4 Times When Spending Extra To Save Time Is Worth It, According to Rachel Cruze
In a recent YouTube video, personal finance expert Rachel Cruze discussed four times she's found it worth spending extra to save time and have more balance. She recommended considering these ideas once you're debt-free with emergency savings.
Cruze said hiring a house cleaner is great for reclaiming time, especially if you've got a busy schedule. She started with a monthly service and eventually moved to a weekly cleaning once her budget allowed for it.
According to Angi, you can expect to pay about $25 to $80 an hour for a house cleaner, depending on your house's features and the level of cleaning. You might get a better deal if you set up more frequent cleanings or work with an individual cleaner.
While the cost might seem high, not needing to buy certain cleaning equipment and supplies anymore can help offset the expense. There's also the satisfaction of having a clean home.
Cruze discussed how ditching the lawn mower and hiring a professional gave her husband more time to enjoy Sundays with the family.
She said, 'He still will do stuff for sure in the yard himself because he just likes it, but to get his time and energy back, it's worth it.'
Besides saving yourself from doing a tiring outdoor chore, you wouldn't have to worry about maintaining a mower or buying fuel. Plus, using a professional can pay off when a nice lawn improves your home's curb appeal and market value.
Angi noted that Americans pay $123 on average for a lawn mowing visit, with yard size playing a major role. Try getting quotes from local landscaping companies and checking service marketplaces like Thumbtack and TaskRabbit, which might be cheaper.
While you might already pay for child care when you're working, Cruze said it was nice to have someone watch the kids occasionally at other times. You could use that time to run errands, go out with your partner or simply relax. A few options include hiring a babysitter, using a drop-in care center or sending your kids to special day programs.
Consider your budget since care costs widely vary. The Care.com 2025 Cost of Care Survey found that parents paid $21.07 an hour on average for an after-school babysitter. However, your location, the care arrangement and other factors will affect the cost.
Don't just go with the cheapest care option. Carefully vet any person or care center so that you know your kids will be safe. You can also ask your loved ones for trusted child care recommendations.
Cruze said, 'This is one that I started during COVID, and I was using Instacart to do all my grocery deliveries.'
While she's enjoyed saving time and avoiding stressful Costco runs, Cruze explained that cost concerns have led her to use delivery services less often. After all, you're not only paying for delivery or subscription fees, but you also must account for tips and potentially higher prices.
To save some money, consider ordering directly from stores like Walmart and Kroger, which mentioned they don't mark up prices online, and look for deals and coupons. You can also compare service fees and check about promotions that waive fees on orders above a certain amount.
More From GOBankingRates
Here's How Much Cars Made in the US Cost Compared to Mexico, Canada and China
I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money
4 Grocery Items To Buy Now Before Tariffs Raise Prices This Summer
The New Retirement Problem Boomers Are Facing
Sources
Rachel Cruze (YouTube channel), 'When Spending Extra to Save Time Is 100% Worth It'
Angi, 'How Much Does Professional House Cleaning Cost? [2025 Data]'
Angi, 'What Are the Average Prices for Mowing Lawns? [2025 Data]'
Care.com, 'How much to charge for babysitting'
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 4 Times When Spending Extra To Save Time Is Worth It, According to Rachel Cruze
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
White House officials defend Trump's firing of BLS chief
White House officials on Sunday defended President Trump's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) following a weak jobs report, a move that has sparked broad criticism. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable,' Kevin Hassett, chair of the National Economic Council, said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Hassett said in another interview on 'Fox News Sunday' that the BLS commissioner has a responsibility to explain major revisions such as the one seen in Friday's jobs report, which showed 258,000 fewer jobs for prior months than initially reported. 'The big downward revision is something of a puzzle. I don't think it was explained very well. And I think that markets might be as much unsettled by the fact that the data are so noisy,' Hassett said. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, one of Trump's top tariff negotiators, said in an interview that aired on CBS's 'Face the Nation' Sunday that the president has 'real concerns' about the jobs numbers reported by the Labor Department. 'Even last year during the campaign, there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers, and so sounds to me like the president has real concerns. You know, not just based on today's, but everything we saw last year,' Greer said in the interview taped on Friday. 'You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' he added. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch.' Trump on Friday directed his team to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the latest jobs report showed the country only adding 73,000 jobs in July, and major revisions for jobs added in May and June. The move prompted immediate outcry from Democrats and a handful of Republicans, with some calling for an investigation. McEntarfer was nominated by former President Biden and overwhelmingly confirmed by the GOP-led Senate early last year in an 86-8 vote. Trump's advisers underscored the president's concerns about revisions to the labor data while defending McEntarfer's firing. Hassett noted that jobs data reported by the government has seen major swings since the COVID-19 pandemic. 'What we've seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers. In fact, they were extremely reliable, the kind of numbers that you want to guide policy decisions and markets, through COVID. And then when COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed. So the typical monthly revision often was bigger than the number itself,' Hassett said on NBC. Trump, in axing the BLS chief, claimed without evidence that McEntarfer 'faked the Jobs Numbers' before the 2024 election in order to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris's White House bid, citing labor statistics revisions during the Biden administration that boosted job numbers ahead of the election. The president accused her of manipulating data to make him and Republicans look bad, writing on Truth Social on Friday, 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' McEntarfer reacted to Trump's firing of her in a social media post over the weekend, saying it was the 'honor of my life' to serve in the role and hailing the 'vital and important work' carried out by civil servants at the agency.
New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary
Business desk: Beyond Trump's Trade Deals 'Dealmaker-In-Chief' Donald Trump has been 'positively monomaniacal' about trade lately, marvels Freddy Gray at The Spectator. His 'real coup' is the 'new framework arrangement with the European Union,' which is 'not simply a major breakthrough in and of itself,' but also 'a useful piece of leverage in the even bigger tariff struggle with China' — because it pulls 'Europe more towards a western trading orbit and less towards the east.' Trump then slammed India for 'buying up Russian oil and gas,' and pivoted sharply by praising a new deal with Pakistan, 'including an arrangement to invest in Pakistani oil.' Advertisement Meanwhile, his enthusiasm for Pakistan — 'an extension of China's empire' — may be part of a plan to 'ring loud alarm bells' in Beijing. From the right: Consolation for the Little Guy 'For all the political criticism they take, the federal courts keep delivering good outcomes more often than not,' cheers The Wall Street Journal's Editorial Board. In 2016, the Labor Department 'imposed hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines' on a fourth-generation farm, Sun Valley Orchards — first requesting penalties and then approving them itself, thus 'serving as prosecutor, judge and jury.' Advertisement But an appeals court just ruled the proceedings 'should properly be enforced in federal court' — the proper venues for federal agencies to impose fines. Sun Valley has since gone out of business,' but at least its owners 'have the consolation of a ruling that will vindicate the rights of other farmers and small businesses under the boot heel of the bureaucracy.' Libertarian: Get Honest About Gov't Spending 'What kind of government do Americans want seriously enough to pay for?' asks Veronique de Rugy at Reason. 'I suspect that most people aren't willing to pay the taxes required to fund everything our current government does.' Advertisement Yet 'all the benefits and subsidies that we're unwilling to pay for' but keep going 'will eventually have to be paid for in the future with higher taxes, inflation, or both' by our children and grandchildren. 'Growing the economy' can be 'part of the solution,' but it won't be enough, and 'raising taxes on the rich will fall short too,' since higher tax rates 'do not automatically translate to more tax revenue.' 'It's long past time' we 'ask what level of spending we truly want with the money we truly have.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Liberal: Hey, Dems — End the #Resistance Advertisement 'Nonstop Democratic fulminations in Trump's second term have been notably unsuccessful in resuscitating the party's toxic brand,' sighs the Liberal Patriot's Ruy Teixeira. Tellingly, 'voters, despite their negative views of Trump's performance on key issues, still prefer Republicans to Democrats.' Also, 'voters neither like nor trust' Dems, and thus don't see them as 'an obvious choice over their opponents.' Yet 'many Democratic politicians persist in reading — loudly — from the #Resistance script.' Why? The '#Resistance trope is what advantages individual Democratic politicians within the party because it generates adulation from activists, media coverage, and gushers of donations.' And taking back the House in 2026 will only 'convince #Resistance aficionados that nothing really needs to change.' Hello, President JD Vance. Health beat: Big Pharma Wins, Patients Lose 'In May, Dr. Vinay Prasad joined the Food & Drug Administration as the top regulator for vaccines,' yet he 'apparently knew the games too well,' gripes Alex Berensen at his Substack: After last week's attacks from Trump's allies, Prasad resigned: 'He was targeted because he posed a direct threat to Big Pharma profits.' Advertisement Just last month, he told Sarepta Therapeutics 'it needed to halt shipments of its gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD.' 'Sarepta has never shown its drugs actually benefit patients.' The company won the right to a drug trial in 2016; 'nine years later, Sarepta still hasn't completed those trials.' Yet 'that hasn't stopped it from selling the drug — for up to $1.5 million per year.' Advertisement 'Big Pharma scalped Prasad for his honesty.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
UPI
38 minutes ago
- UPI
Economists defend labor data chief fired by Trump
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as he departs for a weekend in Bedminster, New Jersey, at the White House in Washington DC, on Friday, August 1, 2025. Photo by Aaron Schwartz/UPI | License Photo Aug. 3 (UPI) -- Economists are lining up to defend Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner Erika McEntarfer, who was fired by President Donald Trump on Friday over his allegations that the agency manipulated a report showing low job growth for July. "It has been the honor of my life to serve as Commissioner of BLS alongside the many dedicated civil servants tasked with measuring a vast and dynamic economy. It is vital and important work and I thank them for their service to this nation," McEntarfer said on social media Friday. Her firing came after the July report had shown that jobs growth was slower than expected as the unemployment rose, with the United States only adding 73,000 new jobs for the month -- down from 147,000 new jobs added in June. "Today's jobs numbers were rigged in order to make Republicans and me look bad," Trump had said Friday afternoon in a Truth Social post. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers called Trump's accusations a "preposterous charge" in an interview with ABC News' "This Week" program Sunday. "These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals. There's no conceivable way that the head of the BLS could have manipulated this number," Summers said. Summers said that the numbers in the job report were "in line" with data and information being reviewed in the private sector and criticized Trump for his "authoritarian" removal of McEntarfer. "Firing statisticians goes with threatening the heads of newspapers. It goes with launching assaults on universities. It goes with launching assaults on law firms that defend clients that the elected boss finds uncongenial," he said. "This is really scary stuff." Bill Beach, McEntarfer's predecessor, appeared in an interview with CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday where he likewise called the move by Trump "totally groundless" and dangerous. "The commissioner doesn't see the numbers until Wednesday before they're published. By the time the commissioner sees the numbers, they're all prepared. They're locked into the computer system," Beach said. Beach said that the only thing the commissioner can do before the jobs report is published is review the text accompanying the data, as he explained part of the process of how they're compiled. "What I think really upset the president on Friday were the revisions to May and June, big revisions. But that's because, like every time we publish on Friday, there are revisions to the previous two months," he said. "This is a survey. And a survey has sample returns." Beach said the jobs reports are compiled from surveys that are sent out to Americans and hundreds of thousands of businesses each month. But the BLS doesn't receive all the returns in time, keeping the window for responses open an extra two months. "What you saw on Friday was the effect of trying to do a better job, getting more information," Beach said. During his interview, Beach was asked if he would believe future report numbers compiled by the BLS after a successor for McEntarfer is found. "I will, because I know the people who work there. They are some of the most loyal Americans you can imagine. They have worked in every kind of political circumstance. They are completely devoted to producing the very best gold standard data possible," he said. "And that's why BLS is the finest statistical agency in the entire world. Its numbers are trusted all over the world. So, I will trust those numbers." Still, White House officials aimed Sunday to double down on the president's claim that the data was being manipulated, without evidence. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett was interviewed on NBC News' "Meet the Press" on Sunday and said that the BLS needs a "fresh set of eyes." "There have been a bunch of patterns that could make people wonder," he said. "And I think the most important thing for people to know is that it's the president's highest priority that the data be trusted and that people get to the bottom of why these revisions are so unreliable." The far-right political activist Laura Loomer, who is not an official member of the Trump administration but has positioned herself as an informal chief adviser on personnel matters, called the BLS situation a "vetting crisis." "Great job by President Trump who just announced he is firing Biden holdover Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of Labor Statistics," she said on social media. "Every single Biden holdover must be FIRED."
