logo
Mains answer practice — GS 2: Questions on India–Canada educational diplomacy and Election Commission (Week 111)

Mains answer practice — GS 2: Questions on India–Canada educational diplomacy and Election Commission (Week 111)

Indian Express6 days ago
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative for the practice of Mains answer writing. It covers essential topics of static and dynamic parts of the UPSC Civil Services syllabus covered under various GS papers. This answer-writing practice is designed to help you as a value addition to your UPSC CSE Mains. Attempt today's answer writing on questions related to topics of GS-2 to check your progress.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for June 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
Discuss the potential clash between Election Commission discretion and the basic structure laid under Article 14 of the Constitution.
Discuss the implications for India–Canada educational diplomacy and for Indian students seeking global educational opportunities.
Introduction
— The introduction of the answer is essential and should be restricted to 3-5 lines. Remember, a one-liner is not a standard introduction.
— It may consist of basic information by giving some definitions from the trusted source and authentic facts.
Body
— It is the central part of the answer and one should understand the demand of the question to provide rich content.
— The answer must be preferably written as a mix of points and short paragraphs rather than using long paragraphs or just points.
— Using facts from authentic government sources makes your answer more comprehensive. Analysis is important based on the demand of the question, but do not over analyse.
— Underlining keywords gives you an edge over other candidates and enhances presentation of the answer.
— Using flowcharts/tree-diagram in the answers saves much time and boosts your score. However, it should be used logically and only where it is required.
Way forward/ conclusion
— The ending of the answer should be on a positive note and it should have a forward-looking approach. However, if you feel that an important problem must be highlighted, you may add it in your conclusion. Try not to repeat any point from body or introduction.
— You may use the findings of reports or surveys conducted at national and international levels, quotes etc. in your answers.
Self Evaluation
— It is the most important part of our Mains answer writing practice. UPSC Essentials will provide some guiding points or ideas as a thought process that will help you to evaluate your answers.
QUESTION 1: Discuss the potential clash between Election Commission discretion and the basic structure laid under Article 14 of the Constitution.
Note: This is not a model answer. It only provides you with thought process which you may incorporate into the answers.
Introduction:
— Four previous Chief Justices of India spoke before the Joint Committee of Parliament on the 'One Nation, One Election' (ONOE) Bill, highlighting the Election Commission's broad powers under the proposed law to organise simultaneous polls.
— Former Chief Justices J S Khehar and D Y Chandrachud questioned whether the EC's power to decide whether simultaneous polls can be delayed for a state is constitutionally permissible. They stressed that holding simultaneous polls is legitimate and would not undermine the Constitution's fundamental framework.
Body:
You may incorporate some of the following points in your answer:
— Ranjan Gogoi, a Rajya Sabha MP and former CJI, pointed out in March that the EC had been given broad powers to decide on the timing of simultaneous polls.
— The 129th Constitution Amendment Bill, which proposes to implement simultaneous polls, specifies that the EC will determine whether they are possible.
— The proposed amendment to Article 82 of the Constitution provides that… 'if the Election Commission is of the opinion that the elections to any Legislative Assembly cannot be conducted along with the general election to the House of the People, it may make a recommendation to the President, to declare by an order, that the election to that Legislative Assembly may be conducted at a later date.'
— Former CJIs have suggested amending the law to include parliamentary oversight over the EC's power to decide the schedule and also narrowing down the EC's powers to delay the schedule only on the grounds of 'public order or national security' to ensure that the power is not used arbitrarily.
Conclusion:
— Broad powers in legislation without sufficient safeguards could be deemed arbitrary by courts and be held violative of the right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.
— Article 14 of the Constitution of India states that 'The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India'.
(Source: Four ex-CJIs raise red flag: EC power to delay simultaneous elections may not pass muster)
Points to Ponder
Read about Article 14
Read about appointment and removal process of CJI
Read about Election Commission
Related Previous Year Questions
Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees, with particular reference to the ''One Nation–One Election'' principle. (2024)
Discuss the role of the Election Commission of India in the light of the evolution of the Model Code of Conduct. (2022)
QUESTION 2: Discuss the implications for India–Canada educational diplomacy and for Indian students seeking global educational opportunities.
Note: This is not a model answer. It only provides you with thought process which you may incorporate into the answers.
Introduction:
— In recent months, Canada has given significantly fewer student visas. In the first quarter of 2025, the government issued only 96,015 study permits, down from 1,21,070 in the same time last year, according to Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) data.
— Several students have blamed their rejections on the employment of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, claiming that AI-driven visa processing processes result in rejections without sufficient human assessment. While experts believe that AI could be the culprit, they point to a very different issue.
Body:
You may incorporate some of the following points in your answer:
— According to experts, the underlying issue is that hopefuls submit inadequately prepared AI-generated applications and fail to compile necessary documents and ensure academic coherence.
— They claim that many students and even study abroad consultants have become unduly reliant on AI to prepare visa-related documents, particularly Statements of Purpose (SOPs).
— While there are no clear instructions not to use AI for applications, experts say the technology produces similar, templated text, preventing candidates from differentiating out or seeming authentic.
— AI-generated SOPs, for example, frequently seem robotic, impersonal, and repetitious, raising red flags among visa officers who review these documents. Such SOPs also lack personal understanding or fail to make a clear connection between an applicant's past and future ambitions. Furthermore, relying on AI indicates a lack of seriousness and effort, which can jeopardise visa clearance chances.
Conclusion:
— In addition to a strong SOP, there is importance of detailed proof of funds with credible financial documents, as well as honest and accurate paperwork. Any mismatched or exaggerated claims, he warned, can lead to outright rejection.
(Source: How AI may be behind drop in student visas issued by Canada to Indians)
Points to Ponder
Read about India-Canada Relations
Read about trade between India and Canada
Recent developments between India and Canada
Related Previous Year Questions
The Indian diaspora has scaled new heights in the West. Describe its economic and political benefits for India. (2023)
'Indian diaspora has a decisive role to play in the politics and economy of America and European Countries'. Comment with examples. (2020)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 3 (Week 110)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 3 (Week 111)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 2 (Week 110)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 2 (Week 109)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 1 (Week 110)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 1 (Week 109)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump will 'crush economy' of India, China, Brazil with tariffs over Russian oil import: US Senator
Trump will 'crush economy' of India, China, Brazil with tariffs over Russian oil import: US Senator

First Post

time20 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump will 'crush economy' of India, China, Brazil with tariffs over Russian oil import: US Senator

US Senator Lindsey Graham has warned that Trump is planning tough economic action against countries still importing oil from Russia, naming India, China, and Brazil as top targets. read more Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enter a hall for a family photo before a plenary session of the BRICS 2024 Summit in Kazan, Russia, October 23, 2024. File Image/Reuters US Senator Lindsey Graham has said that President Donald Trump is preparing to slap hefty tariffs on nations continuing to buy Russian oil, with India, China, and Brazil in the crosshairs. Speaking to Fox News, Graham stated that Trump intends to impose a 100 per cent tariff on oil-related imports from these countries in a bid to choke off revenue to Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'Trump is going to impose tariffs on people that buy Russian oil – China, India, and Brazil,' Graham said, pointing out that these three nations are responsible for nearly 80 per cent of Russia's crude exports, which he claims are funding Moscow's war effort in Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Graham, the move is part of Trump's broader strategy to hold countries accountable for indirectly supporting Russia's war machine. 'President Trump's going to put a 100 per cent tariff on all those countries, punishing them for helping Putin,' he said. Graham said, 'You have played President Trump at your own peril. You made a major league mistake, and your economy is going to continue to be crushed. We're flowing weapons to Ukraine, so Ukraine will have the weapons to fight Putin back.' Senator Lindsey Graham accused Vladimir Putin of attempting to rebuild the Soviet empire by forcefully seizing neighboring nations. 'Putin is trying to reclaim countries that are not his,' Graham said, adding that the Russian leader has shown blatant disregard for international agreements. He pointed to Ukraine's decision in the mid-1990s to surrender over 1,700 nuclear weapons in exchange for security assurances, including a commitment from Russia to respect its sovereignty. 'Putin shattered that promise,' Graham noted, calling it a betrayal of the post-Cold War order.

Big blow to Donald Trump's Republican party as Florida Judge rules Miami election can't be delayed by a year
Big blow to Donald Trump's Republican party as Florida Judge rules Miami election can't be delayed by a year

Time of India

time20 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Big blow to Donald Trump's Republican party as Florida Judge rules Miami election can't be delayed by a year

Miami election was supposed to be held this fall but city authority has taken steps to postpone it to next year. However, a Florida court judge has intervened into the matter. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Miami city commissioners violated the Florida Constitution when they voted last month to postpone this fall's election to November 2026, a state judge ruled Monday, saying that such a change required voter approval. The judge, Valerie R. Manno Schurr of Florida's 11th Judicial Circuit, ruled in favor of Emilio T. González, a candidate for mayor. He sued in late June after the City Commission voted 3-2 to delay the election, a move it said was meant to save money and improve turnout. Critics noted that it would give elected city officials an extra year in office. The postponement had led to public outcry from candidates who had already filed to run, and from some voters who said the process had been Francis X. Suarez and one city commissioner, Joe Carollo, are supposed to leave office at the end of this year because of term limits. Carollo voted against postponing the election; Suarez signed the approved ordinance into three commissioners who voted to postpone the Miami election said at a meeting in June that doing so would align with the midterms, lowering the election costs and probably leading to higher turnout. Before their vote, James Uthmeier, Florida's Republican attorney general, opined that changing the election date without voter approval would be unlawful. Governor Ron DeSantis commissioners and the mayor cannot lawfully change the date of a municipal election by ordinance, the judge wrote. Postponing the election from an odd-numbered year to an even-numbered one amounted to amending the city's charter, which would require approval from the electorate, she judge cited the Miami-Dade County charter, which governs cities in the county, including Miami, under the Florida Constitution. Lawyers for the city had argued that the ordinance changed the city's code, not its charter. The judge dismissed that argument, saying what mattered was the decision's substantive effect."Our Constitution deals with the substance of matters, not mere semantics," she wrote. "The city's contention that its ordinance did not 'amend' its City Charter is nothing more than semantic sleight of hand."Manno Schurr dismissed the city's emergency request to toss out González's lawsuit and granted his request for summary judgment. The city immediately said it would fight the ruling.A1. Governor of Florida is Ron DeSantis.A2. Miami election was supposed to be held this fall but city authority has taken steps to postpone it to next year.

Melting pot bubbling
Melting pot bubbling

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Melting pot bubbling

New polls show majority of Americans are now against harsh action on immigration. That's good news 'Our policy to people born elsewhere should be clear: Enter by the law, or leave,' Trump wrote in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve. He won his second term after promising voters 'the largest deportation programme in American history', and started his presidency by signing an executive order titled 'Protecting the American People Against Invasion'. Trump struck a chord because US does have a major illegal immigration problem. There were over 11mn unauthorised residents by 2022, and roughly 1 in every 15 was Indian. India got a taste of his crackdown in Feb when the first Globemaster with 104 deportees touched down in Amritsar. And such flights have continued, with an average of 14,700 deportations worldwide every month. The number sounds big, but Obama was deporting 36,000 a month in 2013. What's different about Trump, though, is the noise and severity – people shamed and transported in cuffs. And America is sick of it, new polls this month show. A Gallup survey found that only 38% of Americans now support deporting all illegal immigrants, down from 47% last year. In fact, 78% are all for letting them become citizens. Why? Because the ordinary American recognises that the vast majority of illegal immigrants, who have lived for years in America without causing trouble, are useful. Now, a CNN poll also shows the majority of Americans (55%) think Trump has gone too far on deportations. They don't want any more detention centres, and 59% are against detaining illegal immigrants who have lived in America for years. Trump should pay heed to these voices, especially when the mood against immigration in his own Republican camp is changing fast – only 48% now want less immigration, as against 88% last year. Throwing out millions of settled workers would be disruptive for the US economy, and also for their home countries. Indians who have invested their wealth and time to build a life in America, after entering without authorisation, may draw some hope from these developments. So can students and professionals who have been waiting to study and work in America legally. And if Trump relents, America can go back to being the land of opportunity. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store