Columbus approves $23M for improving cybersecurity infrastructure
This comes just days before the one year anniversary of the city being hit with a massive ransomware attack.
NBC4 Investigates uncovered that half a million people's private information, including the identities of undercover officers and crime victims, was stolen and leaked on the dark web. Now, millions of dollars will be invested in a new system.
Council approved $23 million for what is called a 'zero-trust network'. This model is 'never trust, always verify.'
The city is hoping that implementing the zero-trust network will strengthen it's IT infrastructure against future attacks.
Traditional networks assume everything inside an organization's network can be trusted. Now, this security mindset assumes that there are threats both inside and outside of a network and makes it so that only necessary users are authorized.
Once implemented, only those with express permission and who go through strict verification can access the city's network.
A spokesperson for Mayor Andrew Ginther sent a statement saying:
'Federal, state, and local governmental entities, including the City of Columbus, face persistent and sophisticated cybersecurity threats. These threats are constantly evolving and increasing in sophistication. Cybersecurity experts and researchers have developed the Zero Trust Network framework to adapt to these threats.
'Unlike traditional security frameworks that assume everything inside an organization's network is trustworthy, a Zero Trust Network assumes that threats can exist both inside and outside the network. Therefore, among other things, a Zero Trust Network requires strict verification for every user and device attempting to access resources within a network, regardless of their location. It also includes segmenting an organization's network into smaller, isolated zones or microsegments. These microsegments are typically aligned with organizational units such as departments or workgroups, are intended to limit unnecessary network traffic between segments, and are designed to prevent unauthorized movement between segments.
'Zero Trust is not a product, but a shift in security mindset, architecture, and operational approach. The City of Columbus is seeking to commence its Zero Trust Network project later this year and anticipates that it will take at least two years to implement with an estimated investment of $23 million.'
Councilmember Nick Bankston also sent a statement saying:
'In today's world, cybersecurity is public safety. This $23 million investment in a Zero Trust Network is not just about protecting servers — it's about protecting the people of Columbus. By modernizing our infrastructure and adopting industry best practices, we are taking responsible, proactive steps to ensure that residents can trust their government to keep their information safe and services running securely.
Council remains committed to sharing information about last year's cyberattack when it is appropriate to do so. However, what we can say is this: we're taking action to make sure our systems — and our residents — are protected against the evolving threat landscape going forward.'
Hardware will need to be replaced across all city buildings and data centers. The city will start implementing the framework in its core network and largest facilities and expand over the next two years.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Dispute over a major port contract threatens Haiti's fragile political stability
PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti — The leader of Haiti's transitional presidential council claimed Wednesday that one of its communications employees was threatened and forced to publish a press release about a key contract involving the country's biggest port and two well-known members of its elite. The incident has deepened infighting within the council and further strained relations between Haiti's government and its private sector as a wealthy businessman prepares to take over the council's presidency on Thursday.
Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
Blazing new trails: 13 Minnesota cities are considering municipal cannabis stores
As some Minnesota cities fret over regulating newly legalized and normalized marijuana sales, others see an opportunity. Elk River is among 13 Minnesota cities considering opening municipally owned cannabis stores. They would be blazing new trails in this regard, as government-run pot shops aren't currently in use anywhere else in the country. City Administrator Cal Portner talks about Elk River's approach as making the most of a situation. 'I don't sense that our council is enthusiastic about the law to legalize, but they're accepting of reality,' he said. Revenue potential from cannabis sales, and how it can be put to use in the community, is part of the appeal. Assuring compliance is also part of it. 'Our liquor stores never fail compliance tests, whether for tobacco or liquor,' Portner said. 'We feel we can do the same thing within the cannabis industry.' Liquor munis as a model The only state with any track record of a government-run cannabis shop is Washington, where a store in North Bonneville opened in 2015 and operated until 2021. Where Minnesota differed from Washington and other legalized-cannabis states was in the defined path it created for cities to pursue cannabis munis. Despite being a new concept, Minnesota's established muni model for liquor, also novel nationally, gives Portner confidence in the feasibility. Cities have entrepreneurial experience on their sides, he said, including already selling hemp-based THC products in liquor stores. 'We've had practice time basically to understand the products and understand the customer service side of it,' Portner said. Municipal liquor sales add nearly $1 million to Elk River's annual budget. The city's two liquor munis keep profits home, Portner said, rather than going to corporations based out of town or state. 'We're among the top Minnesota liquor store operations within the state and are proud of that,' he said. 'It puts a lot of money back in our community.' Minnesota had 176 cities running liquor munis as of 2023, according to the latest annual report on them by the Office of the State Auditor. Most munis come out ahead, combining for $31.6 million in net profits in 2023. Elk River generated $962,190 of it. Buffalo brought in $710,505. St. Anthony Village was $426,385 in the positive. Even modest net profits, say $10,000 per year, are good deals for small towns, said Paul Kaspszak, executive director of the Minnesota Municipal Beverage Association. 'You could say it's not very much money, but there's nothing else happening in that community that will generate that $10,000,' he said. In his hypothetical, 100 homeowners in the community could be looking at $100 in savings on their property taxes. In Elk River, Portner said it might take an additional 45 businesses in town to generate enough property taxes to equal net profits from city liquor sales. Cannabis sales projections are highly speculative, but Portner said it'll likely take a couple years to turn profits. Between investments in capital, inventory, marketing and education, an estimate prepared for the city in January put first-year losses at $184,698. All but 18 of the state's liquor munis are in Greater Minnesota. For cannabis muni applicants, seven of the 13 are in the seven-county Twin Cities metro area. St. Joseph's mayor, Adam Scepaniak, and other officials from cities on the list confirmed they were still waiting on OCM approval to get their cannabis licenses as of last week. Plans are taking shape in the interim, with St. Joseph, Elk River and others looking into possible locations for cannabis retail. Elk River is considering a building to house both cannabis sales and one of its two municipal liquor stores. Northbound would remain the name of the liquor muni, while the cannabis side would assume the name Cannabound. Owatonna applied for a muni cannabis permit on March 13, said Deanna Sheely, the city's communications manager, in an email. No decisions will be made on it until the license process is completed. When Byron moved forward with an application in February, City Administrator Al Roder noted it didn't bind the city to the idea. 'Applying for the license and even receiving one, doesn't lock us into going ahead with a dispensary,' he stated on the city's Facebook post. 'But the window to apply for a license is very small.' Wide spectrum of attitudes toward cannabis industry As opposed to the 13 cities exploring cannabis munis, Albert Lea sits on the opposite end of the spectrum. A City Council vote last week stopped a privately run cannabis store from opening — an apparent violation of state statute. An update by the city posted on Facebook afterward described the vote being based on 'questions of enforcement, liability and responsibility' necessitating further review. Adopting zoning restrictions on where cannabis businesses are allowed, a lever given to cities in state law, is more of a middle-ground strategy. Combined with caps on the maximum number of businesses allowed to operate, almost all cities implemented some form of this approach or another. The cap is an area of contrast between the state's cannabis and liquor muni regulations. A city with muni liquor doesn't need to allow private liquor stores within its limits, but it can't monopolize cannabis in the same way. Muni cannabis stores don't count toward the cap. ___ This story was originally published by MinnPost and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Community pushes back on city proposal to declare Mission Bay Park properties as surplus land
SAN DIEGO — People are pushing back against the city's proposal to declare three Mission Bay Park properties as 'surplus land.' The move would allow the city to lease or sell the land for longer than 15 years, and it's raising alarm among the local community members who don't trust the city's plans. 'We've never seen the Surplus Act applied to park land before,' said local Scott Andrews. The city council considered this proposal during a meeting last week, but chose to hold off on voting so that the Mission Bay Park Committee could host a meeting to include this topic. 'The public doesn't trust the city council or the mayor and there's a belief that no matter what you decide on the two issues, the city is going to go forward with it anyway,' said Clifford Weaver, who voiced his opposition to the committee. San Diego faces lawsuit over 136-unit ADU project proposal The properties include Sportsmen's Seafood and Dana Marina Landing, which both currently have expired leases. The third and largest property is Marina Village, where the lease is set to expire in 2027. There, the city wants to include a hotel and updated conference center as outlined in the Mission Bay master plan. Locals who came to give public comment all opposed the idea, worried about the procedure following a surplus land designation that requires an entity to negotiate in good faith to allow affordable housing first. 'This is not about building housing on Mission Bay,' said Council President Joe LaCava. The city says it even pushed for an exemption, but the state's Department for Housing and Community Development denied the effort, meaning affordable housing proposals would still need to be considered. A housing project would have to pass several hurdles that the city believes no developer would want to go through. 'Public vote, coastal commission approval that they would never get. It is just so unlikely, but it's just a step we have to take,' explained city of San Diego Communications Director Rachel Laing. Laing explained other routes like seeking an amendment to the Surplus Land Act or getting the state to designate Mission Bay as state park land have been discussed, but they are uncertain and could take years. Ultimately, the committee in Mission Bay Park voted 6-to-2, with one member abstaining to not support the three properties becoming surplus land. Council LaCava says the plan is to bring the proposal back before the council sometime in September. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
