logo
Is Trump forcing a marriage of convenience between India and China? Like most relationships, it's complicated

Is Trump forcing a marriage of convenience between India and China? Like most relationships, it's complicated

CNN5 days ago
Their relationship is defined by a bloody border dispute, a vast power imbalance and a fierce contest for influence across Asia. Yet, President Donald Trump's latest trade war may be achieving the unthinkable: pushing India and China into a wary but tactical embrace.
Trump's announcement of a new base tariff rate of 25% in India – later set to rise to a staggering 50% as additional punishment for purchasing Russian oil – in some ways mirrors the long pressure campaign he's waged against China and creates a shared interest between New Delhi and Beijing.
While a thaw in India and China's fractious relationship was already underway, analysts say Trump's actions have added to this shift.
New Delhi and Beijing now find themselves navigating a volatile and unpredictable Washington that treats strategic partners and geopolitical rivals with the same transactional disdain, be they in Europe or Asia.
But in chastising India for not having a more open economy and its energy ties to Russia, the Trump administration is punishing the very nation the US has spent years cultivating as a democratic counterweight to China's power – creating an opening for Beijing.
This tactical realignment is underscored by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's reported plans to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit later this month, which would be his first trip to China in seven years.
When asked to confirm Indian media reports about Modi's attendance, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said Beijing 'welcomes' Modi for the meeting. 'We believe that with the concerted effort of all parties, the Tianjin summit will be a gathering of solidarity, friendship and fruitful results,' said spokesperson Guo Jiakun.
Yet, as the niceties play out in public, analysts say this is an alliance of convenience, not conviction.
The deep-seated strategic distrust between Asia's two giants, born from their border conflict and struggle for regional dominance, remains firmly in place. For now, they are aligned partly not by a shared vision, but by a shared antagonist in the White House.
'We may see a greater thaw in India-China ties in face of a tough United States,' said Farwa Aamer, Director of South Asia Initiatives, Asia Society Policy Institute.
But she warned that New Delhi must not lose sight of Washington and 'risk reversing the growth in relations it has long worked hard on to achieve.'
India's relationship with the US has undergone a dramatic transformation, from Cold War estrangement to crucial partners in the 21st Century.
Since Modi, a right-wing Hindu nationalist, swept to power in 2014, the relationship reached new heights, partly driven by the personal rapport he developed with Trump during his first term, during which the Indian leader cast aside staid diplomatic protocol to campaign for his counterpart's second term during a rally in Houston.
New Delhi's growing alignment with Washington became even more critical as its own relationship with Beijing cratered after deadly border clashes in 2020 pushed the two Asian giants further apart than at any time in decades.
The US' commitment to India deepened under the Biden administration, which identified New Delhi as a vital counterweight to Beijing's growing influence. President Joe Biden often lavished praise on Modi, while largely setting aside sharp criticism from rights groups over the Modi administration's alleged democratic backsliding at home.
But then came Trump's re-election, with a turbocharged 'America First' policy that looked far beyond confronting just China on trade.
In a move that threatens to shatter this two-decade consensus, the US president publicly reprimanded New Delhi earlier this month over its Russian oil imports, calling the Indian economy 'dead' and singling out India for Washington's highest global tariff rate.
With his new tariffs, Trump is punishing a country that currently imports 36% of its crude oil from Russia, much of it used to support its booming economy and growing 1.4 billion-strong population.
But by treating New Delhi a transactional adversary to be punished, Washington risks shattering a cornerstone of its Indo-Pacific strategy, said Milan Vaishnav, director and senior fellow, South Asia Program at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Trump's latest actions, 'take us right back to that era of estrangement,' he said. 'The US-India relationship is robust enough that it won't be undone overnight, but these moves have created a massive trust deficit on the Indian side.'
While many nations have rushed to strike trade deals with Trump to lower tariffs, India under Modi has been less willing to cave.
India shot back, calling the tariffs 'unfair' and 'unjustified,' pointing out the hypocrisy of Trump's move and noting that the US and Europe still buy Russian fertilizers and chemicals.
Trump has repeatedly called India a 'tariff king,' but a senior Indian official said the country is 'far from' it, noting that India imposes 'zero to low duties on many key US exports' including coal, pharmaceuticals, aircraft parts and machinery.
India imposes some higher tariffs on the US than vice versa, particularly on agricultural imports that attract a simple average tariff of 39% compared to the US's 5%, according to a report from the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
The 'mood (toward the US) is hardening in India, partly because of the way Mr. Trump has gone about and played his cards,' said Harsh V. Pant, vice president of foreign policy at the Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation think tank. 'The way he does diplomacy through public channels, and the way he seems intent on reducing the space for the Modi government to maneuver.'
Modi, who was under pressure by opposition politicians to stand up to his long-term friend, defended his country at an event last week.
India will never compromise on the interests of farmers, fishermen and dairy farmers,' he said. 'I know personally, I will have to pay a heavy price for it, but I am ready for it.'
The unintended consequences of Trump's policies, analysts say, have the potential to push historic rivals New Delhi and Beijing into a strategic embrace.
There has been a gradual normalization of ties between India and China after Modi met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in Russia last October. India and China agreed to resume direct commercial flights, Beijing recently agreed to reopen two pilgrimage sites in western Tibet to Indians for the first time in five years, and both started re-issuing tourist visas for each other's citizens.
'For its own economic reasons, namely a slowdown in growth and a slump in foreign direct investment, India has signaled a greater willingness to entertain warmer trade and investment linkages with China,' said Vaishnav, from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
But this convergence remains limited by the deep-seated mistrust between them, rooted in their deadly border clashes in the Himalayas and China's strategic entrenchment in Pakistan.
Vaishnav predicted the future would be one of duality: 'I expect we will see increasing economic cooperation coupled with strategic rivalry,' he said of the relationship between India and China.
Washington's willingness to antagonize a key partner like India has also baffled observers.
One view is that the Trump administration lacks a clear, overarching strategy, diminishing India's crucial role as a democratic counterweight to China.
'There is no coherent China policy in this administration,' said Vaishnav. 'Which means India's role as a bulwark against China is under-emphasized.'
He added that as Trump's mood on Russia soured, 'India's Russian oil imports became an easy target.'
A more personal motivation may also be at play.
Analysts suggest Trump's hostility could have been triggered by a bruised ego after India downplayed his alleged role in defusing a major crisis with Pakistan. Trump announced he had brokered a ceasefire following a military escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbors in May.
While Islamabad publicly praised the claim and even nominated Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize, Indian officials refused to credit Washington's apparent intervention.
'After that, things went belly up,' Pant said. 'The (trade) deal which at one point seemed very doable, kept on going. And the more frustrated Mr. Trump has become, the more voluble he has become in terms of his public threats to India.'
Critics say Trump's policies could be leading to the very outcome some US strategists have long sought to avoid.
'It could be the worst outcome for the United States,' Trump's former National Security Adviser John Bolton told CNN's Kaitlan Collins.
'The irony here is that while the secondary tariffs against India are intended to hurt Russia, it could push India back closer to Russia and, ironically, closer to China, perhaps negotiating together against the US tariff efforts.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsmax agrees to pay $67M settlement in defamation case over 2020 election claims
Newsmax agrees to pay $67M settlement in defamation case over 2020 election claims

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newsmax agrees to pay $67M settlement in defamation case over 2020 election claims

DENVER (AP) — The conservative network Newsmax will pay $67 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of defaming a voting equipment company by spreading lies about President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss, according to documents filed Monday. The settlement comes after Fox News paid $787.5 million to settle a similar lawsuit in 2023 and Newsmax paid what court papers describe as $40 million to settle a libel lawsuit from a different voting machine manufacturer, Smartmatic, which also was a target of pro-Trump conspiracy theories on the network. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis ruled earlier that Newsmax did indeed defame Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems by airing false information about the company and its equipment. But Davis left it to a jury to eventually decide whether that was done with malice, and, if so, how much Dominion deserved from Newsmax in damages. Newsmax and Dominion reached the settlement before the trial could take place. The settlement was disclosed by Newsmax on Monday in a new filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. It said the deal was reached Friday. The disclosure came as Trump vowed in a social media post Monday to eliminate mail-in ballots and voting machines such as those supplied by Dominion and other companies. It was unclear how the president could achieve that. Nicholas Riccardi, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio

Country Garden wins bank creditor group's support for offshore debt overhaul
Country Garden wins bank creditor group's support for offshore debt overhaul

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Country Garden wins bank creditor group's support for offshore debt overhaul

(Reuters) -Embattled Chinese property developer Country Garden said on Monday it had reached an agreement with a core group of bank creditors that holds 49% of its offshore debt, marking another step in its $14.1 billion restructuring plan. Once China's largest developer, the company defaulted on $11 billion in offshore bonds in late 2023, adding to a sector-wide crisis that had already seen high-profile failures, including of China Evergrande Group. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership A quicker path to financial freedom Country Garden, seeking to slash its offshore debt burden by 78%, said holders representing 77% of its bond value had accepted its restructuring proposal. A restructuring proposal normally requires support from more than 75% in creditor value to pass. The deal follows the backing it won from a key bondholder group in April. Country Garden remains the subject to a liquidation petition, with a court hearing scheduled for January 2026. The developer said it was working with both bondholders and bank creditors to complete the documentation for the restructuring, which it expects to finalise by the end of 2025.

Trump says he will sign executive order and lead ‘movement' against mail-in voting
Trump says he will sign executive order and lead ‘movement' against mail-in voting

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he will sign executive order and lead ‘movement' against mail-in voting

Donald Trump says he plans to 'lead a movement' to 'get rid of' mail-in voting and the use of voting machines to process ballots before 2026 midterm elections. The president — whose false and inflated claims about early voting span more than a decade — once again amplified bogus claims about vote-by-mail ballots and voting machines on his Truth Social account with a lengthy post baselessly accusing Democratic officials of cheating and being 'virtually unelectable' without using mail-in ballots. He said Monday that he intends to sign an executive order 'to help bring HONESTY' to upcoming elections. The president then falsely said that states, which administer elections, are 'merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes.' 'They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do,' he wrote. 'I, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILL FIGHT LIKE HELL TO BRING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BACK TO OUR ELECTIONS,' Trump wrote. 'THE MAIL-IN BALLOT HOAX, USING VOTING MACHINES THAT ARE A COMPLETE AND TOTAL DISASTER, MUST END, NOW!!!' Nearly a third of all ballots cast in the 2024 election were submitted by mail, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. If Trump tries to implement a total ban on mail-in and absentee ballots, voters in the military as well as disabled voters and voters who cannot show up in person on Election Day wouldn't be able to cast a vote. Earlier this year, a federal judge blocked Trump's executive order that sought to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day but arrived later. 'Mail-in voting remains a vital safeguard of our democracy. It ensures that voters with disabilities, those without transportation access, and others who rely on its flexibility and access can exercise their right to vote,' the ACLU's Voting Rights Project director Sophia Lin Lakin said Monday. 'President Trump's attempts to undermine a safe, proven, and reliable method of voting — that he himself uses — along with his attacks on voting technology, are just another part of his strategy to sow distrust in our elections and prevent voters from holding him accountable,' she added. Trump continues to falsely insist Joe Biden lost the 2020 presidential election, sowing doubt about the veracity of election results to construct his lie of 'stolen' and 'rigged' elections. In 2020, nearly half of Republicans believed that any eligible voter should be allowed to vote by mail if they want to, according to polling from the Pew Research Center. Four years later, only 28 percent of Republicans agreed with that. Trump's narrative has also supported his attempts to reverse election results in states he lost, inspired Republican-led legislation in nearly every state to change how elections are run, and was central to his 2024 campaign. The president elevated those false claims while his own campaign was pleading with Republican voters last year to request mail-in ballots and use the exact same election tools that Trump and his allies have tried to criminalize. Trump's campaign and the Republican National Committee launched 'Swamp the Vote,' which used contact information from people who signed up to get campaign updates to 'generate new absentee or mail ballot registrations and early in-person voting commitments.' 'You need to make a plan, register, and vote any way possible,' Trump said in a statement announcing the plan. The president's election lies were also central to criminal cases against him in Georgia and in Washington, D.C, where his claims helped fuel violence at the Capitol on January 6. Trump's Truth Social post comes just days after he claimed that Russian President Vladimir Putin told him that the 2020 election was 'rigged' because of mail-in voting. 'Vladimir Putin said something — one of the most interesting things,' Trump told Fox News host Sean Hannity last week. 'He said 'your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting,'' Trump claimed. 'He said, 'mail in voting, every election — no country has mail-in voting. It's impossible to have mail-in voting and have honest elections.' And he said that to me … because we talked about 2020. He said, 'you won that election by so much.'' At least 34 other countries allow postal voting, including at least a dozen — such as Canada, Germany, New Zealand, South Korea and Sweden — that allow voting by mail for all voters. Russia has allowed mail-in voting in some circumstances as recently as 2020. Asked on Sunday why Trump and Putin had discussed mail-in voting during their summit in Alaska, Russia expert Fiona Hill told CBS News that Putin wants the country to 'tie ourselves up in knots between now and the midterms' in 2026. 'Putin wants to sow chaos in the American electoral system,' Hill said. The Russian president 'used his time with President Trump to push that along,' she said. 'It's a pure blatant piece of manipulation and that's the kind of thing that Putin likes to do.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store