‘We cannot have a third budget failure' — Economist warns as Godongwana faces GNU showdown
Image: File
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana is under pressure to ensure his 2025 budget wins the support of Government of National Unity (GNU) partners, with an economist warning that the country cannot have a situation where a third budget is not passed.
Godongwana is scheduled to table his budget speech on Wednesday.
This comes after the rejection of two previous budget proposals and the recent decision to scrap a planned increase in Value-Added Tax (VAT), placing even more strain on the National Treasury to find alternative ways to address South Africa's growing fiscal crisis.
Speaking to IOL News, Professor Jannie Rossouw of the Wits Business School emphasised the importance of passing the upcoming budget.
'The big thing is, we can only hope that this budget will go through Parliament,' Rossouw said.
'It's problematic that the previous two budgets were not approved by Parliament. The credibility of both the Finance Minister and the National Treasury has been damaged.'
Rossouw said that Godongwana must ensure the budget has the backing of the GNU partners before it is tabled in Parliament.
'I can only hope that he negotiated the budget with the GNU partners and that they agreed to it before it's presented,' Rossouw said.
'We cannot have a situation where a third budget does not pass. That does not instill confidence in the government's ability to run the economy.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The first budget, originally set for February, was postponed amid disagreements within the GNU over the proposed VAT hike.
A revised version, introduced in March, suggested staggered increases of 0.5 percentage points but was met with strong opposition from coalition partners, especially the Democratic Alliance (DA), including parties outside the GNU.
The Western Cape High Court later blocked the proposal.
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) also challenged the VAT hike in court.
With limited options, Godongwana faces the difficult task of bridging the funding gap while satisfying all members of the GNU.
Rossouw said the budget is likely to include deep spending cuts.
'In my view, it will be necessary to cut some expenditure, because the government cannot currently raise taxes,' he said.
'And I can think of several instances where expenditure can be cut without harming service delivery to the average South African.'
Among Rossouw's suggestions, is eliminating all 43 deputy ministers, which is a demand echoed by several political parties in light of the bloated GNU.
'I don't know what deputy ministers do or why we need 43 of them. Simply get rid of them,' he said.
He also called for the closure of underperforming departments.
'Simply close certain government departments that achieve very little, like the Department of Small Business Development. It has not developed even one small business in the eastern part of South Africa.'
Rossouw also criticised what he called wasteful expenditure, including the presidential motorcade.
'Why do we need 11 vehicles and several motorbikes in the presidential motorcade?… It's unnecessary.'
He further pointed out the financial drain of state-owned enterprises, especially the South African Airways (SAA).
'I said a decade ago that the government must give SAA away. It will not fly…The government has this strange ideological idea that it needs to be aligned with these enterprises, but we're now paying the price.'
However, Rossouw said he believes the budget can only pass if it has the necessary political buy-in.
'One thing I want to see in this budget is a clear plan to stimulate economic growth,' he said.
'We need faster economic growth to get the country's unemployment crisis under control.'
'We really need to start thinking outside the box. We urgently need to get the economy going,' he added.
simon.majadibodu@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a minute ago
- The Citizen
Here's how much National Treasury has spent on consultants in two years
The National Treasury does not sign contracts directly with the consultants. The National Treasury has spent hundreds of millions of rands on consultants for specialised projects over the past two years. This was revealed in a written parliamentary reply from Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana. Freedom Front Plus (FF Plus) MP Wouter Wessels requested details on whether the National Treasury had appointed any consultants in the last two years, including the nature of their work and the duration of their contracts. National Treasury's spend on consultants Godongwana detailed an extensive list of service providers and revealed that R350 million (R350 902 028.62) was paid to at least 30 consultancy firms between April 2023 and June this year. From April to June 2025 alone, contracts worth more than R20 million were signed. These included a R6.3 million three-year deal with Ston Infrastructure Services to support provincial treasuries in infrastructure delivery, R4.6 million to Nexor 312 for local government infrastructure management, and R3 million to Thovu Construction Group for architectural space planning services. Among the biggest beneficiaries was OBT Advisory, awarded a R161.9 million, five-year contract in March 2024 to support and maintain the Treasury's back-office system for its asset and liability management division. ALSO READ: Almost 40 municipalities facing sanctions from Treasury over mismanagement Tipp Focus Holding secured a R96.3 million contract to enhance and maintain the central supplier database for the office of the chief procurement officer over the same period. Other multimillion-rand consultancy contracts went to firms such as Akhile Management and Consulting, Mntambo Financial Consulting, Luta Management Services, Stangra Investment, S and G Business Consulting, and Propellius. These companies were primarily engaged to review, amend, and prepare Financial Recovery Plans for financially distressed municipalities across the country. The affected municipalities included Mangaung, Madibeng, Sekhukhune, Emfuleni, Thabazimbi, Modimolle, Govan Mbeki, Thaba Chweu, Musina, and Phalaborwa. Individual contracts for the work generally fell in the range of R1 million to R2.7 million each. More contracts The South African arm of the international advisory firm Rothschild and Co was paid R2.5 million in 2023 for debt structuring and capital markets advice during Eskom's debt relief process. Other notable projects included a R3 million contract awarded to PTP Integrated to source a service provider from the Government Employees Pension Fund and Public Investment Corporation panel for professional services on software-related projects within Treasury's Information and Communication Technology unit over a 12-month period. ALSO READ: R279 million budgeted for National Treasury's building rentals and parking spaces Former National Treasury deputy director-general and current adviser, Ismail Momoniat, was also contracted twice – first in 2024 for R1.38 million and again in 2025 for a smaller R10,563.57 engagement – to lead South Africa's efforts to exit the Financial Action Task Force greylist and support related anti-corruption initiatives. Several more contracts were awarded to enhance municipal supply chain management compliance, develop women empowerment programmes, and support local government infrastructure delivery oversight. National Treasury doesn't sign contracts directly with consultants Responding to concerns about whether consultants were filling in for vacancies, Godongwana stated that all appointments were for 'specific and time-bound projects' and not due to staffing shortages. 'No consultants are appointed as a result of vacancies. National Treasury follows the public service regulations to fill positions,' he said. The minister added that the National Treasury signs the service level agreements with the company, not directly with the consultants. NOW READ: Government under fire for splashing on employees' salaries
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Battle for SA's education future: BELA Act divides stakeholders as deadline approaches
Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube Image: GCIS As the closing date for public comments on the controversial Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Act approaches, reactions from education stakeholders remain mixed, with some raising concerns about implementation and equity, while others welcome the legislation as a step toward accountability and fairness in South Africa's public schools. The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Basic Education, Joy Maimela, warned that some of the regulations 'might undermine the legislation's intention.' 'Firstly, the committee has previously called for all the regulations to be gazetted in one go and not in a piecemeal fashion. We want the public to engage on a comprehensive document that will give expression to the intentions of the Act. 'While we understand the intent may be to avoid technical delays, this fragmented rollout undermines the coherence, urgency and integrity of the BELA implementation process. South Africa's children cannot afford to wait for bureaucratic caution or political compromise,' said Maimela. She added: 'Furthermore, it is noted that some of the terms used in the regulations seem to deviate from the Act. It gives the impression that the regulations aim to undermine the intention of the Act.' Maimela warned that this could contradict Parliament's goal of transforming South Africa's education system and might instead perpetuate the exclusion of vulnerable learners. 'The regulations on admissions, for example, refer to taking into account the demographics and education needs of the 'surrounding community'. In the Bela Act the responsibility for admission policy lies with the head of department (HOD) and is based on the 'broader Education Districts'. This potentially reinforce local demographic homogeneity, contrary to the type of inclusivity the Act intended.' She further noted: 'This, once again, points to keeping previously disadvantaged learners out via location. Historically it has been linked to exclusion. It seems these regulations are attempting to re-write the Bela Act and re-introduce matters that were unsuccessfully contested in the Bela Act legislative drafting process.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Andre De Bruyn from EUSA Image: Supplied 'The committee will continue to closely monitor this process and engage robustly with the Minister on the gazetted regulations, which seem to deviate from the national objective,' emphasised Maimela. Gwarube said the regulations provide 'an important opportunity for education stakeholders and the broader South African public to actively shape the future of basic education in our country.' 'These regulations are instruments that will affect how schools are governed and managed, how children are admitted, and how our values as a society are reflected in our education system. I call on all South Africans, including parents, teachers, school governing bodies, civil society, education experts and community members to participate meaningfully in this public comment process. Your voice matters. Let it be heard in shaping the policies and regulations that govern the education of your children,' said Gwarube. The Educators and Allied Workers Union, Western Cape (EUSA) has raised concerns about proposed learner–teacher ratios, warning they will remain 'a pipe dream' unless consistently enforced across all schools. André De Bruyn, Chairperson of EUSA, said: 'Post level 1 educators are bearing the brunt, often with very little or no administrative time, together with overcrowded classes. Poorer schools face relentless pressure to admit more learners, resulting in severe overcrowding, while affluent schools seldom face the same demands. Wealthier schools have the resources to challenge the department in court over forced admissions.' He added: 'If budget constraints are blamed, who will be appointing the teachers and building the classrooms to make a 1:40 ratio possible? The Department of Basic Education ultimately pursues its predetermined agenda regardless of community engagement. More and more demands are being put on teachers, especially in poorer schools, while the vision of 1:40 and 1:30, if not enforced in all schools, will remain an illusion.' The South African Democratic Teachers' Union (SADTU) expressed strong criticism of the regulations and the Minister's approach. SADTU highlighted that the Minister issued implementation guidelines earlier this year, which the union rejected as unlawful, arguing that only formal regulations have legal standing. Vanessa Le Roux from PEESA Image: Supplied 'The issuing of guidelines appears to be an attempt to sow confusion, delay the implementation of the Act and advance the DA's political agenda against the full implementation of Sections 4 and 5,' said SADTU in a statement. The union emphasised its commitment to safeguarding learners' constitutional right to quality education, warning that any provisions undermining these rights would be opposed. SADTU confirmed it is studying the draft regulations and will submit formal comments by the 5 September 2025 deadline. Vanessa Le Roux of Parents for Equal Education South Africa (PEESA) welcomed the BELA Bill, seeing it as a mechanism to enforce equity and accountability in public schools. 'As an organisation there is mixed feelings, especially because we reside in the Western Cape, over the years we saw the inequalities growing to the point where we feared that education will only be for those who can afford it. 'On the other hand we don't want to take away the power from the SGB/community, who is the real authority when it comes to schools, however what we saw over the years is that governing bodies, in especially township schools are not equipped with enough knowledge to govern the school, and ultimately the principal runs that school to the point where they are involved with finances of the school.' Le Roux said out of all the 9 Provinces in public participation, the Western Cape was the only province who took real issue with the Bela Bill and said it came down to a case of accountability. 'For far too long these former model C schools have gotten away with the violation of the rights to basic education for all learners, and they were protected by the education department. 'So whether they call it centralisation of power, we from poor communities, call it a step in the right direction. The same rules, policies, and laws should be applied. It is a matter of addressing inequalities, discrimination, and racism in public schools. We welcome the implementation of the Bela Bill with much hope, and open arms.' Weekend Argus
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
#UniteBehind takes Parliament to court for letting corrupt MPs off the hook
The activist group argues that changes to Parliament's code of conduct allow MPs implicated in State Capture to evade accountability. #UniteBehind activists protested outside Parliament on Tuesday. The activist group has taken Parliament's Registrar and Joint Ethics Committee to court, challenging Parliament's new code of conduct. In 2022, #UniteBehind laid complaints in terms of Parliament's code of conduct against six ANC MPs who were implicated in State Capture, including grand-scale corruption at the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa). They were Fikile Mbalula, Mosebenzi Zwane, Joe Maswanganyi, Dikeledi Magazi, Sfiso Buthelezi, and Dipuo Peters. In April 2023, #UniteBehind started litigation against the committee for failing to act 'diligently', accusing the committee of 'an unreasonable, and unexplained, delay in handling the complaints'. The organisation amended its notice of motion in February 2025 after discovering that an amended code of conduct had been adopted. #UniteBehind claims this was done without public participation and without alerting them. The case was heard on Tuesday before a full bench in the Western Cape High Court: Judge Lister Nuku, Judge Hayley Slingers and Acting Judge Jonker. Gregory Solik, the advocate representing #UniteBehind, told the court the new code of conduct was unconstitutional, since it was introduced during the course of the litigation. #UniteBehind argued that it constituted an 'attempt to circumvent judicial scrutiny'. When #UniteBehind prepared and filed its final affidavit, it was not informed by Parliament that the code of conduct had been amended and implemented. Solik also argued that if the challenge to the code of conduct is dismissed, then the court should declare the 'no-jurisdiction clause' invalid. This new clause allows MPs to resign to avoid disciplinary action against them. The amended code states that the ethics committee does not have 'jurisdiction' to consider a complaint if the member ceases to be an MP. Also, if the committee is considering a complaint against a former MP, then it may not proceed with the complaint and 'must close the complaint file'. Solik argued that making this clause invalid would ensure that former MPs implicated in corruption could be held accountable by Parliament – Parliament could still complete investigations and refer matters to the National Prosecuting Authority. 'It may be a small measure of justice, but that justice can still be enforced,' said Solik. #UniteBehind further argued that the 'secrecy provisions' of the new code of conduct should be declared unconstitutional. This includes a clause that 'all documents, evidence and information in the possession of the Registrar must… remain confidential', as well as another clause stating that meetings considering 'the recommendation report of the Registrar will be closed to the public and non-Committee Members'. But the respondents argued that #UniteBehind was trying to 'revive a case that was dead', said advocate for Parliament Zinzile Matebese. In an answering affidavit, Anthea Gordon, Registrar of Members' Interests in Parliament, said that #UniteBehind's amendment to its notice of motion, challenging the new code of conduct, was 'disingenuous' and 'an abuse of the court process'. Parliament asked the court to reject #UniteBehind's request. The respondents argued that the process to amend the code started in 2022 and culminated in the adoption of the amended code by the National Assembly in May 2024. They added that it 'was never adopted in haste as suggested by the applicants', nor was it kept secret. Matebese argued that confidentiality of the information clauses was important because it 'might result in unintended consequences for the whole committee' if it were removed. The confidentiality clauses were necessary to protect MPs' information, and the information of their spouses' affairs, which is protected under other legislation such as the Protection of Personal Information Act. In his closing statement, Solik noted that the initial complaints were made because of the 'total abdication of responsibility by Parliament' to address the rot at Prasa. He encouraged the court 'not to lose sight of what the complaints were about', which is that people are 'subject to violence on a daily basis when they use public transport'. Judge Nuku reserved judgment. Protest outside Parliament About 100 #UniteBehind supporters marched from the Cape Town Civic Centre to Parliament, holding placards stating 'No more rigged ethics code', 'Don't protect corruption' and 'No ethics. No Justice. No accountability'. The march ended outside Parliament, where a marquee was set up and several hundred more people joined the protest. DM
