Nvidia Corp: Rising Bullish Sentiment Could Signal a Pullback
(About StockTargetAdvisor.com (STA Research): Is a Canadian investment research company, consisting of Financial Professionals specializing in advanced stock research and analysis).
Nvidia's stock has been on a steady rise since the stock bottomed in April, fueled by investor enthusiasm around artificial intelligence (AI), data centers, and the company's commanding lead in GPU technology. Today the stock has just reached a new record high, crossing over the $160 mark, as retail and institutional investors continue to open and add new positons. However, history and technical analysis suggest that such euphoric sentiment could be a contrarian red flag.
Euphoria Can Mark the End of a Rally
In financial markets, extreme bullishness often coincides with market tops. When nearly everyone is optimistic, it usually means the good news is already priced in. Nvidia's valuation has surged to levels that leave little margin for error. At these elevated prices, even a minor disappointment — in earnings, guidance, or macroeconomic signals — could trigger a sharp correction.
Investor positioning reflects this. Options data and retail inflows show a crowded long trade, which historically tends to precede profit-taking, especially when fundamentals don't accelerate fast enough to keep pace with inflated expectations.
Technical Indicators Point to Market Hesitation
Beyond sentiment, technical analysis is flashing warning signs. The market currently shows uncertainty with a negative bias — a state in which buyers and sellers are indecisive, but bearish momentum is subtly gaining strength. This is evident in Nvidia's recent price action, marked by tightening trading ranges, waning volume on up days, and sharp reactions to intraday resistance levels.
Most notably, a three-candlestick top reversal pattern has emerged on the daily chart — a classic bearish signal. This pattern typically forms at the end of an uptrend and often precedes a reversal in price. The setup consists of a strong upward candle, followed by a small-bodied candle indicating indecision (a doji or spinning top), and capped off with a bearish engulfing or downward candle that closes below the previous two. This signals fading bullish momentum and the emergence of stronger selling pressure.
Lack of Consensus, But Bearish Tone Rising
Adding to the case for caution is the evident lack of consensus among traders. While long-term bulls remain optimistic on Nvidia's fundamentals, short-term traders are showing signs of retreat. Recent selling into strength, hesitant follow-through on breakouts, and increased short interest hint at growing doubts about the sustainability of the rally.
Moreover, breadth in the semiconductor sector is narrowing, with fewer names participating in the upside. This divergence can be a leading indicator that a sector-wide pullback is looming.
Peak Optimism Could Spell Reversal
Nvidia's leadership in AI and chips is not in question, but the stock's parabolic run may have outpaced even its impressive fundamentals. When sentiment becomes overly bullish, the market often sets itself up for a reversal. Combined with bearish technical patterns and a shifting tone among traders, Nvidia's chart suggests caution may be warranted.
Investors holding long positions should consider tightening stop-loss levels or locking in gains. Meanwhile, traders may see this as an opportunity to play a short-term pullback if bearish confirmation unfolds.
In the markets, extreme optimism often sows the seeds of the next decline, of which Nvidia may possibly be at that inflection point.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
27 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Analysts Offer Insights on Communication Services Companies: Warner Bros (WBD) and DoorDash (DASH)
Companies in the Communication Services sector have received a lot of coverage today as analysts weigh in on Warner Bros (WBD – Research Report) and DoorDash (DASH – Research Report). Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Warner Bros (WBD) Bernstein analyst Laurent Yoon maintained a Hold rating on Warner Bros today and set a price target of $11.00. The company's shares closed last Thursday at $11.65. According to Yoon is a 4-star analyst with an average return of 10.3% and a 75.0% success rate. Yoon covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Paramount Global Class B, Charter Communications, and T Mobile US. ;'> The word on The Street in general, suggests a Moderate Buy analyst consensus rating for Warner Bros with a $12.82 average price target, which is an 11.6% upside from current levels. In a report issued on July 2, Wells Fargo also maintained a Hold rating on the stock with a $11.00 price target. DoorDash (DASH) In a report released today, Mike McGovern from Bank of America Securities maintained a Buy rating on DoorDash, with a price target of $245.00. The company's shares closed last Thursday at $238.24. McGovern has an average return of 33.3% when recommending DoorDash. ;'> According to McGovern is ranked #1798 out of 9871 analysts. DoorDash has an analyst consensus of Moderate Buy, with a price target consensus of $229.04, which is a -6.7% downside from current levels. In a report issued on June 29, Raymond James also maintained a Buy rating on the stock.
CTV News
32 minutes ago
- CTV News
Tips from a tech expert on spotting AI-generated fakes
With the upsurge in deepfakes and how easy it is to create them we talk spotting fakes and how you can stay vigilant. The widespread availability and ease of use of image and video generators powered by artificial intelligence (AI) means what you see on the internet may not be what it seems. These programs and apps can create increasingly realistic-looking pictures, videos, and sound with only a few simple text prompts. In one recent example, a popular indie rock band that had more than a million monthly listeners on Spotify turned out to be AI-generated. In another case, officials in the U.S. warned of attempts to use AI tools to impersonate Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre also recently warned about a rise in AI-generated voice messages being used to impersonate high-profile figures to extort victims for money and personal data. Even CTV News Ottawa was subject to impersonation using these kinds of tools. Following a report about an online scam that affected a local family, a fake version of our report circulated online, changing the words our anchors said to make it sound like they were advertising the scam in a positive light. Technology analyst and journalist Carmi Levy told CTV Morning Live that, for now, most AI-generated images and videos have imperfections that can give the game away. 'The two words that we usually use that seem to work for now are 'lean in.' So, when you're watching a video, slow it down, lean in and watch for what we like to call 'tells' that give away the fact that it's not real, it is synthetically generated, AI-created,' he said. Some things to watch out for include how the subject of the video moves. 'The movement might not be as smooth, it might be kind of stop-and-start,' said Levy. 'There might be little hitches here and there; sometimes the lips, the audio doesn't quite match what you're seeing on the individual's face.' The lighting or shading of the video might not look natural, or there might be other artefacts that seem out of place, Levy says. 'For example, if someone puts their arm around the back of somebody, there might be a placement issue or extra pieces; sometimes there are additional fingers or not enough fingers.' Levy warns, however, that these tools are becoming more sophisticated and are better able to replicate a realistic scene. 'With each new generation of these video generator apps, they get better and so it gets even harder to tell that something was AI-created. In fact, the new version of Veo, Veo 3, is so good that for a lot of people, even if they lean in, it's increasing difficult to tell,' he said. The federal government says rapid advances in AI have underscored the risks associated with the technology. 'The Government is taking actions to ensure that AI is developed in a safe and responsible manner,' a spokesperson for Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada said in a statement to CTV News Ottawa. 'Just last November, the Government of Canada launched the Canadian Artificial Intelligence Safety Institute with the mandate to advance scientific understanding of the risks associated with the most advanced AI systems, develop measures to reduce those risks, and build trust to foster AI innovation. 'In addition, the government also launched a Voluntary Code of Conduct on the Responsible Development and Management of Advanced Generative AI Systems in September of 2023. The Code calls on AI developers and managers to take risk-mitigation measures such as developing and implementing reliable and freely available methods to detect content generated by their AI system. Greater transparency on AI generated content can help protect Canadians against AI-enabled scams and fakes. The Government is protecting Canadians from fraud and impersonation, including cases involving AI, and will continue to explore all options to strengthen these protections.' Levy says when you see something online, before sharing it, ask questions and make sure it's coming from a trustworthy source. 'How do you tell if it's real or not real? You check the source. You make sure it's coming from a legitimate source that you can trust. In many cases, if you can't trace it back to its origin, you should start with the assumption that it's not real,' he said. 'That's what I do; I start cynically and require the content to prove to me that it is, in fact, real.'
CTV News
32 minutes ago
- CTV News
National Defence considering purchase of fighter drones that could fly with F-35
An F-35A Lightning II fighter jet practises for an air show appearance in Ottawa, Friday, Sept. 6, 2019. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld OTTAWA — The Department of National Defence is looking at the possibility of complementing its incoming F-35 fleet with uncrewed combat aircraft. Unclassified documents obtained by The Canadian Press show the department is researching various options for acquiring the emerging technology. The documents suggest that purchasing a fleet of aerial combat drones that could fly alongside fighter jets could cost as much as $16 billion and would require hundreds of staff. That cost estimate is in the upper range. The price tag and other aspects of the emerging technology remain uncertain, and the fact that the government is researching combat drones doesn't guarantee that Canada will buy any. David Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, said Canada's allies are already headed in this direction, so at a minimum Ottawa will want to better understand how its closest military partners will use similar technology. He said combat drones could give the air force more flexibility to contribute to allied operations and could act as a force-multiplier that would beef up the 'mass' of the air force. They're also cheaper than fighter jets. 'There's been a trade-off, particularly in the West, with investing in expensive things. It can have super high levels of precision and survivability ... and we've been moving towards having increasingly expensive fighter aircraft that can do phenomenal things, but they're so expensive that you can't build all that many of them,' Perry said. 'The broad thrust of the idea of having an unpiloted vehicle that would be able to operate with a piloted vehicle is that you provide additional numbers in a way that could potentially help provide enough quantity to overwhelm opposition forces.' Perry pointed to the war in Ukraine, where Russia has been launching massive volleys of drones and missiles. 'If you have a whole bunch of targets to track, it makes it much more difficult for any kind of defensive system to be able to deal, at the same time, with all the incoming,' he said. Canada and its allies have never deployed unmanned aerial combat drones that operate in tandem with fighter jets. Daniel Norton is a senior management systems analyst with the RAND Corporation who has done modernization studies for the U.S. air force for more than three decades. He said drones of the type Canada is looking at tend to be smaller than crewed fighters, cost a fraction of a conventional jet if bought in bulk — and can be used in situations where the military wouldn't want to put a pilot at risk. Known as 'collaborative combat aircraft,' the vehicles are designed to act autonomously in some ways — such as targeting and flying — but with humans managing their actions. Future versions of the technology could engage in fully autonomous operations. The drones could be used to carry sensors, jammers or weapons to support normal fighter jets. They could even be used as decoys. Norton said new platforms like these probably won't be deployed in battle by any country before 2030 at the earliest. 'I'd be surprised if it happened sooner,' he said. National Defence vaguely alluded to such platforms in the most recent defence policy update as something the government would 'explore.' The 2024 policy update, titled 'Our North, Strong and Free,' committed to exploring 'options for acquiring a suite of surveillance and strike drones and counter-drone capabilities.' An internal preliminary analysis of the various options for the 'autonomous collaborative platform' ruled out buying completely Canadian-made fighter drones. The analysis said one possible path would have Canada work with partner nations on developing new systems like this, and pointed to several such craft being developed for Australia, the U.S. and European nations. The analysis said such a procurement project 'could provide Canadian aerospace firms with an entry point into development and production of advanced weapons systems.' There are no current off-the-shelf versions but several are being developed, such as Boeing's MQ-28A 'Ghost Bat' for Australia, General Atomics' YFQ-42 in the U.S. and the Anduril YFQ-44A. Boeing's aircraft is undergoing flight testing, while Anduril's is expected to start testing this year. Both the U.S. and Australian air forces use F-35s. There are also several initiatives underway in Europe for autonomous collaborative aircraft. When The Canadian Press asked Lt.-Gen. Jamie Speiser-Blanchet, the new commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force, how the RCAF might change in response to the rapid developments in drone warfare, she said the military is 'already looking at those kinds of future capabilities.' 'It is absolutely something that is on our radar and something that we need to be prepared for in the future,' she said. In March, in response to the trade war with the U.S., Prime Minister Carney ordered a review of Canada's plan to purchase a fleet of F-35 fighter jets. The federal government is expected to render a decision on the procurement project by the end of summer. Canada's planned purchase of 88 of the U.S.-made stealth jets is expected to cost $27.7 billion, according to the auditor general. At this point, Canada has only financially committed to purchasing the first 16 jets. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 12, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press
