logo
Lens on quarry owners-Maoist link after seizure of explosives from Kandhamal and Ganjam districts

Lens on quarry owners-Maoist link after seizure of explosives from Kandhamal and Ganjam districts

New Indian Express10 hours ago
BHUBANESWAR/BERHAMPUR : Even as the Centre has set March 2026 deadline to eradicate Naxalism in the country, the alleged nexus between Maoists and mines/stone quarry owners in the state has come under the scanner of Odisha Police after seizure of over nine tonne of explosives from Kandhamal and Ganjam districts.
Police sources said about 9.4 tonne of explosives including gelatin sticks and boosters were seized from Tumudibandha in Kandhamal and Jagannathpur in Ganjam on August 15 and 16. A stone quarry owner along with two other persons were arrested in this connection.
At least 4,000 detonators were also seized from the three accused. The seized detonators were reportedly manufactured by a firm in Andhra Pradesh. Earlier on July 17, police had seized about 600 detonators of the same brand from a Maoist dump in Kandhamal district during a combing operation.
Briefing mediapersons here on Monday, ADG Operations Sanjeeb Panda said acting on a tip-off, Tumudibandha police conducted a raid while the explosives were being transported from Kandhamal to Bhawanipatna on August 15 night. The driver transporting them was arrested after he failed to produce any valid document regarding transportation of such a large consignment of explosives.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government to ban all money-based gaming transactions under Online Gaming Bill: Sources
Government to ban all money-based gaming transactions under Online Gaming Bill: Sources

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Government to ban all money-based gaming transactions under Online Gaming Bill: Sources

The Union Cabinet has approved the Online Gaming Bill, a move aimed at regulating the rapidly growing digital gaming sector and putting a stop to online betting. According to sources, the Bill is likely to ban all money-based gaming transactions once it comes into THE BILL PROPOSESUnder the proposed Regulation & Promotion of Online Gaming Act, banks and financial institutions will not be allowed to process or transfer funds for real-money online Bill also proposes a complete prohibition on advertisements promoting real money gaming, continued promotion of E-sports and non-monetary skill-based games and strict action against unregistered or illegal gaming platforms. The legislation is expected to be introduced in the Lok Sabha on THIS IS BEING DONEOnline gaming has been under scrutiny ever since the government imposed a 28% GST on such platforms in October 2023. From FY25, winnings from online games are taxed at 30%, and offshore gaming operators have been brought within the Indian tax December 2023, new criminal provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita made unauthorised betting a criminal offence, punishable with up to seven years in jail and heavy 'betting and gambling' fall under the State List of the Constitution, the Centre has already blocked more than 1,400 websites and apps involved in online betting or gambling between 2022 and February CONCERNS OF ADDICTIONThe Education Ministry has issued advisories to parents and teachers, highlighting the growing risk of addiction among Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has also directed broadcasters to carry disclaimers on the financial risks involved in online REGULATOR TO OVERSEE SECTORThe Bill seeks to empower the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) as the nodal regulator for the online gaming sector. It will also give authorities the power to block any unregistered or illegal site operating in putting strict limits on real-money gaming and creating one set of rules for the entire country, the government hopes to cut down on fraud, addiction, and legal confusion across states.- EndsMust Watch

'Can you say it's criminal to love?': SC bats for distinction of rape from 'genuine' romance
'Can you say it's criminal to love?': SC bats for distinction of rape from 'genuine' romance

Hindustan Times

time4 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Can you say it's criminal to love?': SC bats for distinction of rape from 'genuine' romance

The Supreme Court on Tuesday underlined the need to distinguish between rape and genuine romantic cases involving youngsters on the verge of majority. The bench observed that the police would look into the matters to ascertain whether it was a case of kidnapping, trafficking or whether it was a case of genuine love.(ANI) A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan noted the existence of co-education institutions and universities and said, "Now, they develop feelings for each other. Can you say it is criminal to love? We have to keep a distinction between a criminal act like rape, etc., from this." The observations came on a petition raising the question whether or not the age of consent, which is 18 years, should be reduced to 16 under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. "When there are genuine romantic cases, they like each other and they want to get married... Don't treat such cases the same as criminal cases," the bench said. The bench went on, "You have to keep the reality of society in mind." The top court referred to the trauma such couples face, generally owing to the male partner being sent to jail by the parents of the girl after filing a case under the POCSO Act. "This is the harsh reality in society," the bench said, noting cases under the POCSO Act were also filed to cover up elopements. Senior advocate H S Phoolka, appearing for the petitioner organisation, called for safeguards. The bench observed that the police would look into the matters to ascertain whether it was a case of kidnapping, trafficking or whether it was a case of genuine love. Phoolka said a similar issue concerning the age of consent was being considered by another bench of the apex court. The bench posted the matter for August 26 after Phoolka said he would place on record some top court orders in the context of the prayers sought for in the petition. Recently, the Centre defended in the apex court the statutory age of consent of 18 years, saying the decision was a "deliberate, well-considered, and coherent" policy choice aimed at shielding minors from sexual exploitation. The Centre said diluting the age of consent or introducing exceptions under the guise of adolescent romance would be not only legally unsound but also dangerous. The written submissions was filed in a separate case which raises the point of age in adolescent relationships.

Opposition's V-P Pick Reddy Had Struck Down Anti-Naxal Campaign? The 2011 Verdict
Opposition's V-P Pick Reddy Had Struck Down Anti-Naxal Campaign? The 2011 Verdict

News18

time6 hours ago

  • News18

Opposition's V-P Pick Reddy Had Struck Down Anti-Naxal Campaign? The 2011 Verdict

Last Updated: Among Reddy's key judgments is one given in 2011, striking down Salwa Judum, a key anti-Naxal initiative of the Chhattisgarh government The Opposition's INDIA bloc has announced the name of former Supreme Court judge Sudershan Reddy for the upcoming Vice-Presidential election. The announcement has set the stage for a contest between Reddy, the opposition's nominee, and CP Radhakrishnan, the NDA's Vice Presidential candidate. Announcing the INDIA bloc's candidate, Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge said, 'This vice-presidential contest is an ideological battle, and all the opposition parties agreed on this, and this is the reason we have nominated B Sudershan Reddy as the joint candidate." The 2011 verdict Among Reddy's key judgments is one given in 2011, striking down Salwa Judum, a key anti-Naxal initiative of the Chhattisgarh government. The case was driven by Nandini Sundar, long accused of proximity to Maoist groups and named in a Bastar murder First Information Report (FIR) (later dropped). The verdict was seen as a setback to India's anti-Naxal fight, coming at the height of Maoist violence. Who is Reddy? B Sudershan Reddy, born in 1946 in Telangana, served as the Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court before his elevation to the Supreme Court. He began his legal career after enrolling as an advocate with the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh on December 27, 1971. Reddy practised primarily in writ and civil matters at the Andhra Pradesh High Court, where he also served as Government Pleader between 1988 and 1990. In 1990, he briefly worked as Additional Standing Counsel for the Central Government, and later served as Legal Adviser and Standing Counsel for Osmania University. On May 2, 1995, he was appointed as a permanent judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. When is the V-P election? The Election Commission has scheduled the Vice Presidential election for September 9, with both polling and counting to be completed the same day. The deadline for filing nominations is August 21, and candidates will be able to withdraw their papers until August 25. The office fell vacant after Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar stepped down on July 21, the opening day of the Monsoon Session of Parliament, citing health concerns. view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 19, 2025, 17:44 IST News india Opposition's V-P Pick Reddy Had Struck Down Anti-Naxal Campaign? The 2011 Verdict Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store