Does Scotland get more bank holidays than England? Exact number Scots can expect each year
Over the weekend, the England women's national football team defeated Spain on penalties in the Euros final in Switzerland, prompting calls for the country to be given a Bank Holiday to celebrate the Lioness' success.
There was no Bank Holiday in place in 2022 when England's women lifted the Euros trophy for the first time, but Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who was the Leader of the Opposition at the time, backed calls for an extra day off.
However, in an apparent change of heart, the Prime Minister's spokesman has confirmed to the BBC that there are "no plans" for an extra Bank Holiday this Monday, July 28.
But speaking of Bank Holidays - does Scotland get more bank holidays than England? And what are the exact number of Bank Holidays Scots can expect each year?
Scotland has nine Bank Holidays in 2025, whereas England and Wales have eight. Scots enjoy one more Bank Holiday because of St Andrew's Day on Sunday, November 30, which gives us the day off on Monday, December 1.
Northern Ireland comes up trumps, though, with 10 bankers this year. This is because, unlike Scotland, the north mark St Patrick's Day on March 17, Battle of the Boyne (Orangemen's Day) on July 14, and Easter Monday on April 21.
England and Wales also have Easter Monday as a bank holiday, whereas Scotland doesn't. The day is not a nationwide Bank Holiday in Scotland. Instead, it's up to individual councils to decide whether to recognise it as a public holiday, often based on local tradition or custom. We do list Good Friday as a Bank Holiday, though.
This trend will continue into 2026, with Scotland, England and Wales, and Northern Ireland keeping the same number of Bank Holidays. However, there will be a change in Bank Holiday dates in 2026 and 2027.
Three 'substitute days' are being planned. While 2025 will have eight Bank Holidays, these won't all occur on the same dates in the next two years.
In 2026, most of the dates will largely stay the same. Across the UK, we'll enjoy time off on January 1, followed by an extended Easter weekend with a day off on April 3 for Good Friday.
England and Wales will have April 6 off for Easter Monday but this date does not apply to Scotland.
Nationwide days off will also happen on May 4, May 25, August 3 (August 31 for England and Wales) and December 25. Scotland will squeeze in another Bank Holiday between these dates - November 30 for St Andrew's Day.
However, Boxing Day, December 26, won't be recognised as a Bank Holiday next year as it falls on a Saturday. Instead, an additional substitute day off will be allocated on December 28.
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
In general, Bank Holidays in Scotland differ from local or public holidays, which are set by individual councils and can vary from place to place. Bank Holidays, on the other hand, are set at a national level – though not everyone is guaranteed the day off. There's also no legal requirement for businesses or banks to close on a Bank Holiday.
In fact, banks in Scotland typically follow the same holiday schedule as those in England and Wales.
If a bank holiday falls on a weekend, it's usually moved to a substitute weekday, typically the following Monday – to ensure people don't miss out.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reform poll delivers fresh blow to Starmer
New polling reveals that Reform voters largely prefer Jeremy Corbyn over Sir Keir Starmer across most metrics, despite Sir Keir's attempts to shift Labour to the right. The survey, conducted by Merlin Strategy for Novara Media, indicates Reform voters view Mr Corbyn as more authentic, honest, principled, and capable of radical decisions than Sir Keir. Sir Keir was only seen more favourably than Mr Corbyn regarding his standing on the world stage. The poll results coincide with Sir Keir's public approval rating reaching a new low, with many voters perceiving his government as chaotic. The findings follow Mr Corbyn's recent launch of a new political party with Zarah Sultana, which he claims has attracted over 600,000 sign-ups.
Daily Record
11 minutes ago
- Daily Record
UK holidaymakers face major change as new EU passport rules confirmed
The EU will roll out the new entry/exit system in the Schengen zones in October The UK Government today announced that the European Union's (EU) new Entry/Exit System (EES) will begin in October. The EES is a digital border control platform that will replace manual passport stamping for non-EU nationals entering the Schengen Area, including countries such as Spain and Greece. It forms part of the EU's broader digital transformation of border management, which aims to improve security, detect overstays, and streamline border procedures. Approved last week by the European Parliament with a vote of 572 to 42 (with 67 abstentions), the EES introduces biometric registration and automated entry logs at external EU borders According to from October 12, Brits will need to create a digital record on their first visit to the Schengen area, either at the port or airport on arrival. They will also be required to submit fingerprints and have their photos taken at dedicated booths. They may also be required to answer the Schengen Border Code questions. Travellers will not need to provide any information before arriving in a Schengen country. The travel insider, Ivaylo Danailov, CEO of SkyRefund, said: "While the Entry/Exit System is primarily about immigration control rather than security screening or boarding, it will still likely have an impact on overall passenger flow, especially at border control points. "Biometric capture and passport scanning should be able to process multiple passengers simultaneously and reduce border queues, helping passengers reach security and boarding gates more quickly. "Since the Exit/Entry system will hold recent travel history and biometric data, less time per passenger should be needed, especially for regular or low-risk travellers. "It also means airlines and border authorities will have more accurate, real-time information about who has entered or exited the Schengen area. "That should help reduce cases of denied boarding due to visa overstays or documentation issues, which can delay flight departures." Advice posted on states: "If you enter the Schengen area through the Port of Dover, Eurotunnel at Folkestone or St Pancras International, this information will be taken at the border, before you leave the UK. You may also need to provide either your fingerprint or photo when you leave the Schengen area. "EES may take each passenger a few extra minutes to complete so be prepared to wait longer than usual at the border once the system starts. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. "If you frequently travel to the Schengen area for work and/or leisure purposes, you must ensure that your total stay in the Schengen area is no more than 90 days in every 180 days. "You must be aware of the penalty and enforcement approach for exceeding the immigration limit in any individual Member State you plan to travel to, or through." The countries in the Schengen area are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.
BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
The delicate politics behind the UK's move on Palestine
Sir Keir Starmer is familiar with Emily Damari's ordeal. Over the 15 months that she was held hostage in Gaza, the prime minister mentioned her several times when talking about the war, including describing phone calls he held with her British mother Mandy when she did not know whether Emily was still alive. So it will no doubt feel unpleasant, to say the least, for the prime minister to find himself on the receiving end of sharp criticism from Emily today. Responding to Sir Keir's announcement that he was willing to recognise a Palestinian state in September, Ms Damari accused him of "moral failure".She said he risked "rewarding terror" and "prolonging the conflict". Her intervention echoed a statement from representatives of 10 hostages who are being held or have been held in Gaza, who are either British or have close ties to said that they took no position on the "wider politics" of the war, but they were concerned that the UK's new position would remove incentives for Hamas to sign up to a ceasefire and release the remaining hostages, because it could now make recognition of a Palestinian state less concern of the hostage families is based on one of the prevailing interpretations of what the prime minister said in Downing Street after Tuesday's emergency cabinet that UK recognition of Palestine would be determined only by whether Israel met various conditions in the intervening weeks: agreeing to a ceasefire, making it clear it will not annex the West Bank, taking "substantive steps" to end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, and committing to a long-term peace government sources today have been pointing additionally to another element of the prime minister's statement on Tuesday."Our message to the terrorists of Hamas is unchanged and unequivocal," he said. "They must immediately release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza."We will make an assessment in September on how far the parties have met these steps."Parties plural - that's to say, both Israel and Hamas. This, Downing Street sources argue, shows that the question of whether the UK ultimately presses ahead with recognition will be based not solely on Israel's actions but those of Hamas too, and means that their approach will not disincentivise Hamas to release the hostages after all. But that position has not been consistently articulated. For example, speaking to the BBC today, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said that "the ball is in the Israeli government's court". Asked whether recognition would still happen if Hamas is in control of Gaza in September, she replied by speaking only about the need for Israel to meet the government's conditions. The bottom line is this: nobody I have spoken to in Labour expects the government to do anything other than recognise Palestine in all the uncertainty about the precise conditions for getting there, and the mechanics of the assessment process the government will carry out, that is the significance of what Sir Keir said on that is a hugely significant shift in the UK's diplomatic posture, both across governments of different stripes, and compared to what this government was saying just a few days ago. Sir Keir has long said that he wants to recognise a Palestinian state, but only when it would make the biggest contribution to bringing about a two-state solution – which, it had generally been assumed, meant after the end of this delicate politics involved in changing position is one reason why the government has ended up in a slightly convoluted position was also undoubtedly involved in the government's decision to change course. Political gravity Sir Keir's own rhetoric, especially as regards the humanitarian situation in Gaza, has been publicly hardening for a little the mood of the parliamentary Labour party was moving faster. By the start of this week, more than half of Labour's MPs who don't hold government positions had signed a letter urging the government to recognise Palestine. Cabinet ministers were finding ways to let it be known that they agreed some in government, there was concern that when MPs return from their summer break in September, an opposition party would find a way to force a vote on the issue - and Starmer would have to climb down then, if he had not done so gravity was always going to take effect before long. There is a risk, though, that the government could fall between two stools. There are those, including some of those in Labour who have been pushing to recognise Palestine most loudly, who argue that if Palestinian statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people, then it should not be conditional on actions taken by the Israeli is also the position taken by the Liberal Democrats, the Green Party, and independents such as Jeremy the other side, there are those who argue that this is gesture politics, and statehood should not be entertained until Hamas has released the hostages - even though ultimately the Palestinian state the UK envisages would be governed by the Palestinian Authority, not Hamas. That's the position of a few in Labour, though more prominently of the Conservatives and Reform above all, a change in the government's position became inevitable because the middle of the Labour Party - those who have not necessarily always been vocal on this issue, and have generally backed Sir Keir's judgment - wanted a change. They are happy fragile political peace is based on a universal assumption that this is all merely a staging post to inevitable recognition of Palestine in just a few weeks. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
