
Battery makers sweat as antimony shortage hits after China's export curbs
When
China
restricts exports of a key mineral, sometimes the pain is sudden and even crippling - enough to spur a major outcry almost immediately. Other times, it takes longer to be felt.
For the world's makers of lead-acid batteries, China's restrictions on critical mineral antimony that were put in place late last year have become a major headache - one that their customers also now have as sky-high procurement costs are passed on.
"We consider it a national emergency," said
Steve Christensen
, executive director at the US-based Responsible Battery Coalition, whose members include battery maker Clarios, Honda and FedEx.
He noted the key role batteries play in industry and civilian life, how antimony is used in military equipment, as well as the surge in spot prices. Antimony now costs more than $60,000 per metric ton, having more than quadrupled over the past year.
"There are no quick solutions... We were completely caught off guard collectively, as an industry," he said.
China likely produced 60 per cent of all antimony supply in 2024, according to the United States Geological Survey. Much of antimony mined in other countries is also sent to China for processing.
Beijing added the mineral to its export control list last September, requiring companies to gain licences for each overseas antimony deal. It then followed up in December with an outright ban on shipments to the US - an action seen as retaliatory after Washington further restricted exports of advanced semiconductors to Chinese companies.
China's global exports of antimony are now just a third of levels seen this time last year.
Christensen said US companies are hugely reliant on China for their supply of antimony and buyers are increasingly having to procure from an emerging "grey market", where sellers that have stocked up on the material are charging extremely high prices.
China's restrictions on antimony precede its controls on rare earths and rare earth magnets that were imposed in response to US President Donald Trump's tariffs and do not appear to have been discussed in last week's efforts to stabilise a truce in trade tensions between the two countries.
Last week's talks between China and the US also did not include any agreement on specialised rare earths such as samarium needed for military applications.
Vulnerable
Lead-acid batteries, commonly found in gasoline-engine vehicles, are mostly used to start the engine and to power low-voltage instruments. They are also used as sources of backup power in various industries and to store excess energy generated by solar and wind systems.
In addition to batteries, antimony is also essential to military equipment such as night vision goggles, navigation systems and ammunition.
Overall antimony demand is some 230,000-240,000 tonnes a year with lead-acid batteries accounting for about a third of that, according to consultancy Project Blue.
While many battery makers may have access to antimony-lead alloy from recycled materials, Project Blue estimates they collectively need around 10,000 tonnes a year of higher purity antimony to top up the alloy to reach the right battery properties.
Securing that additional portion could be challenging.
Project Blue director Nils Backeberg said there is enough antimony outside China to satisfy non-Chinese demand but buyers need to compete with Chinese purchasers such as the country's huge solar industry, and China's smelters are able to offer better terms.
"With antimony prices at nearly 5x normal market conditions, the cost becomes a factor and with supply limited on the Western market, a shortage is being felt," he said.
For now, it seems that battery makers' antimony woes have not yet led to cuts in output, with companies like Germany's Hoppecke saying they have managed to pass on higher costs. Japan's GS Yuasa said it has passed on costs to some customers and is negotiating with more of its customers to do so.
One source at an Indian battery maker said antimony represented only a small cost of a battery and price increases were being passed onto customers, but any more price rises could spell trouble.
"If the price does increase further, everyone (in the industry) will be vulnerable," said the source who was not authorised to speak to the media and declined to be identified.
The companies and the source at the Indian battery maker declined to disclose the size of their product price hikes.
In a sign that profits are being affected, India's
Exide Industries
blamed high prices for antimony when it logged smaller-than-expected income for its fourth quarter.
Christensen of the Responsible Battery Coalition said policymakers should treat the issue as one of national security, arguing that Western countries had become "overly reliant on a single geopolitical adversary for minerals foundational to both national defense and civilian life."
"For the US, the path forward must include onshoring processing capacity, scaling domestic recycling, and building strategic mineral alliances with trusted partners. Otherwise, this crisis will repeat itself again and again," he added.
Some baby steps towards building an antimony supply chain outside of China are being taken.
Clarios, owned by global investment firm Brookfield, said last month it was scouting locations for an up to $1 billion critical minerals processing and recovery plant in the US that will extract antimony among other minerals.
Nyrstar, owned by global commodity trader Trafigura, also said last month it could produce antimony at its South Australian metals processing plant but would need government support to do so.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
30 killed in alleged Israeli gunfire near aid site in Gaza
Gaza's civil defence agency said 30 people were killed by Israeli fire in the Palestinian territory on Wednesday, including 11 who were seeking aid. The war sparked by Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel has ravaged the Gaza Strip, with severe shortages of food, fuel and clean water. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that 11 people were killed and more than 100 wounded "after the occupation forces opened fire and launched several shells... at thousands of citizens" who had gathered to queue for food in central Gaza. The army told AFP it was looking into the incident reported by the civil defence agency. In early March, Israel imposed a total aid blockade on Gaza amid deadlock in truce negotiations, only partially easing restrictions in late May. Since then, chaotic scenes and a string of deadly shootings have occurred near areas where Palestinians have gathered in hope of receiving aid. The civil defence agency said another 19 people were killed in three Israeli strikes on Wednesday, which it said targeted houses and a tent for displaced people. Israeli restrictions on media in the Gaza Strip and difficulties in accessing some areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency. The UN humanitarian office OCHA said on Monday that its partners "continue to warn of the risk of famine in Gaza, amid catastrophic levels of acute food insecurity". The civil defence agency reported that at least 53 people were killed on Tuesday, as they gathered near an aid centre in the southern city of Khan Yunis hoping to receive flour. The Israeli military told AFP regarding one of Wednesday's attacks that its troops were "operating to dismantle Hamas military capabilities". It said it was "looking into" the other reported attacks. After Israel eased its blockade, the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began distributing aid in late May, but its operations have been marred by chaotic scenes and dozens of deaths. In a statement on Tuesday, the organisation said that "to date, not a single incident has occurred at or in the surrounding vicinity of GHF sites nor has an incident occurred during our operating hours". UN agencies and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the foundation over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. The Hamas attack which triggered the war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to Israeli official figures. The Gaza health ministry said on Wednesday that 5,334 people have been killed since Israel resumed major operations in the territory on March 18, ending a two-month truce. The overall death toll in Gaza since the war broke out has reached 55,637 people, according to the health ministry.


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump to extend TikTok deadline by 90 days
Donald Trump will extend the June 19 deadline for China-based ByteDance to sell the US operations of TikTok by another 90 days, the White House said on Tuesday, June 17. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the decision. She said 'President Trump will sign an additional executive order this week to keep TikTok up and running.' Adding further, she said 'President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark,' saying the next three months will be used to work on closing the sale and ensuring that American users' data is protected. With the new deadline, TikTok will get more time to complete the sale, which is required under US law unless significant progress has been made. Trump says China's approval may be needed for TikTok sale Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said he expected to approve the extension. When asked, he replied, 'Probably, yeah. Probably have to get China approval but I think we'll get it. I think President Xi will ultimately approve it.' In May, Trump had already indicated he would extend the deadline, partly because of the app's popularity with young voters during the 2024 election. What the US law says The law required ByteDance to sell TikTok's US assets or shut down the app by January 19, unless it showed major progress toward a sale. Trump, who began his second term on January 20, chose not to enforce the deadline and has since extended it twice—first to early April and then to June 19.] A deal was being discussed earlier this year to spin off TikTok's US business into a company controlled by American investors. However, the talks stalled after China pushed back following Trump's announcement of new tariffs on Chinese imports. In March, Trump said he was open to lowering tariffs on China if that helped move the TikTok sale forward. The app currently has about 170 million users in the US. Xbox Games Showcase 2025 Highlights: Biggest Game Reveals, New Consoles & More!


Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Opinion trading: India's chance to lead the global prediction market revolution
Since 1991, India's economic liberalisation has repeatedly demonstrated a common pattern: Ground-breaking innovations emerge first, followed by regulatory frameworks. The stories of e-commerce, ride-hailing, and digital payments are testament to this pattern; eBay's early struggles with India's pre-digital trade laws, the initial resistance faced by Uber and Ola, and the years it took for UPI to find its regulatory footing—all highlight how disruptive ideas must navigate ambiguity before achieving legitimacy. Today, opinion trading, also called information/prediction market, platforms stand at a similar inflection point, where regulatory clarity will determine whether India leads or lags in what could become the next frontier of the digital economy. Homegrown platforms like Probo, MPL Opinio, and SportsBaazi are testament to the potential of this sector, aggregating the collective wisdom of over 50 million Indian users to create real-time sentiment markets that rival traditional forecasting methods. The parallels with other sectors are striking. Just as the IT Act had to evolve to accommodate emerging technologies – information markets now demand a regulatory framework that distinguishes skill-based prediction markets from gambling. The current ambiguity is not just stifling innovation but also pushing users toward unregulated offshore platforms, where there are no consumer protections, no safeguards against fraud, and no accountability. The irony is palpable—India's thriving information markets sector, which contributes significantly to GST revenues and employs thousands, is being held back by the same regulatory hesitation that once plagued other breakthrough industries. Globally, the race to dominate prediction markets is already heating up. In the US, platforms like Kalshi have gained regulatory approval to offer event contracts, while Robinhood's integration of crowd-sourced sentiment tools demonstrates how mainstream prediction markets are becoming. Perhaps the most telling development is the ground-breaking partnership between Polymarket and X (formerly Twitter), which embeds real-time prediction trading within social media—a glimpse into how Internet 3.0 will blur the lines between information, social interaction, and financial participation. This is not just about gaming; it's about who controls the infrastructure of collective intelligence in the next decade. The investor interest in this space speaks volumes. Peak XV Partners (formerly Sequoia India), an early backer of US-based Kalshi, has also placed its confidence on Probo—a telling endorsement of India's potential in this sector. This parallel investment strategy by one of the world's most astute venture firms underscores a critical insight: prediction markets are not a western novelty but a global opportunity, and India, with its vast digital population and analytical culture, is uniquely positioned to dominate. The sector has already attracted over $500 million in funding, with marquee investors recognising its potential to create a new asset class at the intersection of gaming, finance, and data analytics. India has the chance to build Made-in-India prediction tech for the world—leveraging its strengths in scalable digital infrastructure, a deep talent pool, and a culture that thrives on analytical engagement (as seen with fantasy sports' success). Unlike the West, where prediction markets are still niche, India's 50 million+ strong user base proves this model can achieve mass adoption. The 2023 amendments to online gaming rules provide a foundation, but implementation must accelerate. Without it, we face a fractured market—where state-level bans push activity into grey zones, startups struggle with investor uncertainty, and India misses its chance to set global standards. India cannot afford to be a bystander. With 50 million users, information market is no longer a niche activity—it's a burgeoning economic force. The 2023 amendments to the intermediary guidelines for online gaming were a step in the right direction, but implementation remains sluggish. Without decisive action, India risks ceding this space to foreign platforms or, worse, underground markets. The choice is clear: regulate with foresight, as was done with UPI and fintech, or repeat the mistakes of the past, where delayed policies stifled growth. The future of information markets isn't just about games—it's about who will harness the wisdom of crowds to shape the next era of the internet. The time to act is now—before the future outpaces us again. This article is authored by Arjya B Majumdar, professor, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat.