
Paul & Shark names cricketer KL Rahul as brand ambassador
With this association, the brand aims to make deeper inroads in India which is a key market for the brand's international distribution network.
As part of the partnership, KL Rahul will feature in a campaign endorsing the brand's spring/summer 2025 collection across Paul & Shark's global platforms.
Commenting on the association, Andrea Dini, CEO of Paul & Shark in a statement said, 'KL Rahul's journey as an athlete, his international appeal, and his distinct sense of style makes him a natural extension of our brand's values. This partnership is not just about fashion – it's about celebrating a way of life that merges sport, travel, and contemporary elegance.'
KL Rahul added, 'Paul & Shark just gets my style. The brand is effortless, sharp, and never trying too hard. It stands for quality and quiet confidence, which is exactly how I see fashion too. Being the first Indian to represent them globally makes it even more special, it feels like the kind of partnership that just fits.'
Founded in 1976, Paul & Shark has a joint venture partnership with Reliance Brands Ltd in India. It operates three stores across Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata, along with five shop-in-shop doors and digital presence on Ajio Luxe.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
17 hours ago
- Euronews
Tech expert: AI is key to bridging productivity gap between EU and US
Despite cultural similarities and technological progress, the productivity gap between Europe and the United States not only persists – it's growing. Euronews spoke with new technology market expert Dawid Osiecki, who recently co-authored a 40-page report analysing economic development on both sides of the Atlantic, about why this is happening and what might change. "We recently conducted a study that clearly shows: the difference between the US and Europe isn't just about money," Osiecki said. "It's also about the number of large companies that can effectively implement new technologies, including AI" or artificial intelligence. AI: opportunity or challenge in technological revolution? "Comparing data since 1996, we see very clearly that the US has emerged more effectively from successive crises – the 2008 financial crisis, the pandemic, and the current one related to AI transformation," Osiecki said, adding that each crises led to increased production in the US. But in Europe, the response has been "stagnation," he added. The key differences? Investments and the structure of the economy. The US stock market is dominated by the so-called Big Tech companies – the seven largest technology companies that not only generate enormous value growth but also effectively implement the latest technologies. As for Europe, "we didn't seize this opportunity," Osiecki said. The economist and former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi's report on how to improve the European Union's competitiveness indicates that AI could be Europe's chance to close the gap with the US. But even here, the situation is not simple. European workers claim to understand the benefits of AI by a whopping 95 per cent, yet two-thirds fear losing their jobs. Meanwhile, three-quarters indicate they lack meaningful access to AI tools in the workplace. And one-third say they do not have training or education that would allow them to better use new technologies. Fewer giants, more mid-sized companies Data collected in a study of 800 companies from six European countries shows that the largest European companies (valued over $10 billion or €8.68 billion) are adopting AI at a rate comparable to American giants. The challenges begin among smaller companies. "The problem lies at the bottom. Smaller companies, especially those valued between $1 billion and $2.5 billion [€2.2 billion], are three times less likely to successfully implement AI than their American counterparts," Osiecki said. Furthermore, the European economy is more fragmented: there are more mid-sized companies, but fewer global giants. These smaller organisations often have limited access to technology, tools, and specialised staff. Company size isn't the only factor. Sector differences are equally significant. The aerospace, defense, and advanced industries are leaders in AI use in Europe. Meanwhile, the public and energy sectors lag significantly behind, with differences reaching dozens of percentage points. Results vary similarly between countries. Switzerland, Germany, and France lead the way, but after taking into account sectoral structure, the United Kingdom emerges as the leader, with AI adoption rates exceeding 50 per cent. On the other hand, while France has large companies and high technological ambitions, it shows surprisingly low adoption rates – around 30 per cent. Spain and Italy are at the bottom of the rankings. Investment is the biggest challenge, according to Osiecki. Between 2013 and 2023, investment capital in new technologies in the US was 5 to 7.5 times greater than in Europe. At the same time, European companies tried to compensate with organisational differences – to no avail. "You can't just tighten your belt for a decade and expect results. You have to invest, train, and implement new technologies with courage," Osiecki said. How to bridge the gap European bureaucracy is often perceived as a barrier to innovation. According to Osiecki, this is not a problem for the largest players in Europe. "For smaller companies, however, regulations can be an excuse or an obstacle," he added. In his opinion, the key is not only simplifying regulations but faster decisions, greater courage, and mass technological education. The EU has ambitious goals: by 2030, 75 per cent of companies should use cloud technologies and AI, and at least 20 million citizens should possess advanced digital skills. Increasing investment in new technologies, supporting medium-sized companies in adopting AI, bridging the gap between sectors and countries, unlocking tools for employees, and providing them with training will be crucial, Osiecki said. "If we don't do this, European productivity will continue to lag behind. And with it, the competitiveness of the entire continent," he said.


Fashion Network
19 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Trump's 50% levy is forcing Indian banks to scrutinise exporters
Indian banks are increasing scrutiny of new loan applications from exporters by asking about exposure to the US market and contingency plans for coping with US President Donald Trump 's steep tariffs, according to people familiar with the matter. Bloomberg News spoke to officials at five large Indian lenders who said they're assessing the financial ramifications of the punitive levies on their clients, especially those in the export-dependent textile, gem and jewellery sectors. They all spoke on the condition of anonymity, as the information is not public. Lenders are asking borrowers more pointed questions when vetting new export financing proposals or renewals of such funding, the people said. They added that some export orders are being put on hold while trade negotiations play out between New Delhi and Washington. The move comes after Trump doubled tariffs on India-made items in the space of a week, with the additional levy effective by Aug. 27, bringing the cumulative tariff to 50%. Businesses worry that this will severely disrupt shipments to the US by making Indian exports prohibitively expensive. The industries hit hardest — they are also among the most labour-intensive — have asked the Narendra Modi-led government to introduce measures to reduce the pain from the new trade barriers. Indian lenders are concerned the trade war will create new balance sheet stress and stoke painful memories of the country's distressed debt problem a few years back. Some of their key queries, according to the people, pertain to cash flows, business continuity plans and burden-sharing efforts with other stakeholders such as distributors. Some banks have begun to identify the most vulnerable clients internally by checking on financial parameters such as the percentage of revenue coming from the US, said two people Bloomberg News spoke to. The exposure to the highest-risk borrowers due to US levies isn't currently that worrisome, they added. Most of the exporters these bankers have spoken to about the trade issue said they're hopeful for a partial rollback of the US tariffs. Indian exporters have already started redrawing strategies to deal with the unexpected levies through measures such as expanding in other markets, shifting output from India to elsewhere and exploring acquisitions in the US. Some cash-rich exporters can sustain losses for a year or two but they worry about longer-term loss of business to rivals in Bangladesh and Pakistan, a person said. These neighbouring nations face lower US levies than India. India's Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal told Parliament late last month that the federal government is engaging with exporters to assess the impact of tariffs and will take 'all necessary steps to secure and advance our national interest.' The Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council is seeking support such as finance relief and duty drawbacks. Other requests include deferment of interest on working capital facilities by six months, 90-day pre-shipment and penalty-free loan payment extensions and a freeze on downward revisions of credit ratings, Kirit Bhansali, the trade group's chairman, said in an August 7 statement. Rating companies haven't taken any action yet on exporters' creditworthiness. However, borrowing companies are worried and seeking government assistance to prevent any slip in ratings that will spike the cost of funding. Other Indian business representatives want to see more liquidity in the banking system to offset damage from the US tariffs. India's government should push 'banks to lower the rate of interest' to keep businesses afloat, said Rahul Mehta, director at Mumbai-based Creative Garments Pvt. Removal of import duties on raw materials should also help, Mehta said, calling for a government response akin to Covid-era emergency policies.


Fashion Network
2 days ago
- Fashion Network
Swiss gold refining sector stung by US tariffs
But a White House official told AFP that President Donald Trump 's administration plans to "issue an executive order in the near future clarifying misinformation about the tariffing of gold bars and other specialty products". It was not immediately clear if this meant the products would therefore be exempt from Trump's "reciprocal" levies, imposed to address what Washington deems as unfair trade deficits. One-kilo gold bars are the most traded type of bullion on Comex, the world's biggest futures market, and Switzerland is a major supplier of the bars on the physical market. Expectations had been widespread that gold bars would be classified under a different customs code that excludes them from Trump's countrywide tariffs. Higher "reciprocal" rates took effect Thursday on dozens of economies. Swiss officials travelled to Washington this week to seek a deal similar to the European Union, whose products now face a 15% rate. But they came back empty handed. The customs update increased pressure on the Swiss government as gold trading weighs heavily on its trade balance. John Plassard, head of investment strategy at Cite Gestion, expects some of the gold refining business would likely flow to other industry centres such as Antwerp. Gold bars produced in the Belgian city Antwerp face a 15% US tariff applied to EU goods. Switzerland is home to four of the world's largest gold refineries, the largest being Valcambi in Balerna, in the Italian-speaking part of the country. They import unrefined gold coming from mines, recycled jewellery or lower-purity bars to be recast into high-quality bars, making Switzerland a hub for the global gold trade. These bars are then reintroduced to the market for jewellery, watchmaking, industry and tech products, as well as the banking sector and for use as central bank reserves. According to a Swiss Federal Customs Administration report, the country imported 2,372 tonnes of gold in 2023 and re-exported 1,564 tonnes. The value of these exports approached 88 billion Swiss francs ($109 billion at current rates), with the main buyers being China at 25.1 billion francs and India at 13.1 billion francs. Including other precious metals like silver and palladium, the sector accounts for 1,500 direct jobs in the country and 1,000 indirect jobs, according to the Swiss association of manufacturers and traders of precious metals. In 2023, Switzerland accounted for 34% of the total refined gold worldwide, according to the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). Swiss gold exports to the United States soared to 11 billion Swiss francs last year, nearly doubling from 6.1 billion in 2023. They then skyrocketed in the first half of 2025, reaching 39.2 billion francs, compared to nearly 1.7 billion in the first half of 2024, according to data Swiss customs provided to AFP. Nearly all of the gold, 37.6 billion francs' worth, was exported in the first quarter of 2025. Shipments then plummeted sharply to roughly 1.6 billion francs in the second quarter. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter on Thursday strongly disagreed with how Trump assessed the US trade deficit with Switzerland, and thus the high tariff imposed. She said the rise in gold exports in 2024 had led to the increase in the deficit. Swiss newspaper Le Temps noted Tuesday that to calculate customs duties on Switzerland "the White House seems to have relied exclusively on 2024 data, "which was "an atypical year". Swiss gold exports to the United States skyrocketed in November, when Trump won the presidential election, triggering a surge in "safe haven" investments such as gold, it said.