logo
Nurse used client details to prescribe others Ozempic, court told

Nurse used client details to prescribe others Ozempic, court told

BBC News11-02-2025
An aesthetics nurse from County Down gave prescriptions to clients using the details of other clients, a court has heard. Nichola Hawes, 49, is on trial for alleged fraud and selling or supplying medicines, including weight loss drugs and botox, without proper prescriptions. Downpatrick Crown Court heard evidence from four women who said prescriptions were filled using their details but they had not asked for, nor received medicines. Ms Hawes runs Nichola Hawes Aesthetic Clinic on the Groomsport Road in Bangor, and has 31 charges against her, including selling or supplying prescription drugs, possessing medicinal products with intent to supply and fraud by false representation.
Lauren Caproni told the jury she had filled in an online questionnaire for the self-administering weight loss drug Ozempic and it had been approved. Ms Caproni said the cost of was between £190-250 per pen. She said she cancelled a face-to-face consultation at Nichola Hawes clinic that had been scheduled for 6 April 2022. Ms Caproni said a prescription had been filled out in her name on 16 March 2022, three weeks before the proposed consultation. The jury was told the online questionnaire by the clinic states medicines will not not be prescribed until after an in-person consultation. Ms Caproni was asked by the prosecution if she had asked "for a prescription or completed a consultation with the defendant to request that prescription?". Lauren Caproni said she had not. The court then heard that a box of Ozempic pens, with the name Lauren Caproni scored out, was given to another client a few weeks later.
'Someone else's name on box'
The jury heard that Ms Hawes' clinic "provides advance skin treatment, aesthetics treatments, anti-wrinkle injections, lip fillers and fat dissolving injections". A Medicines Regulatory Group investigation began in November 2022 when they were alerted to a "potential breach" of regulations.The breach related to a box containing vials of B12, Hyaluronidase and Ozempic pens that were being delivered to Jordan Cairns, whose mother, Janice Cairns, had obtained three pens from Hawes' clinic several months earlier. Janice Cairns told the jury that after she and her daughter had their consultation in April 2022, they were given a box with three Ozempic injections inside but that she noticed "straight away…there was someone else's name" on the box but it had been "scribbled out with black pen". Janice Cairns said she received two more Ozempic pens in October 2022 but had not asked for nor received any further treatments of medicines from the clinic. The jury was told there had been a prescription of three boxes of Rybelsus, a weight-loss tablet, with Janice Cairns details filled in and signed by Ms Hawes. Ms Cairns told the court she had not asked for that nor had she ever received any of the tablets.
Louise Abbott told the court she had been a client at the clinic between December 2021 and some time in October 2022.She confirmed that in March and April 2022 she ordered and paid £500 for two weight-loss pens but when she received the box it was not in her name. The jury also heard that in September 2022 there was a prescription for another weight-loss pen, signed by Ms Hawes with Ms Abbott's details, but she told the court she did not ask nor receive that prescription.
Ozempic and Botox
A fourth women, Lorraine Rogan, told the jury she had been a client of Ms Hawes since 2019, initially receiving B12 injections that she ordered and also ordered two Ozempic pens in 2021 and another pen in May 2022.The prosecution told the jury that other prescriptions for Ozempic pens as well as Botox had been ordered in her name without her request or knowledge.The defence put to Ms Rogan that she had received the other prescriptions of Ozempic pens but Ms Rogan said she only received "three pens".
It is the crown case that Ms Hawes, a prescribing nurse, supplied different types of prescription only medicines including weight loss drugs, facial fillers and drugs used for local anaesthesia.The fraud offences accuse Hawes of filling in prescriptions with the names of people "for whom no treatment was being given".The prosecution told the court the case is not about whether any physical harm had been caused but "this case is about the defendant not adhering to the rules and regulations around the prescribing, possessing and supply of prescription only medicines". The trial continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No legal basis to appeal paedophile GP sentence, PPS says
No legal basis to appeal paedophile GP sentence, PPS says

BreakingNews.ie

time10-07-2025

  • BreakingNews.ie

No legal basis to appeal paedophile GP sentence, PPS says

There is no legal basis to refer the sentence imposed on a GP who had more than 200 indecent images of children to the Court of Appeal, the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) has said. Concern had been expressed by some politicians following the sentencing last month of Alan Trevor Campbell, 40, of Silverbrook Park in Newbuildings, Co Derry. Advertisement He pleaded guilty to 11 offences around possessing indecent images of children on dates between October 2014 and January 2022. He was sentenced to 75 hours of community service and was given a two-year probation order at Downpatrick Crown Court. The PPS had previously said it was considering if there was a legal basis to refer the sentence to the Court of Appeal. But in a statement on Thursday, a spokesperson said it had been 'unable to identify any legal error' in the sentencing process in the case. Advertisement The spokesperson said: 'The PPS recognises that there is rightly public concern when cases involving indecent images of children come before the courts, particularly where the defendant is in a position of trust. 'The courts also recognise that the abuse of young and vulnerable children in the production of indecent images is abhorrent. 'Those who access such material perpetuate the market for this abuse and are guilty by association with those who originally carried out despicable acts in creating the images in the first place.' The spokesperson said the PPS had taken into consideration the judge's sentencing remarks and sentencing guidelines in the Campbell case. Advertisement The statement added: 'While there is understandable condemnation of anyone caught with any amount of indecent images, the independent judiciary have set clear guidelines that have to be followed when sentencing all offenders to ensure a consistency in approach. 'Having carefully considered the detailed sentencing remarks prepared by the judge, we have been unable to identify any legal error and do not consider that this is a case which could be successfully referred to the Court of Appeal on the basis that the sentence was unduly lenient. 'Therefore, there is no legal basis for the PPS to refer it for consideration.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store