US, Japan, India, Australia pledge mineral cooperation
The United States, Japan, India and Australia pledged Tuesday to work together to ensure a stable supply of critical minerals, as worries grow over China's dominance in resources vital to new technologies. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio welcomed his counterparts from the so-called 'Quad' to Washington in a shift of focus to Asia, after spending much of his first six months on the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East and on President Donald Trump's domestic priorities such as migration.
The four countries said in a joint statement that they were establishing the Quad Critical Minerals Initiative, aimed at 'collaborating on securing and diversifying' supply chains. They offered little detail but made clear the goal was to reduce reliance on China, which has used restrictions as leverage as the United States in turn curbs its access to semiconductors and as Trump threatens steep tariffs — including on Quad countries.
'Reliance on any one country for processing and refining critical minerals and derivative goods production exposes our industries to economic coercion, price manipulation and supply chain disruptions,' the statement said. The ministers were careful not to mention China by name but voiced 'serious concerns regarding dangerous and provocative actions' in the South China Sea and East China Sea that 'threaten peace and stability in the region.' China holds major reserves of several key minerals including the vast majority of the world's graphite, which is crucial for electric vehicles. In brief remarks alongside the other ministers, Rubio said he has 'personally been very focused' on diversifying supply chains and wanted 'real progress.' The four-way partnership was first conceived by late Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, who saw an alliance of democracies surrounding China — which has repeatedly alleged that the Quad is a way to contain it. Rubio had welcomed the Quad foreign ministers on January 21 in his first meeting after Trump's inauguration, seen as a sign the new administration would prioritize engagement with like-minded countries to counter China.
But to the surprise of many, China has not topped the early agenda of Trump, who has spoken respectfully about his counterpart Xi Jinping and reached a truce with Beijing to avoid a wider trade war between the world's two largest economies.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Fact-checking Trump's immigration and One Big Beautiful Bill claims
United States President Donald Trump has toured Florida's Alligator Alcatraz immigration detention facility in the Everglades before it gets its first detainees. 'It's known as Alligator Alcatraz, which is very appropriate because I looked outside and that's not a place I want to go hiking,' Trump told the media during a livestreamed event on Tuesday. 'But very soon, this facility will house some of the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet.' Trump campaigned for the presidency on promises to tackle immigration but faces a shortage of detention beds. The One Big Beautiful Bill, Trump's tax and spending plan, passed the Senate during his Florida stop and includes $150bn for his deportation agenda over four years. State officials quickly built the expected 5,000-bed facility to detain immigrants on top of a decades-old landing strip. The Department of Homeland Security pegged the one-year cost of running the facility at $450m, which it plans to pay for with money from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Shelter and Services Program. Florida officials, including former Trump rival Governor Ron DeSantis, joined the president and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for the tour. DeSantis said Noem's team told him the facility would be opened to receive detainees after Trump's departure. Trump talked for more than an hour as he deflected questions about who could lose Medicaid healthcare coverage under the tax and spending legislation, warmly responded to a suggestion to arrest former President Joe Biden's Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and repeated a frequent complaint about shower heads lacking sufficient water pressure. Noem, meanwhile, said US Immigration and Customs Enforcement had detained a 'cannibal' who 'started to eat himself' on an airplane. Here is a fact check of some of Trump's remarks: Trump's 'illegal alien' cost estimate comes from group that advocates for low immigration levels While talking about the goal of cutting the federal budget, Trump said: 'The average illegal alien costs American taxpayers an estimated $70,000.' That is a lifetime estimate by an organisation that supports low levels of immigration. Critics have taken issue with it. The White House quoted 2024 testimony to a committee in the House of Representatives by Steven A Camarota, research director at the Center for Immigration Studies. Camarota said in written testimony: 'The lifetime fiscal drain (taxes paid minus costs) for each illegal immigrant is about $68,000.' He based his estimate on immigrants' net fiscal impact by education level. Camarota said the estimate came with caveats, including what percentage of immigrants in the US illegally were using welfare programmes and the amount of benefits they received and their use of public schools and emergency services. Other analyses show positive economic effects from undocumented immigrants in the US. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a nonpartisan research arm of Congress, in a 2024 report found both costs and benefits from the Biden-era immigration increase. On net, CBO found, the impact was positive in several areas. The CBO estimated an $8.9 trillion boost to the gross domestic product – a measurement of overall economic activity – over 10 years because of the immigration surge, which would improve wages, salaries and corporate profits. The CBO also estimated that federal deficits would decline by almost $1 trillion over 10 years because of increased tax revenues from immigrants, which the agency estimated would outweigh the costs they imposed in the form of additional federal outlays. Separately, the libertarian Cato Institute in 2023 found 'immigrants generate nearly $1 trillion (in 2024 dollars) in state, local and federal taxes, which is almost $300 billion more than they receive in government benefits, including cash assistance, entitlements, and public education.' Michael A Clemens, a George Mason University economist, told PolitiFact that although the Center for Immigration Studies counted the use of public schools by immigrants in the US illegally as a cost, he and other economists see public school funding as having net positive benefits. Trump repeats 'autopen' conspiracy theory about Biden Trump said: 'We have a lot of bad criminals that came into the country. … It was an unforced error. It was an incompetent president that allowed it to happen. It was an autopen, maybe, that allowed it to happen.' He was referring to a conspiracy theory in pro-Trump circles that Biden was so out of the loop during his own presidency that aides were able to repeatedly forge his signature with a mechanical autopen to pursue their own policy goals. No evidence has surfaced to indicate that a document Biden signed – whether by autopen or not – was done without his knowledge or consent. Anything Biden signed using an autopen would have been valid, legal experts say. In March, we rated Trump's claim that Biden's pardons weren't valid because they were signed with an autopen false. US presidents, including Abraham Lincoln, routinely have had subordinates sign pardons on their behalf. Trump falsely says policy bill targets only Medicaid 'waste, fraud and abuse' During his visit, reporters asked Trump about the One Big Beautiful Bill – which the Senate approved mid-visit – and its effect on Medicaid. 'Are you saying that the estimated 11.8 million people who could lose their health coverage, that is all waste, fraud and abuse?' a reporter asked. Trump said: 'No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying it's going to be a very much smaller number than that, and that number will be waste, fraud and abuse.' We rated a similar version of Trump's statement false, finding that the Medicaid changes go beyond just waste, fraud and abuse. The 11.8 million figure comes from a CBO analysis of the Senate-passed bill. Although some provisions could improve the detection of beneficiaries who aren't eligible for coverage, other provisions of the House and the Senate bills would change the healthcare programme for low-income Americans to align with Trump's ideology and Republican priorities. The bill incentivises states to stop using their own funds to cover people in the US illegally; it requires people to work or do another approved activity to secure benefits; and it bans Medicaid payments for gender-affirming care and to nonprofits such as Planned Parenthood that provide abortions among other services. Other changes would impose copays and a shorter window for retroactive coverage. These would change the programme's fiscal outlook but would not target waste, fraud or abuse. Trump doubles estimate of immigrant arrivals under Biden Trump said: 'In the four years before I took office, Joe Biden allowed 21 million people, … illegal aliens, to invade our country.' This campaign talking point remains false. During Biden's tenure, immigration officials encountered immigrants illegally crossing the US border about 10 million times. When accounting for 'got-aways' – people who evade border officials – the number rises to about 11.6 million. Encounters aren't the same as admissions. Encounters represent events, so one person who tries to cross the border twice counts as two encounters. Also, not everyone encountered is let into the country. The Homeland Security Department estimated about 4 million encounters under Biden led to expulsions or removals. During Biden's administration, about 3.8 million people were released into the US to await immigration court hearings, Department of Homeland Security data show. PolitiFact staff researcher Caryn Baird and staff writer Ella Moore contributed to this article.
Al Jazeera
21 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US says its strikes degraded Iran's nuclear programme by one to two years
Washington, DC – The Pentagon has announced that United States military strikes against Iran set back the country's nuclear programme by one to two years, an assessment that follows President Donald Trump's claims that the programme was 'obliterated'. Defense Department spokesperson Sean Parnell said on Wednesday that the three Iranian nuclear facilities targeted by Washington were destroyed, echoing the president's remarks. He praised the strikes as a 'bold operation'. 'We have degraded their programme by one to two years at least,' Parnell told reporters. 'Intel assessments inside the department assess that.' Since the US sent a group of B-2 stealth bombers to Iran on June 21, Trump has consistently lashed out at any suggestions that the attacks did not wreck the country's nuclear facilities. He has maintained that Iran's nuclear programme has been 'obliterated like nobody's ever seen before'. An initial US intelligence assessment, leaked to several media outlets last month, said the strikes failed to destroy key components of Iran's nuclear programme and only delayed its work by months. For its part, Tehran has been coy about providing details about the state of its nuclear sites. Some Iranian officials have said that the facilities sustained significant damage from US and Israeli attacks. But Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said last week that Trump had 'exaggerated' the impact of the strikes. There has been no independent assessment of the aftermath of the US attacks, which came as part of a 12-day war between Israel and Iran. Visual analyses via satellite images cannot fully capture the scope of the damage at the underground sites, especially the country's largest enrichment facility, Fordow. Another persistent mystery is the location and state of the stockpiles containing Iran's highly enriched uranium. Iran's nuclear agency and regulators in neighbouring states have said they did not detect a spike in radioactivity after the bombings, as might be expected from such strikes. But Rafael Grossi, the head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), did not rule out that the containers holding the uranium may have been damaged in the attacks. 'We don't know where this material could be or if part of it could have been under the attack during those 12 days,' Grossi told CBS News last week. 'So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved.' Satellite images showed trucks moving out of Fordow before the US strikes. Grossi also said that Iran could be enriching uranium again in a 'matter of months'. Enrichment is the process of enhancing the purity of radioactive uranium atoms to produce nuclear fuel. The facilities targeted in the US strikes had been under constant IAEA surveillance. But now, Iran's nuclear programme is in the dark, away from the scrutiny of international inspectors. After the war, the Iranian parliament passed a law suspending cooperation with the IAEA, citing the agency's failure to condemn the US and Israeli attacks on the country's nuclear facilities. The Geneva Conventions prohibit attacks on 'installations containing dangerous forces, namely dams, dykes and nuclear electrical generating stations'. Before the war started on June 13, Tehran claimed to have obtained Israeli documents that show that the IAEA was passing off information to Israel about Iran's nuclear programme – allegations that the agency denied. Earlier on Wednesday, the US State Department called on Iran to allow the IAEA access to its nuclear programme. 'It is … unacceptable that Iran chose to suspend cooperation with the IAEA at a time when it has a window of opportunity to reverse course and choose a path of peace and prosperity,' State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said in a statement. Israel launched a massive attack against Iran on June 13 without direct provocation, claiming that it was preemptively targeting Iran's push towards a nuclear weapon. Tehran denies seeking a nuclear bomb. Israel, meanwhile, is widely believed to have an undeclared nuclear arsenal. Israeli air strikes during the conflict killed hundreds of Iranian civilians, including nuclear scientists and their family members, as well as top military officials. Iran responded with barrages of missiles that left widespread destruction and killed 29 people in Israel. Ten days into the war, the US joined the Israeli campaign and bombed Iran's nuclear facilities. Tehran, in turn, launched a missile strike against a US air base in Qatar, an attack that resulted in no casualties. Hours later, Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Officials in both countries have described the outcome of the war as a 'historic victory'. Israel has similarly claimed that Iran's nuclear programme was destroyed. But Iran has insisted it foiled Israel's goals by maintaining the stability of its government as well as its nuclear and missile programmes.
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Big US auto makers report sales jump on pre-tariff demand
Agencies Several leading automakers including Detroit giants General Motors and Ford reported increased US car sales in the second quarter on Tuesday as consumers fast-forwarded purchases ahead of US tariffs. Sales were particularly brisk early in the quarter as expectations of US President Donald Trump's coming tariffs dominated the news. Besides the US companies, Japanese automakers Toyota and Honda and South Korean brands Kia and Hyundai all reported increased sales compared with the 2024 stretch. 'They were able to capitalize on the tariff-induced fear and that drove sales, especially in the early part of the quarter,' said Garrett Nelson, equity analyst at CFRA Research. While the auto industry has been near the center of Trump's efforts to reset global trade, consumers have yet to see significant price increases due to tariffs. That is because companies have relied on existing inventories that include vehicles imported before tariffs took effect. Prices are expected to rise more in the second half of 2025, but market demand and supply forces could constrain such hikes, analysts said. GM notched a 7.3 percent rise in vehicle deliveries to 746,588 behind a continued solid performance in pickup trucks and SUVs, as well as good sales of models geared towards customers seeking affordable vehicles. These include the Chevrolet Equinox and Chevrolet Trax, a lower-priced vehicle imported from South Korea. Ford, meanwhile, scored a 14.2 percent jump in sales to 612,095, reflecting the boon from a popular program that offered customers employee pricing on many models. Most of Ford's leading vehicles saw higher sales, including the best-selling pickup F-series, as well as the Ford Explorer SUV. While Ford had lower sales of its all-electric F-150 Lightning Truck and the Mustang Mach-E, it reported a jump in hybrid vehicle sales. Higher sales had been expected for both companies, but the increases were slightly more than projected by analysts at At Toyota, sales jumped 7.2 percent to 666,470 autos, with double digit gains in several vehicles, including the Toyota Camry sedan and the Toyota Tacoma pickup truck. Honda, Kia and Hyundai reported quarterly sales increases of between five and 10 percent.—AFP But Nissan reported a 6.5 percent drop in quarterly sales to 221,441, while Jeep-owner Stellantis was projected by Edmunds to have a 12.8 percent drop to just over 300,000 vehicles. The United States imposed 25 percent tariffs on imported finished cars in early April. The Trump administration also enacted a 25 percent tariff on imported auto parts in early May, although White House officials allowed a two-year grace period and stipulated that automakers would not face duplicative tariffs due to a 25 percent levy on imported steel and aluminum. While retail car prices have not risen significantly, analysts at Cox Automotive last week pointed to a recent ebbing in dealer incentives as evidence of a somewhat tighter market. Cox Automotive Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke has projected an eight percent rise in prices due to tariffs, adding that 'we don't think consumers or fleet buyers are able and willing to accept that added cost,' he said at a briefing last week. Smoke predicted that uncertainty about the economy and whether the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates could lead many buyers to defer purchases. Nelson said automakers have to be 'very careful' with price hikes. 'Things have cooled off from where they were at the beginning of the quarter,' he said. 'Everything we're seeing suggests that consumers are still very price sensitive.'
