Asylum costs set to take up fifth of UK's shrunken aid budget, watchdog warns
Despite the June spending review suggesting a reduction in such costs over the next three years, they are still on course to absorb a 'significant portion' of total aid funding, according to the watchdog.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced plans to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this Parliament after the National Audit Office said accommodation costs could hit £15.3 billion over a 10-year period.
But progress in bringing down aid spending on so-called in-donor refugee costs remains 'slow', the ICAI said.
International OECD rules allow governments to use their aid budgets to cover some of the costs of helping people claiming asylum in the first year of entering a country, such as housing and food.
According to ICAI calculations, asylum costs are expected to take up £2.2 billion of total UK official development assistance (ODA) funding for 2026-27, £1.8 billion the following year and £1.5 billion by 2028-29.
The Government slashed Britain's aid budget earlier this year from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% in order to pay for increased defence spending.
Total ODA spending is now expected to fall from £10 billion in 2026-27 to £8.9 billion the following year before increasing slightly to £9.4 billion in 2028-29.
This means a fifth of the total aid spend in 2027-28 is expected to go towards asylum costs, before dipping to around a sixth in 2028-29.
ICAI commissioner Harold Freeman, who led the new report, acknowledged the Government had already taken some steps to address 'flaws in the system' but said further changes would be likely to be needed.
He said: 'The UK's development programme is at a turning point, with budget reductions coming against a backdrop of increasing global conflicts, climate threats and rising humanitarian needs.
'At the same time, UK asylum costs are likely to continue to absorb a significant proportion of our aid funding.
'The Government has already taken steps to address some of the flaws in the system for managing aid identified by past ICAI work.
'But further changes will likely be needed to maximise the impact and value for money of the remaining development budget.'
The Government has been contacted for comment.
Last year, the watchdog raised 'value for money' concerns after some 28% – or £4.3 billion – of all UK aid in 2023 was spent on hosting refugees and asylum seekers in Britain under the previous Conservative government.
The amount of ODA spending on in-house refugee costs has risen dramatically since 2020, in part due to visa schemes for Afghan and Ukrainian people but largely linked to lengthy stays in so-called asylum hotels, the ICAI said.
In response to its latest report, the Tories said the 'eye-watering cost' of housing asylum seekers was 'utterly indefensible, particularly when so many people are struggling to get by'.
Shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said: 'This broken system rewards delay and indecision, while the British taxpayer foots the bill.
'Those who have no right to stay here should not be languishing in hotels; they should be detained and deported within days – not years.
'We need a migration system that is firm, fair, and fast.
'Over the past 12 months, Keir Starmer has systematically dismantled every deterrent, while his joke of a migrant deal agreed with France last week will do nothing to stem the flow of migrants risking their lives to cross the Channel.'
The One campaign, which aims to reduce poverty in Africa, said the report confirmed that UK aid had been 'stretched to breaking point'.
Executive director Adrian Lovett said: 'While it's right that refugees are housed in safe accommodation, paying for this from the diminished international aid budget means there will be even less support for the world's most vulnerable people at a time of growing global need.'
Mr Lovett added: 'The UK is at its best when it delivers a strong and growing aid budget, but also uses its political and diplomatic muscle to help create the conditions for sustainable solutions.
'We look to ministers to be creative and ambitious on both fronts in the months and years ahead.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
17 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Edinburgh shops flouting vape ban as illegal disposables still on sale
An undercover probe revealed that retailers were aware the disposable vapes were illegal to sell and had been banned more than a month ago. Shops across the Capital are still selling single use vapes – over a month after they were banned across the country. The Local Democracy Reporting Service was able to buy seven at sites around the city, with many shops still carrying them in public view. Many shop workers acknowledged they were illegal to sell when asked by an undercover reporter, with one saying customers sought them out because they 'liked the taste'. Others said they were working on clearing out stock, while a handful pled ignorance, saying they did not know the vapes were illegal. The ban was brought in on 1 June of this year by the Scottish Government over public health and environmental well-being grounds. Similar bans came into effect in England, Wales and Northern Ireland on the same day, with the Scottish ban delayed by two months to line up the start date nationwide. It had been announced in Scotland in early 2024, giving manufacturers and retailers time to adapt to the change. To be legal, vapes need to be rechargeable, and have the ability for the vape liquid and heating elements inside to be replaced. Vape manufacturers have responded by creating new lines of products that visibly resemble their old disposable ones, but which feature charging ports and disposable pods that contain liquid and new heating elements. Local authorities have been tasked with enforcing the ban – though a council report in May said the city's trading standards team would need more resources to investigate disposable vapes without reducing their other services. Having seen several stores appearing to stock disposable vapes weeks after the ban came into effect we carried out test purchasing at sites across the city. At one popular city centre retailer, we asked if the store had any disposable vapes on hand. A cashier obliged, and took out ten disposable vapes, laying them out on the counter for us to take our pick. He acknowledged that they were illegal, but said that customers seemed to prefer the taste of the old disposable units over the refillable equivalents many companies have released. He said: 'The only difference is the battery. But people still want these, they like the taste I think.' The vape we bought there, a Higo Crystal bar, lacks a charging port or a way to replace the liquid inside, making it illegal under the new law. Returning a couple days later, the same shopkeeper denied he sold us the vape, and said the shop did not stock or carry ones not compliant with the ban. At a Southside convenience store, we were able to ask for a cola-flavoured Elf Bar right off the shelf without issue. When asked if the vape was illegal, the cashier there confirmed it was. He said the store was working on clearing out its stock, and that refills for the newer vapes were hard to obtain. He continued on to say: 'People don't care [whether the vape is disposable], they're the same. The law is pointless without having the refills.' The story was the same at another two city centre newsagents, where we were able to buy a disposable peach ice SKE bar and a disposable cherry cola Elf Bar. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. One shopkeeper there told us: 'The [refill] pods are hard to get. Our supplier doesn't stock them, we can't buy them.' The issue of what is legal and illegal was one which seemed to be causing some shopkeepers trouble. At another city centre newsagent we were able to purchase a pineapple peach mango Elf Bar – and when asked if it was compliant with the ban, the shopkeeper seemed to believe it was, telling us, 'you can change the pods'. He was confused when we removed the vape from its packaging, and pointed out that it had no charger or removable refill pods. When we went back to the shop, a different shop worker also thought the vape was legal, saying they had received the non-compliant Elf Bars as part of a shipment two weeks ago. We were also able to buy non-compliant vapes at two more shops in the city, with both stocking them quite openly. All seven stores were asked for comment, however none had responded by time of publication. At each store we asked for a receipt, however most declined to provide them, with some saying they were out of receipt paper and others providing no explanation as to why one could not be given. The Local Democracy Reporting Service has now passed its dossier of evidence on to Edinburgh Council's trading standards team, who are investigating. We also checked some chain supermarkets for vapes – and managed to find one, the Sainsbury's on Shandwick Place – stocking disposable ones. However, when a cashier tried to ring up the vape, his terminal would not allow him to scan the product. He then cleared the remaining disposable vapes from the shelf behind him. A spokesperson for Sainsbury's said the firm took its 'role as a responsible retailer very seriously', and that it ensures all its stores are compliant with the ban. A spokesperson for the Scottish Government said: 'Local authorities are responsible for enforcement of the single use vape ban. Day to day enforcement activities are carried out by Trading standards officers employed by each Local Authority. 'The Scottish Government remains in contact with regulators and the other UK nations regarding any compliance and enforcement issues.' Alexandra Connell, chair of the Society of Chief Officers of Trading Standards in Scotland, said that trading standards teams need more support in order to tackle the ban. She said: 'We are a small profession. We [already] have an awful lot of other work that's equally important that we have to get out and do. 'The Scottish Government have identified some monies to help us with enforcement of it. But the mechanisms for how that money gets to us isn't particularly clear [yet]. 'And it's a small pot. Divided between 32 local authorities, it means everybody gets a very small pot of money. 'What we really need is to be properly resourced. We need to recognise that we actually have a huge remit. 'And our remit seems to be getting bigger, we have new burdens, but as I say, we are a small profession.' Ms Connell said that trading standards officers often had to prioritise investigating products with the most harm, such as counterfeit or defective children's toys, over enforcement of other products. She also said stopping disposable vapes at the border might be a more cost-effective solution than having council trading standards officers remove them from individual stores. According to her, investigating vapes that aren't compliant with the ban is an expensive and time consuming process. She says trading standards officers need extensive training to identify illegal vapes. And, they sometimes need to take vapes apart, as some will appear to feature charging ports but lack a rechargeable battery. The process of getting rid of disposable vapes is also challenging – due to their lithium batteries, they need to be appropriately recycled, which does not always come cheap. A spokesperson for Edinburgh Council said: 'Single use disposable vaping devices became illegal on 1 June, and any business still offering these for sale is committing a criminal offence. 'Trading Standards Officers may seize the items, issue Fixed Penalty notices or submit reports to the Procurator Fiscal. 'The Trading Standards team will respond to any complaints or reports of non-compliance, which can be sent to or reported via Advice Direct Scotland.'
Western Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
MPs call for sanctions over British man detained in Dubai for 17 years
The group of 15 parliamentarians, led by Sir Iain Duncan Smith, said the case of Ryan Cornelius was a 'flagrant example of arbitrary detention and abuse of power' as they asked David Lammy to publicly call for his release. Mr Cornelius, now 71, was detained for 10 years in 2008 as part of a bank fraud case, and the detention was extended by 20 years in 2018. Foreign Secretary David Lammy (Jonathan Brady/PA) A UN working group has found he is subject to arbitrary detention and last week the European Parliament passed a resolution condemning his detention in 'inhumane conditions' and calling for his 'immediate and unconditional release'. After the European Parliament resolution, Sir Iain and his colleagues asked Mr Lammy to 'immediately clarify the Government's position on Mr Cornelius's case and confirm what steps you will now take to press for his release'. Specifically, they asked whether the Government would make 'strong representations to the UAE on his behalf', publicly call for his release and impose 'targeted' sanctions on those responsible for his detention. They said: 'The UK has a moral and legal duty to act, as well as a diplomatic responsibility to defend its citizens abroad from such mistreatment. 'We urge the Government to act with the utmost urgency to secure his release.' For more than 17 years, we have had nothing but defensive waffle from the British Foreign Office Heather Cornelius and Chris Pagett Sir Iain said it was 'vital' for the Government to take 'decisive action' to secure Mr Cornelius's release. Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer has previously said the Government would 'continue to highlight their concerns' in talks with the UAE and was providing Mr Cornelius with consular assistance, while it took reports of human rights violations 'very seriously'. But the UK's response to his detention has been criticised by Mr Cornelius's wife Heather and brother-in-law Chris Pagett. They said: 'For more than 17 years, we have had nothing but defensive waffle from the British Foreign Office. 'The European Parliament has made a strong and direct call to the UAE for Ryan's release within months of our taking his case to them. 'The contrast is shameful. The British people deserve better.' The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been approached for comment.
The Sun
23 minutes ago
- The Sun
Mortgage guarantee scheme offering 95% loans confirmed in government plans
FIRST-TIME buyers with 5% deposits will continue to get help through a mortgage guarantee scheme, the government has confirmed today. The new scheme will be permanently launched from this month and means first-time buyers can borrow up to 95% of the home price. 1 It replaces the previous Mortgage Guarantee scheme which first launched in 2021 and ended last month. Plans to relaunch the scheme were initially laid out in the Chancellor's Spending Review earlier this month. The move, reiterated in government documents published today, allows buyers to purchase a home across the UK with just a 5% deposit. The government then provides a guarantee to the lender to cover some losses if the buyer cannot repay their mortgage and the property gets repossessed. It is significantly lower than the 10% or 20% deposit many lenders ask buyers to pay when securing a home. For example, if you bought a house for £350,000, you would only need to pay a deposit of £17,500. Someone required to pay a 20% deposit on a property of the same value would have to make a down payment of £70,000. Since the scheme began, over 53,000 mortgages have been completed using it, with a total value of £10.7billion as of December last year. The small deposit mortgage deals were previously popular leading up to the 2008 financial crash but were phased out afterwards. The scheme has been hailed as an accessible way for buyers to get on the ladder. But the larger loan-to-value ratio for the mortgage means buyers will pay higher interest rates when they make repayments. Rachel Reeves FINALLY addresses Commons tears after she and Keir Starmer put on awkward show of unity Peter Stimson, director of mortgages at lender MPowered Mortgages, said the move comes "a year too late". He said: "The mortgage market has changed a lot since Rachel Reeves swept into 11 Downing Street last July. 'The Base Rate has come down by a full percentage point and hundreds of 95% LTV mortgage products are now available. 'Every lender who wanted to offer a 95% loan is probably already doing so. "The Chancellor's announcement is unlikely to make dozens more suddenly follow suit - as the price of entry is unknown and will vary each year." Many lenders are offering their own take on the 95% mortgage. Nationwide just recently launched a 95% mortgage for buyers looking to purchase a new build home. The offer also allows customers to borrow six times their annual income through its Helping Hand scheme. Elsewhere, Skipton Building Society offers a 100% mortgage deal that allows you to buy a home without a deposit. A similar mortgage deal was recently launched by April Mortgages too. ALL CHANGE Mortgages will also be available at over 4.5 times a buyer's income, following recommendations from the Bank of England to loosen lending rules. This will create more than 36,000 additional mortgages for first-time buyers over the first year, the Government said. Britain's biggest building society Nationwide also announced plans last week to make its "Helping Hand" mortgage scheme for first-time buyers available to people on lower incomes. From Wednesday, eligible first-time buyers can apply for Nationwide's Helping Hand mortgage with a £30,000 salary, down from £35,000, and joint applicants with a £50,000 combined salary – down from £55,000. It has been estimated that this will support an additional 10,000 first-time buyers each year. Brian Byrnes, head of Personal Finance at Moneybox, said: "It is encouraging to see steps being taken to support first-time buyers. "Enabling people to borrow more is not a silver bullet. "What first-time buyers truly need is not just the ability to take on more debt, but meaningful, long-term support to help them start saving and investing earlier in life so they can build up that all-important deposit." Elsewhere, plans to cut the tax-free allowance for cash ISAs have been put on hold by the Chancellor, after speculation that reforms to the savings account would also be announced. What help is out there for first-time buyers? GETTING on the property ladder can feel like a daunting task but there are schemes out there to help first-time buyers have their own home. Help to Buy Isa - It's a tax-free savings account where for every £200 you save, the Government will add an extra £50. But there's a maximum limit of £3,000 which is paid to your solicitor when you move. These accounts have now closed to new applicants but those who already hold one have until November 2029 to use it. Help to Buy equity loan - The Government will lend you up to 20% of the home's value - or 40% in London - after you've put down a 5% deposit. The loan is on top of a normal mortgage but it can only be used to buy a new build property. Lifetime Isa - This is another Government scheme that gives anyone aged 18 to 39 the chance to save tax-free and get a bonus of up to £32,000 towards their first home. You can save up to £4,000 a year and the Government will add 25% on top. Shared ownership - Co-owning with a housing association means you can buy a part of the property and pay rent on the remaining amount. You can buy anything from 25% to 75% of the property but you're restricted to specific ones. Mortgage guarantee scheme - The scheme opens to new 95% mortgages from April 19 2021. Applicants can buy their first home with a 5% deposit, it's eligible for homes up to £600,000.
