cowin. 'If you don't have a competitive advantage, let's stop trying to recreate the wheel.'
Franchisee profitability is a key priority for Domino's, with weekly store sales ranging from $30,000 to $100,000, Cowin revealed. But margins were eroded by the spurt of high inflation across ingredients such as cheese as well as wages, fuel and electricity. Meij tried to pass this on by imposing a 6 per cent delivery fee, which backfired with customers who punished the move by buying fewer pizzas.
'Relative price point becomes very important,' said Ten Cap co-founder and lead portfolio manager Jun Bei Liu. 'This price increase for the fast-food category was just so wrong.'
Several fund managers, stock pickers and analysts believe at least some dead weight needs to be shed. Domino's should sell France and exit Japan, said outspoken stockbroker Angus Aitken.
Barrenjoey's Keirath agrees. 'If they get Taiwan, right, is it going to move the dial? No, it's becoming a distraction. The same in Malaysia,' he said.
'What you do by staying in those markets is you dilute the core markets.'
Who's up for the job?
Recruitment is under way for Van Dyck's replacement. But they will have to be someone who will have to play by the rules laid out by Cowin, who has made it clear he wants to see rapid change.
Loading
'If you have a strong chair in place [who has] already said to the market, 'well, that guy is not there because he's not delivering on costs', then the next person has to subscribe to that view,' said Ten Cap's Liu.
'When you have to focus on costs, you got to be a tough person. You can't be a nice guy.'
There are plenty who think Domino's is still a good deal, such as Morningstar equity analyst Johannes Faul, who said the leadership instability has injected uncertainty in the short term but described the pizza chain as 'a robust brand of the future'.
'We do think Domino's still has growth ahead of it. Quite significantly so,' Faul said.
Aitken said there was still a 'huge mass market' for Domino's products. 'The demise of Domino's as a product is not apparent to us,' he said.
'We think backing the No.1 [quick-service restaurant] money-maker over 50 years, when he has no friends, is a great time to back Jack Cowin and Domino's.'
Turning things around could take three years. 'Jack might be in his 80s but he is hands-on and can fix this with the right team.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Firing people can't save Trump from the US economy's unflattering reality
In response, a group of statistical agencies that goes by the name The Friends of the Bureau of Labour Statistics released its own, more factual, statement that read: 'This escalates the President's unprecedented attack on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system. The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome news,' it said. It's also worth noting that the group statement was issued by William Beach, who was McEntarfer's Trump-appointed predecessor at the bureau. It's hard to overstate what Trump has done. Imagine if Anthony Albanese decided to sack the nation's chief statistician because the latest inflation data was not what the government wanted. There would, rightly, be an outcry. Naturally, the Trump apologists have been out defending the indefensible, ignoring the fact that the bureau has always revised job numbers (up and down), no matter the occupant of the White House. Last year, while Joe Biden was still in office, the bureau revised its jobs figures between January and July down by 340,000. But the single largest downward revision came in March and April 2020, during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the number of jobs was cut by almost 925,000. Loading Revisions are part and parcel of what the Bureau of Labour Statistics does. Every month it updates its numbers as it receives more information. The monthly release, plus the revisions, are vital to policymakers (like the Federal Reserve) and investors so they can see how the economy is travelling in as close to real time as possible. Ever since he declared a record crowd at his 2017 inauguration, Trump and reality have been at odds. In the grand scheme of things, crowd size does not really matter. But using a Sharpie to extend the expected landfall of a hurricane, gutting agencies responsible for tracking climate change, and ignoring employment data have very real consequences. Economists and policymakers have, for years, been worried about the statistics coming out of nations where the political leaders meddle with the numbers. In Argentina during the 1990s, the government fired bureaucrats who released less-than-flattering inflation figures and began releasing their own (sound familiar?). Understandably, this made international investors wary and increase their premiums as protection. By 2001, the government was in a full-blown debt crisis and defaulted on $US93 billion of debt. Greece, Turkey, Russia and China have also tried to play fast and loose with statistics over the years. It got to such a point in the case of China that outside economists used electricity consumption or satellite pictures taken at night (to see artificial light) as a de facto measure of GDP because their trust in the official numbers was so low. As financial analyst Ned Davis told The Wall Street Journal, ' Your initial thought is, 'Are we heading toward what you see in Latin America or Turkey, where if the data doesn't look good, you fire someone, and then eventually stop reporting it?'' Just a few days before McEntarfer's sacking, Trump was saying how great the economy was travelling – and demanding the Federal Reserve cut interest rates because it was going so well. Of course, the GDP figures did not show that (growth is slowing while inflation, at 2.7 per cent, is above the Fed's 2 per cent target rate). But Trump couldn't admit that, so he told his own story. Loading Around the same time, the president claimed that his government had cut pharmaceutical prices by '1200, 1300, 1400, 1500 per cent. I don't mean 50 per cent, I mean 1400, 1500 per cent'. And he's the one who thought the Bureau of Labour Statistics was making up numbers. The problem with making up your own numbers, or installing people who will make the numbers show what you want, is that they will be at odds with the lived experience of voters. Just as Biden struggled to convince Americans that the cost of living was getting better while they could see the price of everyday essentials going up, saying the economy is great to people lining up for unemployment benefits has a short shelf life. There's an adage used by economists to describe the models they use to understand the economy: Put crap in, and you get crap out.
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Firing people can't save Trump from the US economy's unflattering reality
In response, a group of statistical agencies that goes by the name The Friends of the Bureau of Labour Statistics released its own, more factual, statement that read: 'This escalates the President's unprecedented attack on the independence and integrity of the federal statistical system. The President seeks to blame someone for unwelcome news,' it said. It's also worth noting that the group statement was issued by William Beach, who was McEntarfer's Trump-appointed predecessor at the bureau. It's hard to overstate what Trump has done. Imagine if Anthony Albanese decided to sack the nation's chief statistician because the latest inflation data was not what the government wanted. There would, rightly, be an outcry. Naturally, the Trump apologists have been out defending the indefensible, ignoring the fact that the bureau has always revised job numbers (up and down), no matter the occupant of the White House. Last year, while Joe Biden was still in office, the bureau revised its jobs figures between January and July down by 340,000. But the single largest downward revision came in March and April 2020, during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the number of jobs was cut by almost 925,000. Loading Revisions are part and parcel of what the Bureau of Labour Statistics does. Every month it updates its numbers as it receives more information. The monthly release, plus the revisions, are vital to policymakers (like the Federal Reserve) and investors so they can see how the economy is travelling in as close to real time as possible. Ever since he declared a record crowd at his 2017 inauguration, Trump and reality have been at odds. In the grand scheme of things, crowd size does not really matter. But using a Sharpie to extend the expected landfall of a hurricane, gutting agencies responsible for tracking climate change, and ignoring employment data have very real consequences. Economists and policymakers have, for years, been worried about the statistics coming out of nations where the political leaders meddle with the numbers. In Argentina during the 1990s, the government fired bureaucrats who released less-than-flattering inflation figures and began releasing their own (sound familiar?). Understandably, this made international investors wary and increase their premiums as protection. By 2001, the government was in a full-blown debt crisis and defaulted on $US93 billion of debt. Greece, Turkey, Russia and China have also tried to play fast and loose with statistics over the years. It got to such a point in the case of China that outside economists used electricity consumption or satellite pictures taken at night (to see artificial light) as a de facto measure of GDP because their trust in the official numbers was so low. As financial analyst Ned Davis told The Wall Street Journal, ' Your initial thought is, 'Are we heading toward what you see in Latin America or Turkey, where if the data doesn't look good, you fire someone, and then eventually stop reporting it?'' Just a few days before McEntarfer's sacking, Trump was saying how great the economy was travelling – and demanding the Federal Reserve cut interest rates because it was going so well. Of course, the GDP figures did not show that (growth is slowing while inflation, at 2.7 per cent, is above the Fed's 2 per cent target rate). But Trump couldn't admit that, so he told his own story. Loading Around the same time, the president claimed that his government had cut pharmaceutical prices by '1200, 1300, 1400, 1500 per cent. I don't mean 50 per cent, I mean 1400, 1500 per cent'. And he's the one who thought the Bureau of Labour Statistics was making up numbers. The problem with making up your own numbers, or installing people who will make the numbers show what you want, is that they will be at odds with the lived experience of voters. Just as Biden struggled to convince Americans that the cost of living was getting better while they could see the price of everyday essentials going up, saying the economy is great to people lining up for unemployment benefits has a short shelf life. There's an adage used by economists to describe the models they use to understand the economy: Put crap in, and you get crap out.
Sydney Morning Herald
11 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
There are a lot of empty shops in the CBD, but two factors could be turning the tide
Brisbane's CBD has more than three times the retail vacancies of Sydney's city centre. About 18.3 per cent of all CBD sites in Brisbane – almost one in five – are unoccupied, according to new data from commercial real estate services company CBRE. In the NSW capital, that figure is just 5 per cent. In Melbourne, it's 6.9 per cent. But despite the high number of vacancies in Brisbane, the rate has been consistently ticking down since COVID. 'Particularly when we compare it to other east coast cities, office attendance in Brisbane is super strong,' said CBRE's head of retail and alternatives research, Kate Bailey. 'That's really helping to drive lunchtime trade and foot traffic volumes throughout the CBD, which is pushing up tenant demand and rents, and subsequently lowering vacancies.' The report found about 79 per cent of Brisbane workers attended the office most days. Wednesday was the busiest time of the week, with about 86 per cent coming in. Bailey said those numbers were buoyed by cheap public transport and new infrastructure, including the Kangaroo Point Bridge and Metro.
