DOT saves taxpayers over $60M by terminating Texas high-speed rail contract
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy made the announcement, saying an agreement between the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and Amtrak to terminate the $63.9 million grant had been reached.
The grant was awarded to Amtrak under the Corridor Identification and Development Program for the Amtrak Texas High-Speed Rail Corridor, previously known as the Texas Central Railway project.
"I am pleased to announce that FRA and Amtrak are in agreement that underwriting this project is a waste of taxpayer funds and a distraction from Amtrak's core mission of improving its existing subpar services," Duffy said. "If the private sector believes this project is feasible, they should carry the pre-construction work forward, rather than relying on Amtrak and the American taxpayer to bail them out. My department will continue to look for every opportunity to save federal dollars and prioritize efficiencies."
The Texas Central Railway project was originally announced as a private venture, but its cost estimates increased dramatically, and the project became dependent on federal dollars and Amtrak for its development.
DOT said the capital cost for the project is believed to be more than $40 billion, adding that the price makes construction unrealistic. The cost also makes the project a risky venture for taxpayers.
Amtrak has struggled with operating deficits, though ridership has recovered since the pandemic.
The main rail company in the U.S. has also experienced operational challenges, including the loss of its Horizon coach fleet to corrosion and delays in the Northeast Corridor.
FRA has made fixing Amtrak's issues a top priority.
Amtrak, under the Biden administration, considered massive loans underwritten by the U.S. government, as well as grants, to be able to take on construction activities, DOT said.
Walking away from the Texas project allows Amtrak to focus on much-needed improvements to be more reliable to its riders, according to the DOT.
"Connecting Dallas and Houston remains one of the more exciting opportunities for new passenger rail in the United States," FRA Chief Counsel Kyle Fields said. "Today's announcement reflects a recognition by Amtrak and FRA that federalizing the Texas Central Railway proposal is not the best use of taxpayer funding."
Amtrak did not respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment on the matter.
According to the DOT, the FRA will continue to seek out new rail projects.
The $60 million saved by terminating the project will be reallocated for other projects that "support safe, efficient, and reliable rail transportation," the DOT added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
What Falling Mortgage Rates Mean for American Homebuyers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Mortgage rates are falling despite the Federal Reserve's reluctance to introduce new cuts over the past eight months, giving American homebuyers more purchasing power at a time when the market is slowly shifting in their favor. Last week, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage—the most popular home loan in the nation—dropped to its lowest level since April. As of August 7, according to Freddie Mac, it was at 6.63 percent, down from 6.72 percent a week earlier but still up 0.16 percentage points from a year earlier. While mortgage rates remain historically high, especially compared to the pandemic lows of below 3 percent, for homebuyers waiting on the sidelines for a good time to enter the market, any movement away from the 7 percent mark is a positive shift. Why Have Mortgage Rates Made a Dip? "Although the Fed has not yet cut its policy rate, mortgage rates and other long-term rates move in anticipation of what's ahead for the economy and the likely policy environment," chief economist Danielle Hale told Newsweek. In this case, the July jobs report has likely determined the recent dip in mortgage rates. The report showed that U.S. employers added 73,000 jobs last month, fewer than the 109,000 forecasters had expected, and unemployment rose from 4.1 percent in June to 4.2 percent. Hiring figures for May and June were also revised down, with a combined total of 258,000 fewer jobs over the past three months than previously estimated. In an aerial view, homes are seen under construction at a new housing development on August 08, 2025, in Henderson, Nevada. In an aerial view, homes are seen under construction at a new housing development on August 08, 2025, in Henderson, Nevada."The fact that the July employment report showed weaker job growth, downward revisions to prior job growth estimates, and an uptick in the unemployment rate has reset expectations among investors," Hale said. "The Fed is now widely expected to cut its policy rate at its meeting in mid-September. This combined with a softer economic outlook has helped nudge longer-term interest rates, including mortgage rates, lower." The weaker-than-expected jobs report has also caused Treasury yields to tumble last week, as concerns over the future of the U.S. economy were revamped among investors, who are now betting that the central bank will cut interest rates next month. "Mortgage rates react to the bond market," Melissa Cohn, regional vice president of William Raveis Mortgage, told Newsweek. "Bonds react to current economic data, and the latest data has been weaker than expected, especially as it relates to the employment sector. All the weaker data and mild inflation reports that the Fed will react to in September are moving bond yields and mortgage rates today." What Does This Mean for the US Housing Market? There is no doubt among experts that lower mortgage rates are good news for American homebuyers. "Mortgage rates have dropped by .25 to .375 percent over the past 10 days. This means more affordability in the home that they are looking to purchase," Cohn said. But experts are also skeptical of the significance of this improvement. "This drop now makes homebuying more affordable of course, but it's too soon to tell if the improvements have an impact," Phil Crescenzo Jr., vice president of Southeast Division at Nation One Mortgage Corporation, told Newsweek. "We saw fairly consistent mortgage rates in late spring and summer, so it didn't take a huge move to be better than recent trends," Hale said. "It's also fair to describe today's mortgage rates as still relatively high." "Put simply, this is a good break for current home shoppers who are already in the market, and it may be enough of a break to spur others to restart their home searches, especially as we approach a seasonably more favorable time of year for buyers," Hale said. "Real improvement in home affordability will need rates to drop even further. For borrowers' sake, let's hope that the data continues to be weaker and rates keep dropping," Cohn said. Is This a Good Time To Buy a Home? It is as good a time as any to buy a home in the U.S.—meaning that buyers are still facing significant challenges even as mortgage rates dip slightly. "I expect mortgage rates to eventually fall further, but this is not guaranteed, and the timing is also challenging to predict," Hale said. "Trying to decide whether it's a good time to buy is about more than just mortgage rates. Buyers should think about what they want and need from a home, and consider their options." Those who are on the fence between renting and owning, Hale said, are likely to find that the monthly costs are still tipped pretty heavily in favor of renting in many markets, "but even in this kind of environment, home ownership can be a good choice, especially for those planning to be in their next home for a longer amount of time." Waiting too long could be risky, however, especially if mortgage rates continue falling. "The interest rate market is still unpredictable and waiting too long risks many buyers coming into the market, affecting supply and increasing home prices," Crescenzo said. Will Rates Continue Falling This Year? Cohn believes that the August jobs report will be a key factor in the Fed's decision at its September meeting. "If the report is anything like the July report, the Fed will cut rates in September," she said. "The only curveball will be the impact that the new tariffs have on the rate of inflation. If inflation increases, it may keep the Fed and rates in a holding pattern." Hale said that whether the Fed will cut rates during its meeting in mid-September will ultimately depend on the next few data readings, though she believes "the elements for a Fed rate cut in September are falling into place." A cut would help mortgage rates fall, but longer-term rates often move before the Fed does, Hale said, and the monetary policy outlook is just one factor investors are considering. "For this reason, mortgage rates and the Fed's rate don't always move in tandem," she said. "For example, from the time that the Fed first cut rates in September 2024 until early January, mortgage rates actually increased by almost the same amount that the Fed cut--a percentage point. In this instance, I expect that mortgage rates are likely to move lower at least until the Fed's first cut, which I expect in September."
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants
For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about President Trump's invasion of an American city. I'm starting to wonder when our government's checks and balances will kick in – or if they will at all. On Monday, Aug. 11, President Donald Trump announced he would be deploying the National Guard in Washington, DC, and taking over the city's police force "to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' The troops began showing up on Tuesday evening. According to Trump, violent crime is up in the nation's capital, and he's the only one who can rescue the city from societal collapse. It's a convenient narrative, one that feeds into MAGA's perception of him. For the rest of us, it's a terrifying move that shows he is willing to test the limits of presidential oversight. But while Trump's hostile takeover of DC public safety is concerning on its own, it's more alarming that Republicans in Congress are letting him do this with seemingly no regard for what is ethical. Even if this deployment is legal, there are certain lines that presidents should not cross. This is one of them. And I have to ask. Would Republicans be sitting on their hands if a Democratic president were doing everything that Trump is doing? I would hope not, but here we are. Of course, Trump is lying about crime in DC Trump seems to have called in the military after an assault on a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer on Aug. 3. While it's horrible that a government employee was attacked, Trump's declaration that Washington is crime-infested and dangerous doesn't align with reality. According to the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime is down 26% compared with last year. In fact, 2024 marked a 30-year low for violent crime in Washington, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Per a New York Times analysis, the homicide rate in 2023 was 40.4 per 100,000 people, the highest rate in 20 years. But that rate declined in 2024, down to 26.6 per 100,000 people. And homicides in the city continue to decline in 2025. While Trump is correct in saying this rate is higher than those of Mexico City and Bogotá, Colombia, it doesn't paint the full picture. A federal takeover is an extreme reaction. It doesn't matter, of course, that violent crime in the city is down overall this year. That wouldn't fit in with the Trumpian narrative, the one where he's the hero saving tourists and locals alike from violent crime. Are you worried about crime? Do you feel safe where you live? Tell us. | Opinion Forum Who even asked for this? It wasn't DC Mayor Muriel Bowser. All of this is happening to the dismay of Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who noted on the Aug. 12 edition of 'The Breakfast Club' that the militarization of the city will instill fear in its residents. '(Trump) wants to send the message to cities that if he can get away with this in Los Angeles, if he can get away with this in DC, he can get away with it in New York, or Baltimore or Chicago, or any other place where millions of people live, work and are doing everything the right way,' Bowser said on the radio show. Bowser is right, this is an escalation. It's Trump's way of showing everyone in Democratic parts of the country that he has the final say and that he isn't afraid to use the military to his advantage. Trump is a bully. He's using the National Guard to conquer DC as a test run. | Opinion Will Republicans hold Trump accountable for anything? For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about Trump's invasion of an American city. In fact, it seems that many are supportive of the move. If a Democratic president were to try to do this, the Republican Party would decry authoritarianism's arrival in the United States. But because it's Trump, there has been zero pushback. Just like his tariff plan that's costing everyday Americans, the failed Elon Musk overhaul of the federal government, the deployment of soldiers against citizens in Los Angeles and his ruthless immigration agenda that includes trying to erase due process, the GOP is letting him get away with all of it. Republicans may even be happy about it. Imagine if Joe Biden did any of that? The Republican pearl-clutching would be generational. But this is fine because it's their king. Trump is considering extending the troop deployment beyond 30 days, something he will need congressional approval for. This seems entirely plausible, even likely, because of the Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress. I'm hesitant to throw the F-word – fascism – around, but if the Trump administration continues down this path, I worry that the rights we have as Americans will slip away. Who's stopping the president from deploying troops to other cities in the United States? It certainly isn't going to be Congress. There's some hope for the Supreme Court, but it has a 6-3 conservative majority. All of this is happening within the first year of Trump's return to the White House. There's no telling what the next three years will bring if this is how he's starting out. There should be firm lines that presidents do not cross – there are some things that are not appropriate or reasonable for a president to do. Yet that line keeps getting moved by Republicans, who don't seem to care as long as their conservative agenda is being implemented. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
How Arctic Could Form Key Part of Ukraine Ceasefire Talks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A ceasefire in Ukraine will be the focus for Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump when they meet in Alaska, but cooperation between Russia and the United States in the Arctic would also be a salient topic for discussion, a regional expert has told Newsweek. Andreas Østhagen, from the Fridtjof Nansen Institute in Oslo, said Anchorage is the natural location for the presidents to discuss the surrounding strategic region, which is drawing increasing attention from both countries. He said that oil and gas exploration, developing the Northern Sea route, and fishing are areas of mutual interest that could be discussed. Why It Matters Both Russia and the U.S. have prioritized the Arctic, making it a natural topic for a summit held in Alaska, which is the gateway to the region where the Bering Strait is a direct maritime passage between the Pacific and Arctic Oceans. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty What To Know The Russian and American presidents will meet at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage on Friday, during which the Trump administration will hope for a breakthrough in the Russia-Ukraine war. As well as the war in Ukraine, Østhagen said that Russia could discuss developing the Northern Sea route (NSR) into a commercial traffic lane, which is a Russian project that the U.S. plays a part in but is not the primary driver of. The NSR, which goes along the Arctic coastline, is the shortest shipping route between the western part of Eurasia and the Asia-Pacific region, and its strategic value chimes with Trump's statements about Greenland, which he wants to acquire. Through it sail container ships, oil tankers, bulk carriers transporting minerals and ores, and vessels servicing oil, gas and mining operations in Alaska and Siberia. It is becoming more navigable due to global warming. Under the Biden administration and Trump's first administration, efforts were made to expand collaboration between Russia and the U.S., focusing on enabling safer traffic through the Bering Strait, which divides Alaska from Russia, said Østhagen, who is also a senior fellow at the Arctic Institute. "If any shipping traffic takes that shortcut between Europe and Asia, it has to go via the Russian Arctic and via the Bering Strait," Østhagen said. The Bering Sea is also home to some of the most profitable fish stocks in the world, where not only Russia and the U.S. are actively fishing, but also other countries like China. There are potential plans for oil and gas development in the Arctic, and joint exploration in shared areas like the Chukchi Sea, north of the Bering Strait, could be considered, though profitability and political factors will influence such projects. "There's a lot to talk about in terms of practical functional cooperation, first and foremost to try to set up shipping or more oil and gas exploration in the Arctic," said Østhagen. What People Are Saying Andreas Østhagen, research director of Arctic and Ocean Politics at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute, told Newsweek: "The fact that both presidents have put the Arctic high on their agendas would make Alaska a natural point to discuss the region." "Russia perhaps could offer developing the Northern Sea route into a viable commercial traffic lane that's a Russian project, which the U.S. plays a part in, but is not the primary driver of," he said. What Happens Next The White House has described Friday's summit in Anchorage as a "listening exercise," for Trump. Before then, European leaders are likely to push for the U.S. to keep Ukraine's interests in mind.
