logo
Argenica brain drug paces for FDA clearance

Argenica brain drug paces for FDA clearance

The Australian2 days ago
FDA provides clear path for Argenica to lift clinical hold on its ARG-007 stroke drug
Further clarification on safety of dose in humans and three additional in vitro lab studies requested
Company confident studies are straightforward and can be completed quickly
Special Report: Argenica Therapeutics now has a clear path forward to clear the clinical hold currently in place on its investigational new drug application that will enable clinical trials for its lead drug ARG-007.
In its full letter, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested additional information to provide assurance that proposed dosing for a US trial of ARG-007 in acute ischaemic stroke can be achieved safely in humans.
The FDA has also requested that Argenica Therapeutics (ASX:AGN) conduct three additional in vitro cell culture studies with clinical research organisations to address identified gaps in data.
AGN plans to use safety data from its Phase 2 acute ischaemic stroke trial, which will be available in September, as part of its response to the FDA's request for safety assurance.
It adds that three additional studies are small ones that can be completed quickly and build on existing data it has already generated.
'We are pleased to have received the clarification from the FDA as to the additional information required to progress the IND application,' managing director Dr Liz Dallimore said.
'Importantly from a timing and cost perspective, the requested additional in vitro assays are standard assays which are straightforward and efficient to perform.
'Argenica will work with the FDA to ensure the proposed approach to providing the additional information is adequate to lift the clinical hold.'
Preventing brain injury
During acute neurological events such as stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and hypoxic brain damage, around 1.9 million brain cells die for every minute that blood flow is halted.
AGN's ARG-007 is a synthetic peptide designed to protect brain cells from dying in the critical minutes and hours by protecting brain tissue during and after these events.
The company noted it was targeting acute ischaemic stroke as many patients that experienced it had a thrombectomy, where a radiologist inserts a catheter through the wrist or groin and guides it up into the brain to physically remove a clot.
However, this process has the risk of reperfusion injury, which occurs when blood flow rapidly returns to previously oxygen-deprived brain tissue after a clot is removed and potentially causes additional damage.
Dosing of patients in a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial of ARG-007 in acute ischaemic stroke patients was completed in April.
This involved 92 patients presenting to eight emergency departments around Australia with data-read out due in September with safety the main endpoint.
The secondary endpoint for the trial will examine efficacy, with a brain scan taken 48 hours post administration of either the placebo or ARG-007.
ARG-007 would be the first neuroprotective drug on the global market if approved, tapping into a large addressable global market for stroke and potentially other indications.
The global stroke management market was valued at $36.1 billion in 2022, and is projected to reach $74 bn by 2032, driven by several factors including a growing ageing population.
There are more than 45,000 strokes annually in Australia and 795,000 in the US – the world's largest healthcare markets.
This article was developed in collaboration with Argenica Therapeutics, a Stockhead advertiser at the time of publishing.
This article does not constitute financial product advice. You should consider obtaining independent advice before making any financial decisions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Should non-diabetics wear continuous glucose monitors?
Should non-diabetics wear continuous glucose monitors?

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

Should non-diabetics wear continuous glucose monitors?

Corrine Moore beams with pride and relief as she opens a graph on her phone, showing a steady line that reflects her blood sugar levels throughout the day. It is a rare event for the 25 year old, who has suffered from type 1 diabetes since she was two and constantly battles to keep her blood sugar levels within a safe range. The app she uses connects to a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) stuck to her arm, which takes measurements of her blood sugar every five minutes. The device not only gives her painless access to checking her blood sugar, but alerts her to rises and drops in her levels before they become dangerous. For Ms Moore, CGMs are part of a constant struggle to keep her body functioning, so she was surprised to scroll upon videos of non-diabetics wearing the devices in recent months. In an Instagram reel, a woman wearing a CGM explains how a morning coffee spiked her blood sugar by 2 millimoles per litre and how she avoided it the next time by going for a walk. The account tells viewers that reducing blood sugar spikes helps the body avoid storing fat, and directs them to an online paid "fatburner" academy. In other videos, self-described "biohackers" nervously install CGM's on their arms for the first time, and recount the information it gives them throughout the day. Ms Moore, whose blood sugar often spikes by more than 10mmol/L after a miscalculated or mistimed insulin dose, says it is frustrating to witness. "To me, that's a lifesaving medical device, to them it's to see what their sugar levels are doing after they eat a banana," Ms Moore says. Ms Moore says it is debilitating or fatal if diabetics do not constantly monitor their blood sugar and adjust it correctly, making it hard to watch people who do not carry the same mental load fret about small rises and drops in their glucose levels. "They make it look so easy-breezy but it's not for us [diabetics]," she says. "We don't want to desensitise how life-threatening diabetes can be, it can be quite scary." The ABC reached out to a number of content creators promoting usage of CGMs. Those who responded were adamant about the potential health benefits. But they insist diabetics should be granted priority access. "In the western world we have a culture of treating symptoms and treating disease," Curious Media director Steve Grace says. "I think everyone wants to move to more of a preventative style [of healthcare]." "If the device is available for purchase, why not allow broader use when it has clear preventative potential?" content creator Kylie Gulliver says. Some of the online content showing non-diabetic CGM users is linked to Vively, which launched in 2021 as "the first company in Australia to bring blood glucose monitoring to those without diabetes". Medical director and co-founder, Michelle Woolhouse, says the devices can help people lose weight by showing them how different foods and behaviours impact their bodies in real-time. "It's really about giving people an educational tool alongside lifestyle advice, that can help them to really feel empowered and understand what works for them," Dr Woolhouse says. She says the devices can also help people discover health issues prior to a diagnosis, such as pre-diabetes, and intervene before it gets worse. "A lot of people are recognising they have more metabolic dysfunction than they previously thought that they would," she says. Dr Woolhouse says peri-menopausal women are a large demographic of non-diabetic CGM users, using them to mitigate weight gain that occurs during a shift in their metabolism. In the wake of a recent shortage in type 2 treatment drug Ozempic, many diabetics such as Ms Moore remain nervous about weight-loss claims triggering demand and shortages in their supplies. However, the Therapeautic Goods Administration says it it not aware of any supply disruptions for CGMs. Dr Woolhouse says her company definitely considered the prospect of shortage, but says it is "not the case" in Australia. "Two new players have just been registered on the TGA, there's a lot of new CGMs coming onto the market," she says. Diabetes WA spokesperson Jessica Weiss says there is "plenty" of stock available but it is "challenging to say" whether the future supply could be affected by uptake from non-diabetics. Unsubsidised, CGMs generally cost about $200 — $300 per month. A limited quota of the devices is partially subsidised each year for type 1 diabetics, and they remain full price for type 2 diabetics, who continue to campaign for affordable access. Ms Weiss says without the right education, non-diabetics using CGMs could misunderstand what to expect from their bodies and set unrealistic targets around their glucose levels, develop increased anxiety or cut out certain types of foods. "You're getting a lot of information that you didn't previously have," she says. "For people without diabetes, our body does an excellent job of regulating our glucose levels. These highs and lows are very normal and very safe. She advises "a little bit of extra caution" when buying health-related products outside of conventional channels. On Vively's website, Dr Woolhouse says the research is "still early" on CGMs, and there is not yet solid evidence to say whether wearing one has any negative impact for non-diabetics. However, she insists her company provides comprehensive coaching by professionals to ensure clients interpret their readings correctly. "We do a lot of education in the app to help people really understand [the data]" she says. "We do find it can actually help people to understand the sources of their eating disorders, as they stabilise their blood glucose levels." Editor's Note: Reporter Brianna Melville has type 1 diabetes and uses a glucose monitor.

Bodybuilding champion dead at 37 in ‘unexpected' tragedy
Bodybuilding champion dead at 37 in ‘unexpected' tragedy

News.com.au

timea day ago

  • News.com.au

Bodybuilding champion dead at 37 in ‘unexpected' tragedy

Bodybuilding champion Hayley McNeff died on the weekend, with the news confirmed on Wednesday (Thursday AEST). She was 37, as the New York Post reports. According to an obituary published on the death of the young American was 'unexpected but peaceful.' Itauma vs Whyte & Goodman vs Ball | Sunday 17 August 3am AEST | Order this PPV event now with Main Event on Kayo Sports. 'Hayley was like a beam of light in this world. She had boundless energy and was very determined to achieve whatever she set out to do,' Hayley's dad, Dave, told People in a statement. 'She set her sights on bodybuilding and fitness and achieved the highest success that sector offered. She loved us and we love Hayley very much, we miss her madly.' McNeff's family is set to hold a service on Sunday and has asked for attendees to make a donation to the National Alliance on Mental Illness in McNeff's honour. Per the obituary, McNeff graduated from Concord-Carlisle High School and University of Massachusetts Amherst, and was an accomplished bodybuilder in the 2000s with state titles in Maryland and Delaware. She was also part of the 2005 documentary 'Raising the Bar', which highlights the world of the sport. 'The quest for getting huge will never end,' McNeff said about her career in the documentary. 'There's no limit. I hope there's a day that I'll be able to look in the mirror 100 per cent of the time and be like 'yeah man, I'm huge'.' After retirement from the sport, McNeff decided to pursue a graduate degree in psychology. 'She had a gift for making those around her laugh and feel welcomed,' the obituary reads. 'Her energy and determination was a constant in her life and she always accomplished what she set out to achieve. 'She treasured her friendships and nurtured strong, lasting relationships with those who knew her best. Hayley will be deeply missed by her parents, siblings, extended family and friends.' Upon hearing the news of McNeff's death, bodybuilding coach Dave Palumbo posted a tribute message on Instagram. 'I'm sad to hear of the passing of former woman bodybuilder @hayleysmash (HAYLEY MCNEFF) … she left us way too soon,' he wrote. 'She was a good soul, super intelligent and had tremendous potential as a bodybuilder. She appeared in @dave_pulcinella RAISING THE BAR videos back in the day and I was proud to be able to call her a friend. 'Prayers to her family and friends. R.I.P.' McNeff is one of many bodybuilders who have recently passed away. Zunila Hoyos Mendez died at 43 in June after she was killed in a hammer attack. A month prior, Gui Bull died at 30.

Tesla backflips on $30k battery repair after Musk steps in
Tesla backflips on $30k battery repair after Musk steps in

Daily Telegraph

timea day ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Tesla backflips on $30k battery repair after Musk steps in

Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Elon Musk has personally intervened after his company initially failed to assist a loyal Tesla customer in dealing with a costly recall fault. The drama began when X user Jessica Tetreau posted a tweet asking for a contact at Tesla management after her Tesla's battery seal failed. Jessica claimed that Tesla's warranty and insurance would not cover the issue, and Tesla Service indicated it was not their responsibility, despite her vehicle being under warranty at the time. MORE: Musk threat to leave Tesla, gets $42 billion Jessica claimed that Tesla's warranty and insurance would not cover the issue/AFP 'Does anyone here have a contact with Tesla management?' she wrote. 'My car has a recall on the battery seal and mine failed. Tesla Insurance won't cover it, and Tesla Service says it's not their problem either. 'They want $30k by the end of the week. I'm literally heartbroken and in tears. My car was $150k and this is an enormous stress for me.' Three days later, Elon Musk responded to her post from his personal X account, promising to 'investigate.' MORE: China unveils plan to smash Tesla in Aus Elon Musk responded to Jessica's tweet. Picture: Jessica's Tesla is reportedly worth US$150,000 ($231,000), and from the images shared online, it appears to be a Tesla Model S, a high-end electric sedan. The Model S, along with the Model X, is currently subject to a recall notice in the US for battery seal issues that could allow water to enter the high-voltage battery pack, potentially causing electrical failure. Jessica had a battery fault issue in her Tesla Model S. Picture: X/@JessicaTetreau Tesla wanted to charge Jessica $24,000 to repair her Tesla Model S. Picture: X/@JessicaTetreau MORE: Musk signs $25bn AI deal with tech giant According to Jessica, Tesla initially wanted to charge her US$24,200.98 to repair the battery fault, and before Musk's intervention, social media users criticised Tesla's customer service. 'That's criminal … I'm so sorry, Jessica. Tesla has fallen victim to the same greed they once criticised legacy automakers for,' one wrote. 'As a TSLA shareholder, service problems are a big reason I'm holding and not buying more,' another added. 'They're only going to get worse — they're not even a luxury car,' a third person claimed. After Musk's post, Tesla employees swarmed Jessica's thread, promising to have the car ready by the end of the week. Three days after Musk's promised investigation, Jessica confirmed that the Tesla was returned to working order. The swift resolution after Musk's public reply has ignited fresh debate about Tesla's customer service and whether a high-profile intervention from the billionaire CEO should be the only means for customers to receive adequate assistance. It has become increasingly common for frustrated Tesla owners to post complaints on X in hopes that Musk will see them. Many believe it's the only way to solve major problems related to their Teslas. Jessica with her repaired Tesla Model S. Picture: X/@JessicaTetreau One user on X said, 'It turns out you have a contact through X. Directly to the motha f***ing god of Tesla.' 'Would be nice if there was a way for people who get stuck in these binds to be able to escalate for resolution without requiring X,' another said. This isn't the first time Tesla owners have expressed dissatisfaction with the company's customer service, and it's certainly not the first time Elon Musk has personally intervened to address Tesla matters. Earlier in May, Elon Musk was forced to intervene again after a Tesla customer posted on X criticising Tesla's customer service as a 'failure.' That matter was resolved in just a few hours after Musk's involvement. Originally published as Elon Musk response sparks fury among Tesla community

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store