30 bulldozers to raze forest overnight? Top court raps Telangana over tree felling
Senior Advocate K Parameshwar, appointed as the amicus curiae in the matter, informed the Court that certain private intervenors intended to respond to the state government's affidavit. The bench agreed to grant time for these responses and re-listed the matter for detailed hearing on August 13.In an earlier hearing, the Supreme Court had strongly criticised the actions of the state authorities, warning them of contempt proceedings and even suggesting that erring officials could be held in temporary prisons constructed at the site if they failed to comply with Court orders. The Court had directed that restoring the status quo at the site was of utmost priority and had asked the State Wildlife Warden to take immediate steps to protect wildlife impacted by the deforestation.It also granted the state government time to respond to the Central Empowered Committee's spot inspection report and ordered the submission of an action plan to restore the forest to its previous condition.The background of the case traces back to a government order issued in 2024 by TSIIC, which sought to alienate forest land for IT development. Although TSIIC claimed to have acquired the land in 2012, the tree-felling gained momentum recently, prompting the filing of multiple public interest litigations before the Telangana High Court. Petitioners argued that the government's actions were in blatant disregard of Supreme Court rulings in TN Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Union of India, which had directed all states to identify forests and forest-like areas as per the dictionary definition of 'forest'.advertisementThe petitioners further contended that the state had not conducted any environmental assessment as required under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006, and alleged that the land was being auctioned off for the construction of an IT park without due process.In defence, the Telangana government maintained that the land in question was already classified as industrial and dismissed the petitioners' claims as being based merely on Google Earth imagery.On April 2, the Telangana High Court had initially stayed the felling of trees until April 3, with the matter being adjourned to April 24 in view of the Supreme Court's intervention. The top court is now set to hear the matter in detail on August 13.- Ends
IN THIS STORY#Telangana
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
WBJEE Results 2025 expected to be out soon, confirms official
Decks have been cleared for the publication of West Bengal Joint Entrance Examination Board (WBJEE) results following the Supreme Court's July 28 order staying the Calcutta High Court's earlier decision to halt the implementation of a revised list of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) notified by the state government, a senior higher education department official said on Wednesday. The WBJEE Results 2025 are expected to be out soon and steps have been taken in this regard, as confirmed by senior education official (Representational image/HT file) "We in the higher education department had already anticipated this and are fully prepared to take appropriate actions immediately," state Education Minister Bratya Basu had said soon after the apex court's order. Asked about the timeline for publication of the WBJEE results, board chairperson Sonali Chakraborty Banerjee remained cautious, though optimistic. "Today (July 30), we received the state government directive. We shall implement the directive and let you know about our decision tomorrow (July 31)," she told PTI. A senior education official told PTI that steps have been taken to publish the results soon. "We have consulted legal experts, and every step has been taken to accommodate candidates' interests. The results will be out soon," he added. Before the Supreme Court's directive, Banerjee had said, "We were ready to publish the results by July 5. But then, the legal developments followed, and the matter became subjudice. We were waiting for the government's directive." The WBJEE exams were held on April 27. On July 28, a bench comprising Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria, while hearing the appeal of the state government, vacated the stay of the HC of the state's OBC policy and said "prima facie, the high court order seems to be erroneous." On June 17, the Calcutta High Court ordered an interim stay on notifications issued by the state government with regard to reservations to 140 subsections under OBC-A and OBC-B categories made by it. The Supreme Court bench took note of the submissions of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the state government, and said, "This is surprising. How can the high court pass such an order? Reservation is part of the executive function." The state had prepared the new list after the high court, in May 2024, quashed the inclusion of as many as 77 communities in the OBC list.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
SC Sets Aside Telangana HC Order, Gives Speaker 3 Months On BRS MLAs Defection Case
The court made it clear that the Speaker, while adjudicating disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule, acts as a tribunal and does not enjoy constitutional immunity. The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Telangana Legislative Assembly Speaker to decide within three months on the disqualification petitions filed against ten Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLAs who had defected to the ruling Congress party. A bench led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai observed that political defections remain a pressing issue in the country and have the potential to destabilise democratic processes if left unchecked. The court allowed the appeal filed by BRS leader Padi Kaushik Reddy, who had sought a direction to the Speaker for a time-bound decision on the pending disqualification pleas. Setting aside the Telangana High Court division bench's order from November 22, 2024, which had interfered with an earlier single judge ruling, the apex court emphasised the need for prompt resolution in such matters. 'We have referred to various parliamentary speeches, including those by Rajesh Pilot and Devendra Nath Munshi, to emphasise that entrusting disqualification proceedings to the Speaker was aimed at avoiding delays that may occur before courts," Chief Justice Gavai noted while reading the judgment. The court made it clear that the Speaker, while adjudicating disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule, acts as a tribunal and does not enjoy constitutional immunity. It further directed the Speaker not to permit the MLAs to delay the proceedings and said that adverse inferences could be drawn if any attempts to protract the process are made. The verdict was reserved on April 3, and a detailed judgment is expected to follow. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Is Pakistan sitting on an oil jackpot? Here's what US surveys suggest
US President Donald Trump announced a new energy initiative with Pakistan to explore and develop the country's "oil reserves", claiming they were 'massive' and suggesting that Islamabad might one day export oil to India. 'We have just concluded a deal with Pakistan … We are in the process of choosing the oil company that will lead this partnership. Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day!' Donald Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. The surprise remark came amid escalating trade tensions with New Delhi and a broader White House campaign to rebalance US trade relationships, including 25 per cent tariffs and added penalties on Indian imports. Trump has expressed dissatisfaction over India's ties with Russia, specifically pressuring New Delhi on its crude oil imports. As of now, neither the US State Department nor Pakistan's Ministry of Energy has confirmed further details. But what does Pakistan actually have underground? The answer lies in two major US government studies — one in 2015 by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) and another in 2017 by the US Geological Survey (USGS). Both offer technically rich yet cautious estimates about Pakistan's hydrocarbon potential. What the US said in 2015: Potential in the billions, on paper According to the 2015 EIA/ARI study on technically recoverable shale resources, Pakistan holds: 9.1 billion barrels of technically recoverable shale oil 105 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of technically recoverable shale gas These are found primarily in two formations: 1. Sembar Shale (Lower Cretaceous): Oil: 5.8 billion barrels Gas: 101 Tcf 2. Ranikot Formation (Paleocene): Oil: 3.3 billion barrels Gas: 4 Tcf The figures are impressive, but the EIA stressed that these were risked, technically recoverable resources, not proven reserves. The data were based on limited field information, modelled from US analogues, and subject to significant geological and infrastructural uncertainties. What the USGS said in 2017: Smaller, still unproven, but quantified In 2017, the USGS conducted its own assessment of the Lower Indus Basin — the same area where Trump's proposed development would likely occur. According to the USGS Fact Sheet (2017-3034), estimated mean technically recoverable resources: Oil: 164 million barrels Gas: 24.6 Tcf Natural Gas Liquids: 601 million barrels This is substantially lower than the EIA's 2015 figures, suggesting that later geological modelling, while still positive, reflects a more conservative view of what's likely to be commercially extractable in the near term. The USGS based its projections on: Six defined assessment units (AUs) in the Lower Indus Basin US shale analogues for productivity benchmarks Post-Eocene geological modelling after plate collision with Eurasia It must be noted that this 2017 assessment still assumes continuous accumulations, not proven reserves, and the probability of actual success was less than 1.0 in several units. Pakistan's ground reality: Exploration yet to begin Despite over a decade of mapping and studies, Pakistan has not drilled a single shale-specific well in these formations. Both reports acknowledged: No domestic infrastructure for commercial-scale hydraulic fracturing Water scarcity in potential exploration zones Policy ambiguity, security risks, and lack of field data as barriers Why Donald Trump's timing matters Donald Trump's announcement of an oil development deal with Pakistan came just hours after imposing 25 per cent tariffs and penalties on Indian imports—timing that strongly suggests a strategic use of India–Pakistan rivalry to apply pressure on New Delhi. The move follows a pattern in Trump's diplomacy: leveraging regional tensions to gain a negotiating advantage. In the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump initially suspended US military aid to Ukraine, had a public spat with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and held talks with Russia that excluded Kyiv. Weeks later, he reversed course—publicly pressuring Moscow with a 10-day ceasefire deadline and threats of new US sanctions and openly expressing frustration with Vladimir Putin. Even during trade tension with China in his previous term (2019), Trump showed support for Taiwan through arms sales and diplomatic visits. While no formal project or operator has yet been named, Trump said the US was 'in the process of choosing the oil company that will lead this partnership.' The bottom line Trump's potential energy deal with Pakistan currently rests on highly speculative ground. The geological promise of Pakistan's shale reserves remains real but untested, and commercial extraction is years, if not decades, away without major investment, infrastructure, and political will.
