Currency Shifts, Gold Lifts, and the CSE Goes Global
ANNA
Hi, my name's Anna Serin, and I'm Director of Listings Development with the Canadian Securities Exchange. You're joining us for episode five of The Market This Month . We're in a very interesting moment for global markets, and at the center of it all is the U.S. dollar. Over the past few months, we've seen a notable decline in the currency against other global currencies, particularly against the Canadian dollar. Behind that move is not just monetary policy or economic data, but something more philosophical—something being quietly referred to as the Mar-a-Lago Accord.
The Mar-a-Lago Accord is the framework guiding the Trump administration's second-term trade and currency agenda. It aims to reduce U.S. trade deficits by addressing what it views as structural imbalances in the global economy, particularly the overvaluation of the dollar. It combines broad tariffs, potential currency interventions, and rethinking of international economic relationships, including proposals to link trade access with national security cooperation.
This proposal is a conceptual revival of the 1985 Plaza Accord, but with a very different tone. Rather than a coordinated global effort to stabilize currencies, this new proposal suggests the U.S. should take deliberate steps to weaken the dollar to boost exports and reduce trade deficits. The idea is rooted in the belief that the dollar's role as a reserve currency makes it structurally overvalued. While this isn't official policy yet, it's already having real-world effects. Investors are watching closely as the market starts to react—from commodities to small caps to capital flows in and out of North America, we're seeing early signs of structural shifts.
Today, we'll break down what this all means for Canadian markets, for investors, and for public companies. We'll talk about who stands to benefit from a weaker dollar, whether the rally of gold is sustainable, and what recent moves in the market might signal about the future of small caps. I'm joined by my wonderful co-host, Bruce Campbell with Stonecastle Investments. Thank you for joining me, Bruce.
BRUCE
Hey, Anna. Good to be here.
ANNA
We're joining each other virtually this month. I'm sad not to have you live in the studio, but hopefully you're enjoying sunshine in Kelowna while we get a little bit of January in Vancouver.
BRUCE
Yeah, it's been good here, for sure.
ANNA
Good. Let's jump right into it. Obviously, our big focus today is the U.S. dollar. We know the U.S. dollar affects global markets and currencies. My question is: the dollar has dropped—is it weak, or are other global currencies strong right now?
BRUCE
To answer your question: both. The dollar is relative to other currencies, and we've seen it decline versus others, so it has been weak. The rapid drop and the percentage move has been significant. As the market ran into volatility at the beginning of the year, the dollar strengthened, which is normal. We tend to see the U.S. dollar as a flight to safety. Then, as things started to stabilize and more about the Mar-a-Lago Accord came out, with both Bessant and Trump talking down the dollar, it declined. We've seen a fairly significant move so far.
ANNA
This will have a lot of ripple effects. Can you talk about how this might affect the Canadian markets?
BRUCE
The biggest thing is the inverse correlation between commodities and the U.S. dollar. Typically, when the dollar declines, commodity prices go up. Last year, we saw a strong move in gold even as the dollar was stable. Now, gold is hitting new highs as the dollar sells off. Other metals like platinum, palladium, and silver have started to move. Oil has recently started to move too. Many point to political issues like tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, but oil was trending up before that. It could be a function of investors reacting to the dollar's decline or anticipating geopolitical heat.
Commodities moving typically creates inflationary pressure, which we haven't talked about in a few months. Canada is so dominated by commodities that our market has outperformed the U.S. so far this year.
ANNA
This creates opportunity for us. It feels so counterintuitive to purposefully create a weaker dollar, doesn't it?
BRUCE
They certainly want to make strategic moves they feel will help their economy both short and long term.
ANNA
Just to clarify, they're doing this to strengthen export abilities? If the dollar is expensive, it makes it harder to do business with other jurisdictions. Plus, they're trying to bolster their economy?
BRUCE
Exactly. In Canadian dollar terms, a few months ago we bottomed out around 68 cents. Now it's in the 73 cent range. That's a significant move. It has an impact—goods priced in U.S. dollars are now a bit cheaper than they were three or four months ago.
ANNA
It'll be interesting to see how that plays out. Let's talk about gold. These are pretty unreal prices, but we're also seeing some misalignment. Are we in a gold rush or a bubble?
BRUCE
I wouldn't say we're in a bubble. If you look at inflation and gold, it makes a lot of sense. Gold typically tracks inflation. One long-held metric is that the price of a good quality men's suit should be about the same as an ounce of gold. That seems to hold true.
However, some indicators show it's potentially extended. Bank of America does a weekly fund manager survey. Right now, they say gold is fairly overvalued and the U.S. dollar is the least favored asset—it hasn't been this out of favor since 2005. Gold is the most over-owned asset class in the survey.
Most of last year, that label belonged to the Mag 7. While some of those stocks have shifted, they haven't fallen apart. Same could be said for gold—it's moved sideways over the last month. Even though the dollar is declining, gold hits new highs, then pulls back. So I wouldn't say it's in a bubble, but we shouldn't be surprised if it stabilizes or drops $200–300 over a short period.
ANNA:
So, good for them. They've obviously done a really great job to have that much support in the markets. I also wanted to mention Dragonfly. They're a drone technology firm. They just raised 3.6 million US under their NASDAQ listing. I thought this was interesting because we're starting to see more and more drone companies coming to the market, which I thought was interesting. That technology really is starting to get implemented in many different ways. We have some other companies coming to us that have some neat drone technology.
But also, I wanted to ask you — they are raising money in the US, and I was curious with what's been going on in our political framework. Some of our issuers wonder how US investors feel about investing in Canadian securities right now. What are your thoughts on that?
BRUCE:
It's definitely a vote of confidence. The fact that these US investors stepped in and invested — and they also did in US dollars — which is great to see as well.
ANNA:
Absolutely. Well, congratulations to Dragonfly. And then finally, just wanted to mention King Global Ventures. They closed an oversubscribed private placement of $5.5 million. The proceeds will fund ongoing exploration and drilling at their Black Canyon Project in Arizona, which includes 213 contiguous concessions and 15 former operating mines within that asset, including the past-producing Howard Copper Mine. The company is focused on precious and base metals exploration across North America.
We continue to see, month by month, these nice little exploration capital raises. I know the markets have been tough in the junior and growth side, but we are seeing these nice little chunks getting raised. What are your thoughts on that? Is this specialized money? Where is this coming from?
BRUCE:
Well, the taps haven't been fully turned on, but in a case like this, where they have old past mines that became uneconomic at some point due to what it cost to mine and metal prices, and now you've seen metal prices rising — it becomes economic again. Turn those lights back on. This is kind of the story of the last couple years — not so much the pure exploration like 'we're going to dig a hole and try to find something,' but more like, 'Hey, we know there's something there, and we just want to restart it and get it producing cash flow.' It's going to take a little money to get there, and then they'll have the cash.
ANNA:
That's amazing. Well, congratulations to all of those CSE issuers on doing so well. Okay, Bruce, before we talk again in a month from now, what should we be thinking about in the markets?
BRUCE:
Lots to watch. We've talked a bit about the bigger picture markets — are we in a bull or a bear? Hopefully we get some clarity on that direction. With that comes sector leadership — what sectors are going to be leading, and where the opportunities lie for the next 6, 12, 24 months.
ANNA:
Alright, well I look forward to chatting with you again in a month. Thank you all for joining us for episode four of The Market This Month. We will be back in June for episode five. We have the Summit on Responsible Investment coming up — we'll be in your hometown of Kelowna. For anyone locally, please come and join us. All the information can be found on our website.
We will be releasing content all summer long highlighting our issuers in the space, so stay tuned. If you go to our YouTube page, feel free to hit subscribe and we'll let you know when new content comes to our CSE TV. Thank you again for joining us, Bruce, and look forward to chatting next month.
BRUCE:
Yeah, exactly.
Join the discussion: Find out what everybody's saying about this junior gold and silver mining stock on the Outcrop Silver and Gold Corp. Bullboard and check out Stockhouse's stock forums and message boards.
The material provided in this article is for information only and should not be treated as investment advice. For full disclaimer information, please click here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Canada could be trade winner as U.S. tariffs undershoot global competitors by wide margin, says report
The tariff rate imposed on Canadian exports by the United States is estimated to be the lowest amongst the world's trading countries, meaning that Canada could end up coming out ahead in Donald Trump 's trade war, a new report says. Article content Oxford Economics Group Ltd. estimates the U.S.'s current effective tariff rate on Canada is 2.5 per cent, placing it below Mexico at four per cent and well below other major U.S. trading partners. Article content Article content For example, the U.S. tariff rate is 35 per cent on China, 15 per cent on Japan, 13 per cent on South Korea and eight per cent on the United Kingdom and the European Union, based on data from calculated duties as a share of imports, Oxford said. Article content Article content 'If the relatively low tariffs apparently being paid on imports from Mexico and Canada persist, these two economies could pick up some benefits from shifts in supply chains, although uncertainties over the endgame for tariffs and the future of the (Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement) will be near-term drags,' Adam Slater, lead economist at Oxford Economics, said in the report. Article content CUSMA-compliant goods escape U.S. tariffs, though the trade agreement is scheduled to be reviewed in July 2026, but some people, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, think that deadline could be accelerated. Article content Still, Slater described the current estimates for the tariff rates 'as something of a puzzle.' Article content Article content One set of trade data from the U.S. Census Bureau indicates that 56 per cent of goods entering the U.S. from Canada and 47 per cent from Mexico are compliant with CUSMA, while other Census Bureau data suggests the rates are 91 per cent and 84 per cent, respectively. Article content Article content 'It may be the case that tariff exemptions for these economies are broader than assumed,' Slater said. Article content Slater said Oxford based its overall 2.5 per cent tariff rate for Canada on a higher level of CUSMA compliance, 'while not directly' adhering to the 91 per cent level. Article content But trade between the U.S. and Canada hasn't escaped unscathed. Article content 'The biggest negative impacts have been in Canada, where imports are down 25 per cent from January levels, and in China, where imports are down 50 per cent from January,' Slater said, adding that 'Chinese data on exports to the U.S. shows a much less dramatic decline of around 25 per cent since January,' possibly due to rerouting of goods through other countries.
Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
Canada's first-past-the-post voting system is constitutional, Ontario appeal court rules
OTTAWA — A panel of three Ontario Court of Appeal judges unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system in a ruling released on Monday. The system, laid out in the Canada Elections Act, sees the candidate who receives the most votes in a given riding or electoral district become the member of Parliament. Fair Voting BC and the Springtide Collective for Democratic Society argued in court that the first-past-the-post system violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of effective representation. The groups also said the system leads to the under-representation of women and other groups in Parliament, breaching the Charter's equality rights provision. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In a proportional representation system, the number of representatives a political party elects reflects the percentage of the total vote the party receives. In November 2023, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed the challenge from Fair Voting BC and Springtide. It said that while a proportional representation system would be a fair alternative to the current system, it's not required by the Constitution. In its decision, the province's Court of Appeal also rejected the groups' key arguments. 'The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter,' Justice Grant Huscroft said in written reasons delivered on behalf of another judge on the panel. 'The appellants' arguments that the electoral system violates the Charter are, in essence, a repackaging of failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.' The expert evidence 'put forward in support' of those arguments, Huscroft wrote, is 'replete with highly contestable policy arguments about which reasonable disagreement abounds, not only in the academic community but amongst the public at large.' 'This evidence demonstrates the shortcomings of constitutional litigation in addressing public policy disagreements,' he added. The short answer to the argument that the electoral system violates the Charter is that Canadian citizens are free to vote for anyone they choose, and for any reason they choose, Huscroft added. 'There is no constitutional requirement that their individual choices aggregate in a way that achieves some ideal of representational diversity,' he wrote. 'Neither the political party affiliation nor the personal characteristics of the candidates who win election are relevant to the constitutionality of the electoral system.' During the 2015 election campaign, then-Liberal leader Justin Trudeau promised it would be the last federal election held under the first-past-the-post system. Once in office, however, Trudeau's government abandoned his pledge to replace the system. Fair Voting BC and Springtide argued that under the current system, small political parties do not enjoy the success they deserve, creating a disadvantage for people who vote for them. 'I do not doubt that small political parties fare poorly in Canada,' Huscroft wrote. 'They receive relatively few votes and invariably win few or no seats.' The failure of a political party cannot open the door to a claim for constitutional redress, he said. 'In short, the right to vote is a right to vote pursuant to the electoral system in operation — whatever that system is, and regardless of the electoral outcomes that may obtain,' he wrote. The appellants also argued the first-past-the-post system contributes to the under-representation of women and minorities in Parliament. Huscroft said no matter what sort of electoral system is in place, over- or underrepresentation of particular demographic groups might occur to a greater or lesser extent from time to time. He added that arguments based on degree of representation lose sight of the fundamental fact of the matter: that people are entitled to vote the way they want. 'This is the very essence of the freedom that lies at the heart of the right to vote,' he wrote. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Canada's first-past-the-post voting system is constitutional, Ontario appeal court rules
A woman casts her vote in a federal election. Photo by Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press/File OTTAWA — A panel of three Ontario Court of Appeal judges unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system in a ruling released on Monday. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors The system, laid out in the Canada Elections Act, sees the candidate who receives the most votes in a given riding or electoral district become the member of Parliament. Fair Voting BC and the Springtide Collective for Democratic Society argued in court that the first-past-the-post system violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of effective representation. The groups also said the system leads to the under-representation of women and other groups in Parliament, breaching the Charter's equality rights provision. Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again In a proportional representation system, the number of representatives a political party elects reflects the percentage of the total vote the party receives. In November 2023, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed the challenge from Fair Voting BC and Springtide. It said that while a proportional representation system would be a fair alternative to the current system, it's not required by the Constitution. In its decision, the province's Court of Appeal also rejected the groups' key arguments. 'The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter,' Justice Grant Huscroft said in written reasons delivered on behalf of another judge on the panel. 'The appellants' arguments that the electoral system violates the Charter are, in essence, a repackaging of failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.' The expert evidence 'put forward in support' of those arguments, Huscroft wrote, is 'replete with highly contestable policy arguments about which reasonable disagreement abounds, not only in the academic community but amongst the public at large.' 'This evidence demonstrates the shortcomings of constitutional litigation in addressing public policy disagreements,' he added. The short answer to the argument that the electoral system violates the Charter is that Canadian citizens are free to vote for anyone they choose, and for any reason they choose, Huscroft added. 'There is no constitutional requirement that their individual choices aggregate in a way that achieves some ideal of representational diversity,' he wrote. 'Neither the political party affiliation nor the personal characteristics of the candidates who win election are relevant to the constitutionality of the electoral system.' During the 2015 election campaign, then-Liberal leader Justin Trudeau promised it would be the last federal election held under the first-past-the-post system.
