Alliance with AIADMK for 2026 polls restricted to only Tamil Nadu for now: Puducherry BJP in-charge
AIADMK Puducherry unit secretary A. Anbalagan had recently expressed displeasure over the BJP's decision to independently distribute welfare assistance in constituencies across the Union Territory.
Asked about this, Mr. Surana said: 'As of now, our alliance for the 2026 Assembly polls with AIADMK pertains to only Tamil Nadu. So far, we have not held talks with AIADMK for coming Assembly polls in Puducherry. It is only an emerging political situation. Hence, we are working in all 30 constituencies to shore up our support base and strengthen our both level activities.'
Mr. Surana was in Puducherry on Monday (August 18, 2025) for the party's election strategy meeting.
On the accusation that BJP was working in constituencies even currently held by AINRC, he said 'our alliance partner too is active in all the 30 constituencies. Both the parties will try to strengthen their base in all constituencies There is nothing wrong in political parties trying to galvanise their workforce before the Assembly election. It will help the alliance only.'
Asked if he was ruling out any electoral pact with the AIADMK in Puducherry, Mr. Surana said 'AIADMK is our valued partner and future decisions, electoral strategies are decided by our national leadership in consultation with partners.'
In the last Assembly polls, the AINRC contested 16 seats and allotted 14 seats to BJP. The BJP had parted with 5 seats from its kitty to the AIADMK. The AINRC had won 10 and BJP 6. The Dravidian party had failed to win any of the seats it contested. The BJP leaders in recent meetings had expressed desire to contest more seats considering the strike rate the party achieved in the last polls.
The AIADMK Puducherry leadership has requested Chief Minister N. Rangasamy to convene a meeting of National Democratic Alliance to sort out issues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Palaniswami trains guns on Vijay
AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami on Thursday attacked TVK founder Vijay, saying he was being ignorant and was expecting results without hard work. Mr. Palaniswami was addressing a meeting in Kancheepuram as part of his statewide tour. Without naming Mr. Vijay, Mr. Palaniswami compared politics with cinema, and said that just as one could not [always] debut as a hero in films, a [political] newcomer could not expect to shine in politics immediately. Mr. Palaniswami's comments came in response to Mr. Vijay's speech at his party's State conference, in which he said the AIADMK had formed an incompatible alliance with the BJP. 'Some people are asking whose hands is the AIADMK in today. What a pity! That kind of talk is out of ignorance. If he is the leader of a party without even knowing this, how can his partymen trust him?' he said. Attributing his success in politics to the people, Mr. Palaniswami said his only identity was hard work, loyalty, and service that helped him become the party's general secretary as well as the Chief Minister of the State. 'Some people are saying whatever comes to mind without knowing what is happening in the country,' he said. A plant would take time to become a tree and then to bear fruits, Mr. Palaniswami said, adding that any political organisation would also have to go through a similar process. Due to the hard work of late leaders M.G. Ramachandran and Jayalalithaa, the AIADMK ruled the State for over three decades, Mr. Palaniswami said, listing the achievements of successive AIADMK governments. 'Many are ignorant of all this, and speak as if they have accomplished a Himalayan task,' he said. Pointing to former Ministers S.S. Vaigaichelvan and V. Somasundaram, who were accompanying him, Mr. Palaniswami said they, too, were recognised through their hard work. 'Some people think they have an influence on the people. They are talking as if the people could be saved only on their arrival. You all know whom I am referring to,' he said. Recalling the life and contributions of MGR and Jayalalithaa, Mr. Palaniswami said, 'Whoever intends to start a political party could do so only by praising our leaders.' Recalled his public life spanning five decades, he said, 'Some people are not even working, but are already expecting results. It would not last.' Reiterating that the AIADMK was the only force that could defeat the DMK, he said his party had the highest number of workers.
Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Day after attack, CM Rekha Gupta announces public hearings in all Delhi constituencies
Delhi chief minister Rekha Gupta on Thursday announced that she will hold public hearings in every assembly constituency, just a day after she was physically assaulted during a 'Jan Sunwai' at her official residence in Civil Lines. Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta a day after she was allegedly attacked during a 'Jan Sunwai' programme at her official residence.(PTI) Announcing the decision, Rekha Gupta recalled her father's lesson, 'When I was in college, Papa gave me a car to drive. One day, a big accident happened. I got scared and became afraid to even touch the car again. Then Papa said that accidents happen in life, but you can't stop out of fear. You can't stop walking on the path,' she said. She added, 'Today, his same lesson comes to mind again. Yesterday, another accident happened, but I can never stop fighting for the interests of Delhiites.' The chief minister stressed that women have the strength to withstand adversities. 'Anyway, women have double the strength to fight through difficulties. They have to pass countless tests to prove themselves. I am ready too! Now, public hearings will not only be held at my home but in every assembly of Delhi. Your Chief Minister, at your doorstep,' Gupta said. On Wednesday, the Delhi CM said the attack would never 'shake her determination' or 'weaken her resolve' to serve the people. 'Such attacks can never shake my determination or weaken my resolve to serve the people. I will now be among you with even greater energy and dedication,' she had said in a post on X. Attack during Jan Sunvai at CM residence The Delhi CM's announcement came after she was physically assaulted during her weekly public hearing (Jan Sunvai) on Wednesday. Police said the accused, identified as Rajeshbhai Khimjibhai Sakriya, a 41-year-old auto driver from Rajkot in Gujarat, entered posing as a complainant. According to people in the CM's office, the man moved forward while the chief minister was interacting with citizens, handed her a piece of paper, started speaking loudly, used expletives, and then "attacked" her. The CM's security team and others present at the spot overpowered the assailant and handed him over to police. A first information report (FIR) under sections pertaining to attempt to murder has been registered. Police said his motives are not yet known, and it is unclear if he acted alone. Meanwhile, on Thursday morning, all seven of the party's Members of Parliament from Delhi, including Chandni Chowk MP Praveen Khandelwal, visited Gupta at her residence to enquire about her health. Delhi BJP MPs described the incident as a 'mishap'.
News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
Mobbed By Oppn, Karnataka Govt Sends Crowd Control Bill To House Panel: What Are The Objections?
There was stiff opposition from the BJP and JD(S), who argued that the proposed law could curtail protests and affect cultural or religious events The Siddaramaiah government introduced the Karnataka Crowd Control (Managing Crowd at Events and Places of Gathering) Bill, with stringent penal provisions, which it hoped to pass in this assembly session. But the proposed legislation has now been referred to a house committee after facing severe opposition from the BJP and JD(S) on the way it has been framed. The bill was introduced in the wake of public outrage over the stampede two months ago at Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru following RCB's IPL victory celebrations. The June 4 stampede, which claimed 11 innocent lives after lakhs of RCB fans gathered to see the winning team and the trophy brought to Bengaluru after 18 years, raised serious questions on crowd control, event management, organisers' responsibility, and people's safety. Both the Karnataka government and the RCB management faced criticism for poor planning, lack of coordination between authorities, and inadequate safety arrangements at the event. Karnataka home minister Dr G Parameshwara, who is piloting the bill, clarified that family functions or events such as marriages held within private premises are exempted. He said the Chinnaswamy Stadium incident was a 'wake-up call" that made the government conclude, after much deliberation, that event organisers must bear responsibility in the event of any mishap. However, the bill was referred to a house committee following stiff opposition from the BJP and JD(S), who argued that the proposed law could curtail protests and affect cultural or religious events. The bill stated its main aim as: 'It is considered necessary to make a new legislation to— (i) effectively control the crowd and manage mass gatherings at events and functions; and (ii) prevent unlawful gatherings." The bill defines crowd management as the techniques used to manage lawful assemblies before, during, and after an event. It specifies that anyone intending to organise a function expected to draw a large gathering must obtain prior permission from the jurisdictional authority. If the expected crowd is fewer than 7,000, permission may be granted by the officer in charge of the local police station after due inquiry. For gatherings between 7,000 and 50,000, the jurisdictional deputy superintendent of police is the competent authority, while events expecting more than 50,000 people require permission from the jurisdictional superintendent or commissioner of police. The bill further mandates that organisers must apply for permission at least 10 days before the event. Adequate arrangements must be made to ensure the smooth movement of crowds in and around the venue, and organisers are required to execute an indemnity bond of Rs 1 crore. Defending the need for a regulatory framework, Parameshwara cited the farmers' protest in Belagavi during the winter session of the legislature, which repeatedly led to lathi charges year after year. 'Of late, we have seen crowded events taking place without any legal framework. One example of such an event is during the winter session at Belagavi, farmers were lathi-charged," said Parameshwara. He raised the question as to what created such circumstances. Where were the regulations or the permissions sought to hold such an event, the home minister questioned. The penal provisions of this bill have also triggered strong opposition. The proposed legislation prescribes up to seven years' imprisonment if an event leads to injuries, and 10 years or life imprisonment in case of fatalities. Causing disturbance or breaching peace during an event will attract three years in jail, along with a Rs 50,000 fine. It also stipulates that anyone disobeying or abetting disobedience of lawful directions issued by a police officer of or above the rank of sub-inspector, instructing dispersal from a gathering, will be liable to a Rs 50,000 fine and one month of community service. Once enacted, these offences will be cognisable, non-bailable, and triable by a judicial magistrate first class. The opposition, however, raised major concerns and called the bill 'draconian". Leader of the opposition R Ashoka hit out at the government, alleging that the bill had been drafted only to placate the High Court, which had raised five questions on the tragedy. He argued that nothing new had been added, since 'all the provisions already exist", and claimed the move was merely to file an affidavit before the court. Ashoka further cautioned that the provisions were ambiguous and risked being used as a political tool against the opposition. He pressed for the bill to be sent to a house committee for wider discussion and insisted on a clear demarcation between commercial and non-commercial events before it could be taken forward. In the opposition, the BJP and JD(S) leaders asked how large religious gatherings could be managed under such stringent rules. BJP MLA Sunil Karkala questioned how temples could be expected to furnish a Rs 1-crore bond. He also asked who would be held accountable if something went wrong at a government event of such magnitude. The bill also lays out the approval process: upon receiving a written application from organisers, the authority shall conduct an inquiry into the details of the organisers, the expected crowd size, the purpose of the event, the safety measures proposed, and the no-objection certificates obtained from departments such as fire and emergency services, health and family welfare, public works, and traffic police. The authority will also verify the venue, including the feasibility of crowd control, entry and exit points, and other safety and law-and-order requirements. A decision on granting or denying permission must be taken within four days of receiving the application. If permission is denied, reasons must be clearly stated and communicated to the organisers in writing or electronically. If granted, the authority will convene security meetings with the organisers and relevant departments, assign roles and responsibilities, and prepare a detailed bandobast or security plan, which must be submitted to superior officers within two days of the meeting. On the day of the event, the authority and the organisers must ensure strict compliance with the approved bandobast scheme. In case of exigencies or unforeseen developments, the authority reserves the right to cancel permission or halt the ongoing event. BJP members also argued that during religious gatherings, miscreants might try to create disturbances—as has been witnessed in the past—raising questions about whether temple authorities would then be held accountable. BJP MLA S Suresh Kumar lashed out at the government, arguing that the bill was drafted only after the High Court pulled it up over the stampede tragedy and demanded standard operating procedures (SoPs). top videos View all 'At the Jagannath Temple in Puri, 10 to 15 lakh people gather. Even though it may seem disorganised, the crowd is managed in such a way that tragedies are prevented. The June 4 stampede happened because of a hunger for publicity. The provisions this bill speaks of already exist and can be enforced with common sense, even without passing a new law. To bring such legislation only after 11 people lost their lives is deeply unfortunate," he said. Having heard the opposition up in arms, the home minister decided to refer the bill to a house committee. About the Author Rohini Swamy Rohini Swamy, Associate Editor at News18, has been a journalist for nearly two decades in the television and digital space. She covers south India for News18's digital platform. She has previously worked with More Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : BJP congress crowd karnataka stampede view comments Location : Bengaluru, India, India First Published: August 21, 2025, 22:13 IST News politics Mobbed By Oppn, Karnataka Govt Sends Crowd Control Bill To House Panel: What Are The Objections? Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
