Public transit funding and pension reform, budget and Bears stadium are big issues in final week of legislative session
SPRINGFIELD — Illinois lawmakers head into the final days of their spring session this week looking for ways to close a substantial gap in the budget while at the same time shoring up ailing public transit operations and taking steps to fix inequities in the state's pension system.
The General Assembly also could move on Gov. JB Pritzker's legislative goals, such as further abortion protections and cryptocurrency regulation. Also still unresolved is whether the state will provide any help for the Chicago Bears' potential relocation to Arlington Heights.
As happens every spring, much of the most serious business in the four-month spring legislative session has been left to the final hours.
But legislative leaders have also warned there's also a chance that, to maintain a balanced budget, legislators will have to return to Springfield after their scheduled adjournment on Saturday, May 31, because of uncertainty over federal funding under President Donald Trump's administration.
Democratic Sen. Elgie Sims of Chicago, the lead budget negotiator for the Senate Democrats, likened the situation with federal funding to the factors that led to a two-year plus budget impasse under Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner, which decimated social services and hurt the state's economy.
'There was a great deal of uncertainty, so we couldn't predict what was going to happen from one moment to the next,' Sims said. 'It has a feel like that coming out of Washington. But that's why you have to stay the course, make sure that we have a clear understanding of what the priorities are, of what the needs are.'
While Democrats have solid control of the General Assembly, haggling about the $55.2 billion budget Pritzker proposed in February could divide party progressives and moderates, especially over issues such as health insurance for noncitizen immigrants under 65, which the governor did not fund in his proposal.
Republicans have long complained about being left out of the budget process, but Sen. Seth Lewis of Bartlett, who works on budget matters for the GOP, said he was happy about one thing this year: Pritzker's message that funding requests must be limited in a tight financial year.
'The governor's early warnings to all interested parties has (tamped) down at least the public requests for more money,' Lewis said. 'We don't know what's coming. But from the tone that I have experienced around the Capitol, the requests for funding for everyone and everything do seem to be (tamped) down.'
'That also (tamps) down any requests for additional revenue,' he said. 'I think that also (tamps) down and forces our agencies to look at what and where they're spending. So, if we can continue this and improve upon it, that'll be good for the residents of Illinois.'
Although the GOP has little power to effect change, House Republicans have voiced opposition to any proposal that calls for increased spending or any potential tax hikes. Republicans regularly note state budgets in Illinois have risen from about $40 billion to more than $50 billion in the past decade under Democratic leadership.
'The Democrats' answer for tax reform is revenue. More revenue. We need to be looking at this as a holistic approach,' said House GOP leader Tony McCombie of Savanna. 'We know we need to lower our corporate income tax here in Illinois. We know, every one of us, as we're getting our property tax bills with increases this year, we know we have to have some real reform there and we cannot piecemeal this.'
An April report from the legislature's Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability showed the state's revenue growth has fallen $471 million short of the $55 billion in state revenues Pritzker used in his February budget proposal.
The bleak financial outlook makes the challenge of addressing reforms and funding to Chicago-area and downstate transit systems especially tough. The Chicago area's transit infrastructure faces a projected fiscal cliff of hundreds of millions of dollars as COVID-pandemic-related federal funds are set to run out by the beginning of next year.
Prompted by years of customer dissatisfaction, a proposal to combine the Chicago Transit Authority, Metra, Pace and the Regional Transportation Authority is now on the table but has been met with pushback from labor groups. Legislation tying a bailout of the CTA to limits on the mayor's influence on the transit boards is also being considered. There have also been discussions about a single police force for all Chicago-area transit systems.
The RTA, which oversees the CTA, Metra and Pace, wants Springfield to allocate $1.5 billion in new funding to overhaul the system. The CTA has outlined a doomsday scenario for Chicago-area transit if lawmakers don't act on reforms and funding by May 31.
'The magnitude of these cuts is unprecedented and would require several rounds of schedule adjustments in 2026 and beyond,' CTA spokesperson Catherine Hosinski has said.
Orlando Rojas, a train conductor for Metra, said there's been talk that 300 jobs, possibly including train conductors and engineers, could be in jeopardy at the agency if transit reforms and accompanying funding aren't put into place in the near future.
'The jobs would basically … be a lot less desirable and probably, you know, have to work longer hours, less desirable hours, just to meet the needs of the remaining service,' said Rojas, a union representative for Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Local 653.
Sarah Chiappe, a line cook at a downtown Chicago hotel, takes the Red Line or a bus to work for her 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. shift. She said she worries that cuts in service could require her to take more expensive ride-sharing options home more often.
'I love taking the train. It gives me a chance to clear my mind on my way to work,' Chiappe said. 'I can finish book after book instead of going through the stressfulness of driving a car everyday to work. But God knows that road rage is a real thing in the city.'
One key lawmaker involved in transit talks, Sen. Ram Villivalam, said he's 'cautiously optimistic' there could be some sort of resolution on the transit issue by the end of the month.
'We're continuing our conversations. There's a lot of consensus as it relates to centralizing responsibilities such as fare policies, capital planning, service planning and so much more, to a central authority,' Villivalam said last week. 'And I think we're continuing to stay with our mantra of no funding without reform.'
Lawmakers could also consider changes to the state's pension system that grants greater benefits to recipients who were employed by the state prior to 2011, when changes to the massively underfunded system took effect, compared with workers hired since then.
The goal of the Tier 2 plan created back then was to shrink a pension debt that now runs to about $141 billion. However, at some point, benefits paid out under the system won't be equal to what Social Security would provide to those employees, a violation of a federal 'safe harbor' law. This would require the state to pay large sums in Social Security taxes instead of operating its own pension system which, while still costly, allows the state more flexibility.
The Pritzker administration has proposed allocating $78 million toward addressing the Tier 2 issue, a figure that Sen. Robert Martwick, a key lawmaker involved in the pension negotiations, thinks could rise as negotiations continue.
'There are different benefit structures throughout the state of Illinois and that means a one-size-fits-all is difficult. But I think we're (homing) in. We've had serious discussions between the House and the Senate, and the governor's office, and I feel like we're narrowing in on a potential solution,' said Martwick, a Chicago Democrat.
He acknowledged the goal is to make moderate changes to pension guidelines as they relate to an employee's final average salary, retirement age and other factors.
'I think there are all kind of ingredients. I don't know that we'll do all of them, or to what degree we'll do any of them,' he said. 'But those are all the different (things) that we're working on, trying to come up with a solution that works for the state, works for the taxpayers, works for our employees.'
While the Bears signaled earlier this month they aren't seeking significant state funding for a new stadium, the team does acknowledge a move to Arlington Heights would be contingent on legislative action allowing for the negotiated financing of large-scale developments. This so-called megaproject legislation would allow them to negotiate with local governments over property tax bills.
Rows of trees on the southern edge of the former Arlington International Racecourse are lit by the sunrise on May 23, 2025, in Arlington Heights. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune) The former paddock is marked by a circle and cross at the former Arlington International Racecourse on May 23, 2025, in Arlington Heights. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune) An aerial photo of the former Arlington International Racecourse on March 12, 2024, in Arlington Heights. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune) The former Arlington International Racecourse on May 19, 2025, in Arlington Heights. The Chicago Bears currently own the property and may build a new stadium and entertainment district. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune) The view from the neighborhood northeast of the former Arlington International Racecourse on Dec. 30, 2024, in Arlington Heights. The Chicago Bears own the property and could potentially build a stadium there. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune) A digital billboard advertising the Chicago Bears sits near the practice track of the former Arlington International Racecourse near Route 53 and Northwest Highway on June 25, 2024, in Arlington Heights. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune) The former Arlington International Racecourse is seen on March 12, 2024, in Arlington Heights. The Bears purchased the Arlington Heights property last year. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune) Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneThe grandstand at the former Arlington International Racecourse is dismantled on Sept. 25, 2023, in Arlington Heights. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneThe shell of the grandstand remains at the former Arlington International Racecourse as crews continue to demolish it on Aug. 31, 2023, in Arlington Heights. Brian Cassella / Chicago TribuneRiders wait for a Metra train at the station in downtown Arlington Heights on Sept. 29, 2021. Antonio Perez / Chicago TribunePeople wait for a Metra train in downtown Arlington Heights on Sept. 29, 2021. Antonio Perez / Chicago TribuneDowntown Arlington Heights features a small park, condos, retail shopping and dining on Sept. 29, 2021. Chris Sweda / Chicago TribunePeople walk through the intersection of Vail Avenue and Campbell Street in downtown Arlington Heights on Oct. 14, 2021. Eileen T. Meslar / Chicago TribuneArlington International Racecourse property in Arlington Heights on May 1, 2023. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneWorkers gather in a parking lot outside of the former Arlington Park to begin demolition on May 30, 2023, in Arlington Heights. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneDemolition continues on the grandstand at the former Arlington International Racecourse on July 11, 2023, in Arlington Heights. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneThe grandstand of the former Arlington International Racecourse is razed on Sept. 25, 2023, in Arlington Heights. Chris Sweda / Chicago TribuneSelso Nunez, of Palatine, dressed in Bears garb, peeks over the gate of Arlington International Racecourse as he looks for a spot to watch the fireworks following a day of races on Sept. 25, 2021. Antonio Perez / Chicago TribuneThe former Arlington International Racecourse is shown behind the Arlington Park Metra train station on Oct. 28, 2021. After buying the former Arlington International Racecourse in Arlington Heights in 2023, the Chicago Bears proposed building a $2 billion stadium there as part of a 326-acre development including entertainment and residential uses. (Chicago Bears) Armando L. Sanchez / Chicago TribuneClouds pass over the now-closed Arlington International Racecourse on Sept. 6, 2022, in Arlington Heights. Chris Sweda / Chicago TribuneA rendering of the plan is shown as representatives from the Chicago Bears present their concept for building a new stadium and entertainment district on the site of Arlington International Racecourse during a public meeting at Hersey High School in Arlington Heights on Sept. 8, 2022. Hart Howerton/Chicago BearsA rendering released by the Chicago Bears shows the view from the proposed stadium of the Arlington Park entertainment district. E. Jason Wambsgans / Chicago TribuneThe synthetic racing surface is being removed from the track at the Arlington Park International Racecourse property in Arlington Heights on Feb. 8, 2023. Eileen T. Meslar / Chicago TribuneThe Arlington International Racecourse property in Arlington Heights on May 1, 2023. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneConstruction equipment stands ready for expected demolition at the former Arlington International Racecourse at sunrise on May 30, 2023, in Arlington Heights. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneDemolition continues on the grounds of the former Arlington International Racecourse on June 13, 2023, in Arlington Heights. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneDemolition crews hired by the Chicago Bears begin knocking down the grandstand at the former Arlington International Racecourse on June 16, 2023, in Arlington Heights. The Bears are looking at the site for a possible new stadium for the team. Trent Sprague/Chicago TribuneDemolition continues of the main grandstand at the former Arlington International Racecourse in Arlington Heights on Aug. 1, 2023. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneDemolition of the grandstand continues at the former Arlington International Racecourse, Aug. 7, 2023. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneDemolition of the grandstand continues at the former Arlington International Racecourse, Aug. 7, 2023. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneDemolition continues on the grandstand and surrounding structures at the former Arlington International Racecourse, Sept. 25, 2023, in Arlington Heights. E. Jason Wambsgans / Chicago TribuneArlington International Racecourse property in Arlington Heights is seen on Feb. 8, 2023. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneA Metra train passes the former Arlington International Racecourse at sunrise on May 30, 2023, in Arlington Heights. Antonio Perez / Chicago TribuneArlington Park International Racecourse in Arlington Heights is seen on Sept. 29, 2021. The Chicago Bears have signed a purchase agreement for Arlington International Racecourse, the near-century-old facility that likely hosted its final horse race last Saturday. Erin Hooley / Chicago TribuneArlington Park International Racecourse is seen on Oct. 6, 2021, in Arlington Heights. The Chicago Bears have signed a purchase agreement for Arlington International Racecourse, the near-century-old facility that likely hosted its final horse race. E. Jason Wambsgans / Chicago TribuneA view of the former grandstand of Arlington Park International Racecourse property in Arlington Heights is seen on Feb. 8, 2023. Stacey Wescott/Chicago TribuneThe former Arlington International Racecourse is seen at sunrise on May 30, 2023, in Arlington Heights. Demolition is expected to begin soon. Trent Sprague/Chicago TribuneCrews demolish the main grandstand of the former Arlington International Racecourse in Arlington Heights, July 14, 2023. The site may become the future home of the Chicago Bears. Trent Sprague/Chicago TribuneMain grandstand demolition continues at the former Arlington International Racecourse in Arlington Heights, Aug. 1, 2023. Show Caption1 of 41A Chicago Bears digital billboard glows at sunrise just off of Route 53 at the former Arlington International Racecourse on May 23, 2025, in Arlington Heights. (Stacey Wescott/Chicago Tribune)Expand
But passing such a measure quickly might be a tall order, especially for Chicago lawmakers with an interest in keeping the team in the city.
There are at least three megaprojects-related bills sitting in the legislature that could provide the Bears some sort of path to work on with lawmakers in trying to ease their move to Arlington Heights if the northwest suburb officially becomes their new home.
'Apparently the Bears have made a proposal on what version, which is a combination of all three, that they want to negotiate,' Sen. Mark Walker, an Arlington Heights Democrat who is sponsoring one of those bills, said May 16, the day the Bears announced their shift in focus to Arlington Heights. 'So that's going to be under negotiation in the next couple of weeks.'
Also up in the air are elements of Pritzker's legislative agenda, a menu that includes legislation involving consumer protection, education, local governance and abortion rights, one of the governor's signature issues.
One measure passed by the Senate and awaiting approval from the House would provide more protections under Illinois' 2023 shield law, which prevents health care workers from facing disciplinary action by the state if, for instance, they provide abortion care to someone from another state that has more stringent abortion restrictions.
The legislation also would ensure prescribing abortion medications such as mifepristone would remain legal in the state even if the U.S. Food and Drug Administration revokes approval, as long as the World Health Organization recommends their use. Democrats have warned that access to these drugs could be jeopardized following declarations toward that end by Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation policy group thought to have influence on the Trump White House.
Passed by the Senate and awaiting a House vote is a Pritzker-backed bill that would require school districts to adopt guidelines to prohibit students from using cellphones during instructional time, while providing secure and accessible storage for the devices, before the 2026-27 school year.
The bill provides exceptions that would allow students to use phones during an emergency, when a teacher authorizes the device for instruction, when a phone can assist students with a disability or when the device is necessary for a student learning English.
Another Pritzker initiative would allow the state to impose regulations on the cryptocurrency industry, which has come under scrutiny for leaving customers vulnerable to fraud.
Digitized cryptocurrency can be used for electronic payments through the internet that are usually not controlled by a government body or authoritative entity, and the Trump administration has been friendly to the industry, stopping investigations into crypto businesses and litigation against at least one company.
Two bills calling for the cryptocurrency regulations are before the General Assembly, and each has passed through one chamber.
The governor is also pushing legislation that would regulate pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, companies that act as intermediaries among drugmakers, insurance corporations and pharmacies.
The legislation, among other things, would prevent PBMs from sending patients to pharmacies where they have a financial interest and it would also include prohibiting PBMs from pocketing certain savings on medications.
A bill that is expected to include language for a Pritzker-led measure that would allow some community colleges to offer four-year degrees advanced through the House Executive Committee Friday. But Democratic Rep. Curtis Tarver of Chicago at that hearing said, 'The Black Caucus has some concerns about the concept and the bill in general.'
Another Pritzker initiative awaiting consideration by lawmakers would grant voters the ability to decide whether to consolidate township governments, including as a potential solution to lower property taxes.
All of those issues could be addressed as lawmakers continue to press to get money for programs and services they want in the coming year, even as Pritzker has indicated the answer will often be 'No.'
'There are still those priorities that individuals want to see addressed in the budget, making sure that we're protecting our most vulnerable, making sure that we're providing for our seniors,' Sims, the chief budget negotiator for the Senate Democrats, said. 'So those kinds of things, those discussions are ongoing. I imagine we'll continue to do that over the next week.'
Chicago Tribune's Olivia Olander contributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools, churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey, alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision. Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.'


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools , churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey , alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision . Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.' ___ Associated Press writers Susan Haigh, Trân Nguyễn, Jesse Bedayn, John O'Connor and Brian Witte contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Who's running for office? Georgia candidates announce 2026 bids
State Rep. Derrick Jackson, a Tyrone Democrat, has become the latest candidate to launch a bid for governor. The 2026 elections are more than a year away, but campaign announcement season in Georgia is in full swing, as candidates seek to secure a position under the Peach State's iconic Gold Dome. State Rep. Derrick Jackson, a Tyrone Democrat, has become the latest candidate to launch a bid for governor, unveiling a campaign Friday that highlighted his military service, business experience and focus on advocating for Georgia residents' civil rights. 'When I see something that's not right, that's not fair, that's unjust, I have a moral obligation as an elected official,' he said in an interview with the Georgia Recorder, citing a conversation he had with the late civil rights icon and long-time Georgia Congressman John Lewis that inspired him to run for governor. 'I realized we are in a political season right now where I need to do more.' He said he hopes to implement policies that would benefit working families in Georgia, including a $20 minimum wage and eliminating state taxes for teachers, nurses, military veterans and senior citizens. 'A lot of citizens are looking at this American dream, and they see it fading away because of some of the laws and policies that we put in place in Georgia,' he said. 'And so as governor, I would be in the pivotal place to stop some of these harmful pieces of legislation that are negatively impacting families in urban, suburban, rural and underserved areas in Georgia.' Jackson, a General Electric marketing executive, began his first term in the state House in 2017, but emphasized his 42 years of leadership experience throughout his time in the U.S. Navy, the Legislature and in his private sector work. He joins fellow legislator Sen. Jason Esteves of Atlanta and former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms on the Democratic ballot. On the Republican side, Attorney General Chris Carr is the only announced candidate, but with Gov. Brian Kemp term-limited from running again, there will likely be a long list of GOP primary candidates. Lt. Gov. Burt Jones is widely expected to mount a run for governor. This also isn't Jackson's first bid for higher office. In 2022 he ran for lieutenant governor, but finished sixth in the Democratic primary. He returned to the State Legislature in 2023 after winning a special election to replace Rep. Tish Naghise, a Fayetteville Democrat who died during her first term. Most recently, he ran for House Minority Leader in 2024 but lost to Rep. Carolyn Hugley, a Columbus Democrat. The gubernatorial race isn't the only statewide contest that's getting competitive. Among the candidates who launched campaigns this week are state Sen. Brian Strickland, a McDonough Republican who is entering the race for attorney general, and President Pro Tem John F. Kennedy, a Macon Republican hoping to become Georgia's next lieutenant governor. Democratic state Rep. Jasmine Clark of Lilburn also launched a bid for Congress this week, vying to unseat incumbent Rep. David Scott to represent Georgia's 13th congressional district. Ahead of this year's Aug. 26 special election, candidates are vying for a chance to replace outgoing state Sen. Brandon Beach, an Alpharetta Republican who President Donald Trump appointed to serve as U.S. Treasurer earlier this year. A total of seven candidates — six Republicans and one Democrat — are hoping to fill his shoes. Farooq Mughal, the former Democratic state representative from Dacula, is seeking reelection after losing his seat in one of Georgia's narrowest state legislative races of the 2024 season. Mughal made history as the first Pakistani-American in the Legislature when he was elected in 2022. However, after the 2023 redistricting cycle drew more conservative voters into his district, he became the target of a governor-backed effort to flip some of the most competitive House districts red, losing to Republican challenger Sandy Donatucci in 2024 by only 80 votes. Now, he's hoping to return to the legislature with an agenda focused on supporting public schools, securing tax relief for families and addressing gun violence. 'It was the honor of my life to serve the people of District 105,' Mughal said in a statement announcing his candidacy. 'I'm running to return to the State House because there's still critical work to be done for Gwinnett families.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX