Cabinet vows to tackle manufacturing and logistics woes amid dwindling economic growth
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni addressing the post-Cabinet media held at Imbizo Media Centre in Cape Town.
Image: GCIS
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni addressing the post-Cabinet media held at Imbizo Media Centre in Cape Town.
Image: GCIS
The gross domestic product (GDP) figures released by Statistics South Africa also indicated that the economy grew by 0.1% in the first quarter of 2025 following a downwardly revised increase of 0.4% in the fourth quarter of 2024.
During a post-Cabinet media briefing on Thursday, Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, said the government was now working to fine-tune the country's industrial policy.
'Cabinet remains concerned about the decline in the manufacturing industry, more so when the government has prioritised boosting local manufacturing and thus awaits the finalisation of the revised Industrial Policy,' Ntshavheni said.
'The government understands the impact of the challenges within freight and logistics that continues to impact the growth of the mining industry, and we are maintaining a razor-sharp focus on the work of Operation Vulindlela Phase 2 and the Government Business Partnership in urgently resolving the logistics challenges of the country.'
Industrial policy during the Sixth Administration was characterised by innovation within the confines of an increasingly complex context, characterised by global instability and system-level shocks and trends.
South Africa's industrial policy framework, primarily articulated in the National Industrial Policy Framework (NIPF) and its subsequent iterations, aims to drive industrialization and create a more robust and diversified economy.
The NIPF focuses on strengthening the manufacturing sector and supporting the development of non-traditional tradable goods and services. Key components include investment facilitation, trade promotion, technology development, and support for small businesses, as well as competition and labor market policies.
However, the economy is facing domestic and global headwinds, particularly from the looming US import tariffs that would cripple the South African manufacturing industry.
On April 2, US President Donald Trump introduced a 10% base tariff on nearly all imports into the US, with additional reciprocal tariffs for specific countries.
However, these reciprocal tariffs were suspended for 90 days to allow room for negotiations.
Trade, industry and competition minister Parks Tau has acknowledged the current uncertainty around what decision the US will make on July 9, adding that South Africa was exposed to both direct and indirect trade and growth risks.
Everest Wealth CEO, Thys van Zy, on Thursday said the government must end the wait-and-see approach on the economy.
Van Zyl said the looming July 9 deadline for the possible implementation of 30% reciprocal tariffs on South African exports to the US — and the uncertainty surrounding it — should serve as yet another wake-up call for the government on the importance of bold decision-making.
He said should the 30% tariffs be implemented, they are likely to significantly impact export-dependent industries – especially automotive manufacturing, agricultural products like citrus and wine, and the steel and mining sectors.
'These sectors contribute significantly to South Africa's GDP and job creation, and higher tariffs will not only undermine exports but also threaten local investment and production,' Van Zyl said.
'The government must use this negotiation window to secure a new, mutually beneficial trade agreement that protects and expands South Africa's economic interests. The focus should be on maintaining preferential access to the US market and avoiding higher tariffs that could harm our exports.'
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Here's why Rasool won't be able to help ANC reclaim the Western Cape
Political analysts say Rasool's extensive experience may not be enough to bolster the ANC's campaign ahead of the upcoming elections. ANC, SACP and Cosatu members welcome former South African Ambassador to the US Ebrahim Rasool at the Cape Town International Airport on 23 March 2025 in Cape Town. Picture: Gallo Images/Die Burger/Theo Jeptha The Western Cape is a lost cause to the ANC, whether or not South Africa's former ambassador to the US, Ebrahim Rasool, comes to its rescue. Political analysts argue that Rasool could not gain ground for the ANC when he was previously the provincial leader in the province. They added that it will be more difficult now because many Western Cape voters, particularly coloureds, have found new and more attractive political homes. The Western Cape, which has been dominated by the DA for 16 years, has become a formidable challenge for the ANC. Can Rasool rescue the ANC? The analysts believe that even Rasool's potential involvement, with his extensive experience, diplomatic prowess, and his role as the province's former leader, may not be enough to bolster the party's campaign efforts in the upcoming elections. The landscape is increasingly challenging now with new dynamics. The ANC faces an uphill battle to reclaim ground that has slipped from its grasp since the DA ousted it in 2009. ALSO READ: Mapaila says SACP to contest 2026 elections as standalone party, Ramaphosa warns against the move Independent political analyst, Goodenough Mashego, gives the ANC no chance of reclaiming the Western Cape. Asked if Rasool could rescue the party now that he had returned after his controversial exit as the country's envoy in Washington, Mashego said: 'The return of Rasool is not going to get them the votes. The ANC used to own the coloured votes in the Western Cape because of Alan Boesak and others, but it has since lost those votes to other parties. 'It would be unwise of the ANC to impose a coloured leader merely to win an election. Many coloured people had permanently abandoned the ANC and joined other parties, old and new. 'I think the Western Cape is a lost cause for the ANC, I don't think Rasool is going to salvage them,' he said. Mashego said the ANC lost the plot when it put black African leaders instead of coloured ones in the forefront after those leaders toppled Rasool as the ANC provincial chairperson. He said Rasool's exit left a vacuum that would be difficult for anyone to fill. He said many of the ANC's coloured voters were disgruntled after Rasool's removal and joined other parties, such as the DA, Independent Democrats, Patriotic Alliance and other coloured-inclined parties. ANC recovery 'highly unlikely' This view was shared by political economy analyst Daniel Silke, who said it's too late for the ANC to even imagine retaking the Western Cape. 'It's a very long haul for the ANC to claw back any semblance of hope that it can get close to a majority in the Western Cape. Western Cape voters have systematically left the ANC in previous elections, with the last election being its lowest performance for the party to date. I think the ANC's recovery, ultimately, to a position of threatening the DA is highly unlikely,' Silke said. He added that the ANC brand had been severely dented, both in the Western Cape and nationwide. The province itself has an additional dynamic that complicates the ANC position. The DA, the Patriotic Alliance and other smaller parties have 'provided potential ANC voters with other choices and perhaps more attractive choices as well'. ALSO READ: A fight for survival: Next political moves will be crucial ahead of 2026 elections Mashego said the ANC has lost ground in the province since Boesak's days in the Western Cape, and the party is unlikely to recover soon. If Rasool were to return as the face of the ANC in the province, he would have no choice but to carry the coloured race card in an attempt to attract voters, but that could tarnish his image and damage his legacy. 'Rasool is a coloured person, but I don't think he is capable of really building very strong structures of the ANC that can contest the DA and other coloured parties,' Mashego said. Rasool better suited to national politics He suggested that Rasool should be deployed at the national level, perhaps at the Department of International Relations and Co-operation, where his experience as a former ambassador would be better used. According to Silke, Rasool was not universally liked within the Western Cape ANC during his reign as provincial leader and premier. Instead, the ANC became divided and polarised around him. 'So, in terms of being a unifying candidate, it's not a given that he can achieve that. I think we are in for fragmented politics in the Western Cape – the DA clearly remains the ascendant power in the Western Cape. However, I think for the ANC it's a hard slog and an unlikely slog to think that it could get back into the seat of power unless it is part of a much broader coalition following a surprise decline for the DA, but I don't necessarily see that happening in any dramatic form in the near future,' he said. NOW READ: WATCH: 'I will wear my persona non grata as a badge of dignity,' says expelled Rasool
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump's white South African resettlement plan and the global colour line
The narrative that white South Africans are victims of racial persecution has long circulated in far-right echo chambers, sustained by groups like AfriForum and amplified by conservative US media. Yet no credible human rights body has substantiated claims of systematic violence or oppression based on race in South Africa. Image: File/X THE arrival of over 3 000 white South Africans in the United States under President Donald Trump's fast-tracked refugee resettlement programme is a racial spectacle of historic proportions. Framed by Trump as a rescue mission from 'racial discrimination' and even 'genocide' in post-apartheid South Africa, the scheme repackages whiteness as victimhood while reasserting racial hierarchies through the veneer of humanitarian concern. Cheryl Harris's seminal concept of 'whiteness as property' is especially instructive here. This programme protects not the displaced, but the entitlements embedded in whiteness — land, social status, and the right to global mobility. These arrivals, facilitated under a controversial executive order, mark the first time in US history that white South Africans have been accepted en masse as refugees. The move has drawn intense scrutiny, with South African Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola dismissing the claims as 'unfounded and inflammatory'. He clarified that the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) had no involvement and had consistently found no basis for refugee status for white South Africans. 'The resettlement of South Africans under the guise of being 'refugees' is a political project to delegitimise our democracy,' Lamola asserted. The narrative that white South Africans — particularly Afrikaner farmers — are victims of racial persecution has long circulated in far-right echo chambers, sustained by groups like AfriForum and amplified by conservative US media. Yet no credible human rights body has substantiated claims of systematic violence or oppression based on race in South Africa. In February 2025, Trump signed Executive Order 14152: Addressing Egregious Actions of the Republic of South Africa, suspending non-essential aid. He cited South Africa's land reform policies and its support for Palestine at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as evidence of 'anti-white discrimination'. His language echoed apartheid-era rhetoric, framing land expropriation without compensation — a constitutional measure designed to redress historical injustice — as proof of racial targeting. This is not a story about humanitarian rescue. It is about the repackaging of privilege as persecution. Trump's administration, by reclassifying specific 'South African communities' for humanitarian parole, has revived the settler-native divide. As Mahmood Mamdani has noted, this manoeuvre casts descendants of apartheid's beneficiaries as 'refugees' and South Africa itself as the oppressor. Achille Mbembe's critique of global humanism is relevant here: the programme renders Black suffering invisible while privileging whiteness as a passport to refuge and legitimacy. Consequently, while Black refugees languish in camps, whiteness is deemed inherently worthy of protection, effectively enacting a form of apartheid within the asylum system itself. The 1951 Refugee Convention defines a refugee as someone fleeing a 'well-founded fear of persecution.' Neither the Convention nor US law has ever interpreted this to include the loss of economic dominance or historical privilege. Fleeing land redistribution or reduced social status does not amount to persecution, especially when these changes are legally enacted by a democratic society seeking to correct historical wrongs. The parallels to earlier racial engineering are striking. In 1932, the US-sponsored *Carnegie Poor White Study* analysed the 'problem' of poor whites in South Africa. The initiative was not rooted in concern for poverty but in preserving white supremacy. The report warned that poor whites threatened the racial order and recommended state interventions to uplift them, while black South Africans were systematically excluded from similar support. This laid the foundation for apartheid's white welfare state and established a pattern of American intervention when white South Africans faced hardship, real or perceived. Trump's resettlement scheme is the 21st-century iteration of this pattern. White South Africans are framed not as beneficiaries of a violent racial order, but as victims of transformation, worthy of rescue. South Africa's Constitutional Court recently affirmed that acquiring foreign nationality — whether through refugee resettlement or otherwise — does not automatically strip someone of South African citizenship. In a landmark ruling, the Court struck down a section of the Citizenship Act that had quietly revoked citizenship without due process, calling the move irrational and unconstitutional. However, the case of these white South Africans is unique. Their refugee claims are based on false premises and a political agenda. South Africa may therefore have grounds to argue that accepting the US offer constitutes a voluntary renunciation of citizenship. The Constitutional Court's ruling on dual citizenship might not protect them in this politically charged context. Nowhere is the hypocrisy more glaring than in the American South. In the Mississippi Delta, six Black farmworkers filed a federal lawsuit in 2021 after being replaced by white South Africans brought in under the H-2A visa programme. The plaintiffs, many descended from enslaved people who built Southern agriculture, earned just $7.25 per hour — the federal minimum wage — while their white South African replacements were paid over $11. The lawsuit alleges that these Black workers were forced to train their replacements, who were then housed in better accommodations and elevated in status simply because they were white. Between 2011 and 2020, the number of South Africans on H-2A visas increased by 441%, making them the second-largest national group in the programme. The majority are white. The message is clear: in the racial calculus of US capitalism, white foreign labour is worth more than black American lives. Mexican seasonal workers, once the backbone of US agriculture, are also increasingly excluded — both by border walls and by labour policies that privilege whiteness over need. The result is a reshuffling of the global racial order, disguised as economic necessity. Trump's South African refugee programme is less about humanitarian concern and more about reaffirming a hierarchy of global suffering, where privilege continues to mask itself as victimhood. What we are witnessing is the reinforcement of a global colour line — one where whiteness retains its claim to mobility, safety, and opportunity, while blackness and brownness are rendered threats to be contained. The implications are profound: Refugee systems that prioritise whiteness over need. Economic visas favour white foreign farmers over Black citizens. Historical privilege is purposely mistaken for victimhood. This is not humanitarianism. It is neo-colonialism in motion. As the world watches Trump engineer the next stage of global apartheid, we must ask: What kind of refugee is it when only the privileged are welcome? When does skin colour ration citizenship, safety, and opportunity? If the notion of 'refuge' is to mean anything, it must centre justice, not historical comfort. Siyayibanga le economy! * Siyabonga Hadebe is an independent commentator based in Geneva on socio-economic, political and global matters. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, Independent Media, or IOL.
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
Strengthening the Global Fight Against Corruption
Brazil, Brasilia – The 2nd G20 Anti-Corruption Working Group (ACWG) under the South African Presidency convened in Brasilia from June 9 to 12, 2025, uniting delegates to address critical issues in preventing and combating corruption. Co-Chaired by South Africa and Brazil, the meeting aimed to reinforce the Working Group's priorities to strengthen the public sector by promoting transparency, integrity, and accountability, increasing the efficiency of asset recovery measures, enhancing participation from the public sector, private sector, civil society, and academia, and improving whistleblower protection mechanisms. The South African Ambassador to Brazil, Mr. Vusi Mavimbela, delivered the opening remarks during the inaugural session. He highlighted the importance of international collaboration in the fight against corruption and stressed South Africa's dedication to advancing collective goals, stating, 'Through our G20 Presidency theme, 'Solidarity, Equality, and Sustainability', we reaffirm our commitment to advancing collective efforts toward inclusive global economic growth and sustainable development.' Brazil's Minister of State for the Office of the Comptroller General, H.E. Mr. Vinícius Marques de Carvalho, delivered the keynote address, stressing the significance of inclusive approaches in anti-corruption efforts. He underscored the complex nature of corruption, requiring diverse perspectives and expertise. H.E. Carvalho called for a multi-agency strategy, urging the involvement of civil society, academia, and the private sector in shaping effective anti-corruption policies. At the heart of the meeting were the discussions of the draft G20 High-Level Principles on the Management of Seized and Confiscated Assets. These draft principles aim to provide a framework for G20 countries to manage seized assets, closing gaps identified by the ACWG to strengthen asset recovery. The Group also considered the Zero Draft Ministerial Declaration, encapsulating the commitment of G20 countries to address corruption through prevention. This draft will be presented for adoption at the Ministerial Meeting in October 2025. In addition to the main sessions, a side event was held on measuring integrity in public procurement, exploring challenges in quantifying corruption, and the necessity for evidence-based methodologies, co-hosted by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The UNDP informed that it is establishing a framework for measuring integrity, collecting data from 60 countries by the end of 2025. This initiative aims to provide objective tools to gauge the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures. Another side event was held to address the preventive dimension in the fight against corruption and new forms of organised crime, co-hosted by EL PACTO 2.0, a partnership with the European Union focused on justice and security. The G20 ACWG and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Working Group on Bribery held a joint meeting aimed at supporting the shared commitment to combating the bribery of foreign public officials in international transactions. The 2nd G20 ACWG l Meeting provided an opportunity for delegates to exchange views, share experiences, and deepen their understanding of the evolving challenges and opportunities in the fight against corruption through the lens of the Presidency's theme of solidarity, equality, and sustainability. The Working Group acknowledged that there remains considerable work ahead to fully realise the deliverables committed to at the start of the year, including timely responses to the questionnaires, substantive inputs toward the draft Ministerial Declaration, and the High-Level Principles on the Management of Seized and Confiscated Assets. Through these efforts, the G20 seeks to instil confidence in its commitment to combating corruption and promoting sustainable development, ensuring a brighter future for all. As South Africa and Brazil lead this charge, the hope is that the momentum generated from this meeting will translate into tangible actions that resonate beyond borders, creating a global environment where corruption has no place. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
