Treasury minister Reynolds struggles over Lower Thames Crossing answers
The Lower Thames Crossing will link Essex and Kent but economic secretary Emma Reynolds was unable to give details of the precise location of the crossing or the total cost of the project.
She also mistakenly referred to the existing crossing being the 'Dartmouth tunnel', apparently confusing the Devon town with Dartford, the location of the crossings for traffic across the Thames.
'I meant Dartford, excuse me, I had a very early morning,' the minister told LBC Radio.
Asked about the proposed new crossing's location, she said: 'You'll forgive me, I can't recall the landing zone.'
The crossing will involve two tunnels under the Thames to the east of Tilbury in Essex and Gravesend in Kent.
Pressed on the cost, she said 'it's going to cost quite a lot of money', suggesting it would be 'several billion pounds'.
LBC Radio presenter Nick Ferrari told Ms Reynolds: 'Is there much point continuing this conversation because you don't know where a bridge starts, where it ends and you don't know how much it costs?'
National Highways has estimated the cost will be between £9.2 billion and £10.2 billion depending on the funding model chosen.
It would connect the A2 and M2 in Kent to the A13 and M25 in Essex via a 2.6-mile tunnel under the Thames, which would be the UK's longest road tunnel.
The funding for the Lower Thames Crossing will be part of the Government's 10-year plan for infrastructure.
A new structures fund will also invest in repairing bridges, flyovers, tunnels and other transport infrastructure such as roads.
The Lower Thames Crossing is aimed at reducing congestion at Dartford.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has said that the project is 'essential for improving the resilience of a key freight route and is critical to our long-term trade with Europe'.
'It will speed up the movement of goods from south-east England to the Midlands and the north, crucial to thousands of jobs and businesses,' she added.
Rachel Reeves has said ministers are 'going all in by going up against the painful disruption of closed bridges, crossings and flyovers'.
The Chancellor added: 'This is a turning point for our national infrastructure, and we're backing it with funding to support thousands of jobs and connect communities, delivering on our plan for change.'
It comes ahead of the Government's infrastructure strategy, expected this week, while public procurement rules are set to be overhauled so that public bodies will have to give more weight to firms which can prove they will boost British jobs when they are bidding for contracts.
The Chancellor outlined a range of infrastructure investments as part of last week's spending review.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
7 minutes ago
- Spectator
Why Britain needs Israel to win against Iran
It's understandable that the focus of coverage of Israel's strikes on Iran, and the Iranian regime's response, has been entirely on the potential regional consequences of Israel's mission to destroy Iran's nuclear capability. But although this may seem more like a version of Neville Chamberlain's infamous 'quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing' than an issue of immediate relevance to British national security, it is most definitely the latter. It is vital to our national security that Israel succeeds. For one thing, Iran operates hit squads in the UK with the explicit aim of assassinating British citizens it deems to be enemies. It's said that the best way to ensure something remains secret is to mention it on the floor of the House of Commons. It sometimes seems that this is exactly what happened in 2023 when the then security minister Tom Tugendhat gave MPs details of how the police and security services had detected at least 15 'credible threats' to kill or kidnap UK citizens and residents in 2022. Iran, he said, had been gathering information about Jews as a 'preparation for lethal operations'. The IRGC uses the same techniques as Isis and al-Qaeda to develop and radicalise UK-based regime supporters In his statement, he named an IRGC member Mohammad Mehdi Mozayyani, who had 'worked to conduct a lethal operation against Iranian dissidents here in the United Kingdom'. Iran International, an Iranian opposition television station, was forced to close its London office because the threat to its staff was so serious. Last month, three alleged Iranian spies appeared in court charged with targeting UK-based journalists so that 'serious violence' could be inflicted on them. The import of Mr Tugendhat's statement has been widely ignored, not least by the government in which he served and the current Labour government. Neither has proscribed the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the terror arm of the regime. In a subsequent interview with the Jewish Chronicle, one of the few outlets to cover the Iranian presence in the UK, Tugendhat said: We have very clear intelligence about the activities of hostile regimes in the UK and we keep a very close eye on what their agents and those close to them are doing. We know that the Iranians are using non-traditional sources to carry out these operations, including organised criminal gangs. They are paying criminal gangs to conduct surveillance. Basically, the Iranians are using crooks based in Britain to spy for them… We have been seeing threats and Iranian operational activity directed against them [Israeli and Jewish targets in the UK]. I do not issue these warnings lightly. The director general of MI5, Ken McCallum, has said that Iran's 'aggressive intelligence services' are actively planning terrorist attacks on British soil, calling it 'the state actor which most frequently crosses into terrorism'. Last October MI5 said it had foiled at least 20 regime-backed terror plots in the UK since 2022. But it is not just Iranian terror operations that pose a threat to UK safety. The regime is also behind an extensive network of organisations, mosques and student bodies that are a more insidious concern. There is, for example, no bar on alleged links with the IRGC, so the Islamic Centre of England (ICE) has been able to operate as a charity with impunity. This is despite being described last year by the then chair of the Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee, Alicia Kearns, as the IRGC's 'London office'. It had an official warning by the charity commission after holding a vigil to honour the IRGC terror mastermind Qasem Soleimani after he was assassinated in 2020. It was also ordered to scrap a rule in its constitution requiring one trustee to be a representative of Iran's Supreme Leader – which the regulator said created a conflict of interest and demonstrated an 'apparent lack of independence'. The ICE says it is a: Purely religious and cultural organisation, which provides various services to the local communities… It is an independent charity regulated by British law, which is totally funded by the local beneficiaries. The majority of the trustees, donors, and attendees are British citizens. Indeed, this charity is nothing to do with politics, while we strongly believe that the politically motivated lobbies are trying to drag the charity into their political disputes. The Islamic Student Association of Britain has hosted online talks at the Kanoon Towhid Islamic centre in west London with senior IRGC commanders. One of these was Saeed Ghasemi, who said in his talk in 2021 that if Soleimani had not been killed, 'we could have taken over one after another the European countries you are studying in'. A former chair of the association has said that Islamic Students Associations have never had any direct or indirect affiliation to the IRGC or any army, government or security group anywhere in the world and neither have I… Islamic Students Associations have never held any physical gathering/seminar/conference…with any of the falsely accused individuals. Astonishingly (well, rather predictably given our repeated failure to take this form of the Iranian threat seriously) at least six charities with alleged links to Iran or the IRGC have been funded by the British taxpayer as part of the pandemic furlough scheme. One, the Islamic Centre of England, received £109,476 in 2020 and £129,556 in 2021. The key point is that the IRGC uses much the same techniques as Isis and al-Qaeda, utilising a network of mosques, charities and centres to develop and radicalise UK-based regime supporters. One such organisation was exposed for hosting online IRGC commanders who called on British students to join the IRGC to 'bring an end to the lives of Zionists and Jews across the world'. The security services do a valiant job in seeking to uncover and foil terror plots. But they have been let down – as have all of us – by a political class which has refused to proscribe the IRGC, which would make all of the above illegal. Even now, as Israel is doing the West's work for it, our PM and Foreign Secretary cannot bring themselves to offer a word of actual support. Even though, as we have seen, the threat Iran poses to UK security is real – and growing.
Glasgow Times
19 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
'Visitor levy in Glasgow could grow city's tourism offer'
If it gets the go-ahead, the visitor levy will increase the cost of an overnight stay in the city by a small percentage. But in doing so it can raise millions of pounds, which will be reinvested in improving the Glasgow experience for visitors and residents alike. We reckon that if we add 5% to an accommodation bill – that's an average of just under £5 per night – then we could raise around £16 million extra income annually. Given the unprecedented pressures on public finances, that's a decent amount of money to help improve our city and its tourism offer. Visitor levies are common across much of the world. Cities such as Barcelona, Lisbon, Berlin, Hamburg and Paris have all introduced similar schemes in recent years and all have had an increase in visitor numbers. Closer to home, after a few years of preparatory work, Edinburgh's visitor levy will come into force next summer. So, there's an opportunity to learn from our colleagues across the M8 as their scheme is implemented. And I know that most major cities south of the border are also exploring the introduction of visitor levies, so it's important that Glasgow isn't left behind. As you would expect with something as significant as the introduction of new local taxation, the opinions expressed within the 1300-plus consultation responses were many and varied. But what came through was a strong agreement that if we go ahead with Glasgow's visitor levy then it has the potential to grow the city's tourism offer, that we can use the extra finances to ensure our culture and events remain world class, and that the levy can support the promotion and visibility of our city across the world. Ultimately all of this adds up to better supporting employment and opportunities in an extremely important sector of our economy. If the paper which I'm taking to Thursday's City Administration Committee is accepted by colleagues, then Glasgow's visitor levy would be in place from the start of 2027, with the first finances collected by April of that year. Councillors from across the political spectrum have long made the case for new powers that can help us better deliver for our communities and for our city. Now that the Government has given us some of those powers, it's time we put them to good use. The visitor levy is no silver bullet to our financial challenges. But those financial challenges aren't going away any time soon. And with the levy we can deliver for our visitors, our businesses and our communities without the onus falling on Glaswegians. Child poverty remains the most acute challenge currently facing Glasgow. If we're to meet these inequalities head-on then we need a collective effort across all levels of government in partnership with our colleagues in the Third Sector. Of course, the UK Government has always had the powers and resources to make the biggest impact. Scrapping the Two Child Cap, for example, would lift nearly half a million children across the UK out of poverty. I'm delighted that colleagues in the Scottish Government will scrap the cap in early 2026. And that alongside the Scottish Child Payment, we're making real inroads into tackling this scourge here in Scotland. The council has its role to play and tomorrow I'll bring a paper to the City Administration Committee asking for approval to release £510,000 to support those families, households and communities who are most vulnerable to the effects of child poverty. The money means we can continue to fund our pioneering financial inclusion officers who are based in schools across Glasgow. These officers provide face-to-face advice on benefits and money to parents of school-age children, as well as guiding them to additional support via the new Glasgow Helps service. And some of the resource will also fund a project that refers people in need to local social enterprise partners so they can access pre-loved clothing, including school uniforms. It can be disheartening that here in 2025 we continue to have to confront the long-standing consequences of inequalities on our city. But the SNP here in Glasgow and across Scotland will not shirk our responsibility in standing up for our poorest and most vulnerable.
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bracknell Forest Council to roll out kerbside glass recycling
A council is expected to start providing kerbside glass recycling in the authorities across England are required to offer kerbside recycling collections for a wide range of products as part of the updated Simpler Recycling legislation, including glass and flexible plastics.A report published ahead of Bracknell Forest Council's next cabinet meeting says the introduction of a kerbside glass collection service "is a significant improvement for residents who have frequently requested this".Residents already recycle around 75% of glass used in the borough. The report says additional collections will be "costly" but due to government mandate, the council has "no choice" but to implement the bins have been recommended as "the most practical and safest way" to collect the houses, a 140 litre bin will be provided, while flats and communal areas will be provided with bins up to 360 will cost around £980,000 for the vehicles needed, as well as £800,000 for the containers, with three 26-tonne glass collection vehicles required and a 16-tonne vehicle for limited access report says 12 extra crew members will be needed for the delivery of the new bins across the borough will be a "logistical challenge", it will enable the council to communicate with residents over how it works, the report cabinet will make a decision on Tuesday. You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
