Claiming HRA By Paying Rent To Parents? Know The Rules Before You Do
'It's technically legal to claim HRA if you're paying rent to your parents. But it's only legal if you're actually doing it — and doing it right," says CA Apoorva Gavai.
HRA Deduction By Paying Rent To Parents: If you're a salaried employee looking to reduce your tax burden, claiming House Rent Allowance (HRA) by paying rent to your parents might seem like a smart move. And yes, it is legal — but only if it's done properly and genuinely.
CA Apoorva Gavai in a recent post on LinkedIn said, 'Yes — it's technically legal to claim HRA if you're paying rent to your parents. But it's only legal if you're actually doing it — and doing it right."
Every year, during income tax return (ITR) season, tax professionals encounter cases where individuals attempt to claim HRA without actually fulfilling the necessary legal conditions. The 'jugaad" mindset may work in other areas of life, but when it comes to taxation, shortcuts can lead to Income Tax notices and penalties, according Gavai.
Under Section 10(13A) of the Income Tax Act, salaried individuals living in rented accommodation can claim HRA deductions. The law does not restrict the landlord to a third party. So, if you're living with your parents and actually paying them rent, you can legally claim HRA.
But there's a catch: You must be able to prove it.
What the Income Tax Department Looks For
In recent years, the Income Tax Department has increased scrutiny of HRA claims, especially those involving rent paid to family members. Salaried individuals have started receiving notices when they:
In essence, the tax department is tightening the loop to crack down on fraudulent deductions.
How to Claim HRA to Parents?
Here's what you must do to ensure your claim stands up to scrutiny:
Actually Pay Rent via Bank Transfer
Make sure to transfer rent every month to your parents' bank account. Cash payments or backdated transfers are red flags. A consistent digital trail helps you prove genuine intent and regularity.
The monthly rent amount
Duration of tenancy
Address of the property
Names and PAN details of both parties
Having a written contract formalises the arrangement and strengthens your claim.
Your parents should report this rental income in their own ITR under 'Income from House Property". If they fail to do so, it could lead to mismatches in records and possibly land you in trouble.
What Not To Do
Avoid these common pitfalls:
No rent transfer: Just claiming rent on paper without financial proof can lead to tax notices.
Verbal agreements: These hold no value for tax claims.
Last-minute calculations: Backdating rent or transferring a lump sum in March raises suspicion.
Parents skipping ITR declaration: This is a classic red flag for the taxman.
Documents to Keep Handy
HRA Claim: An Example
Let's say:
You earn Rs 10 lakh annually.
You live with your parents and pay Rs 15,000/month in rent.
They're retired and fall in the 5% tax bracket.
top videos
View all
By claiming HRA properly, you may reduce your taxable income by a significant amount. Meanwhile, your parents declare the rental income in their ITR, possibly paying less tax overall — a win-win if done correctly and legally.
'If you're earning a salary and looking to save tax, know the rules — don't game them. Half-baked knowledge is the fastest way to land an IT notice in your inbox," CA Apoorva Gavai said.
About the Author
Mohammad Haris
Haris is Deputy News Editor (Business) at news18.com. He writes on various issues related to personal finance, markets, economy and companies. Having over a decade of experience in financial journalism, Haris h...Read More
Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends, stock updates, tax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates—only on News18. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
house rent income tax income tax return ITR filing
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 07, 2025, 09:08 IST
News business » tax Claiming HRA By Paying Rent To Parents? Know The Rules Before You Do
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
So, what do HR teams actually do?
Modern work culture is a self-contained bubble where people say nonsense with extraordinary confidence A few weeks back, after the CEO of data platform company Astronomer, Andy Byron, and the company's HR head, Kristin Cabot, resigned - after being sadly 'caught' like deer in Coldplay headlights - many people arrived at a question they rarely ask out aloud: What does HR actually do? (Privacy at public spaces like concerts remains a separate question. But in most places, undisclosed relationships within workplace hierarchies fall foul of company policies.)No one, it seems, has an answer. Human resources may, in fact, be the strangest post-invention known to a workplace. According to its job description, HR is meant to 'manage all aspects of an employee's life cycle' and 'foster a positive working environment.' Which, frankly, has one scratching one's head right from the onset. 'Manage all aspects of an employee's life cycle' could mean just about anything. Like the HR team at my last job, which had the audacity to offer women - already fraying under institutional patriarchy - a free manicure coupon for International Women's Day. Which really tells us nothing, except what we already know and don't need a brush with HR to find out: one person's positive is another's poison. Besides, how can people who aren't trained in the actual jobs employees do possibly manage their entire life cycle? By their own description, HR professionals are trained in 'positivity', and 'employee management' and can move seamlessly from companies selling ketchup to those making nuclear weapons. To date, no one - and I've whispered it myself behind mugs of black coffee and through eyerolls - has answered this of the confusion lies in the strange, bloated language of corporate life. Modern work culture is now a self-contained bubble where people say absolute nonsense with extraordinary confidence. The American workplace vocabulary spawned by B-schools became mainstream through the 1980s and 1990s with the rise of management consultancies, Silicon Valley, and self-help business promoted the idea of the worker as the 'entrepreneur of their own self,' with the entire purpose of existence henceforth being the marketing and branding of that self. This language spread across the world via popular American dramas and sitcoms - Ally McBeal, Friends, The Office, Suits - and now parodies itself across LinkedIn profiles worldwide. Here, a man can bleed out his soul in public and it becomes a marketing lesson. A woman can combust from PTSD, and it becomes a case study in told we must constantly 'reinvent ourselves to stay relevant' - a line so exhausted it forgets that 'relevant' already contains the 're-' in it. At 20, you're not 'creating content'. You're just beginning to figure things out. At 30, you're not 'networking'. You're naturally curious about the world and its connections. And at 40, you're not 'reinventing'. You're TV shows like Silicon Valley, Severance, and even older satires like Dilbert and The Devil Wears Prada have held up a mirror to this culture. Entire books have analysed its roots - Barbara Ehrenreich's 2009 Smile or Die: How Positive Thinking Fooled America and the World, and David Graeber's 2018 Bullshit Jobs: A Theory being especially memorable are among them. On LinkedIn, it all collapses into clapping emojis and humblebrags, like a bad parody stuck on loop. As the Coldplay debacle continues to putter along in memes and gags across the internet, people in workplaces are watching with silent glee as this toxic world of self-bestowed titles - 'positivity,' 'reinvention,' and 'energised leadership' - collapses in on itself like a cruel joke, with a Coldplay-loving CEO ducking under the first available table. That Astronomer's HR head and CEO were caught in an embrace so graphic - Byron wasn't holding Cabot's waist, but her breasts - has only made the moment more visceral: a perfect picture of corporate hypocrisy hiding behind 'corporate culture' rules drawn up by - who else? - HR. Everyone's brimming over with laughter at the punchline - a joke HR never meant to deliver, but did anyway. And that just makes it sit in that sweet HR spot where every delight, like injury, is unintended. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. BlackRock returns, this time with Ambani. Will it be lucky second time? The airport lounge war has begun — and DreamFolks is losing End of an era: The Maggi Man who rebuilt Nestlé India bows out India's last cement IPO did not work. Can JSW Cement break that curse? Is Shadowfax closing in on its closest rival? Stock Radar: APL Apollo Tubes stock fails to hold momentum after hitting highs in June; what should traders do? Buy, Sell or Hold: Avendus trims target on Titan Company; Motila Oswal maintains buy on Jindal Stainless These large- and mid-cap stocks may give more than 25% return in 1 year, according to analysts
NDTV
5 hours ago
- NDTV
"Normal Parliamentary Procedure": Kiren Rijiju On New Income Tax Bill
New Delhi: Amid criticism of the new Income Tax Bill's withdrawal from the Lok Sabha, Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said that introducing a Bill in Parliament after necessary amendments is a normal procedure. The new Income Tax Bill was withdrawn from the Lok Sabha on Friday and will be tabled in the House by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Monday after incorporating around 285 suggestions by a Select Committee, BJP member Baijayant Panda. Concerns were raised over the Bill's withdrawal, especially on social media. "It is being presumed that there will be an absolutely new bill, ignoring the earlier bill for which a lot of work was done, and all the work done and time spent will go down," Mr Rijiju said. "It is a normal convention that when a Select Committee submits a report and there are several amendments which are suggested and accepted by the government, the earlier bill is withdrawn and a new bill with all the amendments as accepted is introduced, so that it becomes easier for the Parliament to consider and pass the bill," he added. Explaining the three motions needed to be moved to incorporate each amendment, Mr Rijiju said the procedure is workable for a smaller number of amendments. In case of a high number of amendments, the lengthy process is avoided by withdrawing the Bill and introducing it again after incorporating all changes accepted by the government. The minister said there should be no apprehension that the new Income Tax Bill, which is going to be introduced on Monday, will be different. Mr Rijiju stated that all the hard work done in the last six months will not go to waste. "On the contrary, the hard work done by each one and the suggestions will get reflected in the new Income Tax Bill," he said. The Income Tax Bill, 2025, was first introduced in the Lok Sabha on February 13 to replace the existing Income Tax Act, 1961. It aims to simplify India's decades-old tax structure, cut down legal confusion, and help individual taxpayers and MSMEs avoid unnecessary litigation. The new measures will play a significant role in creating a fair and equitable system of direct taxation that ensures no additional burden of direct taxes on the working and middle-class population of the country. The new Income Tax Bill will make filing taxes easier for common citizens and small businesses.
NDTV
6 hours ago
- NDTV
Paid At 10, Quit At 10:05: HR's Post On 'Unethical' Resignation Sparks Fierce Debate
A LinkedIn post by Human Resource professional Priyavarshini M has triggered a wave of discussion on workplace ethics after she recounted an incident involving an employee who resigned just one month after joining. In her post, Priyavarshini revealed that the employee's salary was credited at 10:00 AM, only for the resignation email to arrive at 10:05 AM. She questioned the ethics behind such a move, asking, "Was that fair? Was it ethical?" She further challenged the decision, writing: If you never intended to stay, why take the job? Why go through the process? Why remain silent during onboarding or training? According to her, a resignation immediately after payday reflects "a lack of intent, maturity, and accountability," and sends the wrong message to both employers and colleagues. The post struck a nerve online, quickly going viral with over 2,000 reactions and more than 600 comments. The discussion escalated into a full-blown debate, with opinions ranging from defending employee choices to highlighting corporate layoffs and questioning employer ethics. From workplace loyalty to the realities of the job market, the comment section became a battleground of perspectives. "Person is not wrong. But being HR, you should not post such matters on social media. "It clearly shows your immaturity, please," commented a user. " Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi, he must have come to know that there is a lot of darkness here in the future; neither the sky would have been clearly visible nor the rumble of clouds would have been heard, so he took such a decision. To maintain a long-term relationship, it is very important to have trust in both. In today's time, if anyone sees a little darkness, then he will walk," wrote another user. "I see the point, but employees may leave quickly due to unmet expectations, poor culture, or role mismatch-often realised only after joining. While sudden exits aren't ideal, they can protect one's mental health or career. Employers, too, make abrupt decisions like layoffs. Professional ethics should work both ways, with honesty and respect on both sides," commented a third user.
