US consumers will bear brunt of Trump's tariffs, say Goldman Sachs economists
So far, companies have paid the majority of the tariffs, which has shielded consumers from the full impact of Trump's sweeping taxes on foreign goods, according to a group of economists including Jan Hatzius.
Through June, consumers have absorbed just 22% of tariff costs – but their share is expected to jump to 67% as more US firms start to hike their prices, the report said.
US consumers will end up bearing the brunt of President Trump's tariffs, according to Goldman Sachs economists.
Reuters
US businesses have taken around 64% of the hit from tariffs so far, but that share is expected to shrink to less than 10%, the economists said.
Foreign exporters have absorbed 14% of tariff costs through June, though this may rise to 25%, according to the report.
Goldman economists predicted inflation will rise at a faster pace, with core PCE – one of the Fed's preferred gauges – hitting 3.2% year-over-year in December.
The underlying inflation from tariffs would be 2.4%.
Core PCE, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, rose to a hotter-than-expected 2.8% in June.
Meanwhile, even domestic producers – who do not have to cough up the extra costs associated with the tariffs – have raised their prices to enjoy a boost in profits, further heating up inflation, according to the report.
President Trump signs executive orders in the White House in July.
REUTERS
Uncertainty around Trump's tariffs and their potential impact on inflation has kept the Federal Reserve in a stubborn 'wait-and-see' approach, leaving interest rates unchanged in the 4.25% to 4.5% range since last December.
Meanwhile, Trump has only ramped up his pressure on 'Too Late' Fed Chair Jerome Powell to slash rates immediately.
The president is also planning to nominate Stephen Miran to a board seat that unexpectedly opened up after Fed governor Adrianna Kugler announced she was retiring.
Miran is an outspoken Trump ally, having accused central bankers of 'tariff derangement syndrome.'
The odds of a quarter-point interest rate cut at the Fed's September meeting have jumped to over 85%, according to 30-day Fed Funds futures prices tracked by CME FedWatch.
July's Consumer Price Index is set to be released Tuesday morning, which will give more insight into how tariffs are impacting inflation.
Goldman said tariffs have already boosted core PCE by 0.2% so far this year through June, with another 0.16% expected in July and an additional 0.5% over the rest of the year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump taps conservative economist EJ Antoni to serve as next labor statistics chief
President Trump on Monday announced he would nominate E.J. Antoni, a top economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, to serve as the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after he pushed out the previous leader. 'Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'I know E.J. Antoni will do an incredible job in this new role. Congratulations E.J.!' Antoni is the chief economist at the Heritage Foundation and previously contributed to Project 2025's policy rubric, which outlined potential moves for the next GOP administration during the 2024 campaign. Antoni has in the past expressed skepticism about data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. He recently appeared on conservative firebrand Steve Bannon's podcast to urge Trump to fire the previous commissioner, Erika McEntarfer. The position requires Senate confirmation, but Republicans hold a 53-47 GOP majority, giving Antoni a path to the job even if there are defections. Trump earlier this month ordered the firing of McEntarfer, a Biden White House appointee who was confirmed with a large bipartisan majority in the Senate in 2024. The move came after the jobs report released in early August showed lower-than-expected hiring in July and major downward revisions to the jobs reports from May and June. While Trump and his allies argued it was a move intended to improve transparency and accuracy, critics noted McEntarfer had little to do with what the numbers showed. Economists and lawmakers also expressed concern that it would erode credibility and confidence in government data, hurting businesses and consumers in the process.
Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
Intel CEO appears to win over Trump
Just four days after demanding Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan resign, President Trump has described a meeting with Tan as "a very interesting one." Why it matters: The president's resignation call over Tan's alleged Chinese ties had threatened to waylay the chip maker's turnaround effort. What they're saying: After a meeting Monday at the White House with Tan, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Trump posted on Truth Social that Tan's "success and rise is an amazing story. Mr. Tan and my Cabinet members are going to spend time together, and bring suggestions to me during the next week." The context: Trump called for Tan's resignation last week after Sen. Tom Cotton (R.-Ark) said that he had written to Intel's board expressing concerns about what he said were "Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army." Tan had previously served as CEO of Cadence Design Systems, which in July reached a plea agreement with the government over claims of illegal exports to China. Intel's board has supported its CEO. "We are engaging with the administration to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts," Tan wrote to Intel employees on Thursday. "I fully share the president's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security, I appreciate his leadership to advance these priorities, and I'm proud to lead a company that is so central to these goals." The bottom line: By moving quickly to engage the White House and to endorse its priorities, Tan has taken a page from Apple CEO Tim Cook and other corporate chieftains on how to best navigate being caught in the Trump spotlight.
Newsweek
43 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Student Loan Update: Warning Issued Over Trump's New Plan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Institute for College Access and Success (TICAS), a student loan borrower advocacy organization, is warning against a new repayment plan that the Trump administration is introducing within the next few months. The Department of Education (ED), headed by Education Secretary Linda McMahon, has unveiled a new repayment plan option, called Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), to replace older plans that allowed borrowers to repay based on their specific income and eventually gain student loan forgiveness. Newsweek has reached out to TICAS and the ED for comment via email. Why It Matters RAP was introduced under the "Big Beautiful Bill" that President Donald Trump signed into law last month. Under the new regulations, three other income-driven repayment (IDR) plans: Income-Contingent Repayment (CIR), Pay As You Earn (PAYE), and Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) are being phased out by 2028. Enrolling in RAP will be a new option, but student loan borrower advocates warn there could be long term negative consequences to signing up for the plan. What To Know Beginning July 1, 2026, all borrowers who consolidate their student loans through the federal direct loan program will have to choose between RAP and the standard plan, which does not depend on a borrower's income. Under RAP, your monthly payments for each year are determined based on your income, and after a fixed term, you would qualify for student loan forgiveness. However, it differs from other IDR plans because it has higher monthly payments and uses a different formula where the percentage of income that is counted toward your monthly payment increases for every $10,000 in additional income earned by the borrower with a cap of $100,000. Other IDR plans use a fixed repayment formula and factor in inflation. RAP plan enrollees will also be subject to a minimum required monthly payment even if they bring in no income, unlike ICR, PAYE, SAVE and Income-Based Repayment (IBR). Additionally, while the other options factored in all the other people the borrower lived with in their home, RAP only adjusts a $50 monthly payment reduction for a dependent child. RAP also mandates a longer repayment period of 30 years before borrowers can qualify for student loan forgiveness, unlike older plans which allowed for this after 20 or 25 years. The Institute for College Access and Success warned that this new plan means many borrowers will likely find themselves in default on their loans compared to prior options. "The plan departs radically from the core design tenets of all previous income-based repayment plans," TICAS wrote in a recent blog post. "One stark difference is that it removes the 'income protection' that all prior plans have, which is meant to 'protect' a certain amount of a borrower's income so they can stay current on their loan payment while still having enough funds to cover their basic needs." It added: "RAP scraps this approach and instead bases a borrower's payment on their gross income, rather than their discretionary income. Unlike all existing income-based plans—which require monthly payments only once a borrower's income is a certain amount above the federal poverty threshold—RAP will require payments from even those earning far below the poverty level." As the cost-of-living increases, TICAS said RAP will likely "push more borrowers than ever into the nightmarish world of loan default." "All told, the RAP proposal is not much of a safety net," TICAS wrote. "When it's the only thing standing between borrowers and loan default, we can expect many more borrowers to enter the draconian student loan collections system, in which many will be trapped." President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters in the Oval Office on August 7 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters in the Oval Office on August 7 in Washington, People Are Saying Education and Workforce Committee chairman Tim Walberg, a Michigan Republican, said in a previous statement: "The student loan repayment process has become bloated and too complex. The plan simplifies the loan repayment system to help troubled borrowers repay loans without saddling taxpayers with the burden of paying back the loans of wealthy borrowers." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "The warning is valid. The setup looks eerily similar to prior plans like IBR and PAYE, but with a few important twists. The structure feels familiar, yet as the saying goes, 'all that glitters isn't gold.'" He continued: "Calling it a debt trap is putting it mildly. This design pushes people to stay in the workforce longer, keeping them tied to repayment well into their lives. From a business perspective, it's a tool to keep labor in the system. On the 'bright' side, more companies are offering loan repayment perks—but those are just retention levers to keep people tied to the company." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "While the new Repayment Assistance Plan beginning next year may appear similar to other recently introduced programs designed to lessen monthly payment amounts for some borrowers, the reality is there are some stark differences that could have negative effects on those carrying substantial student debt. The new plan will still require a monthly payment regardless of whether the borrower has a job or not, differing from plans like SAVE which could lower the amount to $0 if the loan holder is out of work." What Happens Next? Once ICR, PAYE and SAVE are phased out, borrowers will be forced to choose a different repayment plan by July 2028. RAP will likely be more affordable than IBR for many borrowers, despite TICAS's warned risks. "These are the kinds of pro-business policies you get when the people crafting the legislation have a business mindset," Thompson said. "They see people as one thing and one thing only: inputs to the labor force."
