Iran rules out nuclear talks if US insists it abandons enrichment
Tehran and Washington held several rounds of negotiations aimed at reviving a nuclear deal, but those efforts were derailed after Israel launched a wave of strikes on Iran in June, triggering 12 days of war.
Following the ceasefire, both sides signalled interest in returning to the negotiating table. However, Tehran has remained firm that it will not relinquish its right to the peaceful use of nuclear power.
'If the negotiations must be conditioned on stopping enrichment, such negotiations will not take place,' Ali Velayati, an adviser to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted as saying by the news agency.
The remarks came after foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said Iran had not set a date for a meeting between Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US envoy Steve Witkoff.
'For now, no specific date, time or location has been determined regarding this matter,' said Mr Baqaei on Monday.
Mr Araghchi and Mr Witkoff failed to conclude a deal after five rounds of talks that began in April and were the highest-level contact between the two countries since Washington abandoned the nuclear pact, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), in 2018. The talks, which were mediated by Oman, took place in Muscat and Rome.
Tensions escalated further after the US joined its ally Israel in limited military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June, deepening mistrust and stalling diplomacy.
'We have been serious in diplomacy and the negotiation process, we entered with good faith, but as everyone witnessed, before the sixth round, the Zionist regime, in co-ordination with the United States, committed military aggression against Iran,' said Mr Baqaei.
In a statement on Monday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said that Iran 'supports diplomacy and constructive engagement'.
'We continue to believe that the window for diplomacy remains open, and we will seriously pursue this peaceful path.'
Tehran warns against sanctions
Israel and western governments have long accused Iran of seeking to develop a nuclear weapon. Tehran strongly denies the claim, insisting its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful.
While it is the only non-nuclear weapons power to enrich uranium to 60 per cent purity, close to the level needed for a warhead, the UN's atomic energy watchdog has said it had no indication Iran was working to weaponise its stockpiles.
Mr Baqaei said on Monday that Iran would react to any reimposition of UN sanctions over its nuclear programme, without elaborating on what action Tehran might take.
European diplomatic sources had previously told The National that France, Britain and Germany, collectively known as the E3, would have to restore UN sanctions on Iran under the so-called 'snapback mechanism' if no nuclear deal was reached.
Under the terms of a UN resolution ratifying the 2015 nuclear pact, the three European powers have the ability to trigger the mechanism before October 18. This would allow them to reimpose sanctions if they determine that Iran is not complying with the agreement.
'The threat to use the snapback mechanism lacks legal and political basis and will be met with an appropriate and proportionate response from the Islamic Republic of Iran,' Mr Baghaei told a press conference.
'The European parties, who are constantly trying to use this possibility as a tool, have themselves committed gross and fundamental violations of their obligations under the JCPOA,' he added.
'They have failed to fulfil the duties they had undertaken under the JCPOA, so they have no legal or moral standing to resort to this mechanism.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Who is in the running to succeed Jerome Powell as Fed chair?
Replacing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is not a question of if, but when. Speculation over who could succeed Mr Powell ramped up this week following reports that President Donald Trump was considering firing the Fed chair – an unprecedented action. Mr Powell's term expires in May 2026. Mr Trump said it was unlikely he will try to fire Mr Powell and will instead wait out the remainder of his term. The US President has thus far not attempted to oust Mr Powell, but the race to replace him has already begun. He has considered naming Mr Powell's successor by September or even sooner, the Wall Street Journal reported last month. Such an extended period could lead to confusion in the markets should a 'shadow Fed chair' emerge ahead of the end of Mr Powell's term. But Mr Trump has become increasingly irate with Mr Powell for not cutting interest rates. Mr Trump has made clear that anyone who wants the job in Foggy Bottom must support low interest rates. Here is a look at the reported candidates to replace Mr Powell: Kevin Hassett National Economic Council Kevin Hassett is one of Mr Trump's longest-serving economic aides. Mr Hassett held two roles during Mr Trump's first term including as chair of the Council of Economic Advisors. He was also the economic architect of the Abraham Accords. Before rejoining the White House this year, Mr Hassett was the global director of research for Affinity Partners, a private equity firm led by Jared Kushner, Mr Trump's son-in-law. He was previously director of economic policy studies at the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute. Mr Hassett also served as economic adviser to John McCain, George Bush and Mitt Romney during their presidential campaigns. Kevin Warsh Former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh served as former Fed chair Ben Bernanke's liaison between Washington and Wall Street during the global financial crisis. Mr Warsh has become increasingly critical about the Powell Fed within the last year, accusing the current board of 'mission creep' earlier in May. Speaking to CNBC on Thursday, the former Fed governor criticised the central bank for worrying that Mr Trump's tariffs policies could lead to an inflation resurgence. 'If they were a very credible central bank, they could say, 'We're looking past this one-off change in prices,' and so their hesitancy to cut rates, I think, is actually quite a mark against them,' he said. Mr Warsh was considered a hawkish official to fight against inflation during his tenure at the Fed from 2006 to 2011, but he has shifted his position this year which has put him in line with Mr Trump's desire install a dove to lead the Fed. Scott Bessent Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is leading the search committee, is also a reported contender. Mr Bessent has been at the centre of tariff negotiations with major trading partners including China. But Mr Trump could want Mr Bessent to remain at the Treasury Department. 'Because I like the job he's doing,' Mr Trump said on Tuesday. Christopher Waller Christopher Waller, who currently serves on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, is considered to be a dark horse candidate to ascend to chair. Mr Waller is notably one of two recent Fed officials to have argued for a rate cut at the Fed's recent meeting – outliers from other voting members. He has also said that he expects Mr Trump's tariffs to lead to a one-time effect on inflation rather than being a more persistent increase in prices. Mr Waller, a Trump appointee, joined the Fed in 2020. His tenure as Fed governor runs through January 2030.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
US House passes stablecoin legislation, sending bill to Trump
The US House of Representatives on Thursday passed a bill to create a regulatory framework for dollar-pegged cryptocurrency tokens known as stablecoins, sending the bill to President Donald Trump, who is expected to sign it into law. The vote marks a watershed moment for the digital asset industry, which has been pushing for federal legislation for years and poured money into last year's elections in order to promote pro-crypto candidates. House lawmakers also passed a bill developing a regulatory framework for crypto. That will move on to the Senate for consideration. The stablecoin bill, called the Genius Act, received bipartisan support, with many Democrats joining Republicans to back the proposed federal rules. The vote on the market structure bill, known as the Clarity Act, was also notably bipartisan. Stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a one-to-one dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds between tokens. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say that they could be used to send payments instantly. If signed into law, the stablecoin bill would require tokens to be backed by liquid assets – such as US dollars and short-term Treasury bills – and for issuers to publicly disclose the composition of their reserves on a monthly basis. The crypto sector has long pushed for lawmakers to pass legislation creating rules for digital assets, arguing that a clear framework could enable stablecoins and other crypto tokens to become more widely used. The sector spent more than $119 million backing pro-crypto congressional candidates in last year's elections and has worked to paint the issue as bipartisan. The House of Representatives passed a stablecoin bill last year but the Senate – in which Democrats held the majority at the time – did not take up that bill. Mr Trump has sought to broadly overhaul US cryptocurrency policies after courting cash from the industry during his presidential campaign. Tension on Capitol Hill over Mr Trump's various crypto ventures at one point threatened to derail the digital asset sector's hope of legislation this year as Democrats have grown increasingly frustrated with Mr Trump and his family members promoting their personal crypto projects. Mr Trump's crypto ventures include a meme coin called $TRUMP, launched in January, and a business called World Liberty Financial, a crypto company owned partly by the president.
The National
7 hours ago
- The National
US Senate approves $9bn federal cuts, including to USAID
The US Senate on Thursday approved a package of spending cuts proposed by President Donald Trump that would cancel more than $9 billion in funding for foreign aid programmes and public broadcasting. The cuts were proposed by Elon Musk 's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) and largely affect USAID-administered programmes designed to assist foreign countries suffering from disease, war and natural disasters. The plan also eliminates all $1.1 billion the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was due to receive over the next two years. CPB funds National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service, which Republicans have accused of anti-conservative bias. The bill now goes back to the House for final approval, with legislators up against the clock. Congress, which had already allocated the money, has to approve the cuts by Friday or the White House must spend the cash as originally intended. The $9 billion at stake is small in the context of the $6.8 trillion federal budget and represents only a tiny portion of all the funds approved by Congress that the Trump administration has held up while it has pursued sweeping cuts. The cuts would overturn bipartisan spending agreements most recently passed in a full-year stopgap funding bill. Mr Musk originally said Doge would save taxpayers $2 trillion but the agency now acknowledges it has saved taxpayers $190 billion – though factcheckers suspect even that claim as dubious. Despite the unpopularity of the proposal in some sections of both parties, the Republican-led Senate passed the measure with 51 votes for and 48 against in a session that lasted more than two hours beyond midnight. Republicans have indicated more packages codifying the Doge cuts were still to come. Mr Musk, who left the government in May, was recruited by Mr Trump to lead the task force after the tech billionaire spent $290 million helping him get elected. The version of the text passed in June by the House of Representatives sought to eliminate $400 million in funding allocated to health programmes, including the Pepfar global Aids relief fund created by then-president George W Bush. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham told AFP that while he was a "big fan" of the soft power approach of foreign aid, he said the bill was consistent with Mr Trump's promises to cut spending. "When you start spending money on a bunch of junk and liberal programmes disconnected from the purpose of the aid package, it makes it difficult on a guy like me," he said.
