IRS delays popular child tax credit refunds for 2024 returns. Here's how to claim them
IRS delays popular child tax credit refunds for 2024 returns. Here's how to claim them
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Tax season begins: New IRS tools aim to simplify filing
Tax season has officially begun, and the IRS started accepting returns on Monday.
Fox - 32 Chicago
The Internal Revenue Service started accepting income-tax returns on Jan. 27, opening the spigots of refund money shortly thereafter. But taxpayers who claimed the Earned Income Tax Credit or the Additional Child Tax Credit will need to wait a bit longer.
'By law, we can't issue EITC or ACTC refunds before mid-February,' the Internal Revenue Service explained on its website, irs.gov. 'This includes your entire refund, not just the part that's related to the credit you claimed on your tax return.'
If you claimed one of those credits, plan on a refund showing up by around March 3, the IRS said. Refund money generally will appear faster if you have it directly deposited to a bank account. The delays are designed to protect taxpayers from fraud, reducing the possibility that crooks might get in early and file for refunds in someone else's name.
A popular federal tax credit among Americans
The EITC is a payment designed to help lower- and moderate-income workers, especially those with kids. Refund amounts vary depending on income and the number of dependent children. On average, taxpayers who claimed this credit received $2,743 in 2023.
What qualifies as low income? It varies based on the number of dependent children and other factors. Singles without any children can receive a credit with up to $18,591 in 2024 income or $25,511 for married couples filing jointly. Conversely, singles with three or more kids can qualify with income up to $59,899 or up to $66,819 for married couples. The lower the income and the more kids, the higher the potential credit.
The irs.gov website features an "EITC assistant" calculator to help you determine if you qualify and, if so, for how much of a refund.
In Arizona, nearly 516,000 federal tax returns were filed in 2022, the most recent year for which full statistics are available, claimed the EITC, the IRS reported. That was out of about 3.37 million individual federal returns filed by Arizonans that year.
More tax tips: Tax deductions and credits may boost your refund. Which ones are available to new filers?
Two interconnected tax credits for children
The Additional Child Tax Credit, the other benefit for which refunds are being delayed, is connected to the Child Tax Credit. Understanding one requires familiarity with the other.
The Child Tax Credit offers tax savings to parents, including those who otherwise might not need to file a tax return.
It's worth up to $2,000 for each qualifying child, who generally must be under 17, have lived with you for more than half of the year, provided no more than half of their own financial support and be a U.S. citizen, national or resident alien. Plus, the youngster will need a Social Security number and must be your child, stepchild, eligible foster child or other dependent.
The IRS also has an online tax assistant calculator to help determine if you qualify for this benefit, along with other explanatory information on it.
Married couples filing a joint return can receive the full credit with income of not more than $400,000, or $200,000 for single parents. Partial credits are available for incomes above those thresholds.
But you might not receive the full $2,000-per-child credit if your tax liability for the year is too low. That's where the Additional Child Tax Credit comes in. It enables qualified taxpayers to receive up to $1,700 of that $2,000 amount as a refund. You first apply for the Child Tax Credit to determine eligibility for the additional one.
'Understanding the Additional Child Tax Credit begins with the standard Child Tax Credit,' noted TurboTax. 'If your available Child Tax Credit is greater than your tax liability, the Child Tax Credit can only reduce your tax bill to zero — you don't get any unused portion of the credit back as a refund.'
You also can start the process by filling out the Child Tax Credit worksheet contained in the instructions for Form 1040.
Roughly 410,000 returns filed by Arizonans in 2022 claimed the fully refundable Child Tax Credit or Additional Child Tax Credit, the IRS said. The nonrefundable child-related credits were claimed nearly twice as often.
There are other related benefits, too, such as the Child and Dependent Care Credit, which offers partial subsidies for working parents who must pay helpers for assistance, and the Credit for Other Dependents, for those who can't qualify for the Child Tax Credit.
Reach the writer at russ.wiles@arizonarepublic.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tigran Gambaryan, Binance Exec Who Was Detained in Nigeria for Nearly a Year, Departs Crypto Exchange
Tigran Gambaryan, the former U.S. federal agent who led Binance's financial crime compliance efforts, announced that he is leaving the company after a tumultuous four-year tenure. Gambaryan, once a IRS investigator, joined Binance in 2021 when the crypto exchange was under growing scrutiny for its lax compliance with anti-money laundering regulations. At the time, Binance had no investigations team. Under his leadership, the company built a 100-person global unit staffed with former prosecutors and federal agents, he said on social media. However, His tenure at Binance took a dramatic turn in 2024, when Nigerian authorities detained him on allegations tied to the exchange's operations. Gambaryan spent eight months in prison before being released on humanitarian grounds following bipartisan U.S. political pressure. He was ultimately cleared of charges, though Nigeria continued to pursue penalties against Binance. Later on, he said it would be an honor to serve his country again, if asked to do so. In his departure message, Gambaryan reflected on his time at Binance and expressed a desire to continue bridging the worlds of enforcement, technology, and compliance. 'There's a growing need for trusted, experienced operators, people who understand how to translate between technology, enforcement, and compliance,' he wrote. 'That's where I intend to continue making a difference,' he in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Budget chairman explains why there's no 'pork' in Trump tax bill after Elon Musk attacks
FIRST ON FOX: The chairman of the House Budget Committee is pushing back on Elon Musk's claim that President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" is full of "pork." Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital it was not possible for "pork barrel spending" to be included in the legislation, called a budget reconciliation bill, because the reconciliation process was simply not the mechanism for such federal funds. "Reconciliation does not have anything to do with discretionary spending — earmarks, and all of that," Arrington said. "And quite frankly, the [Department of Government Efficiency] findings were, I think, almost entirely an issue for... annual appropriations." "Discretionary spending" refers to the annual dollars allocated by Congress each year through the appropriations process, also known as "spending bills." House Gop Targets Another Dem Official Accused Of Blocking Ice Amid Delaney Hall Fallout It's a process that's historically known to be rife with "pork barrel spending" from both Republicans and Democrats — funding for pet projects or other specific initiatives benefiting a certain member of Congress' district. Read On The Fox News App But reconciliation deals with the government's "mandatory spending" — largely government welfare programs that can only be amended by changing the law. "We're dealing with mandatory spending programs — entitlements, health care, welfare and the tax code," Arrington said. "We did a responsible bill. There's no pork in it. The question, I think, for some folks and the objective of mine and my budget committee members was, whatever we're doing on tax or security to unleash growth and to buy greater security for the American people, we wanted it to be done in a fiscally responsible way." Senior White House advisor Stephen Miller echoed that sentiment on X: "The reconciliation bill cuts taxes, seals the border and reforms welfare. It is not a spending bill. There is no 'pork.' It is the campaign agenda codified." Mike Johnson, Donald Trump Get 'Big, 'Beautiful' Win As Budget Passes House The vast majority of the trillions of dollars in the bill are aimed at Trump's tax policies — extending his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) while implementing new priorities like eliminating taxes on tips and overtime wages. There's also $4 trillion in House Republicans' versions of the bill aimed at raising the debt limit. The legislation is also aimed at amending current laws to enable new funding for border security and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) — projected to boost those priorities by billions of dollars. To offset those costs, House GOP leaders are seeking stricter work requirements for Medicaid and food stamps, while shifting more of the cost burden for both programs to the states. Republicans are also looking to roll back green energy tax subsidies in former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). But Musk and other fiscal hawks' main concern has been that the legislation does not go far enough with those spending cuts. They have also raised concerns about the overall bill adding to the national debt, which is currently nearing $37 trillion. As part of his social media campaign against the bill, Musk called for both eliminating the tax cuts and removing the debt limit increase from the final legislation. Musk reposted another X user who wrote, "Drop the tax cuts, cut some pork, get the bill through." He's also shown support on X for Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and his call to strip the debt limit provision out of the bill. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has projected that the bill would cut taxes by $3.7 trillion while raising deficits by $2.4 trillion over a article source: House Budget chairman explains why there's no 'pork' in Trump tax bill after Elon Musk attacks
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
What To Know About The IRS's $4 Billion Tax Assessment On Yum! Brands
KFC Taco Bell (Photo by Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images) The IRS has assessed $4 billion in taxes, penalties, and interest on Yum! Brands. The issue stems from a tax-deferred reorganization in 2014. Yum! Brands is now suing to prevent the IRS from collecting these funds. M&A is often among the most complicated tax issues large corporations face, which can often lead to uncertainty and scrutiny from the IRS. In this article, I discuss the Yum! Brand corporation, what happened in 2014, and why they are facing such a steep tax penalty now over a decade later. Yum! Brands is the parent company of KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, and Habit Burger & Grill. As noted by The Washington Post, this corporation spun off from PepsiCo in 1997 to become among the largest set of restaurant chains in the United States and the world. While it currently features those three staples, the corporation has also previously held other chains, such as A&W and Long John Silvers. Yum! Brands has been known to be innovative by having combination restaurants. In these situations, customers can order from a KFC or Taco Bell (or both) at the same location. What makes Yum! Brands particularly impactful is their international appeal. As stated on the Yum! Brands website, the brands total over 61,000 locations and can be seen in 155 countries. According to CNN, KFC has blossomed to become an international staple in countries like Japan, where people often have KFC as their Christmas dinner. Yum! Brands is also no stranger to tax-related news. In early 2025, the company announced a different restructuring. While the company is famously headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky (hence, Kentucky Fried Chicken), Fortune reported that it will be relocating to Plano, TX, due to, among other things, taxes. Kentucky is a state that levies a corporate income tax (5% in 2025). Meanwhile, Texas famously has a 0% tax rate on corporate profits. Individual income tax is also not levied in Texas. Newsweek suggests that Texas has become a bit of a tax haven for new corporate headquarters such as Tesla, Toyota, Charles Schwab, Chevron, and now Yum! Brands. Prior to 2014, Yum! Brands was made up of separate legal entities based on brand and region. For example, there were separate legal entities for KFC Asia and KFC Europe. According to court filings, On November 30, 2013, Yum! Brands publicly announced a corporate reorganization. In this reorganization, the company would no longer be broken out into segments based on geography. Instead, it would focus its organization based on brands (i.e., KFC, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut). It would also have separate divisions for China and India. The goal of this reorganization was to drive growth. To help facilitate the reorganization, the new subsidiaries issued stock in exchange for stock in the previous subsidiary. This stock for stock reorganization often falls under the Internal Revenue Code Section 368(a)(1)(B), which allows for the acquisition of a corporation solely in exchange for all or part of its voting stock. As long as all of the conditions are met, the Yum! Brand legal entities can exchange the stock without recognizing a gain on the appreciated value of the stock. The conditions for this type of reorganization are as follows: Reorganizations under Section 368 are valuable for a company like Yum! Brands because it wishes to restructure the company's organization to enhance future profits. In a normal transaction where Yum! Brands were selling its stock to another company, Yum! Brands would have a gain (or loss) on the appreciated (depreciated) value of the stock. However, Section 368 allows companies to meet certain conditions to defer the gain to a future period. Importantly, companies still have to recognize a gain on the stock's appreciated value, but this gain will not typically happen until the company ultimately disposes of it. In this case, Yum! Brands thought that the conditions under Section 368(a)(1)(B) were met, which would defer the gain, allowing the reorganization to make more sense from a financial perspective. In Yum! Brand's 2024 10-K financial statements, the company notes the following: As reported by Bloomberg Tax, this disagreement comprises over $4 billion dollars in damages: the $2.1 billion in taxes that the IRS believes Yum! Brands should have paid during their reorganization in 2014, $418 million in underpayment penalties and over $1.5 billion in interest on the money that has not yet been paid to the taxing authority. $4 billion is a large assessment for any firm. However, to put it into context, Yum! Brands in 2024 had a pre-tax income of $1.9 billion and paid income taxes of $414 million on that income. Thus, a tax bill of over $4 billion is astronomical for even a company of this size. NRN reports that the disagreement stems from Yum! Brands believe to have met all of the requirements under Section 368 for the reorganization to be tax-deferred, whereas the taxing authority believes that these matters were not all addressed and initiates billions of dollars of income by way of a sale of appreciated value of stock. NRN also reports that Yum! Brands has taken this matter to court and appeals court but was unsuccessful. In turn, Law360 reports that Yum! Brands have taken the IRS to court to sue them over the collections of this $4 billion. While the matter is still uncertain, many in the M&A tax space continue to watch this saga unfold since it represents a significant assessment being levied against some of the U.S.'s most recognizable restaurant brands.
