logo
New York Times comes to Wall Street Journal's defense in wake of Trump lawsuit

New York Times comes to Wall Street Journal's defense in wake of Trump lawsuit

The Hill22-07-2025
The New York Times issued a blistering statement on Tuesday condemning a decision by the White House to ban The Wall Street Journal from covering an overseas trip by President Trump this weekend, calling it 'simple retribution.'
'The White House's refusal to let one of the nation's leading news organizations cover the highest office in the country is an attack on core constitutional principles underpinning free speech and free press,' the Times said. 'Americans regardless of party deserve to know and understand the actions of the president and reporters play a vital role in advancing the public interest.'
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday said the Journal would be excluded from the travel pool heading to Scotland with Trump this weekend, citing the outlet's reporting on a previously unknown letter it said Trump sent disgraced financier Jeffery Epstein.
'Thirteen diverse outlets will participate in the press pool to cover the President's trip to Scotland,' Leavitt said. 'Due to the Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the thirteen outlets on board.'
The ban comes just days after Trump sued the Journal and its owner Rupert Murdoch over the newspaper's reporting on his past relationship with Epstein, a convicted sex offender who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. The Journal reported that Trump was among those who sent a 'bawdy' letter to Epstein for his birthday in 2003.
Trump denies writing the letter and has said he appealed directly to Murdoch to stop publication of the Journal story. The president has pushed back forcefully amid widespread calls in the GOP for his administration to release more information about the case involving the dead financier.
'This is simple retribution by a president against a news organization for doing reporting that he doesn't like,' the Times said Tuesday. 'Such actions deprive Americans of information about how their government operates.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Ally Faces Disbarment For 'Dishonesty': Panel
Trump Ally Faces Disbarment For 'Dishonesty': Panel

Newsweek

timea minute ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Ally Faces Disbarment For 'Dishonesty': Panel

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, a longtime ally of President Donald Trump, should be stripped of his law license for his role in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, a Washington-based disciplinary panel has ruled. The D.C. Bar's Board on Professional Responsibility issued its ruling on Thursday, stating that Clark "persistently and energetically sought" to pressure Justice Department leaders to make false claims about election fraud and had made "intentionally false statements." The board concluded that his conduct violated professional ethics and warranted disbarment: "Lawyers cannot advocate for any outcome based on false statements and they certainly cannot urge others to do so," the board said in its report. "[Clark] persistently and energetically sought to do just that on an important national issue. He should be disbarred as a consequence and to send a message to the rest of the Bar and to the public that this behavior will not be tolerated." In response, Clark called the process "100% politicized and said, "I know I did the right thing ... and wouldn't be able to look at myself in the mirror if I had not proceeded to internally raise the election questions I did." Why It Matters If upheld, the panel's ruling would reinforce accountability for government lawyers alleged to have been involved in attempts to subvert election results and add to a growing list of Trump-aligned attorneys facing sanctions over 2020 election challenges. The board said the ruling is intended to deter future efforts to pressure federal agencies into making false claims on matters of national importance; that it is essential for upholding professional ethics and maintaining public trust in the justice system. Jeffrey Clark, former Acting Assistant Attorney General, testifies during a January 6th hearing on June 13, 2023 in Washington, DC. Clark has launched a legal battle to save his law license after accusations that he... Jeffrey Clark, former Acting Assistant Attorney General, testifies during a January 6th hearing on June 13, 2023 in Washington, DC. Clark has launched a legal battle to save his law license after accusations that he sought to overturn the 2020 presidential election result. (Photo by Michael A. McCoy/Getty Images) More MichaelWhat To Know Clark served as assistant attorney general in Trump's first administration and became a key figure in the president's attempts to challenge his 2020 loss to Joe Biden. According to a Senate Judiciary report, Clark pushed Justice Department superiors to send a letter to Georgia lawmakers stating that federal investigators had found "significant concerns" about the election's outcome—a claim officials had already determined to be false. Clark's attorney, Harry MacDougald, said during disciplinary hearings last year that the letter was part of normal debate between lawyers and punishment would have a "chilling effect." Growing List of Trump Allies Hit With Sanctions Jeffrey Clark, who now serves as acting head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget, is not the first Trump-aligned attorney to face professional sanctions for actions related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election, and joins a list who have faced or are facing disciplinary action: Rudy Giuliani: Disbarred in Washington and New York. Disbarred in Washington and New York. John Eastman: Suspended while appealing disbarment in California. Suspended while appealing disbarment in California. Jenna Ellis: Three-year suspension in Colorado. Three-year suspension in Colorado. Kenneth Chesebro: Lost law license in New York. Rudy Giuliani was disbarred in Washington and lost his New York law license for advancing false claims of election fraud. John Eastman, who advised Trump on strategies to challenge the election results, has been suspended from practicing law while he appeals a California judge's disbarment recommendation. Jenna Ellis, a former Trump campaign attorney, agreed to a three-year suspension of her law license in Colorado after admitting to making false statements about the election and pleading guilty in a related Georgia criminal case. Attorney Kenneth Chesebro, who helped design the so-called "alternate electors" plan, lost his New York law license earlier this year. What People Are Saying Jeffrey Clark, responding to Thursday's "100% politicized" decision, said on X: "I know I did the right thing in 2020 and 2021 during the first President Trump Administration and wouldn't be able to look at myself in the mirror if I had not proceeded to internally raise the election questions I did." Harry MacDougald, Clark's attorney, said: "They want to disbar Jeff Clark for the heresy of privately recommending further investigations of the 2020 election." In criticizing the disciplinary proceedings, he argued they unfairly targeted his client for legal advice, saying: "This is a pure thought crime and a travesty of justice." James Burnham, Managing Partner at King Street Legal, said on X: "I worked closely with Jeff Clark in both Trump Administrations. This is an outrageous weaponization of the bar ethics process—one that could be turned against any lawyer serving in government at any time. All steps must be taken to push back." Rachel Cauley, White House OMB communications director also denounced the ruling, calling it: "...another chapter in the Deep State's ongoing assault on President Trump and those who stood beside him in defense of the truth," adding: "Jeff Clark has been harassed, raided, doxed, and blacklisted simply for questioning a rigged election and serving President Trump." What Happens Next The recommendation now goes to the D.C. Court of Appeals, which will make the final decision on whether Clark will permanently lose his license. Under D.C. Bar rules, the finding triggers an automatic suspension of Clark's ability to practice law unless he successfully petitions the court within 30 days to block it.

Justice Department fired official whose husband operated controversial ICEBlock app
Justice Department fired official whose husband operated controversial ICEBlock app

CBS News

timea minute ago

  • CBS News

Justice Department fired official whose husband operated controversial ICEBlock app

Carolyn Feinstein said she initially thought the message sent to her private email address on a late Friday afternoon was a scheme or a prank. It turned out that she was being fired from her federal job. Once Feinstein read the email, she discovered her work cellphone was no longer operating. Feinstein's decade of work as a forensic auditor for the Justice Department's Office of Trustee — which helps oversee bankruptcies — ended on July 18, when her employment was terminated in a three-paragraph message sent by an agency administrator. "This is a big loss to me," Feinstein told CBS News. "I have dedicated my career to the mission of the U.S. Trustee program. I believe strongly in that mission. I would get up every day knowing that my actions professionally were helping. They were adding to the greater good." Feinstein joins dozens of other Justice Department employees who have been ousted this year. Her firing was conducted in a similar fashion to other Justice Department terminations, via an email from the agency that cited the administration's "Article II" power to fire employees. "I felt like I was just kind of left in the dark, because that termination letter really didn't explain anything to me," Feinstein said. But Feinstein's background and her case are different from the others. Feinstein's husband, who operates a private business, developed a controversial phone app that helped users track the location of federal immigration agents. The ICEBlock app, which carries the moniker, "see something; tap something", bills itself as an "innovative, completely anonymous crowdsourced platform that allows users to report Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity with just two taps on their phone." ICEBlock — and similar apps that notify people about the presence of ICE agents — have grown in popularity this year, as the Trump administration aims to ramp up arrests and deportations of undocumented immigrants. Administration officials have lashed out at those responsible for these apps, alleging they impede the work of federal law enforcement. In the days after the ICEBlock app was publicized in reporting by CNN and later by Trump ally and social media figure Laura Loomer, Feinstein said she notified her employers about threats she and her husband had been receiving from critics. Feinstein said she was fired days after, with the Justice Department alleging the termination was "based on your lack of candor during an internal inquiry." "It's dehumanizing to the federal workforce, it's treating them like commodities," said Kel McClanahan, an attorney who is representing Feinstein. McClanahan told CBS News he views the recent wave of firings as a governmental version of a "5-year-old's tantrums." Feinstein has a 20% ownership of the company that operates ICEBlock, which her husband runs, according to McClanahan. The lawyer told CBS News that Feinstein held an ownership stake to allow her to wind down the company if her husband were to face an emergency or die. The app is free, and Feinstein's husband told CNN he doesn't plan to monetize it. McClanahan said Feinstein had reported her connection to the business behind the app on annual disclosure forms. The Justice Department cited the app and Feinstein's connection to the company in a statement defending her firing. "For several weeks, the Department of Justice inquired into this former employee's activities and discovered she has a sizable interest in All U Chart, Inc., the company that holds the IP for ICEBlock," a Justice Department spokeswoman told CBS News. "ICEBlock is an app that illegal aliens use to evade capture while endangering the lives of ICE officers by disclosing their location. This DOJ will not tolerate threats against law enforcement or law enforcement officers." Feinstein is the latest of dozens of career Justice Department civil servants fired this year. In the hours after President Trump's second inauguration, his administration began conducting a purge of prosecutors, staff and office administrators who were involved in prosecuting people who took part in the Jan. 6 riot — a violent insurrection that Mr. Trump has sought to redefine — and the criminal investigations of Trump himself, which were shuttered in 2024 after his election. The firings have continued this summer, with several high-profile terminations of administrators and prosecutors, who have claimed their firings were forms of political retribution. Feinstein argued her firing will exacerbate a staffing shortage inside the agency's bankruptcy trustee audit program. She worked out of a Texas office for the U.S. Trustee Program. "Those people are very competent and able to do their jobs, but they are only human. So when you take out someone as proficient as myself in such a vital role as auditor, it is really going to impact what that office can do for the program," she said. The Justice Department is facing unusually severe shortages of employees in other major offices, according to multiple sources who spoke with CBS News. In late spring, the U.S. Attorney's Office of the District of Columbia had 89 staffing openings, a capacity gap that two former prosecutors said could lead to staff being overworked and greater delays in processing cases. That office handled all of the Jan. 6 prosecutions, and saw multiple prosecutors fired early in 2025. The office's total workforce is nearly 700 people, including prosecutors and support staff. Federal employees, including Feinstein, have the right to challenge their terminations under the government's Merit Services Protection Board. But several fired employees have told CBS News the board is jammed with a wave of new cases and is less able to move swiftly on any new complaint. Feinstein said she loved job and misses the work. "I'd go back in a heartbeat," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store