logo
'Voluntary' contributions, digital devices and other costs make education anything but free

'Voluntary' contributions, digital devices and other costs make education anything but free

Irish Examiner5 hours ago
With just a few weeks to go before the 2025/2026 school year begins the back-to-school advertisements are prompting those parents who have not already done so to get shopping for their children's essential school needs.
From uniforms and digital devices to so-called voluntary contributions and exam fees, the cost of sending a child to school in Ireland continues to place an enormous strain on households—particularly those already facing poverty and disadvantage.
At the Society of St Vincent de Paul (SVP), we see the effects of this every day. In 2023, we provided over €5.3 million in education assistance to families across Ireland. That support covered everything from school uniforms to digital devices and college bursaries. Yet even before the last academic year ended, we were already receiving calls for help with next year's costs.
Education has long been viewed as the most powerful tool for breaking the cycle of poverty. But for education to fulfil this promise, it must be accessible, inclusive and truly free. Right now, that is not the case.
We commend the Government for recent initiatives such as the hot meals programme and free schoolbooks for all. These have made a measurable difference, with SVP recording a 20% drop in requests for support when free school books were introduced for primary education and a 6% drop in calls the following year when they were introduced for the junior cycle as a result.
However, these gains are being undermined by other growing costs. One common issue we encounter is the continued imposition of 'voluntary' contributions. Though technically optional, these fees are, in many schools, treated as mandatory.
Families report receiving multiple requests for payment, while some schools withhold or threaten to withhold lockers, journals, or participation in activities for children whose parents have not paid. One school in Dublin barred students from joining a Transition Year trip if the contribution hadn't been paid in previous years.
These practices, though often driven by financial necessity, place undue pressure on children and families and run counter to the principle of free education.
Another growing challenge is the increasing reliance on digital devices in the classroom. Tablets and laptops are now essential for many pupils but the cost, which can be several hundred euros, is prohibitive for low-income families. And for those families who purchase devices through instalment plans, they are forced to pay a poverty premium.
This digital divide not only undermines the spirit of the free schoolbook scheme, but risks leaving disadvantaged students further behind.
Charges for mock examinations and corrections, ranging from €25 to €300, is another area of concern. In some cases, students have been denied access to their results until fees are paid. This adds stress to students already navigating this pressurised exam period.
The pressures continue into third-level and further education. Our education bursary scheme supported over 700 students this year, providing more than €2.3 million in financial assistance.
Despite recent reforms to the SUSI grant scheme, many students still struggle to meet rising costs for accommodation, transport, equipment, and food. While requests for support with course fees have declined slightly, the growing number of families needing help with basic living expenses highlights the gap between the support offered and the reality of student life.
The Programme for Government promises to reduce third-level fees and this happened last year by €1,000. But that was a once-off and the recent controversy would suggest that it won't happen again in the forthcoming budget. We urge the Government to honour its promise.
If we want education to be a real way out of poverty, we must remove the financial obstacles within the system.
As we expect the amount of calls for help to SVP this year to approach 250,000, our Delivering an Equal and Inclusive Budget submission is a strategic, data-driven approach that targets support where it is most needed.
Our key recommendation to improve educational equity include:
Allocate €10 million to establish local, publicly run Early Childhood, Education and Care (ECEC) services, beginning with areas and communities that are currently not served and experiencing high concentrations of disadvantage.
Make our state education system truly free by removing costs and charges to families. Remove mock exam and correction fees, providing funding support for electronic devices in schools where they are mandatory and increase the capitation grant by 25%, with a higher rate of 30% made available to schools that implement the Department of Education's guidance on affordable school uniforms.
Benchmark SUSI grants and reckonable income levels against the cost of living, include SUSI maintenance support for part-time students and enable those in receipt of SUSI to receive financial support for repeat exams.
Education remains the single most important factor in shaping a person's life. If Ireland is to be a country where every child can achieve their right to education, we must ensure that education is not only free in name, but free in practice.
Niamh Dalziel is research & policy officer with the Society of Saint Vincent De Paul
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Voluntary' contributions, digital devices and other costs make education anything but free
'Voluntary' contributions, digital devices and other costs make education anything but free

Irish Examiner

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

'Voluntary' contributions, digital devices and other costs make education anything but free

With just a few weeks to go before the 2025/2026 school year begins the back-to-school advertisements are prompting those parents who have not already done so to get shopping for their children's essential school needs. From uniforms and digital devices to so-called voluntary contributions and exam fees, the cost of sending a child to school in Ireland continues to place an enormous strain on households—particularly those already facing poverty and disadvantage. At the Society of St Vincent de Paul (SVP), we see the effects of this every day. In 2023, we provided over €5.3 million in education assistance to families across Ireland. That support covered everything from school uniforms to digital devices and college bursaries. Yet even before the last academic year ended, we were already receiving calls for help with next year's costs. Education has long been viewed as the most powerful tool for breaking the cycle of poverty. But for education to fulfil this promise, it must be accessible, inclusive and truly free. Right now, that is not the case. We commend the Government for recent initiatives such as the hot meals programme and free schoolbooks for all. These have made a measurable difference, with SVP recording a 20% drop in requests for support when free school books were introduced for primary education and a 6% drop in calls the following year when they were introduced for the junior cycle as a result. However, these gains are being undermined by other growing costs. One common issue we encounter is the continued imposition of 'voluntary' contributions. Though technically optional, these fees are, in many schools, treated as mandatory. Families report receiving multiple requests for payment, while some schools withhold or threaten to withhold lockers, journals, or participation in activities for children whose parents have not paid. One school in Dublin barred students from joining a Transition Year trip if the contribution hadn't been paid in previous years. These practices, though often driven by financial necessity, place undue pressure on children and families and run counter to the principle of free education. Another growing challenge is the increasing reliance on digital devices in the classroom. Tablets and laptops are now essential for many pupils but the cost, which can be several hundred euros, is prohibitive for low-income families. And for those families who purchase devices through instalment plans, they are forced to pay a poverty premium. This digital divide not only undermines the spirit of the free schoolbook scheme, but risks leaving disadvantaged students further behind. Charges for mock examinations and corrections, ranging from €25 to €300, is another area of concern. In some cases, students have been denied access to their results until fees are paid. This adds stress to students already navigating this pressurised exam period. The pressures continue into third-level and further education. Our education bursary scheme supported over 700 students this year, providing more than €2.3 million in financial assistance. Despite recent reforms to the SUSI grant scheme, many students still struggle to meet rising costs for accommodation, transport, equipment, and food. While requests for support with course fees have declined slightly, the growing number of families needing help with basic living expenses highlights the gap between the support offered and the reality of student life. The Programme for Government promises to reduce third-level fees and this happened last year by €1,000. But that was a once-off and the recent controversy would suggest that it won't happen again in the forthcoming budget. We urge the Government to honour its promise. If we want education to be a real way out of poverty, we must remove the financial obstacles within the system. As we expect the amount of calls for help to SVP this year to approach 250,000, our Delivering an Equal and Inclusive Budget submission is a strategic, data-driven approach that targets support where it is most needed. Our key recommendation to improve educational equity include: Allocate €10 million to establish local, publicly run Early Childhood, Education and Care (ECEC) services, beginning with areas and communities that are currently not served and experiencing high concentrations of disadvantage. Make our state education system truly free by removing costs and charges to families. Remove mock exam and correction fees, providing funding support for electronic devices in schools where they are mandatory and increase the capitation grant by 25%, with a higher rate of 30% made available to schools that implement the Department of Education's guidance on affordable school uniforms. Benchmark SUSI grants and reckonable income levels against the cost of living, include SUSI maintenance support for part-time students and enable those in receipt of SUSI to receive financial support for repeat exams. Education remains the single most important factor in shaping a person's life. If Ireland is to be a country where every child can achieve their right to education, we must ensure that education is not only free in name, but free in practice. Niamh Dalziel is research & policy officer with the Society of Saint Vincent De Paul

Letters to the Editor: We need a passenger cap on Cork Airport
Letters to the Editor: We need a passenger cap on Cork Airport

Irish Examiner

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Letters to the Editor: We need a passenger cap on Cork Airport

The first and last planes fly in and out of Cork Airport at about six in the morning and at midnight. As a result, jets fly over our suburban house continuously, except for a six-hour window. Day and night, they roar right over the southside of the city. The hollow thunder of the take-offs and the whistle of the landings is unmistakable. And just as these aircraft disrupt our lives, the DAA plans to invest €200m and substantially increase the number of flight slots at Cork ( Irish Examiner, May 8). In the meantime, the Government has omitted to set a cap on passenger numbers at Cork, even though, at Dublin Airport, night-time flights and aircraft noise have become health issues for those who live nearby (Irish Examiner, May 15). People fly to places that once were only dreamed of. Yet it is irritating that many of them will not form any connection with the cities to which they travel. Others are heading out to their third or fourth holiday of the year, in a mad, uncontrollable rush; and still others are returning early to avoid the blisteringly hot temperatures that are a result of climate change, and which are partly caused by aircraft emissions. Surely it is time for the Government to give some direction for the future? As a beginning, they could consider regulating the flight paths over the city and imposing a passenger cap at Cork Airport so that jets do not fill all of our skies. Anthony Beese, Friar's Walk, Cork Dublin's award to Obama a mistake Sadly, I have to agree with Colin Sheridan when he says Barack Obama is not deserving of the freedom of Dublin City being conferred upon him. His silence on Gaza makes the award deeply problematic. Apart from a recent tweet on X, the 44th US president has been unusually quiet over the last 18 months on the most horrifying, man-made humanitarian catastrophe of our time. This is all the more troubling as Obama was very much pro-Palestine until he assumed the Oval Office. Obama is increasingly out of touch, not just with young, progressive, liberal America, but also many of its Jews. A recent headline in The New York Times was unequivocal that being Muslim, pro-Palestinian, as well as anti-Zionist does not mean voters will reject you, as in the case of Zohran Mamdani's quest to be the next mayor of New York, in the largest enclave of Jews outside of Israel. Many Jewish voters back Mamdani and many agree with him on Gaza. With the Israeli assault on Gaza continuing, it would be a grave mistake to grant Obama freedom privileges in our capital city on behalf of the people of Ireland. Moneygall was indeed enough. Tom McElligott, Listowel, Co Kerry What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Palestine deserves spirit of O'Connell As we mark the 250th anniversary of Daniel O'Connell's birth, we do so not merely as a ceremonial remembrance, but as a call to conscience. Witnessing oppression and war crimes in Palestine, we must ask: would O'Connell prioritise diplomatic comfort, Big Tech, and multinational companies over the cries of the innocent? The answer resounds from every speech he gave, every principle he championed: O'Connell would not allow economic considerations to silence his voice. He would not bow to external pressures when human rights were being trampled. He would be appalled by many of our leaders' complicity in the face of such carnage. In concert with O'Connell's values, we echo the words of the 34 former ambassadors of the EU in their July 23 letter to the heads of government and foreign ministers of the EU states which stated 'the European Union and nearly all of its member states have failed to respond meaningfully to these horrific events' in both Gaza and the West Bank. The United Nations, humanitarian organisations, and independent observers — including Israeli and Jewish voices — have documented these crimes in detail. While Irish Government representatives have rightly condemned the Gaza genocide, words are not being matched by deeds. Ireland can, and must, act independently and through the EU to: Enact, without further delay, the Occupied Territories Bill — ensuring that it covers services, as well as goods; Prohibit the sale of war bonds. The current practice, whereby the Irish Central Bank is facilitating the sale of war bonds is immoral and reprehensible; Suspend, with immediate effect, all arms and dual-use exports to Israel, and immediately end the use of Irish airspace and airports for the transportation of any military equipment. We are aware of possible adverse economic consequences, and cognisant of statements that have emanated from some quarters in the USA. Yet, we demand that the Irish Government defend Irish sovereignty, not be bullied by external vested interests. Short-term economic gains should never take precedence over peace, justice, and human rights. As O'Connell stated, 'nothing is politically right that is morally wrong'. The actions we take in respect of the Palestinian people and others who are suffering oppression are a measure of the extent to which we respect the values of Daniel O'Connell. The Liberator's work is unfinished while occupation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide continue anywhere. Breandán Ó Caoimh, South Kerry Friends of Palestine, Caherciveen, Co Kerry Short-cut society must change Ireland is increasingly chasing instant gratification — weight loss injections, fast food, cosmetic tweaks, mental health apps, and risky financial schemes — while ignoring slower, more effective paths to lasting health and stability. Rising prescriptions, takeaway dependence, and speculative investing reveal a national preference for quick wins, even though steady effort delivers better outcomes. Weight loss drugs like semaglutide saw a 25% prescription jump in three years. Botox and filler demand rose 30% in 2024. Over 1,000 fast-food outlets thrive, while 10% of Irish adults used mental health apps like Calm. In finance, crypto trading and 'buy now, pay later' (BNPL) schemes are booming — 20% of shoppers used them for non-essentials in 2025. These solutions are seductive. Injections promise weight loss without lifestyle changes. Fast food satisfies instantly. Apps offer stress relief in seconds. BNPL lets people spend now, worry later. Real change — healthy eating, exercise, mindfulness, saving — feels hard in a busy world. But slow, steady habits win. A Mediterranean diet and regular exercise cut diabetes risk by 40%. Home cooking beats takeaway diets for heart health. Therapy and digital detoxes ease stress better than apps. The Central Bank notes 80% of retail investors lose money, while steady saving builds wealth. Why the obsession with shortcuts? They're convenient and often cheaper. Fast food undercuts fresh produce. Botox or apps seem easier than long-term routines. Low-income communities — hit hardest by time and money pressures — turn to fast fixes out of necessity. Social media glamourises quick wins and instant makeovers. Quick fixes aren't all bad — weight loss drugs help severe cases; mental health apps fill service gaps; BNPL can be a lifeline. But over-reliance burdens public services: €1bn is spent annually on obesity-related illness, and crypto losses hit €500m in 2022. The good news? Lasting change is doable. One fewer takeaway, a daily walk, free meditation sessions, or saving a fiver a week adds up. Community gardens, park runs, and cheaper fresh produce can support the shift. Better habits give us real control over health and finances — unlike shortcuts, which often just kick the can down the road. Ireland's future depends on choosing substance over speed. Alessio Roselli-O'Keeffe, Swords, Co Dublin What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Re-nationalise electricity supply I wonder is there any point in drawing the Government's attention to the fact that when electricity was generated and supplied by a single semi-state entity, the ESB, Ireland enjoyed the lowest electricity charges in Europe? In recent times, Government policy of outsourcing was extended to this vital sector, and the result has been a significant increase in costs. Ireland has now leapfrogged the rest and has electricity charges that are ahead of the European average — and by some considerable margin. It seems a readymade solution is staring us all in the face: revert to the previous model that served us so well and re-nationalise electricity supply. Perhaps it might be helpful if the Commission for Regulation of Utilities undertook an in-depth analysis of the energy spend in Ireland at present and establish how much of that spend goes to profit, an amount that would not have to be borne by citizens under a nationalised system. There is little doubt also that the national energy affordability taskforce the Government has established 'to identify, assess and implement measures that will enhance energy affordability for households and businesses' would find such data illuminating. Jim O'Sullivan, Rathedmond, Co Sligo

Group of US politicians express concern over proposed Irish trade ban with Israeli settlements
Group of US politicians express concern over proposed Irish trade ban with Israeli settlements

The Journal

time7 hours ago

  • The Journal

Group of US politicians express concern over proposed Irish trade ban with Israeli settlements

A GROUP OF US politicians have urged the US treasury secretary Scott Bessent to examine if the Irish Government's proposed ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine would breach American anti-boycott laws. Sixteen US congress members have signed a letter calling for the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025, which seeks to ban the trade of goods between Ireland and Israeli settlements, to be investigated. Republican Congresswoman Claudia Tenney, for New York, is leading the group of politicians. The letter references the US anti-boycott laws, which seek to oppose boycotts against America and its allies. Should the US find the Irish ban constitutes a 'foreign boycott', America may take action to counteract the ban and include Ireland on a purported 'boycott list', potentially suspending future US business deals in Dublin and elsewhere. The Irish government has been aware for a number of years that the anti-boycott movement in the US, made up of a number of American politicians, would take issue with the Occupied Territories Bill. The group's letter reads: 'This measure is part of a broader effort aligned with the global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to economically isolate Israel. 'Such policies not only promote economic discrimination but also create legal uncertainty for U.S. companies operating in Ireland.' It added that the Irish ban on trade between illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine would 'not only promote economic discrimination but also create legal uncertainty for US companies operating in Ireland'. Advertisement It added: 'We encourage the Treasury Department to assess whether Ireland's proposal indicate that they require or may require participation in or encouragement of an international boycott within the meaning of [US anti-boycott mechanisms].' Speaking to The Journal prior to the general election in November, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the US embassy have previously expressed concern over the ban, but that Ireland was clear in its position on the matter. He said: 'I had already made the decision, prior to that communication. I was aware of that it's not a new concern [from the US]. That's been there a long time. 'It's not a surprise that the US Embassy would communicate that, they communicated that five or six years ago, and that's been a standard position. 'Our position is that it relates to the Occupied Territories, not to Israel. And that might be a point of difference in the US, because, in the US, people might look at it differently – but we have a very clear view of it here.' Politicians on the Oireachtas Foreign Affairs Committee last month recommended that trade of services should be included in the law. Chairperson of the committee, Fianna Fáil's John Lahart, said while the Bill has been described as largely symbolic, it remains 'important'. He added that Ireland's reputation has been tarnished by some , stating that there have been smears and lies said about the country due to the position it has taken on this piece of legislation. With reporting by Christina Finn Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store