Australia's largest private hospital operator to close majority of psychology clinics to be ‘flexible, sustainable'
The hospital network said it would progressively close 17 out of its 20 clinics by the end of August, in order to transition Ramsay Psychology to a 'more flexible and sustainable model'.
Three clinics in Cairns, Charlestown and Joondalup will remain open to 'support local needs, maintain key partnerships and pilot more integrated models of care', Ramsay Health Care said in a statement.
'We understand this change might be unsettling and we are working closely with our psychologists to ensure every client is supported and has continuity of care, whether through our existing and expanded Telehealth service or with another trusted provider, depending on what is clinically appropriate,' the statement said.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
Ramsay's website states it is 'Australia's largest private provider of psychology services'.
It has not yet become clear if the closures amount to significant job losses. The network lists 141 psychologists on the website's 'find a practitioner tool'.
The company also provides psychology services through mental health clinics offering inpatient treatment and outpatient sessions and day programs, which Guardian Australia understands will not be affected.
In November an Australia government review of the private hospital sector's financial viability highlighted that obstetrics and mental health were 'two particular services of concern' becoming 'increasingly difficult to offer'.
The president of the Australian Association of Psychologists, Sahra O'Doherty, said 'the closure of these clinics is very sad news for anyone needing professional mental health care'.
'Given we learned today the National Mental Health Commission Report Card showed that 20% delay seeking mental health help because of cost, these closures mean accessing psychological care will be more challenging,' Doherty said.
The report for 2024, released on Thursday, also found less than half (45.1%) of people who had a mental disorder in the last 12 months had seen a health professional for their mental health in the past year.
The diminishing access to mental health services comes against the backdrop of shortages of psychiatrists in both the public and private sectors, with the high-profile dispute between NSW Health and the state's public psychiatrists highlighting the constraints on mental health care in public hospital settings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hospitals are meant to cure and care for our loved ones, not destroy their quality of life
Among the daily cascade of statistics about the state of the NHS lie, as we all know, individual human stories and for some a quiet rage about how hospitals meant to cure and care for patients are destroying their quality of life. Last weekend, we 'celebrated' my older brother's 82nd birthday in a nursing home. Not where he or we had planned to spend it. In early April, he went into a West Midlands hospital with an infection, shortly afterwards diagnosed as pneumonia. He was in a four-bed section of a ward which appeared fairly well-staffed. But despite numbers, it's difficult to do one's job properly or competently when there's a dominant culture of not caring. A father of three and formerly a successful business owner, my brother has had dementia for several years now but, prior to his admission, he had a good quality of life. The pub one day or night a week for a zero beer with old friends and new, who made a fuss of him, meals out, and two days a week at dementia day care. Supported by a number of privately paid part-time carers, my sister-in-law cared for him so well, and he tucked into his food and watched his beloved sport on TV. So, what happened to all that? After four weeks in an NHS hospital, my brother was finally discharged, cured of pneumonia but unable to walk, doubly incontinent and having lost quite a lot of weight. He was not taken to the toilet but kept throughout in 'nappies'. My sister-in-law frequently had to tell staff when his bed was soaking wet. He lost weight because meals were deposited in front of patients – if you were able-bodied you ate, if not, or confused with dementia, the meal just sat there before it was taken away. Only one male nurse we saw made any attempt to help patients eat. Physio was initially offered but only when he was still very ill with pneumonia. When well enough, we asked for physio but were told he hadn't engaged. So, no physio, despite protests. He now sits in a wheelchair in what is an excellent nursing home paid for by his wife, after she discharged him, but the life he had is gone forever. Precious time was wasted at the hospital as unworkable home care packages were proposed. Having fractured her spine last summer lifting my brother from a fall and also recovering from an NHS treatment that has – at least temporarily – worsened her health, my sister-in-law can no longer care for him at home in the state he is now in. It's more than fortunate that she has the funds (for now) to pay for a nursing home. So many others have no choice but to be in the hands of cash-strapped councils. I've deliberately not shared my brother's name to protect his dignity and privacy, nor identified the hospital as a formal complaint will be made. I know that my brother's plight is not unique. But how can we ensure that the elderly and vulnerable, unable to speak for themselves, are not robbed of their mobility, dignity and quality of life as a result of such a short hospital stay. I'm angry and sad in equal measures, and determined to warn others who are older and liable to require hospitalisation, to beware. Your NHS may have some nasty surprises in store. Meanwhile, Secretary of State, it's too late for my brother, but what are you going to do and when to ensure that NHS hospitals are places of safety and prolong rather than shorten a decent quality of life?
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Democrats use new tactic to highlight Trump's gutting of Medicaid: billboards in the rural US
The road to four struggling rural hospitals now hosts a political message: 'If this hospital closes, blame Trump.' In a series of black-and-yellow billboards erected near the facilities, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) seeks to tell voters in deep red states 'who is responsible for gutting rural healthcare'. 'UNDER TRUMP'S WATCH, STILWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL IS CLOSING ITS DOORS,' one sign screams. The billboards are outside hospitals in Silex, Missouri; Columbus, Indiana; Stilwell, Oklahoma; and Missoula, Montana. The fate of rural hospitals has become a politically contentious issue for Republicans, as historic cuts pushed through by the GOP are expected to come into effect over the next decade. Donald Trump's enormous One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) cut more than $1tn from Medicaid, the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled Americans, insuring more than 71 million adults. 'Where the real impact is going to be is on the people who just won't get care,' said Dave Kendall, a senior fellow for health and fiscal policy at Third Way, a center-left advocacy organization. 'That's what used to happen before we had rural hospitals – they just don't get the care because they can't afford it, and they can't get to the hospital.' In response to criticism, Republicans added a $50bn 'rural health transformation fund' just before passage of the OBBBA. The fund is expected to cover about one-third of the losses rural areas will face, and about 70% of the losses for the four hospitals where Democrats now have nearby billboards. The rural health fund provides money through 2030, while the Medicaid cuts are not time-bound. That is already becoming a political football, as Democrats argued in a letter that the money is a 'slush fund' already promised to key Republican Congress members. 'We are alarmed by reports suggesting these taxpayer funds are already promised to Republican members of Congress in exchange for their votes in support of the Big, Ugly Betrayal,' wrote 16 Democratic senators in a letter to Dr Mehmet Oz, Trump's head of Medicare and Medicaid. 'In addition, the vague legislative language creating this fund will seemingly function as your personal fund to be distributed according to your political whims.' Rural hospitals have been under financial strain for more than a decade. Since 2010, 153 rural hospitals have closed or lost the inpatient services which partly define a hospital, according to the University of North Carolina Sheps Center for Health Services Research. 'In states across the country, hospitals are either closing their doors or cutting critical services, and it's Trump's own voters who will suffer the most,' said the DNC chair, Ken Martin, in a statement announcing the billboards. The OBBBA is expected to further exacerbate those financial strains. A recent analysis by the Urban Institute found rural hospitals are likely to see an $87bn loss in the next 10 years. 'We're expecting rural hospitals to close as a result – we've already started to see some hospitals like, 'OK, how are we going to survive?'' said Third Way's Kendall. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion A June analysis by the Sheps Center found that 338 rural hospitals, including dozens in states such as Louisiana, Kentucky and Oklahoma, could close as a result of the OBBBA. There are nearly 1,800 rural hospitals nationally, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), a healthcare research non-profit. That perspective was buttressed by the CEO of the National Rural Health Association, Alan Morgan, who in a recent newsletter said 45% of rural hospitals are already operating at a loss. 'When you remove $155bn over the next 10 years, it's going to have an impact,' he said. In the fragmented US healthcare ecosystem, Medicaid is both the largest and poorest payer of healthcare providers. Patients benefit from largely no-cost care, but hospitals complain that Medicaid rates don't pay for the cost of service, making institutions that disproportionately rely on Medicaid less financially stable. In rural areas, benefit-rich employer health insurance is harder to come by; therefore, more hospitals depend on Medicaid. But even though Medicaid pays less than other insurance programs, some payment is still better than none. Trump's OBBBA cut of more than $1tn from the program over the coming decade is expected to result in nearly 12 million people losing coverage. When uninsured people get sick, they are more likely to delay care, more likely to use hospital emergency rooms and more likely to struggle to pay their bills. In turn, the institutions that serve them also suffer. 'This is what Donald Trump does – screw over the people who are counting on him,' said Martin, the DNC chair. 'These new DNC billboards plainly state exactly what is happening to rural hospitals under Donald Trump's watch.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
'Hardline' BMA blocks emergency pleas for strike doctors to work
NHS bosses have criticised the British Medical Association for its "increasingly hardline" approach in rejecting emergency requests for striking doctors in England to return to work.A system known as 'derogation' is in place whereby the NHS can ask for resident doctors, who are taking part in a five-day walkout, to cross the picket line where patient safety is at of Sunday evening, 18 requests by hospitals for derogations had been rejected in this strike - the twelfth in the long-running pay dispute - with nine BMA said while it was ready to respond to emergencies, poor planning and the push to continue non-urgent care in this strike had stretched staffing too much. However, NHS England accused the doctors' union of putting safety at risk, criticising a "remote BMA panel" for "second-guessing" doctors on the ground who were trying to look after patients.A central committee of senior BMA doctors makes decisions on each derogation England said it was particularly worried about a number of requests relating to cancer care being turned it said the BMA was sitting on some requests for hours, with some rejected because hospitals would not pay striking doctors premium rates to come back this strike started, the BMA had only agreed to five derogations during the whole dispute. 'Rigorous' Among the requests agreed was a doctor to work at Nottingham City Hospital's neonatal intensive care unit over the BMA members were also brought in to work a night shift at the Northern General in the BMA rejected a request by Milton Keynes Hospital for a doctor to carry out prostate cancer checks. In that case the BBC understands a doctor did return to work under their own volition.A BMA spokesman added: "It remains our position that this agreement will be available for the NHS to rely upon should a safety-critical, urgent event occur."That process is there day and night throughout industrial action, and we remain ready to respond to any emergency requests."However, we need to be clear that the purpose of this agreement is not to facilitate the continued delivery of non-urgent care at the same time as senior doctors are covering for residents taking industrial action, as trusts simply do not have enough senior doctors to do that safely."NHS England sources said it was particularly disappointed with the rejections as the national organisation was now vetting every request from hospitals to ensure a consistency in approach between different request, they said, was based on "rigorous assessment"."We absolutely recognise the legal right for people to strike, but we also recognise that it's essential to maintain as many services for patients as possible," they five-day strike by resident doctors is due to run until 07:00 on Wednesday morning.
