Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to regulations under UK Online Safety Act
The Wikimedia Foundation took legal action at London's High Court over regulations made under the law, which it said could impose the most stringent duties on Wikipedia.
The foundation said if it was subject to so-called Category 1 duties — which would require Wikipedia's users and contributors' identities to be verified — it would need to drastically reduce the number of users who can access the site.
Judge Jeremy Johnson dismissed its case on Monday, but said the Wikimedia Foundation could bring a further challenge if regulator Ofcom "[impermissibly] concludes that Wikipedia is a Category 1 service'.
The Online Safety Act was criticised earlier this month by social media site X, which said significant changes were needed to the law. Free-speech campaigners and content creators have complained its rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content.
The British government says the law is designed to protect children and remove illegal content, and technology secretary Peter Kyle has said those who wanted to overturn it were 'on the side of predators'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
11 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Judges Matter: SA's judiciary must double down on abuse of power
JOHANNESBURG - Judiciary monitoring group Judges Matter said it's high time the country's judiciary doubles down on its zero tolerance for abuse of power. This comes after Chief Justice Mandisa Maya announced a landmark sexual harassment policy for the South African judiciary on Women's Day at the weekend. The 25-page document is part of efforts to address longstanding claims of sexual harassment in the legal fraternity. ALSO READ: Judge Selby Mbenenge appearing before tribunal is positive - Judges Matter This includes the most recent troubling case against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge, who is accused of making unwanted sexual advances towards High Court Secretary Andiswa Mengo between 2021 and 2022. The newly introduced policy outlines clear procedures for addressing complaints of sexual misconduct in the judiciary and disciplinary measures against offenders. Co-ordinator at Judges Matter, Alison Tilley, weighs in on the move. 'The idea is to establish a gender desk at the office of the Chief Justice, and people would be able to go and complain there, but in different ways, so you don't have to do a full-on Judicial Service Commission complaint like Ms Mengo had to do. You can also raise a concern in confidence and ask for mediation.' Tilley said the policy also seeks to address the skewered power dynamics that make it hard for complainants to come forward. 'It does do that, and then it also creates a reporting mechanism so that you don't have to directly confront your boss or your boss' boss, but you can then go to the gender desk and report there and talk through your options.'
The Herald
15 hours ago
- The Herald
Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to regulations under UK Online Safety Act
The operator of Wikipedia on Monday lost a legal challenge to parts of the UK's Online Safety Act, which sets tough new requirements for online platforms — but has been criticised for potentially curtailing free speech. The Wikimedia Foundation took legal action at London's High Court over regulations made under the law, which it said could impose the most stringent duties on Wikipedia. The foundation said if it was subject to so-called Category 1 duties — which would require Wikipedia's users and contributors' identities to be verified — it would need to drastically reduce the number of users who can access the site. Judge Jeremy Johnson dismissed its case on Monday, but said the Wikimedia Foundation could bring a further challenge if regulator Ofcom "[impermissibly] concludes that Wikipedia is a Category 1 service'. The Online Safety Act was criticised earlier this month by social media site X, which said significant changes were needed to the law. Free-speech campaigners and content creators have complained its rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content. The British government says the law is designed to protect children and remove illegal content, and technology secretary Peter Kyle has said those who wanted to overturn it were 'on the side of predators'. Reuters
TimesLIVE
17 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to regulations under UK Online Safety Act
The operator of Wikipedia on Monday lost a legal challenge to parts of the UK's Online Safety Act, which sets tough new requirements for online platforms — but has been criticised for potentially curtailing free speech. The Wikimedia Foundation took legal action at London's High Court over regulations made under the law, which it said could impose the most stringent duties on Wikipedia. The foundation said if it was subject to so-called Category 1 duties — which would require Wikipedia's users and contributors' identities to be verified — it would need to drastically reduce the number of users who can access the site. Judge Jeremy Johnson dismissed its case on Monday, but said the Wikimedia Foundation could bring a further challenge if regulator Ofcom "[impermissibly] concludes that Wikipedia is a Category 1 service'. The Online Safety Act was criticised earlier this month by social media site X, which said significant changes were needed to the law. Free-speech campaigners and content creators have complained its rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content. The British government says the law is designed to protect children and remove illegal content, and technology secretary Peter Kyle has said those who wanted to overturn it were 'on the side of predators'.
