
Chaitanya Baghel actively linked to proceeds of crime in liquor case: ED tells court
Based on the purported disclosures by Laxmi Narayan Bansal, another accused in the case, the probe agency told the court that Mr. Bansal had admitted in his statements that he handled more than ₹1,000 crore cash originating out of the liquor scam in association with Mr. Chaitanya Baghel, which are proceeds of crime.
'...he [Bansal] used to collect these proceeds of crime from Anwar Dhebar via Dipen Chawda and thereafter he had delivered the said funds to Shri Ram Gopal Agarwal in coordination with Chaitanya Baghel. Also, he delivered around ₹80-100 crore cash (out of the above said funds received from Dipen Chawda) to 'Shri K.K. Srivastava' on Chaitanya Baghel instructions,' the ED stated before the court. All the other names mentioned above are co-accused in the case.
It claimed that Mr. Chaitanya Baghel 'is in receipt of proceeds of crime of ₹16.70 crore and has also played an important role in handling of more than ₹1,000 crore originating out of proceeds of crime'.
Opposing the petition, the counsels appearing for Mr. Chaitanya Baghel, Faisal Rizvi and Harshwardhan Parganiha, denied all the allegations made in the grounds of arrest. They argued that the accused had legitimate sources of income, primarily drawn from the agriculture business spanning over 200 acres of land, proportionate to his expenditure as well as assets which could well be justified from his annual Income Tax Returns (ITRs).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Loktantar' or ‘Loktantra'? Did INDIA bloc fumble on Hindi word for Democracy? Here is what we know
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Thursday attacked the Congress party-led INDIA bloc opposition for misspelling the Hindi word 'loktantra' for democracy in their protest posters. The Opposition members were seen holding up posters criticising the state of democracy during the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament. But the word 'loktantra' (democracy) was mistakenly written as 'loktantar,' drawing quick ridicule from BJP leaders. BJP IT Cell chief Amit Malviya pointed out the error, saying, " It's Loktantra, not Loktantar." The BJP also shared the poster with a spelling error on its X handle. The jibe came as opposition MPs, including Congress leader Sonia Gandhi, staged a demonstration at Parliament's Makar Dwar over the issue of the Special Intensive Revision of Electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. "Can't blame Congress. They can neither spell nor save Loktantra. they believe in Parivar Tantra and Emergency. Surely they can spell and save that," BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla said. The apparent spelling error unleashed a debate on social media over the correct spelling of the word Loktantra The apparent spelling error unleashed a debate on social media over the correct spelling of the word Loktantra A user said there was nothing wrong with the spelling and it was like people spell 'Satyendar' differently, sometimes as Satyendra too. 'It is Adope unsupported font issue. College mein bahut hota that,' said a social media user. Can't blame Congress. They can neither spell nor save Loktantra. A Hindi language expert said the word was grammatically correct as it would also be pronounced as 'Loktantra'. 'Bas humare yahan Loktantra ko raise likhne ki parampara nahi hai. (It may be traditionally incorrect. But the pronunciation remains the same),' the expert said.

The Wire
26 minutes ago
- The Wire
ED Begins PMLA Investigation Against Anil Ambani's Reliance Group Companies
Over 35 premises, 50 companies and over 25 individuals are covered in search operations undertaken by the ED under section 17 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. A security guard outside industrialist Anil Ambani's office, in Mumbai, Thursday, July 24, 2025. The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday conducted simultaneous raids as part of a money laundering investigation linked to an alleged bank loan fraud of Rs 3,000 crore against Anil Ambani group companies and Yes Bank. photo: PTI. New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate has begun investigating the Anil Ambani's Reliance Group companies after the Central Bureau of Investigation registered two first information reports against them. Over 35 premises, 50 companies and over 25 individuals are covered in search operations undertaken by the ED under section 17 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The case has to do with Yes Bank, which in 2017, when it was headed by Rana Kapoor, invested in Reliance Commercial Finance Limited, Reliance Capital Ltd and Reliance Home Finance Ltd to the tune of Rs 900 crore, Rs 1,000 crore and Rs 1,000 crore respectively. In turn, Anil Ambani Group entities advanced loans to family entities of Rana Kapoor to the tune of Rs 285 crore, allegedly as bribe. Yes Bank's investments in the Anil Ambani Group companies turned 'non performing' in 2019, after which it filed a complaint with the CBI in 2020. The probe agency registered FIRs RC2242022A0002 and RC2242022A0003 in 2022. The ED conducted searches after a three-year gap. Other agencies and institutions like the National Housing Bank, SEBI, National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA), and Bank of Baroda are also learnt to have shared information with the ED. Preliminary investigation by ED has revealed a well-planned and thought out scheme to divert or siphon off public money by cheating banks, shareholders, investors and other public institutions. The offence of bribing bank officials including the promoters of Yes Banks Limited is also under the ED's scanner. The ED has said that its preliminary investigation reveals illegal loan diversion of around Rs 3,000 crores from Yes Bank between 2017 and 2019. ED has found that just before the loan was granted, Yes Bank promoters received money in their concerns. Among violations that the ED found in Yes Bank loan approvals to Reliance Anil Ambani Group of companies are backdated credit approval memorandums, investments proposed without any due diligence or credit analysis in violation of banks credit policy and so on. In violation of loan terms, these loans were further diverted to many group companies and shell companies. Some red flags found by ED include the fact that loans given to entities with weak financials, no proper documentation of loans, no due diligence, borrowers have common addresses or common directors and so on. The ED also found diversion of loans to promoter group entities, ever-greening of GPC loans, loans onward lent on same date, loans disbursed on same date as date of application, loans disbursed prior to sanction, and misrepresentation of financials. SEBI is also learnt to have shared its findings with ED in the case of Reliance Home Finance Ltd. The ED is looking at a dramatic increase in corporate loans by RHFL, from Rs 3,742.60 crore in FY 2017-18 to Rs 8,670.80 crore in FY 2018-19. It is also investigating issues of irregular and expedited approvals, process deviations and other illegalities. Reliance Power's and Infrastructure's statements Reliance Power and Reliance Infrastructure have released identical notes saying that the ED's actions "have absolutely no impact on the business operations, financial performance, shareholders, employees, or any other stakeholders of" Reliance Power or Reliance Infrastructure. "The media reports appear to pertain to allegations concerning transactions of Reliance Communications Limited (RCOM) or Reliance Home Finance Limited (RHFL) which are over 10 years old. It is clarified that [Reliance Power/Reliance Infrastructure] is a separate and independent listed entity with no business or financial linkage to RCOM or RHFL," it said. They also added that while RCOM is undergoing the corporate insolvency resolution process as per the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, for the last six years, RHFL has been fully resolved following a Supreme Court judgement. "Further, Mr. Anil D. Ambani is not on the Board of [Reliance Power/Reliance Infrastructure] . Accordingly, any action taken against RCOM or RHFL has no bearing or impact on the governance, management, or operations of [Reliance Power/Reliance Infrastructure]," the statements said. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.


Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Congress raising its pitch on J&K statehood has irked National Conference: ‘Nothing less than sabotage'
The Congress's sudden announcement last week of protests in Jammu, Srinagar, and New Delhi seeking the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir's statehood has not gone down well with ally National Conference (NC), with several leaders in the Omar Abdullah-led party labelling it a sabotage of its own efforts. The J&K Congress's announcement coincided with the joint letter that Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge, the Leaders of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, respectively, wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on July 16, demanding that a law be brought in the Monsoon Session of Parliament to restore J&K's statehood. 'This is nothing less than sabotage,' said an NC leader. 'For six years, they were silent about our plight, fearing it would hit their prospects in the elections. For nine months (since the formation of the government) we have been fighting for statehood and they have remained silent. Now that they have developed a sudden interest in statehood. What else can it be but sabotage?' Since returning to power in a landslide win last year, the NC has limited its demand to the return of statehood rather than pushing for the reinstatement of Articles 370 and 35A. This has divided the NC itself, with leaders such as Srinagar MP Aga Ruhullah Mehdi criticising what they see as a climbdown by the party. However, the NC leadership led by Chief Minister Omar Abdullah opted for a more practical and realistically achievable goal rather than antagonise the BJP-led Central government. This section of pragmatists in the party believes their approach is working and is hopeful that the Centre will soon decide on the statehood question. This is why these NC leaders believe that the Congress is either trying to take credit for their party's work or foil any possibility of return to statehood. 'We fail to understand the logic behind this campaign at this point,' said an NC leader. 'The common sense is that the Modi government is not going to buckle under pressure, or at least they will not let it be perceived that they have come under pressure. In this context, the Congress campaign will only create hurdles rather than facilitate it (return of statehood).' Another leader wondered if the Congress had received any feelers about the restoration of statehood and wanted to take the credit for themselves. The CM, too, did not hide his frustration about his ally's actions, saying on Tuesday, 'We passed a resolution for it (statehood) in the very first Cabinet meeting and later in the Assembly. It is good that Congress is finally remembering this issue after a long time. But if they need our support, they should first talk to us.' The CM said Congress had not reached out to the NC. 'We only read about these things in newspapers. No one reached out to us. Even during the recent INDIA bloc meeting, there was no mention of these things. Had they informed us, we would have joined.' Congress leaders said they do not require anybody's permission before undertaking any political activity. 'What can the NC tell us? Whether it is Article 370, 35A or statehood, it was the Congress's gift to Kashmir. It is the Congress's responsibility to get back statehood for Jammu and Kashmir. National Conference doesn't look beyond the power binary. For them, the chair is everything,' said one leader. Another Congress functionary said it was incorrect to say the party was silent on the issue for the last nine months. 'We are a national party and we have to follow the central command. Rahul ji and Kharge ji wrote to the Prime Minister. What else could we have done? Once the central command made a decision, the J&K unit followed.' Though the Congress and the NC jointly contested the Assembly elections, the alliance has seen friction from day one. Leaders in both parties were against any pre-poll alliance and following the NC's win and the Congress's failure to make a mark, the latter stayed out of the government. Since then, there has been little bonhomie between the allies, and now the latest flashpoint threatens to pull them in different directions.