logo
Ukraine could be Trump's fall of Saigon

Ukraine could be Trump's fall of Saigon

Telegraph30-04-2025
On April 30, 1975, North Vietnamese forces captured Saigon after a rapid-fire spring offensive. The fall of Saigon rendered the collapse of the US-aligned South Vietnamese regime inevitable and facilitated the unification of Vietnam under communist rule.
This chain of events dealt a devastating blow to US prestige and marked an ignominious end to its two-decade-long struggle against communist expansion in Southeast Asia. The humiliation stemmed not just from South Vietnam's state failure but from the voluntary nature of the US's surrender to communism. President Richard Nixon's desperation to end the Vietnam War resulted in him declaring 'peace with honour' in January 1973 and set the stage for North Vietnam to militarily overwhelm its depleted southern neighbour.
A half-century later, the US is at a similar inflection point. After more than three years of stoic resistance against Russian military aggression, Ukraine faces overwhelming headwinds. Russia is unevenly expanding its grip on eastern Ukraine and has structural war materiel and manpower advantages. If President Donald Trump stops US military aid to Ukraine, he risks repeating Nixon's fateful mistake and facilitating a Saigon-style fall of Kyiv.
The events that immediately followed Saigon's demise underscore the grave consequences of such an abdication. Under Pol Pot's despotic tyranny, the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia perpetrated a genocide that killed three million people. The Pathet Lao movement leveraged North Vietnamese assistance to place Laos under communist rule in December 1975. While the much-feared domino effect of communist takeovers in Southeast Asia did not transpire, the US was a spectator to totalitarian consolidation and mass murder.
If Russia can outlast US military assistance and capitalise on Europe's defensive limitations, it could eventually overthrow Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and establish a puppet regime in Kyiv. President Vladimir Putin's neo-imperial delusions suggest that he will not stop there. President Alexander Lukashenko's retirement or death could trigger a Russian invasion of Belarus. Georgia and Moldova lack ironclad security guarantees and are sufficiently vulnerable that Russia could turn partial occupations into complete ones.
Even if Russia does not test Nato's Article 5 by invading the Baltic States, the end of Ukrainian sovereignty would have harrowing spillover impacts. Given Russia's track record of levelling of major cities and gun-barrel cultural assimilation in Ukraine, the human costs of Putin's further aggression would be catastrophic.
Taking the Saigon precedent a step further, the aftershocks of Trump's abandonment of Ukraine could lead to the unravelling of US primacy. After South Vietnam's collapse, the aura of invincibility that surrounded the US after World War II fell apart. The Soviet Union transcended economic stagnation and expanded its sphere of influence in Africa. China embarked on the course of economic reform that would make it the world's second most powerful country. Japan and West Germany continued their economic booms.
A bipolar world where the US had material superiority over the Soviet Union became somewhat more multipolar. This shift also encouraged malign actors to carry out aggression with impunity. Sensing the US's Vietnam-induced crisis of confidence, Iran took fifty-three Americans hostage in November 1979 and the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan a month later. It took President Ronald Reagan's defence spending boom, the collapse of the Soviet Union and rapid-fire US triumph in the 1991 Gulf War to eviscerate these negative trendlines.
A Saigon 2.0 in Kyiv would have even more disastrous consequences for US primacy and the world order. China's appeal as an alternative superpower partner would rise precipitously. Europe could eventually reconstitute itself as an independent pole detached from US hegemony. Russia's expanded territorial reach and India's economic dynamism could further erode US dominance. In the name of America-First, Trump risks overseeing the end of American exceptionalism and birth of a post-hegemonic multipolar world order.
If Russia is rewarded for its neo-imperialism, China could follow a similar path in the Indo-Pacific region. Much like after Saigon, nuclear proliferation and proxy warfare would intensify. Trump's pledges to prevent World War III and make America safe again would ring alarmingly hollow.
The US can still pull itself back from the brink of Saigon 2.0. Trump's periodic willingness to call out Russian obstructionism provides a glimmer of hope. Now is the time for these statements to transform into the reaffirmation of US support for Ukraine and peace through strength.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump may think he's the ultimate salesman
Trump may think he's the ultimate salesman

Metro

time28 minutes ago

  • Metro

Trump may think he's the ultimate salesman

Yesterday, Volodymyr Zelensky turned up to the White House in a black suit and a spine of steel. In a meeting with European leaders and President Trump, he showed more poise and patience than most leaders manage in peacetime, let alone in his position. The valiant leader had already been publicly humiliated in the Oval Office earlier this year, but still kept his cool while Trump did what Trump does in Washington. But let's be clear about what it was. For all of the Ukrainian leader's flattery (with non-stop 'thank yous' and a letter from his wife to the First Lady) and Europe's strongly worded statements, the day amounted to a full-court press to push Ukraine into a meeting with Putin and a deal that, while not explicitly spelled out yesterday, would almost certainly see land handed to Russia. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. It is not good enough – and it's time for the UK and our allies to say so. Trump floated another call with Putin and teased a three-way sit-down. European leaders were marched in like human guardrails – having initially been kept outside by the petulant President. The optics were polite; the ask was not. The pressure is still coming from Trump for Ukraine to engage with Putin, who should be required to give up any hopes of 'land swaps' before talks begin. Otherwise, that is not peace. That is defeat with nicer lighting. Hours before the handshakes yesterday, Russian strikes killed families in Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia. You do not reward that with a pen stroke that amputates a sovereign country. Do you think Ukraine should give up land to Russia? You make the next strike less likely by raising the cost of aggression until Moscow cannot pay it. That is the job. Everything else is theatre. There is no world in which Putin settles for parcels of land. Give him paper and he will eat it. Give him land and he will ask for more. We already knew Trump was delusional – he underlined it by claiming Putin wants to make a deal to make the US President happy. That level of misconception inspires no confidence in any future summitry. Trump says he has since begun the arrangements for a meeting between Putin and Zelensky, then a trilateral with himself. Fine – wars end when enemies meet. But the self-styled salesman is still flogging a shortcut to peace that does not exist. Meanwhile, Europe turned up in force – Starmer, Macron, Merz, Meloni, Stubb, von der Leyen, Rutte – and that matters, for now. Keir Starmer, who has led our country's support for Ukraine with clarity and confidence, said there was 'real progress' and a 'real sense of unity' yesterday. Great. But that has been the case since Day One. The presence of Starmer, Macron and co is useful only if they say the quiet part out loud, in front of the cameras and behind closed doors: there will be no deal that gives Russia an inch of Ukraine. They need to say cleanly, publicly, repeatedly: If the price of Trump's 'reasonable chance' of peace is Ukrainian territory, the answer is no. Forget flattering Trump. Box him in. Give Ukraine what they need to shut down the sky – layered air defence, ammunition without drama, long-range strikes to put Russian logistics at risk every night. Seize frozen Russian sovereign assets and wire them to Ukrainian air defence and reconstruction. That is what 'security guarantees' actually mean. Anything less is a press release. And finally, cut the coyness about how this ends. It ends when Russia leaves. All of it. That is the baseline, not the maximalist position. The only negotiation is about sequencing and verification, not whether Ukraine keeps its territory like a contestant keeps a prize. If Moscow wants a photo-op to claim victory at home, fine – give them a nothingburger with an embossed seal. But give Ukraine the protection. That is the bargain – optics for them, outcomes for us. As practically every leader has said, yesterday was a 'good step forward.' But now go and read the casualty sheets. Watch the footage from Kharkiv. Count the children abducted, the cities utterly cratered and the power grids attacked as winter approaches. Ukraine is holding. Their resistance has been heroic and their people have more courage than the rest of us combined. Our job now is to make sure they can hold until Russia understands there is no profit in continuing. Then, we – as in Ukraine, Europe and the US – must take back Ukrainian land and rebuild it. Yesterday's test was not whether Zelensky smiled in a suit. It is whether Europe and the United States can say, in public, that territorial concessions are off the table. There is only one way wars like this ever end: when the aggressor is forced to accept what he cannot change. If yesterday's Washington show delivers that, good. But the signs are bleak. More Trending Trump values theatre above all else, and Ukrainians have buried too many of their people to be cast in another play. This has gone on long enough – and the message from yesterday should have been that this is Putin's last chance to back down. If not, it's up to all us together – Britain, Europe and America – to secure Ukraine's victory. And it'll take more than suits and smiles to make that happen. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Lisa Nandy's 'protect the dolls' T-shirt left a sour taste in my mouth MORE: Fact check: Donald Trump boasts he's ended 'six wars in six months' but has he? MORE: Russian troops troll Zelensky by flying US flag on mission into Ukraine

Jesse Watters declares ‘Big Balls, we love you,' as he celebrates Trump's DC crime crackdown
Jesse Watters declares ‘Big Balls, we love you,' as he celebrates Trump's DC crime crackdown

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Jesse Watters declares ‘Big Balls, we love you,' as he celebrates Trump's DC crime crackdown

Jesse Watters professed his love for the former Department of Government Efficiency staffer, better known by his nickname ' Big Balls,' claiming that the teen's assault in Washington, D.C., spurred Donald Trump 's decision to deploy the National Guard. Watters praised Edward Coristine for taking a 'beating for the rest of the city' during Monday evening's episode of Jesse Watters Primetime, about two weeks after the 19-year-old was brutally assaulted in an attempted carjacking. According to the Fox News host, Coristine's assault was directly linked to the president mobilizing the military in D.C. last Tuesday. 'When Big Balls went down, that's when Trump had to call it,' Watters told fellow Fox News host Will Cain. 'If Big Balls isn't safe, no one's safe. And I'm glad he took a beating for the rest of the city, and he's back up on his feet.' In closing, Watters declared: 'So, Big Balls, we love you.' Cain also chimed in that, though he doesn't frequent the capital, he said that through 'anecdotal evidence' he can see just 'how bad' crime is there. 'And you're seeing this evidenced by the fact that, as you've pointed out, so many people are happy to see President Trump take over Washington, D.C., and make it feel safe,' he added. Since Trump tried – and subsequently failed – to hand over responsibility for policing the district to Pam Bondi, the attorney general announced on Tuesday morning that 465 arrests have been made – 52 on Monday evening alone. Days after posting a picture of a bloodied Coristine across social media, Trump insisted at a press conference last Monday (August 11) that his strategy was necessary because crime in D.C. is 'out of control.' The president claimed the city required 'liberation' from 'violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people.' His claim is not consistent with official crime statistics over the past two years, which report that street crime has declined to 30-year lows, leading his opponents to suggest he is seeking a 'distraction' from the Jeffrey Epstein firestorm. Last week, tourists in D.C. were met by the unusual and eerie sight of U.S. military members patrolling the city upon sunrise. Members of the National Guard were present along the Mall last Thursday as part of the administration's show of force, which was trailed in advance by an insider who spoke to ABC News.

The Daily T: Ben Wallace – ‘Trump still hasn't put any pressure on Putin'
The Daily T: Ben Wallace – ‘Trump still hasn't put any pressure on Putin'

Telegraph

time29 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The Daily T: Ben Wallace – ‘Trump still hasn't put any pressure on Putin'

Yesterday's much-anticipated summit in Washington, which saw a host of European leaders accompany Volodymyr Zelensky to The White House for talks with Donald Trump about achieving peace in Ukraine, has been talked up optimistically by all who were present. However, with Donald Trump today ruling out American boots on the ground as part of any security guarantees for Ukraine, and Zelensky ruling out Vladimir Putin's offer of a bi-lateral meeting in Moscow - two of the key takeaways from the meeting - was anything really achieved in Washington? On today's Daily T, former UK defence secretary Ben Wallace tells Camilla and Tim that the summit was 'relatively pointless' and 'nothing really came of it'. He makes the point that Donald Trump has never applied serious pressure on Putin - such as through the increased use of economic sanctions - to bring him to the table, as well as outlining his worry that Trump will end up rewarding Putin with 'ground that he hasn't already taken'. Wallace also worries that any security guarantees will end up 'policing Ukraine in a frontline that suits Russia', which would 'fix our forces', allowing Putin to then 'go off and re-arm and pose threats elsewhere on the European continent'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store