US, China hold new talks on tariff truce extension, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
US Treasury Chief Scott Bessent was part of a US negotiating team that entered Rosenbad, the Swedish prime minister's office in central Stockholm in early afternoon. China's Vice Premier He Lifeng was also seen arriving at the venue on video footage.
China is facing an Aug 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals.
Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from US duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said that he did not expect "some kind of enormous breakthrough today" at the talks in Stockholm that he was attending.
"What I expect is continued monitoring and checking in on the implementation of our agreement thus far, making sure that key critical minerals are flowing between the parties and setting the groundwork for enhanced trade and balanced trade going forward," he told CNBC.
The Stockholm talks come hot on the heels of Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods exports to the United States, including autos.
Trade analysts said that another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May between China and the United States was likely.
An extension would facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November.
The Financial Times reported on Monday that the US had paused curbs on tech exports to China to avoid disrupting trade talks with Beijing and support Trump's efforts to secure a meeting with Xi this year.
DEEPER ISSUES
Previous US-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing US and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States.
So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include US complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that US national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth.
"Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place," said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption – a decades-long goal for US policymakers.
Analysts say the US-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time.
China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on US industries.
In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Malaysia businesses respond to latest Trump tariff announcement
Businesses in Malaysia remain cautious despite the decision by the US to reduce tariffs on Malaysian imports. But the reduction at least helps the overall cost competitiveness of Malaysian-manufactured goods in the US market. Businesses and manufacturers are also bracing for higher operating costs and potential price hikes. Afifah Ariffin reports.
CNA
18 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: How the US weaponised Pakistan against India
NEW DELHI: Many in New Delhi welcomed President Donald Trump's return to power, expecting him to take the Indo-US relationship to new heights. They must wonder where it all went wrong, given that Trump launched an unprecedented broadside against India this week – threatening tariffs of 25 per cent and warning that a surcharge would be added unless India stops buying Russian oil and weapons. He even expressed dissatisfaction with the nation's participation in the 'anti-US' BRICS grouping. Normally, Prime Minister Narendra Modi might just overlook a few social media posts. It may be humiliating to wind up with higher tariff rates than India's peers after wooing Trump, but that can be shrugged off as well. Yet the president didn't stop at trade. He twisted the knife by announcing a tariff deal with Pakistan on the very same day – and added that US companies would help India's troubled neighbour extract oil from recently discovered reserves, and that 'maybe they'll be selling oil to India one day.' I'm not sure Trump knows what he's playing with. Yes, the government was looking forward to a more transactional era: For New Delhi, almost everything is negotiable. But not its relationship with Pakistan. Citizens already resented Trump claiming credit for a ceasefire between the nuclear-armed nations earlier this year. Nothing is more likely to cause any Indian leader to dig in his heels and stop talking about economic ties than a mention of Pakistan. INDIA HAS LITTLE LEVERAGE Policymakers are grimly absorbing some unpalatable truths. Has New Delhi overestimated its geopolitical importance? The tariff threat was bad enough: 25 per cent is higher than the 19 per cent agreed with the Philippines and Indonesia, and much higher than the 15 per cent offered to US allies like the European Union, Korea and Japan. For some reason, India expected it was so indispensable to the US that it would receive a better deal than long-term allies – even one that preserved the barriers it has erected around industry and agriculture. Instead, unless it gives away far more than planned, it might wind up as one of the few countries that emerged from Trump's tariff 'pause' with a higher, not lower rate than was originally threatened. New Delhi has learned, too late, that it has very little actual leverage in Washington. The Chinese may be granted another extension because they have things that they can threaten the US economy with. The Europeans and East Asians can promise to buy American-made weaponry or invest in the US. India can neither threaten nor bribe. For years, it has nevertheless managed to punch above its actual economic weight by tacitly promising to be part of Washington-led attempts to contain a rising China. Tacitly, not openly, mind – India doesn't believe that closeness to the US precludes it from participating in China-dominated groupings or supporting Beijing's clients in Moscow. But Trump's ire demonstrates that this balancing act has may finally have run its course. Russia might not be his top priority, but its second-largest client's refusal to fall in line will still irritate him. He received fulsome praise from Pakistan's leaders after he announced a ceasefire; the Indians pointedly ignored him. This White House wants homage, not defiance. There was certainly a cantankerous edge to his remark that, for all he cared, India and Russia could 'take their dead economies down together'. INDIA'S US POLICY IS IN SHAMBLES Had he merely demanded more distance between Delhi and Moscow – and done so, if possible, without insulting India's economic prospects – leaders might well have quietly given in. The discount on Russian oil is only between US$6 and US$10 a barrel, and according to research from Standard Chartered, the impact on inflation of switching to US sources would be negligible. Sure, the government would have to somehow convince its nationalist base that the switch would be in the country's interest after spending two years claiming the opposite. But trust in the prime minister is high enough for him to pull that off. What voters won't accept, however, is any dilution of the government's hard line on Pakistan. Capitulation to Trump after he has signalled he prefers their neighbours would be a tough sell, even for Modi. In less than 24 hours, New Delhi's policy for the Trump era, and its carefully cultivated strategic ambiguity amid US-China tension, were both left in shambles. I expect Modi will still be able to push through some sort of deal, if with more concessions and domestic political damage than he would like. But Trump is clearly asking himself exactly what India brings to the table as a partner. Equally, citizens will wonder if the US is once again making the mistake – as it has so often before – of trusting Pakistan's establishment while ignoring India. New Delhi's confidence that it could navigate the Trump era has been well and truly shattered; it will take a long time for the relationship to recover from this tumultuous week.
CNA
18 hours ago
- CNA
Mistral in talks with VC firms, MGX to raise funds at $10 billion valuation, FT reports
French artificial intelligence startup Mistral is in talks with investors, venture capital firms and Abu Dhabi's MGX to raise $1 billion at a valuation of $10 billion, the Financial Times reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. The company launched in June Europe's first AI reasoning model, which uses logical thinking to create a response, as it tries to keep pace with American and Chinese rivals at the forefront of AI development. The funding would accelerate the commercial rollout of Mistral's Le Chat chatbot and support continued development of its large language models, the report said. MGX and Mistral did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. The startup raised 600 million euros in a Series B funding round that valued the company at 5.8 billion euros last year. Industry observers consider Mistral as Europe's best-positioned AI company to rival Silicon Valley leaders, though the French firm has yet to achieve comparable market traction or revenue scale.
