Google's Gemini 2.5 ranks first in coding charts, AI IQ tests
Google's (NASDAQ: GOOGL) Gemini 2.5 has come out on top across a range of artificial intelligence (AI) testing benchmarks, outperforming the rest of its peers.
According to the rankings, the AI chatbot sits on top of the leaderboard on WebDev Arena, an AI ranking site for coding. A quick scan of WebDev Arena reveals that Gemini 2.5 ranks ahead of Claude and ChatGPT 4 in standardized coding tests for large language models (LLMs).
Apart from setting the pace in coding functionalities, Gemini 2.5 also clinched first place in creative writing and style control.
When placed in standardized IQ tests, Gemini 2.5 outclassed its peers to achieve an IQ of 124 on the Mensa Norway test. However, the model scored 115 in offline mode, ranking in joint second place with OpenAI's ChatGPT.
Gemini 2.5 scored 86.7% and 84% on the AIME 2025 math test and the GPQA science assessment, respectively. Despite scoring only 18.8% on Humanity's Last Exam, Gemini came first, outperforming Claude 3.7 Sonnet and OpenAI's o3.
Gemini 2.5's successes across the board are propped by its context window, allowing up to 1 million tokens.
Its closest competitors, Claude and ChatGPT's flagship models, are only designed to handle 128K tokens, with Gemini 2.5 ranking above the field. Google has unveiled plans to expand the context window to 2 million tokens.
'Gemini 2.5 models are thinking models, capable of reasoning through their thoughts before responding, resulting in enhanced performance and improved accuracy,' said Google in a statement during its commercial release.
A pro version pushes the frontiers for Gemini 2.5, with costs starting at $2.50 and $15.00 for input and output costs. Google's Gemini 2.5 is significantly cheaper than its peers, offering advanced enterprise functionalities, including blockchain-based smart contract audits.
Real-world AI use cases heat up
Apart from the academic discourse around AI models, real-world applications are rising. AI chatbots are changing the landscape in the workplace, offering automation and advanced personalization perks for consumers.
Governments are also turning to AI to improve the scope of public services for citizens, but concerns over misuse remain. The UN has warned of the potential risks stemming from AI abuse, including censorship and the proliferation of fake news, while authorities are cracking down on misuse in financial markets.
Microsoft-funded Space and Time goes live with an array of major builders
Space and Time, a new blockchain project, has launched its mainnet to offer advanced data infrastructure using zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs. According to the press statement, the project will bring ZK-proven data infrastructure to digital asset service providers. Designed by MakeInfinite Labs, the project offers service providers with decentralized and verifiable databases.
Space and Time allow developers to access large datasets off-chain and verify their accuracy on-chain using smart contracts. The Microsoft-backed Space and Time leans on major distributed ledgers to index data while providing a safe platform for developers to query gleaned data via its proprietary Proof of SQL.
Space and Time's Proof of SQL mechanism verifies that an SQL query on a dataset is accurate despite off-chain computations. Each query result is wrapped as a ZK proof and submitted to a distributed ledger for smart contracts to verify their proof.
'Prior to Space and Time, onchain applications had no way to query basic user data from a database of blockchain activity without introducing security risks and tampering,' said Space and Time co-founder Scott Dykstra.
The use cases in digital asset verticals are broad, with decentralized finance (DeFi) applications racking the most utility. Service providers and developers can confirm asset prices without exposing price feeds.
Furthermore, DeFi protocols can update interest rates using ZK proof-based data infrastructures while leaning on the offering for Proof-of-Reserves. Video game developers can provide on-chain rewards based on in-game activities, while decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) can use the offering for automated treasury activities.
The project is off to a good start with Dykstra confirming that major technology giants are building with Space and Time's expansive solutions. Google BigQuery and Azure are leaning on Space and Time as the project braces for an avalanche of users in the coming weeks.
Blockchain use cases outside DeFi continue to surge
Outside of DeFi, blockchain records myriad utilities across cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, Internet of Things (IoT), and supply chain. To stifle the trend of AI misinformation, researchers are turning to blockchain to fight bias and deepfakes, with one report tagging the technology as the missing link for trust.
Blockchain is also being used in public services, with governments rolling out Web3-based solutions around subsidies and digital IDs. An integration of blockchain with IoT is tipped to solve a slew of climate change issues, with previous use cases in agriculture yielding benefits.
In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek's coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI .
Watch | Alex Ball on the future of tech: AI development and entrepreneurship
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Google to pay $36M fine for anticompetitive deals with Australia's largest telcos
Google has agreed to pay a 55 million Australian dollar ($36 million) fine for signing anticompetitive deals with Australia's two largest telcos that banned the installation of competing search engines on some smartphones, the U.S. tech giant and Australia's competition watchdog said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement it had commenced proceedings in the Australian Federal Court on Monday against the Singapore-based Google Asia Pacific division. The court will decide whether the AU$50 million ($36 million) penalty is appropriate. Under the anticompetitive agreements, which were in place for 15 months until March 2021, Telstra and Optus only pre-installed Google Search on Android phones sold to customers. Other search engines were excluded. In return, the telcos received a share of the advertisement revenue Google generated from those customers. Google accepted that the agreements were likely to have the effect of 'substantially lessening competition,' the commission said. Google has also signed a court-enforceable undertaking that commits the company to removing certain pre-installation and default search engine restrictions from its contracts with Android phone manufacturers and telcos, the commission said. The tech company said in a statement: 'We're pleased to resolve the ACCC's concerns, which involved provisions that haven't been in our commercial agreements for some time.' Commissioner chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said: "Conduct that restricts competition is illegal in Australia because it usually means less choice, higher costs or worse service for consumers.' 'Importantly, these changes come at a time when AI search tools are revolutionising how we search for information, creating new competition,' Cass-Gottlieb added. Last year, Telstra, Optus and their smaller rival TPG agreed to court-enforceable undertakings with the commission that they would not renew or make similar deals with Google to limit search options.
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Google Pixel Watch 4 vs. Galaxy Watch 8 Classic: The Ultimate Showdown
The smartwatch market continues to evolve, offering users a variety of choices that cater to different preferences and lifestyles. Samsung has already released its new Galaxy Watch 8 Classic, and the most anticipated release of 2025 is the Google Pixel Watch 4. These two devices represent distinct approaches to design, functionality, and user experience. Samsung leans into its heritage of blending traditional aesthetics with innovative technology, while Google emphasizes a sleek, minimalist design paired with modern performance. By examining their design, size options, display, hardware, battery life, and features, you can determine which watch aligns best with your needs. Watch this video on YouTube. Design: Classic Heritage vs. Modern Minimalism The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is a testament to timeless design. Its iconic rotating bezel not only adds a tactile element to navigation but also reinforces its classic watch aesthetic. The 'squirkle' case—a fusion of square and circular shapes—encases a fully circular display, striking a balance between vintage charm and modern functionality. This design appeals to users who appreciate a traditional look with a touch of innovation. In contrast, the Google Pixel Watch 4 adopts a 'water drop' design, where the glass seamlessly curves into the case. This creates a clean, minimalist appearance that exudes modernity. The slim bezels and smooth contours make it an attractive choice for those who prioritize contemporary elegance. Whether you prefer the tactile familiarity of Samsung's rotating bezel or the sleek simplicity of Google's design, both watches offer distinct visual identities. Size Options: Flexibility for Different Wrists Samsung's Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is available exclusively in a bold 46 mm size, making it a statement piece on the wrist. This size is ideal for users who prefer a larger, more prominent smartwatch. However, it may not be as comfortable for individuals with smaller wrists. Google, on the other hand, provides more flexibility with two size options for the Pixel Watch 4: a smaller 41 mm model and a larger 45 mm version. This range accommodates a wider audience, making sure that users with smaller wrists or those who prefer a more compact wearable can find a suitable option. The availability of multiple sizes highlights Google's commitment to inclusivity and user comfort. Display: Brightness vs. Smoothness The display is a critical component of any smartwatch, and both models excel in this area, albeit with different priorities. Samsung equips the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic with a 1.34-inch Super AMOLED display that delivers an impressive 3,000 nits of brightness. This ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, making it a practical choice for outdoor enthusiasts. Google's Pixel Watch 4, while slightly smaller in its smaller variant (1.27 inches) and slightly larger in its bigger model (1.43 inches), features AMOLED displays with at least 2,000 nits of brightness. Additionally, the Pixel Watch 4 features a 60 Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals for an immersive user experience. While Samsung prioritizes outdoor visibility, Google focuses on balancing display size options with smooth performance, catering to users who value both aesthetics and functionality. Hardware: Power and Storage Under the hood, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is powered by the Exynos W1000 chip, paired with 2 GB of RAM and 64 GB of storage. This combination provides ample space for apps, media, and other data, making it a versatile device for everyday use. Google's Pixel Watch 4, on the other hand, features the Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 chip, which is designed to deliver improved performance and energy efficiency. It also includes 2 GB of RAM but offers 32 GB of storage. While Samsung provides more storage capacity, Google's newer chip may offer better overall performance and battery optimization. This makes the Pixel Watch 4 a compelling choice for users who prioritize innovative hardware. Battery Life: Longevity vs. Efficiency Battery life is a crucial factor for any smartwatch user. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic features a 445 mAh battery, which provides 1-2 days of usage depending on activity levels and settings. This longevity makes it a reliable option for users who need a watch that can keep up with their busy schedules. Google's Pixel Watch 4, by comparison, includes a smaller 306 mAh battery in its 41 mm model and a 420 mAh battery in the 45 mm version. However, the Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 chip and Wear OS 6 optimizations may help offset the smaller battery capacity, potentially extending usage times. This highlights Google's focus on efficiency and software integration to enhance the user experience. Software and Features: Ecosystem and Health Tracking Both watches run on Wear OS 6, but their ecosystems and features differ significantly. Samsung integrates its Galaxy Eye and Gemini Assistant, offering advanced bioactive sensors for heart rate, ECG, temperature, and antioxidant tracking. Additional features such as a running coach and Samsung Health further enhance its fitness capabilities, making it a strong choice for health-conscious users. Google, meanwhile, emphasizes a streamlined user experience with its Material You redesign and Gemini 2 assistant. The Pixel Watch 4 also includes enhanced fitness tracking, workout building, and expanded activity monitoring. These features cater to users who value simplicity and functionality in their daily routines. While both watches offer robust health and productivity tools, their distinct approaches ensure that users can find a device that aligns with their specific needs. Key Differentiators: What Makes Each Unique The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic's standout feature is its rotating bezel, which provides intuitive tactile navigation. Combined with its comprehensive health tracking suite, including unique metrics like antioxidant monitoring, it appeals to fitness enthusiasts and traditional watch lovers alike. Google's Pixel Watch 4, on the other hand, focuses on innovative design with slimmer bezels and a modern aesthetic. The inclusion of the Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 chip underscores its commitment to performance and efficiency, making it an attractive option for users who prioritize innovation and style. Making the Right Choice Choosing between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic and Google Pixel Watch 4 ultimately depends on your personal preferences and priorities. If you value a polished, traditional design with reliable features and comprehensive health tracking, Samsung's offering is a strong contender. However, if you're drawn to sleek aesthetics, modern performance, and the promise of technological advancements, Google's Pixel Watch 4 may be the better fit. Both watches cater to distinct audiences, making sure there's a smartwatch for every preference and lifestyle. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in AMOLED Display. Source & Image Credit: Demon's Tech Filed Under: Android News, Gadgets News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Tech companies know when ‘you're looking at pictures of your ex'
Social media developers have worked tirelessly to track your every move, and the designers behind these apps have confirmed they can even see when you're stalking an ex's profile Tech experts who helped to create the apps we use day in day out have since opened up about just how much of your online behaviour they track – and it turns out it's just about everything. The Social Dilemma is a groundbreaking documentary that dropped on Netflix, revealing to audiences the inner workings of their most used apps. From Google to Facebook and Instagram, the creators behind some of these big hitters opened up about just how much of what you get up to on your devices is monitored and used to keep you online. "If you are not paying for the product. You are the product". These were powerful words used by former Google design ethicist and leading voice throughout the film, Tristan Harris. He explained in simple terms the ethics behind sites - that while they may seem like a simple way to see what your friends are up to or source new information, they are essentially "competing for your attention". The technology ethicist named some of the world's biggest social media apps and how their business models are all set to keep people engaged on their screens. Other experts chimed in to explain that while many of these services we deem to be free, they are in fact not, it's just that they are in fact paid for by advertisers – ultimately, our attention is the product. The documentary explains the way in which these booming tech companies, in order to be successful, need to have accurate predictions. How they do that is with a hell of a lot of data, which they gather through constantly monitoring our online behaviour. Jeff Seibert, Twitter 's former executive and serial tech entrepreneur, explained just how this works. He said: "What I want people to know is that everything they're doing online is being watched, is being tracked, is being measured. Every single action you take is carefully monitored. and recorded." "Many people call this surveillance capitalism," Harris explains. He added: "Capitalism profits off of the infinite tracking of everywhere everyone goes by large technology companies whose business model is to make sure that advertisers are as successful as possible." When explaining just how much tech companies monitor, Seibert said they have the capability to see not only when you look at something but also how long you're looking at it for. This helps them to understand users' emotions on a deeper level when they're feeling lonely or even in depressive states. "They know when people are looking at photos of their ex romantic partners," the tech entrepreneur explained. "They know what you're doing late at night. They know the entire thing." If one thing became clear in The Social Dilemma, it was that technology companies have more unprecedented amounts of information about us than anyone has ever had before. The more we continue to use these apps, the better they get to know their users and the more time they can guarantee we spend using their platforms. To uncover more about the online world and the intelligent minds behind these apps, you can watch The Social Dilemma, exclusively on Netflix. It's full description reads: "This documentary-drama hybrid explores the dangerous human impact of social networking, with tech experts sounding the alarm on their own creations."
