
‘War devours the innocent': Akal Takht Jathedar condemns attack in Poonch, urges peace between India and Pakistan
'The attack on Gurdwara Sri Guru Singh Sabha and the loss of Sikh lives is not just an event—it is a blow to humanity,' he said. Calling for diplomatic efforts, Jathedar Gargaj urged both India and Pakistan to reduce tensions. 'Both governments must act with wisdom, not weapons,' he added.
Official sources said that at least 10 civilians were killed and 40 were injured, mostly in Jammu 's Poonch sector, as Pakistani troops resorted to heavy shelling across the Line of Control in response to India's Operation Sindoor. A large number of houses were damaged or caught fire in the cross-border shelling, forcing hundreds of residents to flee to safer areas.
The deceased in Poonch included Bhai Amreek Singh, soldier Bhai Amarjeet Singh, and Bhai Ranjit Singh, a shopkeeper. A Sikh woman, Bibi Ruby Kaur, also lost her life in the Manakot area.
'Since 1947, this conflict has caused suffering, including to Hindus and Sikhs near the border. How many more must pay for a conflict they did not create?' Gargaj said that the longer the region remains in conflict, the more it will harm its people. 'War always devours the innocent… Peace is not weakness—it is the strength we must summon.'
'This violence has taken lives from our community,' Jathedar Gargaj said, adding, 'Amreek Singh served through kirtan, Amarjeet Singh defended the borders, and Ranjit Singh was a tradesman. Their lives should not have ended like this.' He called for prayers (ardas) for their souls and for their families to gain strength.
Addressing the people of the border areas, Jathedar Gurgajj asked for support and faith. 'Support one another. Take shelter in Gurbani. Stay firm. Pray for peace,' the Jathedar said.
After the shelling by Pakistan, many families in Poonch have begun fleeing toward Jammu, seeking safety amid fears of further violence.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
5 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
'Terrorist country' Pakistan will pay 'very heavy price' if it attacks Indians: J&K L-G
Paying tributes to those killed in the 'Pakistan-sponsored' terror attack in Pahalgam on April 22, Sinha said through Operation Mahadev and Operation Sindoor, 'we have exacted revenge for Pakistan's brutality'.


India.com
34 minutes ago
- India.com
What is Balochistan Liberation Army, which has been a thorn in Pakistan's flesh for decades? How did it become so powerful?
Islamabad: The Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) has been in the news for its daring attacks on the Pakistani armed forces. The BLA has been a formidable challenge for Pakistan. The US State Department, on Tuesday, 12 August 2025, labelled the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and its branch, the Majeed Brigade, as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO). It is being viewed as a victory for Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir, as declaring BLA a terrorist organisation will weaken its global support. Amidst these developments, let us tell you about the Balochistan Liberation Army. What is the Balochistan Liberation Army? The Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) was formed in 2000. It made international headlines in March this year when it hijacked the Jaffar Express train going from Quetta to Peshawar. The Pakistani army had a tough time freeing this train. Balochistan is Pakistan's largest province, rich in minerals and resources, and the least populated and most backwards. The Baloch people blame the policies of the Pakistani government for this. After the formation of Pakistan in 1947, there have been at least five separatist rebellions in this region. The most recent movement started in the early 2000s. Which event further triggered the Baloch movement? The violence in Balochistan worsened after the assassination of Nawab Akbar Bugti by Pakistan's security forces in 2006. Nawab Akbar Bugti was Balochistan's most prominent tribal leader. It is alleged that Bugti was killed on the orders of Pakistan's then-dictator General Pervez Musharraf. Akbar Bugti was not only the head of the influential Bugti community, but he was also the Chief Minister of Balochistan. This assassination shocked Pakistan, but the biggest impact was felt in Balochistan. Why did the new generation of Balochis join the separatist movement? After Bugti's assassination, the new generation of Balochis became convinced that the Pakistani regime did not want to talk to them. This gave rise to a wave of separatism in Balochistan. The group launched violent attacks targeting Pakistani security forces, government infrastructure and projects related to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) present in Balochistan. Its special unit, Majeed Brigade, is known for suicide missions and more coordinated urban attacks. The group has safe havens in Iran and Afghanistan, which enable it to continue its attacks inside Balochistan. How did the new leadership of BLA restructure the organisation? The BLA started out under tribal leadership, but the inclusion of commanders like Aslam Baloch and Bashir Zeb gave it a new dimension. Aslam and Zeb emerged from the cadre of the Baloch student organisation Azad and later joined the BLA. They did not get along with London-based leaders like Hyrbyair Marri, and thus, the movement gradually turned from tribal chiefs to a middle-class rebellion. Aslam Baloch focused on recruiting educated Baloch youth to the group. This change encouraged women like Shari Baloch, Sumaiya Qalandarani and Mahal Baloch to enlist as suicide bombers for the BLA's Majeed Brigade. In a region like Balochistan, the involvement of women in an armed movement was seen as a significant change. What does the BLA demand? Supporters of this movement argue that the Pakistani government exploits the wealth of Balochistan, which has led to poverty and political marginalisation of the local population. Although the BLA describes its struggle as a freedom movement for the independence of Balochistan, Pakistan and many Western countries consider it a terrorist organisation due to its use of violence. The group's attacks on infrastructure projects and civilian transport have strengthened its position globally. This is why the US now considers it a direct threat to regional stability.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘One BrahMos after another': BJP leader Mithun Chakraborty warns Pakistan; bizarre ‘dam' remark aimed at Bilawal Bhutto
NEW DELHI: Actor-turned-BJP leader Mithun Chakraborty on Tuesday hit back at Pakistan People's Party chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari over his remarks on the Indus Waters Treaty , warning that India could respond with 'a series of BrahMos missiles' in case of any provocation. Speaking to reporters, Chakraborty accused the Pakistani establishment of warmongering while emphasising that his comments were not directed at the people of Pakistan, whom he described as peace-loving. 'If such words and rhetoric continue to be made, and we lose our cool, we will dispatch one BrahMos after another to strike them,' he said. Chakraborty also made an unusual remark, claiming that India would build a dam where '140 crore Indians will relieve themselves' before releasing the water to unleash a 'tsunami' on Pakistan, adding that the comment was aimed solely at Bhutto-Zardari. — ANI (@ANI) 'We will build a dam where 140 crore of our people will relieve themselves. And once the dam is opened, it will lead to a tsunami without a single shot being fired. I apologise for saying this. These words are only meant for him (Bhutto), not for the people of Pakistan,' he said. His statement came in response to Bhutto's speech at the shrine of Sindhi saint Shah Abdul Latif Bhitai on Monday, where the Pakistani leader warned New Delhi against any attempt to disrupt the Indus River's flow. ''If war is waged, then… we will send a message to the Modi government that we do not retreat, we do not bow down, and if you dare think about launching an attack on the Indus River, then the people of every province of Pakistan will be ready to confront you. ' Tensions over the treaty have risen since April 22, when India placed the 1960 agreement 'in abeyance' following the Pahalgam terror attack.