Ballot box representation
Barely a quarter of all directly elected members of the National Assembly won more than 50% of the total votes cast in their constituencies, raising new questions about the mandates of our parliamentarians. Without delving into any rigging allegations, the data not only reflects the deep political divisions in society, but the unrepresentative nature of our current first-past-the-post (FPTP) election system, where a politician can, in theory, win with even less than 10% of the vote. Should such a victory constitute a legitimate mandate?
Data from Free and Fair Election Network (Fafen) underscores the need to take a long hard look at major election reforms to ensure that the winning candidate is at least generally popular in their own constituency. One change suggested in several FPTP systems is a runoff system, where low vote-getters are eliminated and fresh polls held until somebody reaches a certain threshold, usually 50% of the vote. However, runoffs can be prohibitively expensive as they can require several stages of polling. This makes ranked choice voting - which lets people vote for several candidates while attaching a weightage to each name - more doable. This leads to an instant runoff, ensuring that the winner has at least some support from an outright majority of voters. It can also ensure that a generally unlikeable candidate with a strong base cannot win a split-vote election, and makes 'seat adjustment' between parties unnecessary.
Some countries also have proportional representation, where votes are cast for parties, not candidates, and seats are allocated based on parties' own priority lists. But while this leads to strong governments, it opens the door for undemocratic parties to take regressive measures, making it a hard pass for Pakistan, where most major political parties lack internal democracy, and some have authoritarian leadership.
Whatever the solution to better elections, it certainly is not FPTP in its current form.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Govt mulling tabling 27th amendment bill: PTI
ISLAMABAD: PTI senior leader Asad Qaiser on Sunday addressed rumours of the 27th Constitutional Amendment, stating that the party would approach the legal fraternity regarding the potential legislation. After passing the 26th Constitutional Amendment last year, the government had been planning to table another amendment, colloquially known as the 27th Amendment, aimed at reforming local governments and 'addressing issues skipped in previous legislation'. Addressing a press conference here on Sunday, the PTI leader and former National Assembly speaker stated that there is 'new drama' surrounding the legislation. Joint session approves 4 bills amid PTI protest 'In this case, we will approach the lawyers' community regarding this legislation,' Qaiser said. 'We will begin by meeting with the Islamabad Bar this month.' Referring to a 'schedule of activities' for this month, Qaiser said that the PTI will also arrange an engagement with foreign diplomats and embassies, as well as a seminar. The PTI leader also assailed the manner in which the country is being governed, branding it 'illegal, unconstitutional and undemocratic'. 'The country is practically under martial law and decisions are being made based on personal preferences,' Qaiser stated. 'The country cannot be run under this hybrid system we have right now. 'We have decided that we will use all available forums — parliament, the courts, the public — to take our struggle against injustice and oppression forward.' PTI Leader Asad Qaiser Addresses Rumors of 27th Constitutional Amendment Asad Qaiser, a senior leader of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, announced on Sunday that the party will consult with the legal community regarding the proposed 27th Constitutional Amendment. The amendment, which follows the 26th Constitutional Amendment passed last year, reportedly aims to reform local governments and address outstanding legislative issues. During a press conference in Islamabad, the former National Assembly speaker called the new legislation a 'drama' and outlined the PTI's plan of action. He stated that the party will meet with the Islamabad Bar this month as a first step. Qaiser also mentioned a series of upcoming activities for the month, including a seminar and an engagement with foreign diplomats and embassies. In his remarks, Qaiser was critical of the current government, calling it 'illegal, unconstitutional and undemocratic.' He claimed that the country is essentially under martial law, with decisions being made based on personal whims rather than established procedures. He stated that the PTI will utilize all available platforms—parliament, the courts, and public forums—to oppose what he described as injustice and oppression. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
NA panel to probe Rs300bn sugar windfall
ISLAMABAD: With sugar prices hovering around Rs 200 per kilogram, a special National Assembly panel is poised to examine how policy gaps, export incentives, and industry manoeuvres have enabled mill owners to reap windfall profits estimated at Rs 300 billion—and whether a new tax can claw some of it back for consumer relief. The multi-party panel, led by PTI's Atif Khan, is scheduled to meet Monday (today) to probe what it calls the 'hidden beneficiaries' behind the sugar price spiral. The inquiry will look into years of cyclical price hikes, export-import swings, and the role of government deregulation. The push for accountability follows testimony from the Auditor General of Pakistan at a Public Accounts Committee meeting, confirming that sugar mill owners had benefitted massively from price fluctuations and export-friendly policies. Critics in parliament have gone further, branding the sugar industry a 'mafia' with disproportionate influence over policy. Tax on windfall profits of sugar millers being mulled Federal Minister for National Food Security and Research, Rana Tanveer Hussain, recently announced full deregulation of the sector — removing government control over prices, procurement, and supply. But while he vowed to act against hoarders and named certain mill owners on the Exit Control List (ECL), retail prices have continued to soar beyond agreed limits. A July 15, 2025 agreement between the government and Pakistan Sugar Mills Association (PSMA) fixed the maximum ex-mill price at Rs 165/kg, allowing a monthly increase of Rs 2 until mid-October. Insiders say the Rs 2 increase was based on a 25% interest rate that has since dropped to 11%, making the agreed carrying cost — and thus the price escalation — unjustified. Ministries of Finance and Commerce reportedly resisted sugar exports over price concerns, but some mill groups withheld stock until export approvals to capitalise on higher global prices — reportedly Rs 30-40/kg more than domestic rates — while avoiding sales tax on exports. The government is now preparing to import 100,000 tons of sugar via the Trading Corporation of Pakistan by October to ease shortages. This follows a broken assurance from PSMA that prices would not exceed Rs 140/kg. Atif Khan's panel is now weighing a windfall tax similar to that imposed on banks, aiming to capture part of the extraordinary profits made by millers and channel them towards subsidising sugar for consumers. The move could mark the first serious fiscal pushback against a sector long accused of manipulating both the market and policy to its advantage. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Omar Ayub's bail pleas rejected in Jinnah House, Askari Tower cases
An anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Lahore on Saturday dismissed interim bail petitions filed by senior Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Omar Ayub in three separate cases linked to the May 9 violence, citing his absence from court proceedings. The cases pertain to attacks on key state and military properties during May 9 riots, including the high-profile incidents at Lahore's Jinnah House and Askari Tower. ATC Judge Manzar Ali Gul presided over the hearings and noted Ayub's failure to appear before the court as grounds for rejecting his bail pleas. A request for a one-day exemption from appearance was also denied. Also Read: Security forces kill 14 more terrorists in sanitization operation near Afghan border Ayub, who previously served as the opposition leader in the National Assembly, had secured interim bail in connection with the cases but was required to continue appearing before the court. His non-compliance resulted in the cancellation of his bail. Last month, the Faisalabad ATC sentenced top PTI leaders, including Ayub, to up to 10 years in prison in cases related to the May 9 protests. Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Shibli Faraz, Zartaj Gul, MNA Sahibzada Hamid Raza, and former MNA Sheikh Rashid Shafiq were among the 108 PTI leaders convicted out of 185 individuals implicated in the cases. Read: PM Shehbaz receives Saudi Crown Prince's invitation for Riyadh FII On Friday, the National Assembly removed three PTI leaders from key parliamentary positions following the disqualification of several party lawmakers. Ayub was stripped of his position as Leader of the Opposition, Gul lost her role as Parliamentary Leader, and Ahmad Chattha was removed as Deputy Parliamentary Leader. The May 9 protests—triggered by the arrest of PTI founder Imran Khan—led to a series of violent clashes across the country, with several PTI leaders and supporters facing charges under anti-terrorism laws. The state has since moved to prosecute those involved in the attacks on military and public infrastructure.
