logo
'It tells us something about how elites seek to retain their power': How Lampedusa's The Leopard skewered the super-rich

'It tells us something about how elites seek to retain their power': How Lampedusa's The Leopard skewered the super-rich

BBC News05-03-2025

Lampedusa's mid-20th-Century novel The Leopard became a bestseller, then a revered film – and is now a lavish Netflix series. Its withering takedown of society's flaws and hypocrisies still hits home today.
"Dying for somebody or for something, that was perfectly normal, of course: but the person dying should know, or at least feel sure, that someone knows for whom or for what he is dying." These are some of the opening lines of Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa's The Leopard, published in 1958, only a year after the author died of cancer.
These words are from the novel's protagonist, Prince Fabrizio, head of an aristocratic Sicilian family. He is recalling discovering the body of an unknown soldier under one of his paradisiacal villa's lemon trees. It's an image that sums up the novel's existential spirit: beneath beauty, there is rot.
Lampedusa was never published during his lifetime. His sole novel charts the fortunes of the Salina family, set against the backdrop of the Risorgimento: a social and political movement for Italian unification that led to the creation of a new kingdom of Italy in 1861, during a period of wider European revolutions. As ideas about democracy, liberalism and socialism carried throughout the continent, workers raged against the land-owning gentry, which they held responsible for worsening working conditions and widespread poverty. The period concluded in 1870 with the annexation of parts of the Italian peninsula, the unification of Italy and the capture of Rome.
In The Leopard, one such landowner, Fabrizio, strategises based on what he believes he stands to gain at this tumultuous time for the aristocracy. He orchestrates the marriage between his dashing nephew Tancredi Falconeri and the nouveau-riche Angelica Sedara – against the wishes of Fabrizio's own daughter Concetta, who is in love with Tancredi.
Considered one of the most important works of Italian literature, The Leopard was described by the cultural historian Lucy Hughes-Hallett as "the most loved and admired novel ever written in Italian". The British author EM Forster, meanwhile, in his preface to the Italian author's unfinished memoir Places of My Infancy (1971), wrote: "Lampedusa has meant so much to me that I find it impossible to present him formally… Reading and rereading it has made me realise how many ways there are of being alive." Marking only the second adaptation of the novel – and the first serialised version – a new Netflix series makes a fresh case for The Leopard's relevance in the 21st Century, more than 60 years after Luchino Visconti's classic film.
A runaway hit
Despite its historical shrewdness and epic love story, Lampedusa's novel did not initially fare well with Italian publishers. Two major publishing houses, Arnoldo Mondadori Editore and Einaudi, swiftly rejected Lampedusa's 1956 manuscript. The influential modernist and editor Elio Vittorini claimed it was too "traditional" compared with the experimental avant-garde movement sweeping Italian literature at the time. "Conservatives didn't like it because it's very rude about the Church and it's fairly cynical about aristocrats," David Laven, a historical consultant on Netflix's adaptation, tells the BBC. "Left-wingers didn't like it because he doesn't portray a positive view of the ordinary working class."
After Lampedusa's death, his book fell into the hands of literary agent Elena Croce and eventually landed on the desk of the publisher Feltrinelli. The novel had vocal detractors, including the aforementioned Vittorini and the anti-fascist author Alberto Moravia, who were both suspicious of what they believed was the novel's conservatism, a decade after the 1943 overthrowing of the fascist leader Benito Mussolini. As Rachel Donadio wrote in The New York Times in 2008, The Leopard "was at first seen as quaint and reactionary, a baroque throwback at the height of neorealism in cinema and class-consciousness in all the arts".
When it was published, however, it became a runaway bestseller, cycling through a staggering 52 editions in fewer than six months. Perhaps it resonated with a disillusioned generation living well after the Risorgimento, but appreciating what the French Marxist author Louis Aragon described as a "merciless" and "left-wing" critique of the upper classes. Lampedusa was posthumously awarded the prestigious Strega Prize, and his reputation as a literary great would soon outstrip his contemporaries.
Part of what made The Leopard difficult to stomach for so many was its scathing tone, evenly applied to all corners of Italian society. Lampedusa himself was born into the aristocracy in 1896, and lived in a grand palazzo much like the one in his novel – but that did not prevent him from lampooning his own. His biographer David Gilmour wrote in The Last Leopard (1988) that part of what prevented Lampedusa from writing until so late in life was what he believed to be the redundancy of his own class.
More like this:• 10 of the best TV shows to watch this March• The mystery of why Jane Austen's letters were destroyed• The women-only gang that menaced Victorian London
Within the novel's first few pages, Lampedusa disdains Fabrizio's wife and seven children and describes his arduous audiences with King Francis I (King of the Two Sicilies) as coming face to face with: "this monarchy which bore the marks of death upon its face". Far from believing this makes him a cut above the rest, however, the jaded Fabrizio is just as flawed: unscrupulous, forsaking his own family. A tale of disenchantment and fear of obsolescence amid a crumbling dynasty, The Leopard skewers the flaws and hypocrisies present throughout all Italian society.
"The great myth of Italian unification is that it was a bottom-up movement, that Italians suddenly woke up in the morning and really wanted to overthrow the regimes they were living in," says Laven. "If you think about Sicily, civilians were used to regime change." Sicily had been ruled by the kings of Spain, before conquests by the Italian House of Savoy and Austrian Habsburgs. The French Bourbons had taken over by the time Naples and Sicily were merged in 1816. They were, in turn, overthrown in 1848, before returning to power 16 months later.
In Lampedusa's novel, though the revolutionaries have high hopes of radical change, the protagonist insists the middle classes will simply replace the upper classes, while on the face of things everything remains the same. Despite these societal shifts, the status quo was upheld, as captured by one of the novel's most enduring lines: "If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change."
"It's not only something that's going on in Italy but across Europe in the 19th Century," says Laven. "Bismarck doesn't really want German unification. He's trying to defend the interests of the Prussian Junkers [nobility], and he's prepared to make compromises. Lots of British aristocrats don't like the way the world is going, but they realise they must accommodate themselves with a changing world in order to retain their status. [The Leopard] tells us something about the way in which elites seek to retain their power."
According to Laven, although The Leopard contains small historical inaccuracies, Lampedusa really captured the essence of the time. Unlike the work of historical fiction giants such as Leo Tolstoy or Victor Hugo, the author navigates Fabrizio's lofty world with thrift and virtuosic wit. "[When you think of historical fiction], you tend to think of these great slabs of books," says Laven. "What you have [here] is this incredible ability to capture a moment almost 100 years before he's writing with such economy of style."
Legacy of The Leopard
Five years after publication, The Leopard's status as a landmark of Italian literature was cemented by an acclaimed film adaptation, directed by Visconti, a Marxist who, like Lampedusa, hailed from a noble family. It starred Burt Lancaster as the titular leopard, Fabrizio, and Alain Delon as his nephew Tancredi. Visconti's opulent film held the same searingly cynical and yet elegiac view on the upper echelons of Italian society, according to Arabella Cifani, books editor of the Giornale dell'Arte. "Visconti understood it profoundly," she tells the BBC. "One would say that the book was connatural to the worldview held by Visconti, who was also a prince and whose ancestors had ruled Milan for over 100 years."
Famously, the film contains a lavish 25-minute ballroom scene. According to the Rotten Tomatoes' critics consensus, the waltz "competes for [the] most beautiful sequence committed to film". But amid this splendour, Lancaster's Fabrizio has a cloying sense of his own mortality, musing on what his own death will be like. The American star was not Visconti's first choice for the role, but he embarked on in-depth research, spending time with Lampedusa's widow, adopted son and members of the Sicilian nobility. Though it won the Palme d'Or in its year of release (1963), the critic David Weir claimed Visconti's film was less appreciated by audiences than Federico Fellini's 8 ½ from the same year: "The Leopard was part of the story of the early 1960s that saw movie audiences gravitating away from big-budget fiascos". Its ensuing influence on major directors has been undeniable, however, with resonances of it in the grandiose work of Francis Ford Coppola and Martin Scorsese, who has cited it as one of his favourite films, saying: "I live with this movie every day of my life".
For the creators of Netflix's new series, the way The Leopard speaks to a collapsing epoch was at the core of its appeal. "We were going through the throes of Brexit when I first read it, and it seemed to me that there was a sort of Risorgimento in reverse happening," its writer and creator Richard Warlow tells the BBC, referring to new divisions being created in Europe as opposed to unifications. "It did get me thinking about ideas of nationhood, what it is to be an island, the ingrained nature of our lives and what it's like to suddenly change that." Undoubtedly, the lavishness of the novel was another draw for the showrunners, with some already comparing it to hugely successful Netflix series like The Crown or Bridgerton.
Although the Risorgimento – and the novel's events – took place more than 150 years ago, the ramifications are still deeply felt in Italian society, according to Laven, especially against an increasingly political and economic split between north and south. "It's quite clear that for them it's still very meaningful," he says. And how much this revolutionary period of history changed anything – besides the creation of a centrally governed region of Italy – is open to debate. Cifani adds that the novel's famous line: "if we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change" continues to be used as a political slogan. It's a sentiment that seems, like Lampedusa's novel, timeless.
The Leopard is released on Netflix on 5 March.
--
For more Culture stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

David Beckham's feud with son Brooklyn and staggering net worth close to King Charles'
David Beckham's feud with son Brooklyn and staggering net worth close to King Charles'

Wales Online

time19 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

David Beckham's feud with son Brooklyn and staggering net worth close to King Charles'

David Beckham's feud with son Brooklyn and staggering net worth close to King Charles' David Beckham is finally set to receive a knighthood in the King's Birthday Honours list next week, as his reported family feud with son Brooklyn shows no signs of ending any time soon Brooklyn Beckham reportedly has a fractured relationship with his father (Image: Getty Images ) David Beckham is set to become a sir next week when he finally receives a knighthood in King Charles III's Birthday Honours list. The English footballing icon, who turned 50 in May, has long seen calls to have the honour bestowed upon him given his impact on the game and his notable donations to charity over the years. And now, according to The Sun, it appears as though Beckham will finally get the recognition that many fans believe he deserves. ‌ It comes after the King dropped a major hint towards a knighthood when he and Queen Camilla were greeted by Beckham at the Chelsea Flower Show last month. Charles asked: "You got it, didn't you?" That prompted Beckham to respond: "It was incredible, thank you. It was very kind." ‌ Beckham made a name for himself with Manchester United between 1992 and 2003, before a big money move saw him join Real Madrid. He also enjoyed stints with LA Galaxy, AC Milan and Paris Saint-Germain before hanging up his boots in 2013. However, Beckham also received 115 caps for the England national team over the course of his incredible career – eventually becoming the captain of the Three Lions during its golden generation. Now a co-owner of Major League Soccer side, Inter Miami, Beckham has seen his net worth continue to grow. It was announced earlier this year by the Sunday Times' Rich List that alongside wife, Victoria – who enjoyed a notable singing career of her own with the Spice Girls before venturing into the world of fashion – Beckham's net worth had grown by £45million over the last 12 months to a total of around £500m. Article continues below That takes the power couple's estimated fortune to just £140m shy of King Charles III's worth, according to the same publication. Unsurprisingly, a large portion of Beckham's net worth comes from his time on the pitch, given that he was paid £188m over the course of his five years with LA Galaxy alone. David Beckham will see a knighthood from King Charles III (Image: PA ) Meanwhile, lucrative brand and endorsement deals with the likes of Emporio Armani, Gillette, PepsiCo, Breitling and Adidas over the years will have helped Beckham bolster his bank balance further, while his eponymous 'Beckham' Netflix series is said to have earned him another £28m. ‌ And that's not to mention Victoria's career earnings with the Spice Girls – who remain as the top-selling girl group of all time with more than 100m records sold globally – as well as her VB designer clothing range. While Beckham's recent news of a knighthood may lead to familial celebrations, it may not be enough to mend his reportedly fractured relationship with son, Brooklyn. The two are said to have fallen out back in 2022, although the exact reason for the dispute remains unknown. Brooklyn did not attend his father's 50th birthday party earlier this year, with his wife Nicola Peltz pinning the blame his brother Romeo's then girlfriend, Kim Turnbull. ‌ Brooklyn Beckham is married to Nicola Peltz (Image: Getty Images for Airbnb ) Nicola's friends claimed that this was due to Brooklyn having a brief romantic liaison with Kim before his brother dated her, but his friends denied this. The sources, who spoke to the Mirror, also claimed that the Beckham's "chose Kim over Brooklyn." However, friends of the family also noted that this characterisation was fiction, and that Kim had cruelly been "thrown under the bus." After the recent news of Romeo and Kim splitting amicably broke this week, a source claimed that it would not change things within the family, explaining: "There are no signs of reconciliation, sadly. There is still a lot of hurt to process." Article continues below Meanwhile, insiders close to Nicola have previously said that as "an outsider coming into the Beckham family, she has helped Brooklyn see the emotional abuse and toxic behaviour within." These claims, which were dubbed "patently untrue and ludicrous" by friends of David and Victoria, were the "nail in the coffin" of a future relationship, as per sources. One said: "It was a low, low blow... how can you say such things about your own family. It will be interesting to see if Brooklyn and Nicola make any attempt to heal things now Kim is out of the picture."

Huge Netflix show CANCELLED after three seasons on screens as WAG star pulls out of eye-watering £22m deal
Huge Netflix show CANCELLED after three seasons on screens as WAG star pulls out of eye-watering £22m deal

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Huge Netflix show CANCELLED after three seasons on screens as WAG star pulls out of eye-watering £22m deal

Cristiano Ronaldo 's partner Georgina Rodriguez has confirmed she has no plans to make a fourth season of her hit Netflix show despite earning millions. The series, titled 'I Am Georgina', is reported to have made model Rodriguez, 31, $10million (£7.3m) per season, resulting in a whopping $30m (£21.9m) payday. Rodriguez also acted as an executive producer for the documentary, which first aired on the streaming giant in January 2022 and offered a unique glimpse into her life. Episodes took viewers behind the scenes with Rodriguez for both her working and personal life, including her long-term relationship with superstar Ronaldo. The third season, released in September 2024, documented the family's journey as they adapted to life in Saudi Arabia after Ronaldo joined Al-Nassr. Rodriguez, who first met Ronaldo in a Gucci store in Madrid, allowed cameras to capture her emotions as she opened her first beach house, starred in an international campaign for a clothing brand and made her debut at Paris Fashion Week. Netflix lauded the show for 'conquering' the streamer's top 10 in 46 countries. However, Rodriguez has confirmed that the series has now been cancelled. While being interviewed by Ronaldo for the latest issue of Vogue Arabia, Rodriguez said: 'The reality show has been one of the most important professional experiences and the one that has made me most excited. 'It has been a lot of work and requires so much effort. 'I like that it has given me the opportunity to show the real "me" to the world. It has been the most important and large-scale project that I have done so far. However, at the moment, I do not plan to continue with the reality show.' The couple have been together since 2016 and have daughters Alana, seven, and Bella, two, together. Rodriguez is also stepmother of Ronaldo's other three children. She recently took to Instagram to show off a gigantic engagement ring just weeks after Ronaldo revealed the savage reason he is yet to propose. He said on Netflix: 'I always tell her, "when we get that click." Like everything with our life, and she knows what I'm talking about. It could be in a year or it could be in six months or it could be in a month. I'm 1000 per cent sure that it'll happen.' Rodriguez, meanwhile, has dropped a hint over her future ambitions. She added: 'Emotionally I am completely happy, as I have fulfilled my dream of creating an incredible family. 'It's so wonderful that I can only thank God and life for this blessing. 'Professionally, I still have many dreams to fulfill despite having achieved many of the most important ones in fashion. I have many new projects that I hope you see soon, and which I am very excited to share. Stay tuned.'

Meghan Markle's 'two-week rule' key to early relationship success with Prince Harry
Meghan Markle's 'two-week rule' key to early relationship success with Prince Harry

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Meghan Markle's 'two-week rule' key to early relationship success with Prince Harry

There is a saying that people make time for who they want to make time for. When Prince Harry met Meghan Markle in the summer of 2016, they both had jam-packed schedules. Harry had a busy calendar of royal engagements and Meghan was starring in season six of Suits. In their Netflix docuseries, Harry & Meghan, the couple described the early days of their long-distance relationship. In July 2016 the Meghan was in London to promote the new season of the US show and was sent on a 'blind' date with the Prince. The two were keen to keep things under wraps, so their date took place at a private room at the exclusive Soho House - where Meghan's friend Markus Anderson was brand ambassador. Harry had just returned from France to commemorate the Battle of the Somme and was, understandably, in sombre spirits. According to the Sussexes' Netflix docuseries, Harry was late to their date at 76 Dean Street. The couple had two dates before Meghan had to fly back to Toronto on July 5, with Meghan boldly initiating the second date. She said: 'I called him that evening and said "Look I'm leaving the day after tomorrow, do you want to grab dinner tomorrow night?" 'I'm sure he thought it was so forward and American.' And for their third date, Harry took Meghan away on a romantic trip to Botswana. 'It was three, maybe four, weeks later that I managed to persuade her to come join me in Botswana, and we camped out with each other under the stars,' Harry explained during their engagement interview. 'She came and joined me for five days out there, which was absolutely fantastic. 'Then we were really by ourselves, which was crucial to me to make sure that we had a chance to get to know each other.' Harry later said it was during this trip that he knew Meghan was his 'soulmate'. After this trip, Meghan gave Harry a strict rule which he would have to follow in order for the relationship to be viable. In the first episode of Harry & Meghan, the Prince explained: 'She had a two-week rule, which was very smart, that said we had to see each other in, or around two weeks.' He recalled asking Meghan: 'How is that even possible with the stuff that I'm doing? I'm not going to be able to travel to see you that much.' The Duchess said: 'It was much easier for me to go and see him in the UK. I could still just get on a commercial flight and go and see him under the radar. Harry added: 'Those first few months when no one knew, it made much more sense for her to come to me so then she could come and stay with me on Kensington Palace grounds.' The two would go for walks around Frogmore - away from the public eye. Harry said at the time: 'I fell in love with Meghan so incredibly quickly - it was a confirmation to me that all the stars were aligned.' Harry had been looking for someone special, but up until the moment he bumped into Meghan, dating had been a bit of a disaster for him. Despite his status as the most eligible bachelor in the country, the Prince's love life included a series of failed relationships with an array of heiresses, airheads and aristocrats. Following the repeated failures, one expert claimed he started to feel like the 'royal Bridget Jones'. He was so exhausted by the constant dating that by 2016, at the age of 31, he finally felt ready to settle down and find a wife. The thirst for finding the one was so great that he candidly told TV presenter Denise van Outen at a birthday party in January 2016: 'I'm not dating and for the first time ever I want to find a wife.' Four months later, he brought up the subject of love and marriage again during an interview with The Sunday Times. He told the paper: 'At the moment my focus is very much on work but if someone slips into my life then that's absolutely fantastic.' Meghan and Harry's relationship became public in September 2017 and by November the two were engaged. Meghan and Harry's relationship became public in September 2017 and by November, the two were engaged But their whirlwind romance wasn't all smooth sailing. After a short period as working royals following their wedding in May 2018, the couple announced that they would be stepping back as senior royals in January 2020. It sent shockwaves around the world, and the coining of the term 'Megxit' quickly followed - which became one of Collins Dictionary's Words Of The Year in 2020. They went on to declare their plans to divide their time between the UK and North America, and to 'focus on the next chapter'. But it turned out to be a bitter end to the fairy tale romance Britain had enjoyed with Meghan - and the beginning of the end of Harry's relationship with his brother Prince William. In February 2021, after a year's review period, Buckingham Palace confirmed that the couple would not be returning to their royal roles. Then came the Oprah Winfrey documentary. Writing in his book, Charles III: The Inside Story, Mail columnist Robert Hardman described the interview as 'the most astonishing unburdening of family secrets since the late Princess of Wales sat down with the BBC's Martin Bashir in 1995'. Since the revelatory interview, the Sussexes have been accused by the likes of Piers Morgan of lying, with the couple themselves taking back some of their statements The pair made allegations that rocked the monarchy during the 85-minute conversation. They claimed comments had been made about how dark the skin of their son, Prince Archie, might be when he was born, while Meghan accused Kate of making her cry over bridesmaid dresses just days before her wedding. Queen Elizabeth then issued a statement saying the issues raised in the interview would be dealt with privately as a family, adding that 'recollections may vary'. Since the revelatory interview, the Sussexes have been accused by the likes of Piers Morgan of lying, with the couple themselves taking back some of their statements. Despite Meghan once being able to travel on a commercial flight, Harry now says his loss of security protection since stepping down as working royals makes it 'impossible' to bring Meghan and his children to the UK. He also recently made headlines for his no-holds-barred BBC interview, which aired hours after losing his appeal for automatic, full security protection when visiting from the US. He said he 'can't see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back to the UK at this point'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store