Dollar drifts as investors ponder Fed independence ahead of Powell speech
Trump called on Fed Governor Lisa Cook to resign on the basis of allegations made by one of his political allies about mortgages she holds in Michigan and Georgia, intensifying his effort to gain influence over the U.S. central bank.
Cook said she had "no intention of being bullied to step down" from her position at the central bank. Trump has also told aides he is considering trying to fire Cook, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.
"It has the potential to raise questions around the Fed's oversight and regulatory functions but it has little to no near-term monetary policy implications," said Prashant Newnaha, senior Asia-Pacific rates strategist at TD Securities.
That explained the relatively muted reaction in the currency markets to the news as the dollar initially dipped on the news but was mostly calm into the Asian session.
The Japanese yen held onto gains made in previous sessions and was little changed at 147.41 per dollar, while the euro was steady at $1.1642. Sterling last fetched $1.34535.
That left the dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against six other peers, steady at 98.301.
Trump has repeatedly criticized Powell for being too slow to cut rates, stoking investor worries about the central bank's independence and its credibility.
Investors expect Trump will replace Powell with a more dovish appointment when his term ends in May. Trump earlier this month said he would nominate Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran to serve out the final few months of a vacant Fed seat after Adriana Kugler unexpectedly resigned.
Kristina Clifton, a senior economist at the Commonwealth Bank of Australia in Sydney, said if Cook resigns it would create another opening for Trump to appoint a Fed Governor who will vote to lower interest rates.
"Perceived political interference in the Federal Reserve can undermine its independence, steepening the yield curve and denting the USD's safe haven status."
The main focus this week has been on whether Powell will push back against market expectations for a rate cut at the Fed's September 16-17 meeting when he speaks on Friday at the Jackson Hole meeting, following a weak jobs report for July.
"Markets are adamant that recent labor market data necessitates some policy calibration and are expecting Chair Powell to tip his hat in that direction," TD's Newnaha said.
Traders are pricing in an 82% chance of a 25-basis-point rate cut next month, CME FedWatch tool showed. While the odds have lowered from last week after hotter than expected producer price inflation tempered expectations, investors are still pricing in over 50 bps of easing this year.
Some analysts cautioned that markets could end up being disappointed by Powell's speech, noting that the impact of Trump's tariffs on inflation remains uncertain.
"It is not clear that Powell will deliver strong guidance," said Benoit Anne, managing director in the investment solutions group at MFS Investment Management. If the dovish signals elude us, there will be significant pricing out of the odds for a September cut."
In other currencies, the New Zealand dollar was nursing steep overnight losses at $0.58205 after diving 1.2% to its lowest level since April. New Zealand's central bank cut interest rates on Wednesday as expected but left the door wide open to yet more easing if needed.
The Australian dollar eased 0.13% to $0.64245, hovering near a two-week low.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed officials lukewarm on September rate cut as markets await Powell speech
By Michael S. Derby and Howard Schneider NEW YORK (Reuters) -Three Federal Reserve officials appeared lukewarm on Thursday to the idea of an interest rate cut next month, as investors geared up for U.S. central bank chief Jerome Powell's speech to the annual Jackson Hole conference in Wyoming. "I walk into every meeting with an open mind," Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack said in an interview with Yahoo Finance on the sidelines of the three-day symposium, which is hosted by the Kansas City Fed. "But with the data I have right now and with the information I have, if the meeting was tomorrow, I would not see a case for reducing interest rates," Hammack said. Speaking on CNBC, Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid said, "I think we're in a really good spot and I think we really have to have very definitive data to be moving that policy right now." In a separate public appearance, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic said he still has a rate cut penciled in for this year, but added that any forecast is surrounded by uncertainty and "I'm not stuck on anything." The three Fed officials spoke ahead of Powell's highly anticipated keynote address on Friday, which investors hope will offer firm clues on whether the central bank plans to cut rates at its September 16-17 meeting. Financial markets are betting that the Fed will lower its benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point at the meeting next month, and it's possible that Powell will in fact send such a signal. Unexpectedly weak July hiring data coupled with big downward revisions to hiring in May and June bolstered hopes of a coming reduction in borrowing costs. Futures markets currently put a 70% probability on a quarter-percentage cut next month in the Fed's policy rate, currently set in the 4.25%-4.50% range, Goldman Sachs researchers said they did not expect Powell's remarks on Friday "to decisively signal a September cut, but the speech should make it clear to markets that he is likely to support one." TWO-SIDED RISKS The challenge for Fed policymakers is that even as there have been signs of labor market weakening, which on its own would call for lower rates, inflation remains above the central bank's 2% target and could well go higher due to the Trump administration's aggressive hiking of tariffs on imports. Although the tariffs are widely expected to increase prices, that effect is only starting to be seen in the data. There's an active debate within the Fed as to whether any jump in inflation will be a one-off hit that can be ignored by policymakers, or the making of something more persistent. "My biggest concern is that inflation has been too high for the past four years, and right now it's been trending in the wrong direction," Hammack said. She added that firms have been trying to hold off on tariff-related price hikes, but that trend can only go on for so long. Hammack added that the full impact of the tariffs won't be known until next year. Some Fed policymakers, including Governor Christopher Waller, have argued that everything the economics profession knows about tariffs suggests the hit will be a one-time adjustment. But Hammack noted in her interview that "theory and practice can be quite different," underscoring her caution about a rate cut now. Atlanta Fed economists said in a report released on Thursday that "we find evidence for the potential of tariffs to touch off another bout of high inflation," in part because even firms that are not exposed to tariff costs are expecting stronger price pressures. Schmid noted in his interview that with inflation well above the Fed's target, officials would need to take into account how reducing rates now might influence public expectations. "I think we've got to be careful about what lowering short-term rates would do to the inflation mentality," he said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This is the key takeaway from fresh jobless claims data
StoneX senior adviser Jon Hilsenrath and Yahoo Finance Markets Reporter Josh Schafer join Market Catalysts with Julie Hyman to discuss what fresh jobless claims data and other economic indicators might indicate for the Federal Reserve's interest rate cut path going into the September FOMC meeting. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. we did get jobless claims today. What does that tell us about the bigger jobs picture and maybe presage what we might hear in the next jobs report? Yeah, so you you saw a little increase in the weekly jobless claims to mid 230,000 level. That is not a level that economists would normally flag is overly concerning. And that number really hasn't been creeping higher in the past couple weeks as it had been earlier this year. But the key takeaway from actually for me was the continuing claims number, right? The amount of Americans that continue to file for unemployment benefits every single week. That hit another cycle high at its highest level since November of 2021. That is sort of one of those data points that is in the the Fed should be cutting camp. You have a lot of economists flagging that, but essentially what it's telling you is it's taking Americans longer and longer to come back into the labor market to be able to find a new job. So it's one of those small signs of weakness and perhaps some economists coming out this morning that we were tracking some some predictions that might indicate you get a 4.3% unemployment rate in that August non-farm payrolls report. That's going to come out at the end of next week or maybe the week after. I might have my dates wrong there. A week after. A week after. But it will be coming out soon, right? And sort of the key to that report obviously is if you get the week August non-farm payrolls report, probably supports a cut in September. Some economists would argue that if it's particularly weak, it might support a 50 basis point cut. That's not really where the market's at right now, but that is one of the risks that's out there. Well, but then there's the the rock and the hard place situation, right, John? Because, you know, we got the jobless claims data today, but we also got a manufacturing uh purchasing manager's index from S&P Global that was the highest in several years. So, you know, which would indicate maybe some upward pricing pressure. We heard from Walmart today, which indicated that its margins are getting squeezed a little bit because it's having to offer bargains to get people through the door. But that means it's swallowing some of the cost of tariffs. So the Fed, you know, is is is stuck between those dual mandates, perhaps. It's it's it's a tough spot. That S&P Global report you mentioned did actually show that prices paid in manufacturing are rising. You're seeing an upward trend there. You know, I think what Josh described uh very accurately is a labor market where I I would say we have labor hoarding. Companies aren't very aggressively firing workers because things could turn up. Uh but they're not all they're also not aggressively hiring workers. So you have this like uh stasis in the job market. And you know, I think for me the description of where the economy is is a a mild stagflation. So there's just been a lot of uncertainty about how tariff policy plays out, how immigration policy plays out, uh on fiscal policy. And so uh we're seeing some upwards some rebuilding of price pressures on the inflation side and the labor market isn't going very far. So the Fed is not really in a position to move very aggressively. My analogy for how uh Jay Powell is going to manage his last walk through Jackson Hole is small steps. You know, when you're going up or down in uh treacherous terrain, you take small steps and make sure you don't fall over. So he'll acknowledge this shifting uh environment. He'll keep the door open to rate cuts as long as there's no big surprise in the next round of data, but he's not going to encourage people to think that the Fed is going into a much easier mode. Related Videos Existing home sales' July upswing: What it means for housing US Jobless Claims Rise to 235,000, Continuing Claims Climb July retail sales rise 0.5%: What it means for the Fed Why Target can't keep up with Walmart's growth Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
A ban on mail-in ballots would deny me the ability to vote
Regarding the Aug. 19 news article 'Trump says he will seek to eliminate mail-in voting': I was a surgeon for over 40 years, and on numerous occasions my work schedule kept me from being able to vote in general elections. Early-morning surgeries started before polls opened, and emergencies always had to come first even if I had scheduled time to vote. I couldn't vote absentee because I was in town. Mail-in ballots allowed me to lend my vote and voice to the election.
