logo
Pfluger's 'DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes Act' passes the House

Pfluger's 'DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes Act' passes the House

Yahoo08-05-2025
May 7—WASHINGTON, D.C. — Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11), Chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security's Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, on Wednesday had legislation pass through the U.S. House of Representatives.
Pfluger's "DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes Act" will defend American students from the Chinese Communist Party by prohibiting any Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding from flowing to universities that host a Confucius Institute or maintain a relationship with a Chinese entity of concern, a news release said.
Following the legislation's passage, Rep. Pfluger released the following statement:
"The Chinese Communist Party has proven to be an untrustworthy, adversarial actor by continually undermining American interests at every turn — in no world should they have a front-row seat in our classrooms funded by our own taxpayer dollars," Pfluger said. "The bipartisan passage of my legislation today sends a clear message: America's universities and research labs will no longer be used to steal critical research, recruit talent for Military-Civil fusion enterprises, conduct espionage, commit transnational repression, and influence academic institutions to the benefit of the CCP. This is a victory for our national security and future generations of Americans."
Several leaders in the U.S. House of Representatives also praised the passage of Pfluger's legislation:
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said, "House Republicans will not tolerate adversarial regimes, like the Chinese Communist Party, using propaganda to manipulate students, undermine academic institutions, and compromise national security. Higher education in America must remain free from foreign malign influence. I commend Rep. Pfluger for his leadership in protecting students and ensuring taxpayer dollars are not used to fund institutions that host Confucius Institutes or maintain ties to Chinese entities supporting CCP interests."
House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Mark Green said, "Beijing's malign influence should never have been allowed to reach American campuses. Chairman Pfluger's legislation will protect our universities from the CCP's efforts to steal American research and innovation, which Xi uses to undermine our nation's sovereignty," Chairman Green said. "After years of hard work by Chairman Pfluger, I look forward to getting this bill to the Senate and signed into law by President Trump. We must prevent American taxpayer dollars from funding our greatest geopolitical adversary's sinister ambitions."
Majority Leader Steve Scalise said, "For years, the Chinese Communist Party targeted the United States and our institutes of higher education in attempts to influence and exploit American classrooms and research. Specifically, Confucius Institutes were extensions of the CCP's influence network meant to conduct espionage in the U.S., impact academic institutions' decisions, push propaganda, and steal intellectual property and trade secrets. We cannot allow foreign adversaries to infiltrate U.S. education, participate in shaping the minds of America's future leaders, or allow them access to steal intellectual property. That is why we must ensure American institutions of higher education fully cut ties with these hostile entities or face consequences. I'm grateful to Rep. Pfluger for his leadership on this issue and for bringing legislation to protect our best and brightest."
House GOP Conference Chairwoman Lisa McClain said, "There's no place for Chinese propaganda in America. House Republicans are ending CCP influence on college campuses and ensuring taxpayer dollars are not funding foreign agendas. My colleague Rep. Pfluger has done a great job getting this bill to the finish line, and I'm proud to have voted YES to pass this bill and defend our students from harmful CCP influence."
Majority Whip Tom Emmer said, "We cannot allow the Chinese Communist Party to infiltrate and influence American schools without consequence—especially schools that are funded by taxpayer dollars. I thank Rep. Pfluger for leading a bill that rightly restricts federal funding to any institution of higher education that chooses to align with the CCP's anti-American agenda."
Confucius Institutes have historically been presented as centers for promoting Chinese language and culture, but unfortunately, they have proven to be far from that. Confucius Institutes have been used to steal critical research, recruit talent for Military-Civil fusion enterprises, conduct espionage, commit transnational repression, and influence academic institutions to the benefit of the CCP.
At their peak, the United States hosted approximately 118 Confucius Institutes, primarily at colleges and universities. There are fewer than 14 active Confucius Institutes today, but the danger remains. Many of these programs have rebranded themselves within universities with the same mission as before: to subvert national security and expand CCP influence operations.
Prior to its passage, Pfluger delivered remarks on the House floor highlighting these dangers and more to outline the critical need for this legislation.
Pfluger has led this legislation since the 117th Congress, reintroduced the "DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes Act, and held a CTI Subcommittee hearing to combat threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party to U.S. National Security. During the hearing, He had experts agree with the need for his legislation, stating that federal funding should be restricted from universities with Confucius institutes.
Following the hearing, Pfluger's legislation passed through the House Committee on Homeland Security's legislative markup with bipartisan support.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea minute ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.

Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style
Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style

The Hill

timea minute ago

  • The Hill

Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style

Vice President JD Vance criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Wednesday for trying to 'mimic' President Trump's style on social media. In an interview on Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle,' the vice president said Newsom's revamped approach to online messaging misses the 'fundamental genius' that has fueled Trump's appeal. 'This idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic Donald Trump's style — I think that ignores the fundamental genius of President Trump's political success,' Vance said, 'which is that he's authentic.' 'He just is who he is,' Vance added. The comments came after Fox News host Laura Ingraham noted Democrats 'are still doing their 2024 autopsy' and seem to have concluded that they need to be tougher and 'be more like Trump in tone' to win future elections. Vance said that lesson is misguided. 'Look, the autopsy for the Democrats — some free political advice from the president of the United States — is stop sounding like crazy people,' Vance said. 'That really is all it is.' 'You've got to be yourself,' Vance added after criticizing Newsom's approach. 'You've actually got to talk to people honestly about the issues. I don't think it's that complicated: Don't be a crazy person. Be authentic.' Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, in recent days has rolled out a revamped messaging strategy that mirrors Trump's signature social media style. The California governor has posted rants in all-caps letters, he's assigned nicknames to his political opponents, and he's referred to his legislative proposals and political rallies as 'beautiful.' While Newsom's approach has been embraced by many Democrats, who have struggled to find their footing since losing the 2024 election, the governor has faced criticism from some Republicans and Fox News hosts. 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ('RATINGS KING') SAVING AMERICA,' Newsom's office posted earlier this week, responding to that criticism.

California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push

The Hill

timea minute ago

  • The Hill

California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict California's congressional map. 'Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,' reads a brief order posted to the docket. Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters' approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election. Republicans' legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting effort. Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state's high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the redistricting effort. The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers' attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats' strategy would be 'comically absurd.' In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is 'not the end of this fight.' 'This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats' plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,' the statement reads. 'We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,' it continued.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store